|
Quotes & Info
|
| LRY > SEC Filings for LRY > Form 10-Q on 7-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
WHOLLY OWNED CAPITAL ACTIVITY
Acquisitions
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, conditions for the acquisition of
properties were unsettled because of adverse events in the credit markets and
the Company did not acquire any operating properties and does not anticipate
doing so for the remainder of 2009.
Dispositions
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, market conditions for dispositions
were unsettled, which the Company again attributes to adverse conditions in the
credit markets. Disposition activity allows the Company to, among other things,
(1) reduce its holdings in certain markets and product types within a market;
(2) lower the average age of the portfolio; (3) optimize the cash proceeds from
the sale of certain assets; and (4) obtain funds for investment activities.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company realized proceeds of
$34.7 million from the sale of 10 operating properties representing 461,000
square feet. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company realized
proceeds of $80.3 million from the sale of 16 operating properties representing
757,000 square feet and 0.3 acres of land. For 2009, the Company believes that
it will dispose of $125 million to $200 million of operating properties.
Development
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company brought into service
three Wholly Owned Properties under Development representing 1.1 million square
feet and a Total Investment, as defined below, of $73.6 million, and initiated
$12.3 million in real estate development. During the six months ended June 30,
2009, the Company brought into service four Wholly Owned Properties under
Development representing 1.2 million square feet and a Total Investment, as
defined below, of $89.3 million, and initiated $12.3 million in real estate
development. As of June 30, 2009, the projected Total Investment of the Wholly
Owned Properties under Development was $297.0 million. For 2009, the Company
believes that it will bring into service from its development pipeline
approximately $250 million to $350 million of Total Investment in operating real
estate.
Although the Company continues to pursue development opportunities, current
market conditions are not favorable for development, and the Company currently
anticipates only a modest amount of development starts in 2009. Furthermore, any
2009 development starts will be substantially pre-leased. The "Total Investment"
for a Property is defined as the Property's purchase price plus closing costs
and management's estimate, as determined at the time of acquisition, of the cost
of necessary building improvements in the case of acquisitions, or land costs
and land and building improvement costs in the case of development projects,
and, where appropriate, other development costs and carrying costs.
JOINT VENTURE CAPITAL ACTIVITY
The Company periodically enters into joint venture relationships in connection
with the execution of its real estate operating strategy.
Acquisitions
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, none of the unconsolidated
joint ventures in which the Company held an interest acquired any properties.
For 2009, the Company believes that property acquisitions by unconsolidated
joint ventures in which the Company has an interest will be in the $50 million
to $100 million range.
Dispositions
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, none of the unconsolidated
joint ventures in which the Company held an interest disposed of any properties
and the Company does not anticipate doing so for the remainder of 2009.
Development
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, none of the unconsolidated
joint ventures in which the Company held an interest brought any Properties
under Development into service. As of June 30, 2009, the projected Total
Investment of JV Properties under Development was $190.7 million. For 2009, the
Company expects unconsolidated joint ventures in which it holds an interest to
bring into service up to $50 million of Total Investment in operating
properties.
PROPERTIES IN OPERATION
The composition of the Company's Properties in Operation as of June 30, 2009 and
2008 was as follows (in thousands, except dollars and percentages):
Net Rent
Per Square Foot Total Square Feet Percent Occupied
June 30 June 30 June 30
2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008
Wholly Owned Properties
in Operation:
Industrial-Distribution $ 4.34 $ 4.48 31,502 27,083 88.5 % 93.6 %
Industrial-Flex $ 9.18 $ 9.37 11,497 10,240 87.9 % 88.6 %
Office $ 14.35 $ 14.18 21,272 19,732 92.1 % 91.6 %
$ 8.60 $ 8.71 64,271 57,055 89.6 % 92.0 %
Net Rent
Per Square Foot Total Square Feet Percent Occupied
June 30 June 30 June 30
2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008
Joint Venture
Properties in
Operation:
Industrial-Distribution $ 4.23 $ 4.09 8,316 7,786 87.7 % 97.1 %
Industrial-Flex $ 27.86 $ 33.97 171 153 81.3 % 89.5 %
Office $ 25.00 $ 25.26 4,575 4,240 89.9 % 92.6 %
$ 11.91 $ 11.83 13,062 12,179 88.4 % 95.4 %
Net Rent
Per Square Foot Total Square Feet Percent Occupied
June 30 June 30 June 30
2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008
Properties in Operation:
Industrial-Distribution $ 4.32 $ 4.39 39,818 34,869 88.3 % 94.3 %
Industrial-Flex $ 9.43 $ 9.73 11,668 10,393 87.8 % 88.6 %
Office $ 16.20 $ 16.14 25,847 23,972 91.7 % 91.8 %
$ 9.15 $ 9.26 77,333 69,234 89.4 % 92.5 %
|
Geographic segment data for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 are included in Note 2 to the Company's financial statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
When used throughout this report, the words "believes," "anticipates" and
"expects" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. Such statements indicate that assumptions have been used that are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual financial
results or management plans and objectives to differ materially from those
projected or expressed herein, including: the effect of national and regional
economic conditions; rental demand; the Company's ability to identify, and enter
into agreements with suitable joint venture partners in situations where it
believes such arrangements are advantageous; the Company's ability to identify
and secure additional properties and sites, both for itself and the joint
ventures to which it is a party, that meet its criteria for acquisition or
development; the current credit crisis and its impact on the availability and
cost of capital; the effect of prevailing market interest rates; risks related
to the integration of the operations of entities that we have acquired or may
acquire; risks related to litigation; and other risks described from time to
time in the Company's filings with the SEC. Given these uncertainties, readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Refer to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as amended, for a discussion of critical accounting policies
which include capitalized costs, revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful
accounts, impairment of real estate, intangibles and investments in
unconsolidated joint ventures. During the three months ended June 30, 2009,
there were no material changes to these policies.
Results of Operations
The following discussion is based on the consolidated financial statements of
the Company. It compares the results of operations of the Company for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 with the results of operations of the Company
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. As a result of the varying
levels of development, acquisition and disposition activities by the Company in
2009 and 2008, the overall operating results of the Company during such periods
are not directly comparable. However, certain data, including the Same Store
comparison, do lend themselves to direct comparison.
This information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report.
Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 to Three and Six Months
Ended June 30, 2008
Overview
The Company's average gross investment in operating real estate owned for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 increased to $5,038.8 million from
$4,972.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. This increase in
operating real estate resulted in increases in rental revenue, operating expense
reimbursement and depreciation and amortization expense. Rental property
expenses and real estate taxes were relatively unchanged. For the six months
ended June 30, 2009, the Company's average gross investment in real estate owned
increased to $5,030.5 million from $5,010.3 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008. This increase in operating real estate resulted in increases in
rental revenue, operating expense reimbursement, rental property expense, real
estate taxes, and depreciation and amortization expense.
Total operating revenue increased to $185.7 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 from $180.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and
increased to $372.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from
$367.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The $5.7 million increase
during the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008
was primarily due to the increase in investment in operating real estate and the
increase in operating revenue from the Same Store group of properties, discussed
below, and an increase in "Termination Fees," which totaled $1.0 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $0.7 million for the same period
in 2008. The $5.4 million increase during the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same period in 2008 was primarily due to the increase in
investment in operating real estate and the increase in operating revenue from
the Same Store group of properties, discussed below. These increases were offset
by a decrease in "Termination Fees", which totaled $1.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $1.9 million for the same period in
2008. Termination Fees are fees that the Company agrees to accept in
consideration for permitting certain tenants to terminate their leases prior to
the contractual expiration date. Termination Fees are included in rental
revenue.
Segments
The Company evaluates the performance of the Properties in Operation by
reportable segment (see Note 2 to the Company's financial statements for a
reconciliation to net income). The following table identifies changes in
reportable segments (dollars in thousands):
Property Level Operating Income:
Three Months Ended Percentage Six Months Ended Percentage
June 30, Increase June 30, Increase
2009 2008 (Decrease) 2009 2008 (Decrease)
Northeast
- Southeastern PA $ 31,560 $ 29,502 7.0 %(1) $ 63,099 $ 59,281 6.4 %(1)
- Lehigh/Central PA 18,243 17,456 4.5 %(2) 35,785 35,130 1.9 %
- New Jersey 4,867 4,773 2.0 % 9,517 9,629 (1.2 %)
Midwest 13,148 12,995 1.2 % 26,282 25,604 2.6 %
Mid-Atlantic 24,308 24,901 (2.4 %) 47,755 49,591 (3.7 %)(3)
South 31,321 27,424 14.2 %(1) 62,465 54,305 15.0 %(1)
Philadelphia 3,855 3,298 16.9 %(4) 7,410 14,663 (49.5 %)(5)
United Kingdom 875 1,151 (24.0 %)(6) 1,746 1,834 (4.8 %)(6)
Total property level
operating income $ 128,177 $ 121,500 5.5 % $ 254,059 $ 250,037 1.6 %
|
(1) The increase for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily due to an increase in average gross investment in operating real estate, an increase in occupancy and an increase in rental rates.
(2) The increase for the three months ended June 30, 2009 versus the three months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily due to an increase in average gross investment in operating real estate. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in occupancy and a decrease in rental rates in 2009.
(3) The decrease for the six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the six months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily due to a decrease in occupancy. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in average gross investment in operating real estate and an increase in rental rates in 2009.
(4) The increase for the three months ended June 30, 2009 versus the three months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily due to an increase in average gross investment in operating real estate and an increase in rental rates. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in occupancy in 2009.
(5) The decrease for the six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the six months ended June 30, 2008 was due to the effect of Comcast Center operation during the relevant periods. Comcast Center was a wholly owned 1.25 million square foot property until March 30, 2008 when it was sold into an unconsolidated joint venture.
(6) The decrease for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily due to a decrease in average gross investment in operating real estate and a decrease in rental rates. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in occupancy in 2009.
Same Store
Property level operating income, exclusive of Termination Fees, for the Same
Store properties increased to $122.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009 from $121.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, on a straight
line basis (which recognizes rental revenue evenly over the life of the lease),
and increased to $119.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from
$118.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 on a cash basis. These
increases of 1.2% and 0.5%, respectively, are primarily due to an increase in
rental rates and an increase in occupancy in the office portfolio.
Property level operating income, exclusive of Termination Fees, for the Same
Store properties increased to $245.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009 from $241.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, on a straight
line basis (which recognizes rental revenue evenly over the life of the lease),
and increased to $238.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from
$235.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 on a cash basis. These
increases of 1.6% and 1.2%, respectively, are primarily due to an increase in
rental rates and an increase in occupancy in the office portfolio.
Management generally considers the performance of the Same Store properties to
be a useful financial performance measure because the results are directly
comparable from period to period. Management further believes that the
performance comparison should exclude Termination Fees since they are more event
specific and are not representative of ordinary performance results. In
addition, Same Store property level operating income and Same Store cash basis
property level operating income exclusive of Termination Fees is considered by
management to be a more reliable indicator of the portfolio's baseline
performance. The Same Store properties consist of the 622 properties totaling
approximately 59.8 million square feet owned on January 1, 2008, excluding
properties sold through June 30, 2009.
Set forth below is a schedule comparing the property level operating income, on a straight line basis and on a cash basis, for the Same Store properties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Same Store property level operating income and cash basis property level operating income are non-GAAP measures and do not represent income before property dispositions, income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures because they do not reflect the consolidated operations of the Company. Investors should review Same Store results, along with Funds from operations (see "Liquidity and Capital Resources" section), GAAP net income and cash flow from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities when considering the Company's operating performance. Also, set forth below is a reconciliation of Same Store property level operating income and cash basis property level operating income to net income (in thousands).
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009 June 30, 2008 June 30, 2009 June 30, 2008
Same Store:
Rental revenue $ 125,295 $ 123,374 $ 250,609 $ 246,443
Operating expenses:
Rental property expense 35,163 36,302 74,071 73,536
Real estate taxes 20,955 22,328 41,850 41,582
Operating expense recovery (53,652 ) (56,577 ) (110,566 ) (110,085 )
Unrecovered operating expenses 2,466 2,053 5,355 5,033
Property level operating income 122,829 121,321 245,254 241,410
Less straight line rent 3,436 2,573 6,851 5,769
Cash basis property level operating
income $ 119,393 $ 118,748 $ 238,403 $ 235,641
Reconciliation of non-GAAP
financial measure - Same Store:
Cash basis property level operating
income $ 119,393 $ 118,748 $ 238,403 $ 235,641
Straight line rent 3,436 2,573 6,851 5,769
Property level operating income 122,829 121,321 245,254 241,410
Property level operating income -
properties purchased or developed
subsequent to January 1, 2008 5,354 577 9,569 8,797
Less: Property level operating
income - properties held for sale
at June 30, 2009 (1,058 ) (1,059 ) (2,116 ) (2,112 )
Termination fees 1,052 661 1,352 1,942
General and administrative expense (11,659 ) (13,047 ) (27,222 ) (27,083 )
Depreciation and amortization
expense (42,571 ) (42,508 ) (85,705 ) (85,174 )
Other income (expense) (34,217 ) (33,321 ) (68,704 ) (71,583 )
(Loss) gain on property
dispositions (2,050 ) 835 (2,344 ) 1,476
Income taxes (127 ) (580 ) (344 ) (1,064 )
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated joint ventures 1,192 1,010 1,609 1,387
Discontinued operations 4,467 4,489 5,705 6,778
Net income $ 43,212 $ 38,378 $ 77,054 $ 74,774
|
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses decreased to $11.7 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $13.0 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in compensation
expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $27.2 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $27.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 as decreases in compensation expenses were offset by an
increase due to accelerated vesting of long term incentive compensation due to
the years of service and age of certain employees.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased to $42.6 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 from $42.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008
and $85.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $85.2 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2008. The increase was primarily due to the
. . .
|
|