Search the web
Welcome, Guest
[Sign Out, My Account]
EDGAR_Online

Quotes & Info
Enter Symbol(s):
e.g. YHOO, ^DJI
Symbol Lookup | Financial Search
TLGD > SEC Filings for TLGD > Form 10-Q on 6-Aug-2009All Recent SEC Filings

Show all filings for TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS INC \PA\ | Request a Trial to NEW EDGAR Online Pro

Form 10-Q for TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS INC \PA\


6-Aug-2009

Quarterly Report


Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995.
This MD&A should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K, as amended by Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Form 10-K"). Certain statements contained in this MD&A and elsewhere in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "believe," "expect," "intend," "may," "will," "should," "could," "potential," "continue," "estimate," "plan," or "anticipate," or the negatives thereof, other variations thereon or compatible terminology. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results may differ materially from any forward-looking statement as a result of various factors, including those described in Part II, Item 1A below under "Risk Factors." Cable Product Line
On May 27, 2009 we completed the sale of our cable product line for consideration of approximately $3.2 million, subject to adjustment for certain items pursuant to the terms of the agreement. The cable product line no longer supported the Company's refocused growth strategy and the divestiture allows the Company to continue to focus its business on our core telecommunications markets and customers. Unless otherwise indicated, references to "revenues" and "earnings" throughout this Management's Discussion & Analysis refer to revenues and earnings from continuing operations and do not include revenue and earnings from the discontinued cable product line. Similarly, discussion of other matters in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements refers to continuing operations unless otherwise indicated. The results from the divested product line are reported in discontinued operations. Overview
Several trends continued across the Company's markets that affected our performance in the second quarter of 2009.
Our customers continued to be impacted by the current economic environment, as businesses and consumers looked for ways to reduce their expenditures. Capital and operating expense budgets of our customers continued to be under pressure as they look to balance potential lower revenues as a result of the global recession. The Company has felt the impacts of the recession in quarterly sales levels, but also in the delay of customers' capital expense decisions for new projects and deployments.
Our traditional customer base of incumbent telephone carriers (especially the large domestic and European carriers) continue to divert their spending from legacy networks as they focus their capital spending on wireless and next-generation wireline projects such as fiber to the home/curb/premise,


Table of Contents

IPTV, and DSL services. Customer traditional copper line loss is being driven by competition from wireless and cable providers and also the elimination of second phone lines due to DSL penetration. This has resulted in reduced demand for our copper-based products.
In response to these conditions and trends our customers are attempting to reduce their costs, including by reducing the prices of services they purchase under long term service contracts. As a result, each time a contract is scheduled for renewal, we must demonstrate to our customers the value of the entire system and the costs saved by maintaining and even extending the system capabilities. We successfully completed the renewal of maintenance contracts with three existing large customers in recent months. Two of the contracts were renewed for 3-year extensions and one was renewed for a 5-year extension. In total, the contracts represent more than $5 million dollars a year in maintenance revenue. While these discussions took an extended period of time, we held firm on our pricing rationale. We believe that the successful outcome of these negotiations demonstrates that our customers recognized the value that we provide to maximize their customer satisfaction and lower their operational costs.
Negotiations for the renewal of a service agreement with another large customer whose contract expired on June 30, 2009 has yet to be finalized, which has impacted our backlog figures since we do not include any expected revenue from this source in our backlog at June 27, 2009. We are currently working to finalize the renewal of the contract that expired in June and expect to complete the negotiations during the third quarter of 2009. We also have two further agreements that will expire at the end of 2009. We expect to commence negotiations for the renewal of these contracts in the third quarter of 2009. As described in the Form 10-K, management completed a comprehensive strategic review of all our businesses in 2008 to address the trends affecting our business. As a result of the review, we determined that the appropriate strategy for the Company included focusing our strategic efforts and resources on the substantial and growing telecom service assurance market, where we have a significant installed customer base, and use this position to expand into adjacent markets. Our refocused strategy allows us to leverage our strong embedded base of customers, and enhance the value of our long term relationships and services agreements. We have been implementing our refocused growth strategy since October of 2008 and have achieved a significant number of milestones in our strategic plan, including:
1. Developing a comprehensive strategic plan to focus on our core expertise in service assurance and adjacent markets;

2. Selling off non-core assets that do not support our refocused strategy;

3. Bolstering cash reserves to more than $63 million;

4. Authorizing a $15 million stock buyback program;

5. Reducing corporate overhead by streamlining operations; and

6. Making key management changes to strengthen our functional expertise.

The Company expects that this strategy will position it for long-term growth, a return to profitability, and market leadership and increasing returns for investors.


Table of Contents

Products
Services
Our services offerings include software maintenance and support for our operating support systems ("OSS") offerings and hardware maintenance for the test probes, and our professional services, which are designed to ensure that all of the components of our customers' test systems operate properly. The primary customers for our maintenance and professional services offerings are the large domestic carriers and international customers. We have a number of large service agreements with these customers which cover software and, in some cases, hardware maintenance for our products.
Historically, our services business was comprised of the more traditional POTS-based testability services, and the revenue stream was largely project-based and as such, difficult to predict. During the last few years, and primarily as a result of the Broadband Test Division acquisition, the services business has moved toward more contract-based software maintenance services, the revenue from which is more predictable. Because of this trend, our focus on our software applications as part of our refined strategy, and the decline in revenues from our other product lines, we expect services to continue to comprise a larger percentage of our revenue in the future. During the second quarter of 2009, we completed negotiations for the renewal of two multi-year software maintenance agreements which were open at the end of the first quarter of 2009.
In addition, we also entered into a new, multi-year managed services contract with a large global network equipment provider to provide customer support and engineering services. Under this new, multi-year managed services agreement, we will provide customer support and engineering services capabilities. The agreement is an important addition to our services business and is a logical step for us as we offer an expanded portfolio of services to our current customers as well as new customers.
Telecommunications Test and Measurement Products Our proprietary telecommunications test and measurement products, which include our System Test and MCU® products, enable telephone companies to qualify and troubleshoot broadband DSL and IP services and remotely diagnose problems in POTS lines. Most DSL lines today provide broadband Internet access for residential and business customers, fed from a central or remote office Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer ("DSLAM") and configured with either a shared POTS voice service or "unbundled" from the voice switch entirely (in the case of a competitive local exchange carriers ("CLECs") service offering). Our systems can be used to qualify loops for DSL service as well as ongoing maintenance and repair of these "IP" lines. As telecommunications service providers transition their offerings to IP networks and services (voice, video and data), we are in the process of upgrading Tollgrade's test systems to support the testing of these services. POTS lines provide traditional voice service as well as connections for communication devices such as computer modems and fax machines. POTS excludes non-switched and private lines, such as data communications service lines, commonly referred to as "special services." An important aspect of efficiently maintaining a telecommunications network is the ability to remotely test, diagnose and locate any service-affecting problems within that network. Tollgrade's System Test Products are made up of a centralized test operating system integrated into the customers' repair handling database systems, and remote test hardware located at telephone companies' central and remote offices. These systems enable local exchange carriers to conduct a full range of fault


Table of Contents

diagnostics in the "local loop," the portion of the telephone network that connects end users to the central office. In addition, line test systems provide the capability to remotely qualify, deploy and maintain services such as DSL and Integrated Services Digital Network ("ISDN") services which are carried over POTS lines. These test systems reduce the time needed to identify and resolve problems, eliminating or reducing the costs of dispatching a technician to the problem site. Most POTS line test systems, however, were designed only for use over copper wire line; as a result, traditional test systems could not access local loops in which fiber-optic technology had been introduced. Our MCU product line, which is used primarily by large domestic carriers, solved this problem, extending LoopCare™ testing from the central office to the fiber-fed remote Digital Loop Carrier ("DLC") lines by mimicking a digital bypass pair, which is essentially a telephone circuit that connects central test and measurement devices to the copper circuits close to the customer, i.e., "the last mile." We believe our DigiTest® system is well positioned for the present and future of telecommunication network testing, combining our line test system with a next generation test platform to provide a complete test system solution for POTS and DSL local loop prequalification and in-service testing.
During 2008, the Company determined after a thorough strategic review process to reposition itself with a greater focus on its service assurance offerings. The Company intends to build upon the strength of its System Test Products, which are at the center of our service assurance offerings, but with a greater emphasis on expanding our service assurance software solutions. Our System Test product software offerings include four separate OSS: LoopCare, 4TEL™, Celerity™, and LTSC™, each having an established installed base. LoopCare is also the primary application for broadband DSL testing and can be architected to overlay 4TEL and LTSC to add this functionality to the existing line test application with the addition of the DigiTest measurement platform. We plan to leverage our incumbencies with our installed base of software customers, and extend testing coverage to next generation network architectures. The implementation of our strategy initially will expand upon existing customer requests for enhanced features and capabilities. With regard to our software development activities, we have been planning, architecting, coding, and are now into the testing phase to deliver our new software platform. We expect to announce general availability of our first release of the platform this fall and will formally launch the offering in September.
Our legacy MCU products plug into DLC systems, the large network transmission systems used by telephone companies to link the copper and fiber-optic portions of the local loop. MCU products allow our customers to extend their line testing capabilities to all of their POTS lines served by a DLC system regardless of whether the system is fed by a copper or fiber optic link. DLC systems, which are located at telephone companies' central offices and at remote sites within local user areas, effectively multiplex the services of a single fiber-optic line into multiple copper lines. In many instances, several DLC systems are located at a single remote site to create multiple local loops that serve several thousand different end-user homes and businesses. Generally, for every DLC remote site, customers will deploy at least two MCU line-testing products. One of three patents for our legacy MCU products will expire during 2010, and we expect that the loss of this patent protection will permit greater competition within this market segment that could cause our revenues from this product line to decline.
Electric Utility Monitoring Products
The Company's new product development effort, the LightHouse™ product line, is being designed to provide power grid monitoring capabilities to electric utilities. Research and investment throughout 2007 and 2008 enabled the general availability of the first release of the product line during the first


Table of Contents

quarter of 2009. The test system solution currently consists of line mounted sensors, aggregators, and centralized software providing an end to end solution for power providers to efficiently monitor their overhead distribution circuits in real time. A LightHouse sensor, mounted directly on the electrical conductor, will continuously monitor key circuit parameters and transmit data over a wireless network to a central location, reducing time of detecting a problem on the grid, identifying its location and restoring service. LightHouse is intended as an innovative means for electric power utilities to deploy technology to provide real-time grid intelligence to detect faults and help minimize the impact of outages while optimizing the utilization of assets. The system is designed to improve the overall efficiency of energy delivery, improve customer satisfaction and improve the financial performance of the electric utilities. During the quarter and since our general availability of the Lighthouse solution in February, we have upgraded many of our current trial systems with new hardware and software. While the trials continue to receive positive response, we are still awaiting feedback on deployment decisions and timing. We have new trials planned and are in preparation stages with customers to design the trial system configurations for their networks. Our Customers
The Company's customers range from the top telecom providers, to numerous independent telecom, and broadband providers around the world. Our primary customers for our telco products and services are large domestic and European telecommunications service providers. The Company tracks its telco sales by two large customer groups, the first of which includes Qwest, AT&T and Verizon (referred to herein as large domestic carriers), and the second of which includes certain large international telephone service providers in Europe, namely British Telecom, Royal KPN N.V., Belgacom S.A., Deutsche Telecom AG (T-Com) and Telefónica O2 Czech Republic, a.s. (collectively referred to herein as the "European Telcos"). For the second quarter of 2009, sales to the large domestic customers accounted for approximately 35.8% of the Company's total revenue, compared to approximately 25.9% of total revenue for the second quarter of 2008. Sales to AT&T individually exceeded 10% of the Company's total revenue and comprised 19.6% of the Company's total revenue for the second quarter of 2009, compared to 14.4% of the Company's total revenue for the second quarter of 2008. Sales in the second quarter of 2009 and 2008 to the European Telcos accounted for approximately 20.7% and 33.0% respectively, of total revenue. For the three months ended June 27, 2009, sales to customers in the Americas (excluding the United States) were approximately $1.0 million or 24.9% of international sales; sales to customers in EMEA were $2.5 million or 66.3% of international sales; and sales to customers in Asia Pacific were $0.3 million or 8.8% of international sales. For the three months ended June 28, 2008, sales to customers in the Americas (excluding the United States) were approximately $0.6 million or 9.9% of international sales; sales to customers in EMEA were $5.1 million or 78.2% of international sales; and sales to customers in Asia Pacific were $0.8 million or 11.9% of international sales.
For the six months ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, sales to the large domestic customers accounted for approximately 43.7% and 30.6%, respectively, of the Company's total revenue. Sales to AT&T comprised approximately 24.6% and 18.8% of the Company's total revenue for the six months ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively. Sales for the six months ended June 27, 2009 to the European Telcos accounted for approximately 22.8% of total revenue. International sales represented approximately $7.5 million, or 35.7% of the Company's total revenue for the six months


Table of Contents

ended June 27, 2009 compared to $12.1 million, or 51.9%, for the six months ended June 28, 2008. Our international sales were primarily in three geographic areas based upon customer location for the six months ended June 27, 2009: the Americas (excluding the United States); EMEA; and Asia. Sales in the Americas were approximately $1.7 million and $1.0 million, sales in EMEA were approximately $5.3 million and $10.3 million, and sales in Asia were approximately $0.5 million and $0.8 million for the six months ended June 27, 2009 and the six months ended June 28, 2008, respectively. Backlog
The Company's order backlog for firm customer purchase orders and signed software maintenance contracts was $17.7 million as of June 27, 2009, compared to a backlog of $15.1 million as of December 31, 2008. The backlog at June 27, 2009 and December 31, 2008 included approximately $15.6 million and $12.0 million, respectively, related to software maintenance contracts and, beginning in the second quarter of 2009, also our managed services contract. Our backlog specifically for software maintenance contracts has declined sequentially from the first quarter 2009 even with the renewal of the software maintenance agreements that were completed in the second quarter 2009 because three additional major software support agreements have expired or will expire within the next six months. Because one of these contracts expired at the end of June 2009, the backlog figure does not include any amount from that customer. We are currently working to finalize the renewal of the contract that expired in June and expect to complete negotiations during the third quarter 2009. The other two contracts expire at the end of 2009.
On a sequential basis, backlog increased from $12.0 million dollars at March 28, 2009 primarily due to the managed services contract as well as the maintenance renewals signed in the second quarter. The order backlog includes only twelve months of revenue from maintenance agreements and the managed services contract.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51," (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This standard defines a noncontrolling interest, previously called a minority interest, as the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. SFAS 160 requires, among other items, that a noncontrolling interest be included in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity separate from the parent's equity; consolidated net income to be reported at amounts inclusive of both the parent's and noncontrolling interest's shares and, separately, the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and noncontrolling interest all on the consolidated statement of operations; and if a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be measured at fair value and a gain or loss be recognized in net income based on such fair value. The adoption of SFAS 160 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations," (SFAS 141(R)), which replaces SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," (SFAS 141) but retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS 141, including that the purchase method be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This standard defines


Table of Contents

the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control instead of the date that the consideration is transferred. SFAS 141(R) requires an acquirer in a business combination, including business combinations achieved in stages (step acquisition), to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions. It also requires the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from certain contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair values. Additionally, SFAS 141(R) requires acquisition-related costs to be expensed in the period in which the costs are incurred and the services are received instead of including such costs as part of the acquisition price. The impact of the adoption of SFAS 141(R) will depend on the nature and extent of business combinations occurring on or after the effective date. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," (SFAS 157) as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. See Note 6 for the effect of the adoption of SFAS 157, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The provisions of SFAS 157 will be applied at such time a fair value measurement of a nonfinancial asset or nonfinancial liability is required, which may result in a fair value that is materially different than would have been calculated prior to the adoption of SFAS 157.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets," (FSP FAS 142-3). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," (SFAS 142) in order to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141(R) and other GAAP. The adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 had no impact on the Financial Statements. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities," (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 had no impact on the Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS No. 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" (FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1), which amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 107 and APB Opinion No. 28 and requires disclosure about the fair value of its financial instruments whenever it issues summarized financial information for interim reporting periods. FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1 are effective for financial statements issued for interim


Table of Contents

reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1 resulted in the Company's inclusion of the appropriate disclosures in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2, "Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments" (FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2), which amends SFAS No. 115 and FSP FAS No. 115-1 and FSP FAS No. 124-1 and conforms changes to other standards including EITF Issue No. 99-20 and AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) No. 03-3, "Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer," and improves the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. . . .

  Add TLGD to Portfolio     Set Alert         Email to a Friend  
Get SEC Filings for Another Symbol: Symbol Lookup
Quotes & Info for TLGD - All Recent SEC Filings
Sign Up for a Free Trial to the NEW EDGAR Online Pro
Detailed SEC, Financial, Ownership and Offering Data on over 12,000 U.S. Public Companies.
Actionable and easy-to-use with searching, alerting, downloading and more.
Request a Trial      Sign Up Now


Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
SEC Filing data and information provided by EDGAR Online, Inc. (1-800-416-6651). All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.