|
Quotes & Info
|
| ABC > SEC Filings for ABC > Form 10-Q on 6-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
6-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
Overview
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements and notes thereto contained herein and in conjunction with
the financial statements and notes thereto included in AmerisourceBergen
Corporation's (the "Company's") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008.
In May 2009, the Company declared a two-for-one stock split of its outstanding
shares of common stock. The stock split occurred in the form of a 100% stock
dividend, whereby each stockholder received one additional share for each share
owned. The shares were distributed on June 15, 2009 to stockholders of record at
the close of business on May 29, 2009. All applicable share and per share data
in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations have been retroactively adjusted to give effect to this stock
split.
The Company is a pharmaceutical services company providing drug distribution and
related healthcare services and solutions to its pharmacy, physician, and
manufacturer customers, which are based primarily in the United States and
Canada. Substantially all of the Company's operations are located in the United
States and Canada. The Company also has a pharmaceutical packaging operation in
the United Kingdom.
The Company has three operating segments, which include the operations of
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation ("ABDC"), the AmerisourceBergen Specialty
Group ("ABSG"), and the AmerisourceBergen Packaging Group ("ABPG"). The Company
has aggregated the operating results of ABDC, ABSG, and ABPG into one reportable
segment, Pharmaceutical Distribution.
Servicing both healthcare providers and pharmaceutical manufacturers in the
pharmaceutical supply channel, the Pharmaceutical Distribution segment's
operations provide drug distribution and related services designed to reduce
healthcare costs and improve patient outcomes.
ABDC distributes a comprehensive offering of brand-name and generic
pharmaceuticals, over-the-counter healthcare products, home healthcare supplies
and equipment, and related services to a wide variety of healthcare providers,
including acute care hospitals and health systems, independent and chain retail
pharmacies, mail order pharmacies, medical clinics, long-term care and other
alternate site pharmacies, and other customers. ABDC also provides pharmacy
management, staffing and other consulting services; scalable automated pharmacy
dispensing equipment; medication and supply dispensing cabinets; and supply
management software to a variety of retail and institutional healthcare
providers.
ABSG, through a number of individual operating businesses, provides
pharmaceutical distribution and other services primarily to physicians who
specialize in a variety of disease states, especially oncology, and to other
healthcare providers, including dialysis clinics. ABSG also distributes
vaccines, other injectables, plasma, and other blood products. In addition,
through its specialty services businesses, ABSG provides drug commercialization
services, third party logistics, group purchasing, and other services for
biotech and other pharmaceutical manufacturers, as well as reimbursement
consulting, data analytics, practice management, and physician education.
ABPG consists of American Health Packaging, Anderson Packaging ("Anderson"), and
Brecon Pharmaceuticals Limited ("Brecon"). American Health Packaging delivers
unit dose, punch card, unit-of-use, and other packaging solutions to
institutional and retail healthcare providers. American Health Packaging's
largest customer is ABDC and, as a result, its operations are closely aligned
with the operations of ABDC. Anderson is a leading provider of contract
packaging services for pharmaceutical manufacturers. Brecon is a United
Kingdom-based provider of contract packaging and clinical trials materials
services for pharmaceutical manufacturers.
Acquisition
In May 2009, the Company acquired Innomar Strategies Inc. ("Innomar"), a
Canadian specialty pharmaceutical services company, for a purchase price of
$13.4 million, net of a working capital adjustment. Innomar provides services
within Canada to pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including:
strategic consulting and access solutions, specialty logistics management,
patient assistance and nursing services, and clinical research services.
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Divestiture
In October 2008, the Company completed the divestiture of its former workers'
compensation business, PMSI. In accordance with the Financial Accounting
Standards Board's ("FASB's") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets," the Company classified PMSI's assets and liabilities as held for sale
in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2008 and classified PMSI's
operating results and cash flows as discontinued in the consolidated financial
statements for all periods presented.
The Company sold PMSI for approximately $31 million, net of an estimated working
capital adjustment, which includes a $19 million subordinated note due from PMSI
on the fifth anniversary of the closing date (the "maturity date"), of which
$4 million may be payable in October 2010, if PMSI achieves certain revenue
targets with respect to its largest customer. Interest, which accrues at an
annual rate of LIBOR plus 4% (not to exceed 8%), will be payable in cash on a
quarterly basis, if PMSI achieves a defined minimum fixed charge coverage ratio,
or will be compounded semi-annually and paid at maturity. Additionally, if
PMSI's annual net revenue exceeds certain thresholds through December 2011, the
Company may be entitled to additional payments of up to $10 million under the
subordinated note due from PMSI on the maturity date of the note.
Results of Operations
AmerisourceBergen Corporation
Summary Financial Information
Quarter Ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 Change
Total revenue $ 18,393,899 $ 17,996,666 2 %
Total gross profit $ 519,223 $ 498,045 4 %
Pharmaceutical Distribution operating income $ 213,200 $ 205,390 4 %
Facility consolidations, employee severance
and other (213 ) (7,865 ) N/M
Total operating income $ 212,987 $ 197,525 8 %
Percentages of total revenue:
Pharmaceutical Distribution
Gross profit 2.82 % 2.77 %
Operating expenses 1.66 % 1.63 %
Operating income 1.16 % 1.14 %
AmerisourceBergen Corporation
Gross profit 2.82 % 2.77 %
Operating expenses 1.66 % 1.67 %
Operating income 1.16 % 1.10 %
|
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations (Continued)
AmerisourceBergen Corporation
Summary Financial Information
Nine months Ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 Change
Total revenue $ 53,043,927 $ 53,031,887 - %
Pharmaceutical Distribution gross profit $ 1,561,542 $ 1,517,964 3 %
Gain on antitrust litigation settlements - 1,585 N/M
Total gross profit $ 1,561,542 $ 1,519,549 3 %
Pharmaceutical Distribution operating income $ 664,641 $ 633,010 5 %
Facility consolidations, employee severance
and other (5,504 ) (9,426 ) N/M
Gain on antitrust litigation settlements - 1,585 N/M
Total operating income $ 659,137 $ 625,169 5 %
Percentages of total revenue:
Pharmaceutical Distribution
Gross profit 2.94 % 2.86 %
Operating expenses 1.69 % 1.67 %
Operating income 1.25 % 1.19 %
AmerisourceBergen Corporation
Gross profit 2.94 % 2.87 %
Operating expenses 1.70 % 1.69 %
Operating income 1.24 % 1.18 %
|
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
Operating Results
Total revenue of $18.4 billion in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, which
includes bulk deliveries to customer warehouses, increased 2% from the prior
year quarter. This increase was primarily due to the addition of two new large
customers and the above market growth of ABSG, and was offset, in part, by the
July 1, 2008 loss of certain business (approximately $3.0 billion on an
annualized basis) with a national retail drug chain customer. Excluding the loss
of the above-mentioned business, total revenue in the quarter ended June 30,
2009 would have increased by 6% from the prior year quarter. During the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, 68% of total revenue was from sales to institutional
customers and 32% was from sales to retail customers; this compared to a
customer mix in the prior year quarter of 66% institutional and 34% retail.
Sales to institutional customers increased 5% in the current year quarter
primarily due to our expanded relationship with a large institutional buying
group customer and the 6% growth in ABSG. Sales to retail customers decreased 3%
in the current year quarter primarily due to the loss of the above-mentioned
national chain business, offset, in part, by the addition of a new large
independent retail buying group customer. Total revenue of $53.0 billion in the
nine months ended June 30, 2009 was flat compared to the prior year period as
ABSG's revenue growth of 6% was offset by the 1% decline in ABDC's revenue.
Bulk deliveries of $429.1 million and $1,265.2 million in the quarter and nine
months ended June 30, 2009 decreased 12% and 42%, respectively, from the prior
year periods. These declines were due to the prior fiscal year transition of a
significant amount of business previously conducted on a bulk delivery basis
with our largest customer to an operating revenue basis. Due to the
insignificant service fees generated from bulk deliveries, fluctuations in
volume have no significant impact on operating margins. However, revenue from
bulk deliveries has a positive impact on our cash flows due to favorable timing
between customer payments to us and payments by us to our suppliers.
ABDC's total revenue increased by 2% and decreased by 1% from the prior year
quarter and nine-month period, respectively. The loss of certain business with a
large retail drug chain customer, as mentioned above, was more than offset by
the addition of two new large customers in the current year quarter.
ABSG's total revenue of $4.0 billion and $11.5 billion in the quarter and nine
months ended June 30, 2009 increased 6% from the prior year periods due to good
growth broadly across its distribution and services businesses, offset in part,
by declining anemia drug sales (see paragraph below). The majority of ABSG's
revenue is generated from the distribution of pharmaceuticals to physicians who
specialize in a variety of disease states, especially oncology. ABSG also
distributes vaccines, plasma, and other blood products. ABSG's business may be
adversely impacted in the future by changes in medical guidelines and the
Medicare reimbursement rates for certain pharmaceuticals, including oncology
drugs administered by physicians and anemia drugs. Since ABSG provides a number
of services to or through physicians, any changes to this service channel could
result in slower or reduced growth in revenues.
Revenue related to the distribution of anemia-related products, which
represented approximately 5% of total revenue in the quarter ended June 30,
2009, decreased approximately 7% from the prior year quarter. The decline in
sales of anemia-related products has been most pronounced in the use of these
products for cancer treatment. Sales of oncology-related anemia products
represented approximately 1.8% of total revenue in the quarter ended June 30,
2009 and decreased approximately 25% from the prior year quarter. Several
developments have contributed to the decline in sales of anemia drugs, including
expanded warning and other product safety labeling requirements, more
restrictive federal policies governing Medicare reimbursement for the use of
these drugs to treat oncology patients undergoing dialysis or experiencing
kidney failure, and changes in regulatory and clinical medical guidelines for
recommended dosage and use. As a result, oncology-related anemia drug sales have
continued to decline further in fiscal 2009 from our fiscal 2008 total. In
addition, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") is continuing to review
clinical study data concerning the possible risks associated with certain anemia
products and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") announced last
year that it is considering a review of national Medicare coverage policy for
these drugs for patients who have cancer or pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease.
The FDA or CMS may take additional action regarding the use, safety labeling
and/or Medicare coverage of these drugs in the future. Further changes in
medical guidelines for anemia drugs may impact the availability and extent of
reimbursement for these drugs from third party payors, including federal and
state governments and private insurance plans. Our future revenue growth rate
and/or profitability may continue to be impacted by any future reductions in
reimbursement for anemia drugs or changes that limit the dosage and or use of
anemia drugs.
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
We continue to expect that our total revenue growth in fiscal 2009 will be
between 1% and 3%, with ABDC growing between 0% and 2% and ABSG growing between
5% and 7% for the fiscal year. ABDC's revenue growth is expected to be higher in
the quarter ending September 30, 2009, in comparison to its revenue growth in
the first nine months of fiscal 2009 due to the anniversary of the national
retail drug chain customer loss described above and the addition of several new
customers in the second half of fiscal 2009. The expected growth also reflects
U.S. pharmaceutical industry conditions, including increases in prescription
drug utilization, the introduction of new products, and higher branded
pharmaceutical prices, offset, in part, by the increased use of lower-priced
generics. Our growth has also been impacted by industry competition and changes
in customer mix. Industry sales in the United States, as recently estimated by
industry data firm IMS Healthcare, Inc. ("IMS"), are expected to contract
between 1% and 2% in 2009 and are expected to be flat over the five-year period
ending 2013 due to continued brand to generic conversions as well as the
economic slowdown in the United States in 2009. IMS expects that certain sectors
of the market, such as biotechnology and other specialty and generic
pharmaceuticals will grow faster than the overall market. Our future revenue
growth will continue to be affected by various factors such as: industry growth
trends, including the likely increase in the number of generic drugs that will
be available over the next few years as a result of the expiration of certain
drug patents held by brand manufacturers, general economic conditions in the
United States, competition within the industry, customer consolidation, changes
in pharmaceutical manufacturer pricing and distribution policies and practices,
increased downward pressure on reimbursement rates, and changes in Federal
government rules and regulations.
Gross profit of $519.2 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 increased 4%
from the prior year quarter. As a percentage of total revenue, gross profit in
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was 2.82%, an increase of 5 basis points from
the prior year quarter. These increases were primarily due to the strong growth
and increased profitability of our generic programs (with generic revenue
increasing by 23% in comparison to the prior year quarter), increased
contributions from our fee-for-service agreements with branded manufacturers,
and higher brand-name manufacturer price appreciation. All of these positive
factors combined to more than offset normal competitive pressures on customer
margins in the current year quarter. Gross profit in the prior year quarter was
impacted by an $8.4 million inventory write-down of certain pharmacy dispensing
equipment. Gross profit of $1.6 billion in the nine months ended June 30, 2009
increased 3% from the prior year period. As a percentage of total revenue, gross
profit in the nine months ended June 30, 2009 was 2.94%, an increase of 7 basis
points from the prior year period. These increases were primarily due to the
strong growth and increased profitability of our generic programs; increased
contributions from our fee-for-service agreements, including $10.2 million of
fees relating to prior period sales due to the execution of new agreements in
the quarter ended December 31, 2008; and good growth from ABSG's businesses, all
of which were partially offset by ABSG's $12.7 million loss on its influenza
vaccine program, which included a $15.5 million write-down of excess influenza
vaccine inventory, and normal competitive pressures on customer margins in the
current nine-month period. Gross profit in the current year nine-month period
benefited from a settlement of $1.8 million with a former customer. Gross profit
in the prior year nine-month period benefited from a gain of $13.2 million
relating to favorable litigation settlements with a former customer and a major
competitor, and was partially offset by the above-mentioned $8.4 million
inventory write-down. Additionally, in the prior year nine-month period, we
recognized a gain of $1.6 million from antitrust litigation settlements with
pharmaceutical manufacturers. This gain, which was excluded from the
determination of Pharmaceutical Distribution segment's gross profit, was
recorded as reduction to cost of goods sold.
Our cost of goods sold for interim periods includes a last-in, first-out
("LIFO") provision that is based on our estimated annual LIFO provision. We
recorded a LIFO charge of $4.1 million and $5.0 million in the quarters ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our LIFO charge was $20.8 million and
$17.7 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
annual LIFO provision is affected by changes in inventory quantities, product
mix, and manufacturer pricing practices, which may be impacted by market and
other external influences.
Operating expenses of $306.2 million and $902.4 million in the quarter and nine
months ended June 30, 2009, increased by 2% and 1%, respectively, from the prior
year periods. Operating expenses in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 increased
from the prior year quarter due to an intangible asset impairment of
$8.9 million, a legal accrual of $3.0 million relating to the OMH matter (see
Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), and an increase in bad debt
expense of $4.1 million, all of which was offset in part, by a reduction in
facility consolidations, employee severance and other of $7.7 million from the
prior year quarter. Operating expenses in the nine months ended June 30, 2009
increased from the prior year period due to an increase in bad debt expense of
$11.6 million and an increase in asset impairment charges of $8.3 million,
offset in part, by a decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses of
$5.5 million and a decrease in facility consolidations, employee severance and
other charges of $3.9 million. Additionally, expenses incurred in connection
with our Business Transformation project, which includes a new enterprise
resource planning ("ERP") platform, increased by $16.0 million from the prior
year period. As a result of our cE2 initiative described below, we have been
able to substantially offset these incremental costs by reducing our warehouse
operating costs through continuing productivity improvements and by streamlining
our organizational structures within ABDC and ABSG. As a percentage of total
revenue, operating expenses were 1.66% and 1.70% in the quarter and nine months
ended June 30, 2009; this compared to 1.67% and 1.69% in the prior year periods.
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations (Continued)
The following table illustrates the charges incurred relating to facility
consolidations, employee severance and other, (which are excluded from the
operating expenses of the Pharmaceutical Distribution segment), for the quarter
and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
Quarter ended Nine months ended
June 30, June 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Facility consolidations and
employee severance $ 213 $ 7,798 $ 5,504 $ 7,286
Costs related to business
divestitures - 67 - 2,140
Total facility consolidations,
employee severance and other $ 213 $ 7,865 $ 5,504 $ 9,426
|
In fiscal 2008, we announced a more streamlined organizational structure and
introduced an initiative ("cE2") designed to drive increased customer efficiency
and cost effectiveness. In connection with these efforts, we continue to reduce
various operating costs and terminate certain positions. During the nine months
ended June 30, 2009, we terminated 197 employees and incurred $3.2 million of
employee severance costs. Additionally, during the nine months ended June 30,
2009, we recorded $2.2 million of additional expense relating to the Bergen
Brunswig Matter as described in Note 9 (Legal Matters and Contingencies) of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. During the nine months ended
June 30, 2008, the Company terminated 58 employees and incurred $7.6 million of
employee severance costs. Additionally, during the nine months ended June 30,
2008, the Company reversed $1.0 million of employee severance charges previously
estimated and recorded relating to a prior integration plan. Costs related to
business divestitures in the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2008 related
to the sale of our former workers' compensation business, PMSI.
We paid a total of $14.3 million and $4.3 million for employee severance, lease
cancellation and other costs during the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. Employees receive their severance benefits over a period,
generally not in excess of 12 months, or in the form of a lump-sum payment.
Operating income of $213.0 million and $659.1 million in the quarter and nine
months ended June 30, 2009 increased 8% and 5%, respectively, from the prior
year periods. As a percentage of total revenue, operating income in the quarter
and nine months ended June 30, 2009 increased 6 basis points from the prior year
periods. These increases were due to our gross profit growth, which exceeded the
small increases in operating expenses. Operating income growth will be reduced
by approximately 3% over the next twelve months due to the July 1, 2009 renewal
of a large customer contract.
The costs of facility consolidations, employee severance and other, the
intangible asset impairments, and the gain on antitrust litigation settlements
had the following net effects on operating income as a percentage of total
revenue:
• Quarter ended June 30, 2009 - decreased operating income as a percentage
of total revenue by 5 basis points.
• Quarter ended June 30, 2008 - decreased operating income as a percentage of total revenue by 4 basis points.
• Nine months ended June 30, 2009 - decreased operating income as a percentage of total revenue by 3 basis points.
• Nine months ended June 30, 2008 - decreased operating income as a percentage of total revenue by 1 basis point.
Interest expense, interest income, and the respective weighted-average interest rates in the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in thousands):
2009 2008
Weighted-Average Weighted-Average
Amount Interest Rate Amount Interest Rate
Interest expense $ 15,684 4.72 % $ 18,067 5.33 %
Interest income (1,032 ) 0.61 % (2,101 ) 2.76 %
Interest expense, net $ 14,652 $ 15,966
|
Interest expense decreased from the prior year quarter due to a decrease of $73.0 million in average borrowings and a decrease in the weighted-average variable interest rate on borrowings under our revolving credit facilities to 1.38% from 4.22% in the prior year quarter. Interest income decreased from the prior year quarter primarily due to a decline in the weighted-average interest rate, offset in part, by an increase in average invested cash of $383.6 million.
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations (Continued)
Interest expense, interest income, and the respective weighted-average interest
rates in the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in
thousands):
2009 2008
Weighted-Average Weighted-Average
Amount Interest Rate Amount Interest Rate
Interest expense $ 47,946 4.95 % $ 58,648 5.56 %
Interest income (4,590 ) 1.18 % (7,567 ) 3.66 %
Interest expense, net $ 43,356 $ 51,081
|
Interest expense decreased from the prior year nine-month period due to a decrease of $108.5 million in average borrowings and a decrease in the weighted-average variable interest rate on borrowings under our revolving credit . . .
|
|