|
Quotes & Info
|
| FPL > SEC Filings for FPL > Form 10-Q on 31-Jul-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
31-Jul-2009
Quarterly Report
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Notes contained herein and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Management's Discussion) appearing in the 2008 Form 10-K for FPL Group and FPL. The results of operations for an interim period generally will not give a true indication of results for the year. In the following discussion, all comparisons are with the corresponding items in the prior year period.
Results of Operations
FPL Group and NextEra Energy Resources segregate into two categories unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses on energy derivative transactions which are used to manage commodity price risk. The first category, referred to as trading activities, represents the net unrealized effect of actively traded positions entered into to take advantage of market price movements and to optimize the value of generation assets and related contracts. The second category, referred to as non-qualifying hedges, represents the net unrealized effect of derivative transactions entered into as economic hedges but which do not qualify for hedge accounting and the ineffective portion of transactions accounted for as cash flow hedges. At FPL, substantially all changes in the fair value of energy derivative transactions are deferred as a regulatory asset or liability until the contracts are settled, and, upon settlement, any gains or losses are passed through the fuel clause or the capacity clause.
FPL Group's management uses earnings excluding certain items (adjusted earnings) internally for financial planning, for analysis of performance, for reporting of results to the Board of Directors and as inputs in determining whether performance targets are met for performance-based compensation under FPL Group's employee incentive compensation plans. FPL Group also uses adjusted earnings when communicating its earnings outlook to investors. Adjusted earnings exclude the unrealized mark-to-market effect of non-qualifying hedges and other than temporary impairment (OTTI) losses on securities held in NextEra Energy Resources' nuclear decommissioning funds, net of the reversal of previously recognized OTTI losses on securities sold and losses on securities where price recovery was deemed unlikely (collectively, OTTI reversals). FPL Group's management believes adjusted earnings provide a more meaningful representation of the company's fundamental earnings power. Although the excluded amounts are properly included in the determination of net income in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, management believes that the amount and/or nature of such items make period to period comparisons of operations difficult and potentially confusing. Adjusted earnings does not represent a substitute for net income, as prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
In March 2009, FPL, certain subsidiaries of NextEra Energy Resources and certain nuclear plant joint owners signed a settlement agreement (spent fuel settlement agreement) with the U.S. Government agreeing to dismiss with prejudice lawsuits filed against the U.S. Government seeking damages caused by the U.S. Department of Energy's failure to dispose of spent nuclear fuel from FPL's and NextEra Energy Resources' nuclear plants. As a result of the spent fuel settlement agreement, in the first quarter of 2009 FPL Group reduced its property, plant and equipment balances by $107 million ($83 million for FPL) and operating expenses by $15 million ($12 million for FPL) and increased operating revenues by $9 million. The spent fuel settlement agreement increased FPL Group's first quarter 2009 net income by approximately $16 million ($9 million for FPL). The amount received from the U.S. Government related to property, plant and equipment is netted against capital expenditures of FPL and independent power investments on FPL's and FPL Group's condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Through June 30, 2009, FPL Group has collected approximately $124 million ($82 million for FPL) of the amount due from the U.S. Government and has paid approximately $23 million ($5 million for FPL) to the joint owners of certain of its nuclear plants. An additional payment of approximately $30 million ($18 million for FPL) from the U.S. Government is pending. FPL and NextEra Energy Resources will continue to pay fees to the U.S. Government's nuclear waste fund.
Summary - Presented below is a summary of net income (loss) by reportable segment (see Note 11):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
Increase Increase
2009 2008 (Decrease) 2009 2008 (Decrease)
(millions)
FPL $ 213 $ 217 $ (4 ) $ 340 $ 325 $ 15
NextEra Energy Resources 186 3 183 438 167 271
Corporate and Other (29 ) (11 ) (18 ) (44 ) (34 ) (10 )
FPL Group Consolidated $ 370 $ 209 $ 161 $ 734 $ 458 $ 276
|
The decrease in FPL's results for the three months ended June 30, 2009 reflects lower retail customer usage partly offset by higher equity component of AFUDC (AFUDC - equity). The increase for the six-month period reflects the spent fuel settlement agreement, lower operations and maintenance (O&M) expenses and higher AFUDC - equity, partly offset by lower retail customer usage.
NextEra Energy Resources' results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 reflect additional earnings from new investments, the convertible ITCs tax benefit in the three-month period and foreign, state and convertible ITCs tax benefits in the six-month period (see Note 5), the absence of planned and unplanned outages at the Seabrook nuclear facility, favorable margins from NextEra Energy Resources' retail energy provider and, for the six-month period, the spent fuel settlement agreement. These results were partially offset by lower results in the remainder of the existing portfolio due to unfavorable market conditions in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) region and lower wind generation due to a lower wind resource this year and a particularly strong wind resource last year and, during the six-month period, a refueling outage at the Duane Arnold nuclear facility. In addition, interest expense and administrative and general expenses for the three- and six-month periods were higher to support growth of the business. FPL Group's and NextEra Energy Resources' net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 reflects net unrealized mark-to-market after-tax losses from non-qualifying hedges of $31 million while in the prior period net income reflects $157 million of such losses. FPL Group's and NextEra Energy Resources' net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects net unrealized mark-to-market after-tax losses from non-qualifying hedges of $1 million while in the prior period net income reflects $209 million of such losses. The change in unrealized mark-to-market activity is primarily attributable to changes in forward power and natural gas prices, as well as the reversal of previously recognized unrealized mark-to-market gains/losses as the underlying transactions are realized. As a general rule, a gain (loss) in the non-qualifying hedge category is offset by decreases (increases) in the fair value of related physical asset positions in the portfolio or contracts, which are not marked to market under generally accepted accounting principles. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, NextEra Energy Resources recorded $9 million of after-tax OTTI losses on securities held in NextEra Energy Resources' nuclear decommissioning funds. There were no OTTI reversals for the three months ended June 30, 2009 or 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, NextEra Energy Resources recorded $31 million and $12 million, respectively, of after-tax OTTI losses on securities held in NextEra Energy Resources' nuclear decommissioning funds. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, NextEra Energy Resources had approximately $2 million of after-tax OTTI reversals; there were no such OTTI reversals for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The decline in results for Corporate and Other in the 2009 periods is primarily due to consolidating income tax adjustments.
FPL - FPL's net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $213 million and $217 million, respectively, a decrease of $4 million. FPL's net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $340 million and $325 million, respectively, an increase of $15 million. The decrease for the three-month period reflects lower retail customer usage partly offset by higher AFUDC - equity. The increase for the six-month period reflects the spent fuel settlement agreement, lower O&M expenses and higher AFUDC - equity, partly offset by lower retail customer usage.
In March 2009, FPL filed a petition with the FPSC requesting, among other things, a permanent increase in base rates and charges effective January 2010 and an additional permanent base rate increase effective January 2011. To address the addition of FPL's West County Energy Center Unit No. 3 and any subsequent power plant additions, FPL is also requesting FPSC approval to continue the GBRA mechanism previously approved by the FPSC as part of the stipulation and settlement agreement regarding FPL's 2005 base rate case. If approved, the requested permanent base rate increases would increase annual retail base revenues by approximately $1 billion in 2010 and an additional $250 million in 2011. FPL's requested increases are based on a regulatory return on common equity of 12.5% and exclude amounts associated with the proposed extension of the GBRA mechanism and certain proposed cost recovery clause adjustments. FPSC hearings on this base rate proceeding are expected during the third quarter of 2009 and a final decision is expected by the end of 2009. The final decision may approve rates and other terms that are different from those that FPL has requested. The 2005 rate agreement and its provisions will terminate on the date new retail base rates become effective pursuant to an FPSC order. FPL expects that retail base revenues will increase approximately $65 million in 2009 when retail base rates are changed pursuant to the GBRA mechanism to reflect the placements in service of West County Energy Center Unit Nos. 1 and 2, which are expected to occur in the third quarter of 2009 and fourth quarter of 2009, respectively.
FPL's operating revenues consisted of the following:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
(millions)
Retail base $ 966 $ 989 $ 1,759 $ 1,811
Fuel cost recovery 1,422 1,460 2,747 2,791
Other cost recovery clauses and
pass-through costs 429 373 833 707
Other, primarily pole attachment
rentals, transmission and wholesale
sales and customer-related fees 47 49 98 97
Total $ 2,864 $ 2,871 $ 5,437 $ 5,406
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease in the average number of retail customers of 0.3% decreased retail base revenues by approximately $3 million while a 2.5% decrease in usage per retail customer, primarily reflecting factors other than weather conditions, decreased retail base revenues by approximately $20 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease in the average number of retail customers of 0.4% decreased retail base revenues by approximately $7 million while a 3.4% decrease in usage per retail customer, primarily reflecting factors other than weather conditions, decreased retail base revenues by approximately $45 million. The decline FPL experienced in the average number of retail customers in the fourth quarter of 2008 as well as a continued decline in non-weather related retail customer usage, which FPL believes is reflective of the economic slowdown and housing crisis that has affected the country and the state of Florida, has continued into 2009. FPL is unable to predict whether growth in customers and non-weather related customer usage will return to previous trends. The decline in retail customer usage for the six months ended June 30, 2009 also reflects one less day of sales in 2009, as 2008 was a leap year.
Revenues from fuel and other cost recovery clauses and pass-through costs, such as franchise fees, revenue taxes and storm-related surcharges do not significantly affect net income; however, underrecovery or overrecovery of such costs can significantly affect FPL Group's and FPL's operating cash flows. Fluctuations in fuel cost recovery revenues are primarily driven by changes in fuel and energy charges which are included in fuel, purchased power and interchange expense in the condensed consolidated statements of income, as well as by changes in energy sales. Fluctuations in revenues from other cost recovery clauses and pass-through costs are primarily driven by changes in storm-related surcharges, capacity charges, franchise fee costs, the impact of changes in O&M expenses and depreciation expenses on the underlying cost recovery clause, as well as changes in energy sales. Capacity charges and franchise fee costs are included in fuel, purchased power and interchange and taxes other than income taxes, respectively, in the condensed consolidated statements of income.
FPL uses a risk management fuel procurement program which was approved by the FPSC at the program's inception. The FPSC reviews the program activities and results for prudence on an annual basis as part of its annual review of fuel costs. The program is intended to manage fuel price volatility by locking in fuel prices for a portion of FPL's fuel requirements; any resulting gains or losses are passed through the fuel clause. The current regulatory asset for the change in fair value of derivative instruments used in the fuel procurement program amounted to approximately $873 million and $1,109 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The decrease in fuel revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 reflects approximately $58 million attributable to lower energy sales partly offset by approximately $20 million related to a higher average fuel factor. The decrease in fuel revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects approximately $115 million attributable to lower energy sales partly offset by approximately $71 million related to a higher average fuel factor. The increase in revenues from other cost recovery clauses and pass-through costs for both the three- and six-month periods is primarily due to additional revenues associated with the nuclear cost recovery rule.
The major components of FPL's fuel, purchased power and interchange expense are as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
(millions)
Fuel and energy charges during the
period $ 1,433 $ 1,841 $ 2,517 $ 3,078
Net collection of previously deferred
retail fuel costs 1 - 256 -
Net deferral of retail fuel costs - (371 ) - (267 )
Other, primarily capacity charges net of
any capacity deferral 120 128 251 244
Total $ 1,554 $ 1,598 $ 3,024 $ 3,055
|
The decrease in fuel and energy charges for the three months ended June 30, 2009 reflects lower fuel and energy prices of approximately $353 million and $55 million attributable to lower energy sales. The decrease in fuel and energy charges for the six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects lower fuel and energy prices of approximately $455 million and $106 million attributable to lower energy sales. At June 30, 2009, approximately $25 million of retail fuel costs were deferred pending refund to retail customers in a subsequent period. The decrease from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 in deferred clause and franchise expenses and the increase in deferred clause and franchise revenues (current and noncurrent, collectively) on FPL Group's and FPL's condensed consolidated balance sheets totaled approximately $268 million and positively affected FPL Group's and FPL's cash flows from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
FPL's O&M expenses decreased $3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 reflecting lower fossil generation and distribution costs of approximately $4 million and $10 million, respectively, partly offset by higher medical and other employee benefit costs of $13 million and a reserve for ongoing regulatory matters. FPL's O&M expenses decreased $42 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 reflecting lower nuclear, fossil generation and distribution costs of approximately $21 million, $16 million and $22 million, respectively, partly offset by higher medical and other employee benefit costs of $14 million and a reserve for ongoing regulatory matters. The decline in nuclear costs for the six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects a reimbursement of costs expected under the terms of the spent fuel settlement agreement, as well as lower costs related to plant improvement initiatives and refueling and maintenance outages. The decline in fossil generation costs is primarily due to differences in the timing of plant overhauls which are expected to occur later this year. The decline in distribution costs reflects lower support costs and the timing of work activities. Other changes in O&M expenses were primarily driven by pass-through costs which did not significantly affect net income. Management expects O&M expenses in 2009 to exceed the 2008 level, primarily due to the absence of an environmental insurance policy termination which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2008, as well as higher expected nuclear, fossil generation, transmission, customer service, information management and other support costs and employee benefit costs.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 increased $66 million and $102 million, respectively, reflecting the amortization of approximately $62 million and $94 million, respectively, of pre-construction costs associated with FPL's planned nuclear units recovered under the nuclear cost recovery rule and higher depreciation on transmission and distribution facilities (collectively, approximately $5 million and $11 million, respectively). For the six months ended June 30, 2009, these increases were partially offset by a reduction in depreciation due to the spent fuel settlement agreement.
The decline in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 is primarily due to a decline in average interest rates of approximately 34 basis points and 40 basis points, respectively, partly offset by higher average debt balances. The decline in interest expense also reflects a higher debt component of AFUDC. The increase in AFUDC - equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 is primarily attributable to additional AFUDC - equity on three natural gas-fired combined-cycle units of approximately 1,220 mw each at FPL's West County Energy Center in western Palm Beach County, Florida. The decline in interest income reflects lower average investment balances and lower average interest rates.
FPL is currently constructing three units at its West County Energy Center, which are expected to be placed in service in the third quarter of 2009, in the fourth quarter of 2009 and in mid-2011, respectively. In addition, FPL is in the process of adding approximately 400 mw of baseload capacity at its existing nuclear units at St. Lucie and Turkey Point, which additional capacity is projected to be placed in service by the end of 2012. In 2008, the FPSC approved FPL's plan to modernize its Cape Canaveral and Riviera power plants to high-efficiency natural gas-fired units. Each modernized plant is expected to provide approximately 1,200 mw of capacity and be placed in service by 2013 and 2014, respectively. Siting Board approval is pending and a decision is expected in early 2010. In April 2009, FPL filed a need petition with the FPSC for an approximately 300-mile underground natural gas pipeline in Florida, which, if approved, is projected to be in service in 2014. The pipeline would supply natural gas to the Cape Canaveral and Riviera power plants following modernization. An FPSC decision is expected in September 2009. The pipeline requires additional approvals from, among others, the Siting Board.
In 2008, the FPSC approved FPL's need petition for two additional nuclear units at its Turkey Point site with projected in-service dates between 2018 and 2020. The two units combined are expected to add approximately 2,200 mw of baseload capacity. Additional approvals from other regulatory agencies will be required later in the process. In 2009, FPL began recovering under the capacity clause, in accordance with the FPSC's nuclear cost recovery rule, pre-construction costs associated with the planned nuclear units and carrying charges (equal to the pretax AFUDC rate) on construction costs associated with the addition of approximately 400 mw of baseload capacity at its existing nuclear units. Substantially all of these costs are subject to a prudence review by the FPSC. The same rule provides for the recovery of construction costs, once the new capacity goes into service, through a base rate increase.
NextEra Energy Resources - NextEra Energy Resources' net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $186 million and $3 million, respectively, an increase of $183 million. NextEra Energy Resources' net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $438 million and $167 million, respectively, an increase of $271 million. The primary drivers, on an after-tax basis, of these increases were as follows:
Increase (Decrease)
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009 June 30, 2009
(millions)
New investments (a) $ 37 $ 96
Existing assets (a) (9 ) (40 )
Full energy and capacity requirements
services and trading 35 29
Asset sale - 3
Interest expense, differential
membership costs and other (15 ) (8 )
Change in unrealized mark-to-market
non-qualifying hedge activity (b) 126 208
Change in OTTI losses on securities held
in nuclear decommissioning funds, net of
OTTI reversals 9 (17 )
Net income increase $ 183 $ 271
|
¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾
(a) Includes PTCs and ITCs on wind projects and ITCs on solar
projects as well as tax benefits from convertible ITCs under the
Recovery Act (see Note 5) but does not include allocation of
interest expense or corporate general and administrative
expenses. Results from new projects are included in new
investments during the first twelve months of operation. A
project's results are included in existing assets beginning with
the thirteenth month of operation.
(b) See Note 2 and discussion above related to derivative
instruments.
The increase in NextEra Energy Resources' results from new investments reflects the addition of over 1,370 mw of wind generation during or after the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. In addition, results from new investments for the three months ended June 30, 2009 include the convertible ITCs tax benefit and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 included state and convertible ITCs tax benefits (see Note 5). Results from NextEra Energy Resources' existing asset portfolio decreased in both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to unfavorable market conditions in the ERCOT region and lower wind generation due to a lower wind resource this year and a particularly strong wind resource last year, and decreased during the six-month period due to a refueling outage at the Duane Arnold nuclear facility. During the three- and six-month periods, these decreased results from the existing asset portfolio were partially offset by the absence of outages at the Seabrook nuclear facility, favorable commodity margins from NextEra Energy Resources' retail energy provider and, in the six-month period, the spent fuel settlement agreement.
NextEra Energy Resources' results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 reflect higher gains from its full energy and capacity requirements services and trading activities. Full energy and capacity requirements services include load-following services, which require the supplier of energy to vary the quantity delivered based on the load demand needs of the customer, as well as various ancillary services.
The asset sale represents the sale of wind development rights in the first quarter of 2009. The increase in interest expense, differential membership costs and other for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects higher interest expense and corporate general and administrative costs due to growth of the business. For the six-month period, these increases were partially offset by the foreign tax benefit (see Note 5).
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, NextEra Energy Resources recorded net unrealized mark-to-market after-tax losses from non-qualifying hedges of approximately $31 million while in the prior period NextEra Energy Resources recorded $157 million of such losses. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, NextEra Energy Resources recorded net unrealized mark-to-market after-tax losses from non-qualifying hedges of approximately $1 million while in the prior period NextEra Energy Resources recorded $209 million of such losses. The change in unrealized mark-to-market activity is primarily attributable to changes in forward power and natural gas prices, as well as the reversal of previously recognized unrealized mark-to-market gains or losses as the underlying transactions were realized. For the three months ended June 30, 2008 NextEra Energy Resources recorded $9 million of after-tax OTTI losses on securities held in NextEra Energy Resources' nuclear decommissioning funds. There were no OTTI reversals for the three months ended June 30, 2009 or 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, NextEra Energy Resources recorded $31 million and $12 million, respectively, of after-tax OTTI losses on securities held in NextEra Energy Resources' nuclear decommissioning funds. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, NextEra Energy Resources had approximately $2 million of . . .
|
|