|
Quotes & Info
|
| NE > SEC Filings for NE > Form 10-Q on 7-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
Executive Overview
We are a leading offshore drilling contractor for the oil and gas industry. We
perform contract drilling services with our fleet of 62 offshore drilling units
located worldwide, including the Middle East, India, the U.S. Gulf of Mexico,
Mexico, the North Sea, Brazil, and West Africa. Our fleet count includes four
rigs currently under construction.
Economic Outlook
While the global macro environment improved during the second quarter 2009
compared to the previous two quarters, the worldwide economy remains uncertain.
Oil prices strengthened during the quarter to reach the $60 to $70 per barrel
range; however, prices continue to be volatile. Various economic indicators also
continue to be mixed, leading to broad concern about length of the economic
recovery. In spite of higher oil prices, we have not seen a substantial increase
in demand for offshore drilling services. Demand remains high in the deepwater
market segment, but there is little contract activity across the midwater or
shallow water segments. In particular, dayrates for jackup units have decreased
up to fifty percent in most regions and utilization has dropped significantly.
While we believe that the risk for early contract terminations of, or defaults
under, existing contracts has decreased, that risk has not been eliminated. We
believe the contracting environment will continue to be challenging throughout
the remainder of 2009. If the global economy continues to improve and oil prices
stabilize, we hope to see increased demand for contract drilling services in
2010. However, due to the introduction of newbuild jackup units into the market,
it is possible that dayrates for jackup units may not improve from current
levels and could decline further as more units compete for available jobs.
We cannot be certain of the future price of oil or when the global economy will
recover. However, we believe that the current reduced demand for hydrocarbons is
largely a result of the global financial crisis and that an economic recovery
combined with the continued natural decline of worldwide hydrocarbon basins will
be positive factors for the demand for future contract drilling services. We
continue to believe we are well positioned within the industry. Furthermore, our
liquidity and financial strength may create potential rig acquisition
opportunities for us.
Demand for our drilling services generally depends on a variety of economic and
political factors, including worldwide demand for oil and gas, the ability of
the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") to set and maintain
production levels and pricing, the level of production of non-OPEC countries and
the policies of various governments regarding exploration and development of
their oil and gas reserves. Our results of operations depend on activity in the
oil and gas production and development markets worldwide. Historically, oil and
gas prices and market expectations of potential changes in these prices have
significantly affected that level of activity. Generally, higher oil and natural
gas prices or our customers' expectations of higher prices result in greater
demand for our services and lower oil and gas prices result in reduced demand
for our services.
Demand for our services is also a function of the worldwide supply of mobile
offshore drilling units. Industry sources report that a total of 69 newbuild
jackups and 96 deepwater newbuilds are scheduled to enter service worldwide
between 2009 and 2012. A significant number of these units, particularly among
the jackup units, reportedly do not have a contractual commitment from a
customer and are referred to in the offshore drilling industry as "being built
on speculation." The introduction of non-contracted rigs into the marketplace
could have an adverse affect on the level of demand for our services or the
dayrates we are able to achieve.
We cannot predict the future level of demand for our drilling services or future
conditions in the offshore contract drilling industry. Decreases in commodity
prices or the level of demand for our drilling services or increases in the
supply of drilling rigs in the market could have an adverse effect on our
results of operations.
Results and Strategy
In the second quarter of 2009, we recognized net income of $392 million, or
$1.49 per diluted share, on total revenues of $899 million. The average dayrate
across our worldwide fleet increased to $198,270 for the second quarter of 2009
from $194,308 in the first quarter of 2009. Fleetwide average utilization was
84 percent in the second quarter of 2009, as compared to 86 percent in the first
quarter of 2009. Daily contract drilling services costs increased to $57,332 for
the second quarter of 2009 from $53,646 for the first quarter of 2009. As a
result, our contract drilling services margin decreased slightly to 71 percent
in the second quarter of 2009 from 72 percent in the first quarter of 2009.
Our long-standing business strategy continues to be the active expansion of our
worldwide offshore drilling and deepwater capabilities through upgrades and
modifications, acquisitions, and the deployment of our drilling assets in
important geological areas. We have also actively expanded our offshore drilling
and deepwater capabilities in recent years through the construction of new rigs.
During the second quarter of 2009, we continued our expansion strategy as
indicated by the following activities:
• we completed construction on the Noble Scott Marks, an F&G JU-2000E
enhanced premium independent leg cantilevered jackup, which left the
shipyard in the second quarter of 2009 and is expected to begin operations
in the third quarter of 2009;
• construction continued on three newbuild ultra-deepwater semisubmersibles, the Noble Danny Adkins and the Noble Dave Beard, which are scheduled for delivery in the fourth quarter of 2009, and the Noble Jim Day, which is scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2010; and
• construction continued on one dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater, harsh environment Globetrotter-class drillship, which is scheduled to be delivered in the second half of 2011.
Contract Drilling Services Backlog
We maintain a backlog (as defined below) of commitments for contract drilling
services. The following table sets forth as of June 30, 2009 the amount of our
contract drilling services backlog and the percent of available operating days
committed for the periods indicated:
Year Ending December 31,
Total 2009 (1) 2010 2011 2012 2013-2017
(In millions)
Contract Drilling Services
Semisubmersibles/Drillships
(2) $ 8,084 $ 910 $ 1,963 $ 1,627 $ 1,158 $ 2,426
Jackups/Submersibles (3) 1,553 832 551 169 1 -
Total (4) (5) $ 9,637 $ 1,742 $ 2,514 $ 1,796 $ 1,159 $ 2,426
Percent of Available
Operating Days Committed
(6) 75 % 42 % 24 % 13 % 7 %
|
(1) Represents a six-month period beginning July 1, 2009.
(2) Our drilling contracts with
Petrobras provide an
opportunity for us to earn
performance bonuses based
on downtime experienced for
our rigs operating offshore
Brazil. With respect to our
semisubmersibles operating
offshore Brazil, we have
included in our backlog an
amount equal to 75 percent
of potential performance
bonuses for such
semisubmersibles, which
amount is based on and
generally consistent with
our historical earnings of
performance bonuses for
these rigs. With respect to
our drillships operating
offshore Brazil, we
(a) have not included in
our backlog any performance
bonuses for periods prior
to the commencement of
certain upgrade projects
planned for 2010 and 2011,
which projects are designed
to enhance the reliability
and operational performance
of our drillships, and
(b) have included in our
backlog an amount equal to
75 percent of potential
performance bonuses for
periods after the estimated
completion of such upgrade
projects. Our backlog for
semisubmersibles/drillships
includes approximately
$367 million attributable
to these performance
bonuses.
(3) Our drilling contracts with Pemex Exploracion y Produccion ("Pemex") for certain jackups operating offshore in Mexico are subject to price review and adjustment of the rig dayrate. Presently, contracts for five jackups have dayrates indexed to the world average of the highest dayrates published by ODS-Petrodata. After an initial firm dayrate period, the dayrates are generally adjusted quarterly based on formulas calculated from the index. Our contract drilling services backlog has been calculated using the June 30, 2009 index-based dayrates for periods subsequent to the initial firm dayrate period.
(4) Pemex has the ability to cancel its drilling contracts on 30 days or less notice without Pemex's making an early termination payment. We currently have 13 rigs contracted to Pemex in Mexico, and our backlog includes approximately $1.0 billion related to such contracts at June 30, 2009. Also, our drilling contracts generally give the customer an early termination right in the event we fail to meet certain performance standards, including downtime thresholds. While we do not currently anticipate any cancellations as a result of events that have occurred to date, clients may from time to time have the contractual right to do so, which is the case with the drilling contract for the Noble Roger Eason. However, we do not believe that the customer will terminate this contract.
(5) The Noble Scott Marks must be provided by September 30, 2009 or our customer has the right to terminate the contract. The Noble Danny Adkins must be delivered from the shipyard by January 1, 2010 or the customer has the right to terminate the contract. The drilling contract for the Noble Jim Day contains a termination right in the event the rig is not ready to commence operations by December 31, 2010. The drilling contract for the Noble Dave Beard gives the customer the right to terminate the contract if the rig did not commence operations by December 2008 and also gives the customer the right to apply a penalty for delay in delivery beyond October 24, 2009. The customer has not cancelled the contract.
(6) Percentages take into account additional capacity from the estimated dates of deployment of our newbuild rigs that are scheduled to commence operations during the remainder of 2009 through 2011.
Our contract drilling services backlog consists of commitments we believe to be firm. Our contract drilling services backlog reported above reflects estimated future revenues attributable to both signed drilling contracts and letters of intent. A letter of intent is generally subject to customary conditions, including the execution of a definitive drilling contract. If worldwide economic conditions continue to deteriorate, it is possible that some customers that have entered into letters of intent will not enter into signed drilling contracts. We calculate backlog for any given unit and period by multiplying the full contractual operating dayrate for such unit by the number of days remaining in the period. The reported contract drilling services backlog does not include amounts representing revenues for mobilization, demobilization and contract preparation, which are not expected to be significant to our contract drilling services revenues, reimbursable amounts from customers or amounts attributable to uncommitted option periods under drilling contracts or letters of intent.
The amount of actual revenues earned and the actual periods during which
revenues are earned may differ from the backlog amounts and backlog periods set
forth in the table above due to various factors, including, but not limited to,
shipyard and maintenance projects, unplanned downtime, weather conditions and
other factors that result in applicable dayrates lower than the full contractual
operating dayrate. In addition, amounts included in the backlog may change
because drilling contracts may be varied or modified by mutual consent or
customers may exercise early termination rights or decline to enter into a
drilling contract after executing a letter of intent. As a result, our backlog
as of any particular date may not be indicative of our actual operating results
for the subsequent periods for which the backlog is calculated.
Internal Investigation
In June 2007, we announced that we were conducting an internal investigation of
our Nigerian operations, focusing on the legality under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the "FCPA"), and local laws of our Nigerian
affiliate's reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by our customs agents in
connection with obtaining and renewing permits for the temporary importation of
drilling units and related equipment into Nigerian waters, including permits
that are necessary for our drilling units to operate in Nigerian waters. We also
announced that the audit committee of our Board of Directors had engaged a
leading law firm with significant experience in investigating and advising on
FCPA matters to lead the investigation as independent outside counsel. The scope
of the investigation also includes our dealings with customs agents and customs
authorities in certain parts of the world other than Nigeria in which we conduct
our operations, as well as dealings with other types of local agents in Nigeria
and such other parts of the world. There can be no assurance that evidence of
additional potential FCPA violations may not be uncovered through the
investigation.
The audit committee commissioned the internal investigation after our management
brought to the attention of the audit committee a news release issued by another
company. The news release disclosed that the other company was conducting an
internal investigation into the FCPA implications of certain actions by a
customs agent in Nigeria in connection with the temporary importation of that
company's vessels into Nigeria. Our drilling units that conduct operations in
Nigeria do so under temporary import permits, and management considered it
prudent to review our own practices in this regard.
We voluntarily contacted the SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") to
advise them that an independent investigation was underway. We have been
cooperating, and intend to continue to cooperate fully with both agencies. If
the SEC or the DOJ determines that violations of the FCPA have occurred, they
could seek civil and criminal sanctions, including monetary penalties, against
us and/or certain of our employees, as well as additional changes to our
business practices and compliance programs, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business or financial condition. In addition, such
actions, whether actual or alleged, could damage our reputation and ability to
do business, to attract and retain employees, and to access capital markets.
Further, detecting, investigating, and resolving such actions is expensive and
consumes significant time and attention of our senior management.
The independent outside counsel appointed by the audit committee to perform the
internal investigation made a presentation of the results of its investigation
to the DOJ and the SEC in June 2008. The SEC and the DOJ have begun to review
these results and information gathered by the independent outside counsel in the
course of the investigation. Neither the SEC nor the DOJ has indicated what
action it may take, if any, against us or any individual, or whether it may
request that the audit committee's independent outside counsel conduct further
investigation. Therefore, we consider the internal investigation to be ongoing
and cannot predict when it will conclude. Furthermore, we cannot predict whether
either the SEC or the DOJ will open its own proceeding to investigate this
matter, or if a proceeding is opened, what potential remedies these agencies may
seek. We could also face fines or sanctions in relevant foreign jurisdictions.
Based on information obtained to date in our internal investigation, we have not
determined that any potential liability that may result is probable or remote or
can be reasonably estimated. As a result, we have not made any accrual in our
consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2009.
We are currently operating two jackup rigs offshore Nigeria. The temporary
import permits covering the rigs expired in November 2008 and we have pending
applications to renew these permits. However, as of July 31, 2009, the Nigerian
customs office had not acted on our applications. We continue to seek to avoid
material disruption to our Nigerian operations; however, there can be no
assurance that we will be able to obtain new permits or further extensions of
permits necessary to continue the operation of our rigs in Nigeria. If we cannot
obtain a new permit or an extension necessary to continue operations of any rig,
we may need to cease operations under the drilling contract for such rig and
relocate such rig from Nigerian waters. In any case, we also could be subject to
actions by Nigerian customs for import duties and fines for these two rigs, as
well as other drilling rigs that operated in Nigeria in the past. We cannot
predict what impact these events may have on any such contract or our business
in Nigeria. Furthermore, we cannot predict what changes, if any, relating to
temporary import permit policies and procedures may be established or
implemented in Nigeria in the future, or how any such changes may impact our
business there.
Notwithstanding that the internal investigation is ongoing, we concluded that
certain changes to our FCPA compliance program would provide us greater
assurance that our assets are not used, directly or indirectly, to make improper
payments, including customs payments, and that we are in compliance with the
FCPA's record-keeping requirements. Although we have had a long-standing
published policy requiring compliance with the FCPA and broadly prohibiting any
improper payments by us to foreign or U.S. officials, we adopted additional
measures intended to enhance FCPA compliance procedures. Further measures may be
required once the investigation concludes.
Results of Operations
In the following discussion, we address the consolidated results of operations
of Noble-Swiss. With the exception of nominal administrative expenses, the
results of operations of Noble-Swiss are substantially identical to those of
Noble-Cayman. The discussion related to operating revenues and costs and
expenses is identical for, and applies to, both companies. Per share information
relates only to Noble-Swiss.
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
General
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 (the "Current Quarter") was
$392 million, or $1.49 per diluted share, on operating revenues of $899 million,
compared to net income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 (the "Comparable
Quarter") of $376 million, or $1.39 per diluted share, on operating revenues of
$813 million.
Rig Utilization, Operating Days and Average Dayrates
Operating revenues and operating costs and expenses for our contract drilling
services segment are dependent on three primary metrics - rig utilization,
operating days and dayrates. The following table sets forth the average rig
utilization, operating days and average dayrates for our rig fleet for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
Average Rig Operating Average
Utilization (1) Days (2) Dayrates
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
June 30, June 30, June 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008 % Change 2009 2008 % Change
Jackups 80 % 93 % 3,076 3,481 -12 % $ 157,381 $ 147,081 7 %
Semisubmersibles >
6000' (3) 94 % 90 % 596 572 4 % 408,510 323,830 26 %
Semisubmersibles <
6000' (4) 100 % 100 % 273 273 0 % 251,945 192,416 31 %
Drillships 100 % 67 % 273 182 50 % 226,187 131,174 72 %
Submersibles (5) 88 % 67 % 161 182 -12 % 63,324 53,039 19 %
Total 84 % 90 % 4,379 4,690 -7 % $ 198,270 $ 167,002 19 %
|
(1) Information reflects our policy of reporting on the basis of the number of actively marketed rigs in our fleet excluding newbuild rigs under construction.
(2) Information reflects the number of days that our rigs were operating under contract.
(3) These units have water depth ratings of 6,000 feet or greater.
(4) These units have water depth ratings of less than 6,000 feet.
(5) Effective March 31, 2009, the Noble Fri Rodli, which had been cold stacked since October 2007, was removed from our rig fleet.
Contract Drilling Services
The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs
and expenses for our contract drilling services segment for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
Three Months Ended
June 30, Change
2009 2008 $ %
Operating revenues:
. . .
|
|
|