|
Quotes & Info
|
| HUM > SEC Filings for HUM > Form 10-Q on 3-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
3-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Humana Inc. in this document present the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows, and should be read in conjunction with the following discussion and analysis. References to "we," "us," "our," "Company," and "Humana" mean Humana Inc. and its subsidiaries. This discussion includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in filings with the SEC, in our press releases, investor presentations, and in oral statements made by or with the approval of one of our executive officers, the words or phrases like "expects," "anticipates," "believes," "intends," "likely will result," "estimates," "projects" or variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, among other things, information set forth in Item 1A. - Risk Factors in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 that was filed with the SEC on February 20, 2009, in each case, as modified by the changes to these risk factors included in this document and other reports we filed subsequent to February 20, 2009 and are incorporated by reference herein. In making these statements, we are not undertaking to address or update these factors in future filings or communications regarding our business or results. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this document might not occur. There may also be other risks that we are unable to predict at this time. Any of these risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.
Overview
Headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, Humana Inc. is one of the nation's largest publicly traded health and supplemental benefits companies, based on our 2008 revenues of $28.9 billion. We are a full-service benefits solutions company, offering a wide array of health and supplemental benefit products for employer groups, government benefit programs, and individuals. As of June 30, 2009, we had approximately 10.3 million members in our medical benefit plans, as well as approximately 6.8 million members in our specialty products.
We manage our business with two segments: Government and Commercial. The Government segment consists of beneficiaries of government benefit programs, and includes three lines of business: Medicare, Military, and Medicaid. The Commercial segment consists of members enrolled in our medical and specialty products marketed to employer groups and individuals. We identified our segments in accordance with the aggregation provisions of SFAS 131, which aggregates products with similar economic characteristics. These characteristics include the nature of customer groups as well as pricing, benefits, and underwriting requirements. These segment groupings are consistent with information used by our Chief Executive Officer.
The results of each segment are measured by income before income taxes. We allocate all selling, general and administrative expenses, investment and other revenue, interest expense, and goodwill, but no other assets or liabilities, to our segments. Members served by our two segments often utilize the same medical provider networks, enabling us to obtain more favorable contract terms with providers. Our segments also share indirect overhead costs and assets. As a result, the profitability of each segment is interdependent.
Our results are impacted by many factors, but most notably are influenced by our ability to establish and maintain a competitive and efficient cost structure and to accurately and consistently establish competitive premium, ASO fee, and plan benefit levels that are commensurate with our benefit and administrative costs. Benefit costs are subject to a high rate of inflation due to many forces, including new higher priced technologies and medical procedures, new prescription drugs and therapies, an aging population, lifestyle challenges including diet and smoking, the tort liability system, and government regulation.
Our industry relies on two key statistics to measure performance. The benefit ratio, which is computed by taking total benefit expenses as a percentage of premium revenues, represents a statistic used to measure underwriting profitability. The selling, general, and administrative expense ratio, or SG&A expense ratio, which is computed by taking total selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of premium revenues, administrative services fees and other revenues, represents a statistic used to measure administrative spending efficiency.
Government Segment
Our strategy and commitment to the Medicare programs has led to significant growth. Medicare Advantage membership increased to 1,499,800 members at June 30, 2009, up 154,800 members, or 11.5%, from 1,345,000 at June 30, 2008, primarily due to sales of preferred provider organization, or PPO products. This increase also included the impact of the acquisitions of Cariten and Metcare, which together added 54,200 Medicare HMO members. Likewise, Medicare Advantage premium revenues have increased 23.2% to $8.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $6.7 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Recently the mix of sales has shifted increasingly to our network-based PPO offerings, which is particularly important given the enactment of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008, discussed more fully below. Medicare Advantage members enrolled in network-based products was approximately 62% at June 30, 2009 compared to 49% at June 30, 2008, with our PPO membership increasing 107% from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009.
Due to the enactment of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008, or the Act, in July 2008, beginning in 2011 sponsors of Medicare Advantage Private Fee-For-Service, or PFFS, plans will be required to contract with providers to establish adequate networks, except in geographic areas that CMS determines have fewer than two network-based Medicare Advantage plans. We have 574,800 PFFS members, or approximately 38% of our total Medicare Advantage membership at June 30, 2009, down from 49% at December 31, 2008. Approximately 80% of these PFFS members at June 30, 2009 reside in geographies where we have developed a PPO network and offer a PPO plan. We are implementing various operational and strategic initiatives including further developing our PPO network and building network-based plan offerings to address the network requirement.
Final 2010 Medicare Advantage rates were announced by CMS on April 6, 2009, with an effective rate decrease for the industry of 4% to 5%. Based on information available at the time we filed our 2010 bids in June 2009, we believe we effectively designed Medicare Advantage products that address the lower rates while continuing to remain competitive compared to both the combination of original Medicare with a supplement policy as well as other Medicare Advantage competitors within our industry. In addition, we will continue to pursue our cost-reduction and outcome-enhancing strategies, including care coordination and disease management, to mitigate the adverse effects of this rate reduction on our Medicare Advantage members. Nonetheless, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully execute operational and strategic initiatives with respect to changes in the Medicare Advantage program. Failure to execute these strategies may result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
We also offer three Medicare stand-alone prescription drug plans, or PDPs, under the Medicare Part D program: our Standard, Enhanced, and Complete products. These plans provide varying degrees of coverage. In order to offer these plans in a given year, in June of the preceding year we must submit bids to CMS for approval. During 2008, we experienced prescription drug claim expenses for our Medicare stand-alone PDPs that were higher than we had originally assumed in the bid that we submitted to CMS in June 2007. These higher claim levels for our Medicare stand-alone PDPs reflected a combination of several variances between our actuarial bid assumptions versus our experience. These variances resulted from, among other things, differences between the actuarial utilization assumptions (which are our attempts to predict members' future utilization of drugs) in the bids for our Enhanced plans versus our actual claims experience in 2008, as well as an increase in the percentage of higher cost members in both our Standard and Enhanced plans. These issues were addressed for 2009 based on enhancements made to our bid development and review processes. Our Medicare stand-alone PDP membership declined to 1,992,000 members at June 30, 2009, down 1,074,600 members from December 31, 2008 and down 1,113,200 members from June 30, 2008, resulting primarily from our competitive positioning as we realigned stand-alone PDP premium and benefit designs to correspond with our historical prescription drug claims experience.
Our quarterly Government segment earnings and operating cash flows are impacted by the Medicare Part D benefit design and changes in the composition of our membership. The Medicare Part D benefit design results in coverage that varies as a member's cumulative out-of-pocket costs pass through successive stages of a member's plan period which begins January 1 for renewals. These plan designs generally result in us sharing a greater portion of the responsibility for total prescription drug costs in the early stages and less in the latter stages. As a result the Government segment's benefit ratio generally improves as the year progresses. In addition, the number of low-income senior members as well as year-over-year changes in the mix of membership in our stand-alone PDP products,
Standard, Enhanced, and Complete, affect the quarterly benefit ratio pattern. The impact of the Medicare Part D benefit designs on our overall earnings pattern is expected to be less in 2009 as compared to 2008 due to the loss of 1,074,600 Medicare stand-alone PDP members, or 35.0%, from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 as discussed above.
Our military services business primarily consists of the TRICARE South Region contract which covers benefits for healthcare services provided to beneficiaries through March 31, 2010. In July 2009, we were notified by the Department of Defense that we were not awarded the third generation TRICARE program contract for the South Region which had been subject to competing bids. We have filed a protest with the Government Accountability Office in connection with the award to another bidder but are not yet able to make a reasonable determination of the outcome of such protest. In our protest, we cited discrepancies between the award criteria and procedures prescribed in the request for proposals issued by the DoD and those that appear to have been used by the DoD in making its contractor selection. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, premiums and ASO fees associated with the TRICARE South Region contract were $1.8 billion, or 11.7% of our total premiums and ASO fees. We currently are evaluating issues associated with our military services businesses such as potential impairment of certain assets primarily consisting of goodwill which had a carrying value of $50 million at June 30, 2009, potential exit costs, possible asset sales, and a strategic assessment of ancillary businesses. We cannot yet determine a reasonable estimate of the impact of such issues on our earnings.
Commercial Segment
Commercial segment pretax earnings, impacted by lower investment income and the adverse effects of the slowing economy, decreased by $39.8 million, or 19.6% for the 2009 period compared to the 2008 period. Commercial segment medical membership at June 30, 2009 of 3,447,900 decreased 110,600 members, or 3.1% from June 30, 2008, despite the acquisition of Cariten in the fourth quarter of 2008 which added approximately 49,700 fully-insured members and 21,600 ASO members, as discussed more fully below. Commercial segment medical membership decreased 172,900 members, or 4.8% from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009. The decline in membership primarily was a result of the slowing economy as well as the loss of a few larger ASO accounts. The slowing economy has led to increased in-group member attrition, particularly with respect to our smaller group accounts, as these employers reduce their workforce levels primarily through reductions in force of less experienced workers. As a result, we are also experiencing higher utilization of benefits in our smaller group accounts primarily due to the shift in the mix of members to an older workforce having more health care needs and members utilizing more benefits ahead of actual or perceived layoffs. The membership declines were partially offset by enrollment gains in our individual product, a strategic area of commercial growth. Individual membership increased 17% from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009, and 7% from December 31, 2008. This increase in individual membership, together with administrative costs associated with increased business for our mail-order pharmacy, led to a higher Commercial segment SG&A expense ratio. We expect Commercial segment medical membership to decline by 175,000 to 195,000 members for the full-year 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008, reflecting the impact of member attrition due to workforce reductions as well as the loss of a few larger ASO accounts.
Volatility in the Financial Markets
The securities and credit markets continue to experience volatility, increasing risk with respect to our financial assets. At June 30, 2009, cash, cash equivalents and our investment securities totaled $7.4 billion, or 54.1% of total assets, with 21.4% of the $7.4 billion invested in cash and cash equivalents. Investment securities consist primarily of debt securities of investment-grade quality with an average credit rating by S&P of AA+ at June 30, 2009 and an average duration of approximately 4.2 years. Including cash and cash equivalents, the average duration of our investment portfolio was approximately 3.4 years. We had $5.5 million of mortgage-backed securities associated with Alt-A or subprime loans at June 30, 2009 and no collateralized debt obligations.
Gross unrealized losses were $196.6 million at June 30, 2009 compared to $313.0 million at December 31, 2008. Gross unrealized gains were $104.4 million at June 30, 2009 compared to $83.2 million at December 31, 2008. All issuers of securities trading at an unrealized loss remain current on all contractual payments. We believe these unrealized losses primarily were caused by an increase in investment yields as a result of wider credit spreads and tighter liquidity conditions in the current markets than when the securities were purchased. As of June 30, 2009, we do not intend to sell the securities with an unrealized loss position in accumulated other comprehensive income and it is not likely that we will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized costs basis, and as a result, we believe that the securities with an unrealized loss are not other-than-temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2009.
We continuously review our investment portfolios. Given current market conditions, there is a continuing risk that further declines in fair value may occur and additional material realized losses from sales or other-than-temporary impairments may be recorded in future periods.
In addition, in the fall of 2008 we terminated all fixed to variable interest-rate swap agreements outstanding associated with our senior notes based on recent changes in the credit market environment. In exchange for terminating these interest-rate swap agreements, we received cash of $93.0 million representing the fair value of the swap assets. This transaction also fixed the interest rate on our senior notes to a weighted-average rate of 6.08%. We may re-enter into swap agreements in the future depending on market conditions and other factors.
The availability of liquidity and credit capacity in general has been impacted by the current conditions in the financial markets. We believe our cash balances, investment securities, operating cash flows, and funds available under our credit agreement or from other public or private financing sources, taken together, provide adequate resources to fund ongoing operating and regulatory requirements, future expansion opportunities, and capital expenditures in the foreseeable future, as well as to refinance debt as it matures. Our long-term debt, consisting primarily of senior notes, of $1,682.7 million represented 25.0% of total capitalization at June 30, 2009, declining from 30.3% at December 31, 2008. The earliest maturity of our senior notes is in June 2016. We have available a 5-year, $1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit agreement which expires in July 2011. As of June 30, 2009, there were no borrowings outstanding under this credit agreement.
Certain of our subsidiaries operate in states that regulate the payment of dividends, loans, or other cash transfers to Humana Inc., the parent company, and require minimum levels of equity as well as limit investments to approved securities. The amount of dividends that may be paid to Humana Inc. by these subsidiaries, without prior approval by state regulatory authorities, is limited based on the entity's level of statutory income and statutory capital and surplus. In most states, prior notification is provided before paying a dividend even if approval is not required. In the first half of 2009, our subsidiaries paid dividends of $774.1 million to the parent compared to $296.0 million for the full year 2008. In addition, the parent made capital contributions to our subsidiaries of $100.0 million during the first half of 2009. We expect capital contributions to our subsidiaries for the full year 2009 to be less than the $243 million contributed in 2008.
Recent Acquisitions
On October 31, 2008 we acquired PHP Companies, Inc. (d/b/a Cariten Healthcare), or Cariten, for cash consideration of approximately $256.1 million. The Cariten acquisition increased our presence in eastern Tennessee, adding approximately 49,700 commercial fully-insured members, 21,600 commercial ASO members, and 46,900 Medicare HMO members. This acquisition also added approximately 85,700 Medicaid ASO members under a contract which expired on December 31, 2008 and was not renewed.
On August 29, 2008, we acquired Metcare Health Plans, Inc., or Metcare, for cash consideration of approximately $14.9 million. The acquisition expanded our Medicare HMO membership in central Florida, adding approximately 7,300 members.
On May 22, 2008, we acquired OSF Health Plans, Inc., or OSF, a managed care company serving both Medicare and commercial members in central Illinois, for cash consideration of approximately $87.3 million. This acquisition expanded our presence in Illinois, broadening our ability to serve multi-location employers with a wider range of products, including our specialty offerings. The acquisition added approximately 33,400 commercial fully-insured members, 29,700 commercial ASO members, and 14,000 Medicare HMO and PPO members.
On April 30, 2008, we acquired UnitedHealth Group's Las Vegas, Nevada individual SecureHorizons Medicare Advantage HMO business, or SecureHorizons, for cash consideration of approximately $185.3 million, plus subsidiary capital and surplus requirements of $40 million. The acquisition expanded our presence in the Las Vegas market, adding approximately 26,700 Medicare HMO members.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued two FASB Staff Positions, or FSPs, to address concerns about (1) measuring the fair value of financial instruments when the markets become inactive and quoted prices may reflect distressed transactions and (2) recording impairment charges on investments in debt securities. The FASB also issued a third FSP to require disclosures of fair values of certain financial instruments in interim financial statements.
FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, provides additional guidance to highlight and expand on the factors that should be considered in estimating fair value when there has been a significant decrease in market activity for a financial asset. This FSP also requires new disclosures relating to fair value measurement inputs and valuation techniques (including changes in inputs and valuation techniques).
FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, changed (1) the trigger for determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists and (2) the amount of an impairment charge to be recorded in earnings. To determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists, an entity is required to assess the likelihood of selling a security prior to recovering its cost basis. This is a change from the previous requirement for an entity to assess whether it had the intent and ability to hold a security to recovery or maturity. This FSP also expands and increases the frequency of existing disclosure about other-than-temporary impairments and requires new disclosures of the significant inputs used in determining a credit loss, as well as a rollforward of that amount each period.
FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, increases the frequency of fair value disclosures from annual to quarterly to provide financial statement users with more timely information about the effects of current market conditions on their financial instruments.
We adopted these FSPs for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Refer to Note 4, Note 5 and Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report for disclosures related to these FSPs.
In May 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events, or SFAS 165, which establishes general standards of accounting for disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The standard is based on the same principles that currently exist in the auditing standards. SFAS 165 requires disclosure of the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and for certain nonrecognized subsequent events, the nature of the event and an estimate of its financial effect or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. We adopted SFAS 165 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Refer to Note 15 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report for the related disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or SFAS 168. The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (ASC) is the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB and supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All ASC content carries the same level of authority and anything outside of the ASC is nonauthoritative. SFAS 168 is effective for us beginning with our third quarter 2009 condensed consolidated financial statements. The adoption of this standard in the third quarter of 2009 will change the way we reference accounting standards in our disclosures.
Comparison of Results of Operations for 2009 and 2008
The following discussion primarily deals with our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009, or the 2009 quarter, the three months ended June 30, 2008, or the 2008 quarter, the six months ended June 30, 2009, or the 2009 period, and the six months ended June 30, 2008, or the 2008 period.
The following table presents certain financial data for our two segments:
For the three months ended June 30, Change
2009 2008 Dollars Percentage
(in thousands, except ratios)
Premium revenues:
Medicare Advantage $ 4,145,129 $ 3,491,824 $ 653,305 18.7 %
Medicare stand-alone PDP 638,813 905,071 (266,258 ) (29.4 )%
Total Medicare 4,783,942 4,396,895 387,047 8.8 %
Military services 924,308 806,976 117,332 14.5 %
Medicaid 160,529 141,976 18,553 13.1 %
Total Government 5,868,779 5,345,847 522,932 9.8 %
Fully-insured 1,544,093 1,526,026 18,067 1.2 %
Specialty 229,655 234,879 (5,224 ) (2.2 )%
Total Commercial 1,773,748 1,760,905 12,843 0.7 %
Total $ 7,642,527 $ 7,106,752 $ 535,775 7.5 %
Administrative services fees:
Government $ 23,155 $ 19,456 $ 3,699 19.0 %
Commercial 95,539 93,508 2,031 2.2 %
Total $ 118,694 $ 112,964 $ 5,730 5.1 %
Income before income taxes:
Government $ 404,675 $ 249,449 $ 155,226 62.2 %
Commercial 35,275 75,565 (40,290 ) (53.3 )%
Total $ 439,950 $ 325,014 $ 114,936 35.4 %
Benefit ratios (a):
Government 84.1 % 86.3 % (2.2 )%
Commercial 80.8 % 81.0 % (0.2 )%
Total 83.3 % 85.0 % (1.7 )%
SG&A expense ratios (b):
Government 9.3 % 9.5 % (0.2 )%
Commercial 23.5 % 21.5 % 2.0 %
Total 12.8 % 12.6 % 0.2 %
|
. . . |
|
|