|
Quotes & Info
|
| AIV > SEC Filings for AIV > Form 10-Q on 31-Jul-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
31-Jul-2009
Quarterly Report
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, as compared to the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, property operating income increased by
1.6% and 3.6%, respectively. Declines in conventional same store property
operating income of 3.9% and 2.2% for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, were more than offset by increases in property operating income related to
our conventional redevelopment properties and affordable properties. In addition
to focusing on property operating expense control, we have also been successful
at reducing corporate general and administrative expenses. During the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009, general and administrative expenses have been
reduced by 34% and 22%, respectively, from the 2008 comparative periods.
Due to turmoil in capital markets, Aimco has focused on reducing refunding risk
by accelerating refinancing of property loans maturing prior to 2012. At the
beginning of the second quarter 2009, property debt maturing during 2009 through
2011 was $621.5 million. During the second quarter, through refinancing,
repayment and property sales, Aimco reduced these maturities by $312.5 million.
As of June 30, 2009, the balance of property debt maturing through 2011 totaled
$309.0 million and was related to 20 loans. Of these loans, refunding risk is
expected to be eliminated by the end of the third quarter 2009 with respect to
all but five loans. The five remaining property loans total $234.5 million and
are expected to be refinanced at maturity in 2011.
Our portfolio management strategy includes property dispositions and
acquisitions aimed at concentrating our portfolio in our target markets, which
are the largest 20 U.S. markets as measured by the total market value of
institutional-grade apartment properties in a particular market (total market
capitalization). We continue to increase our allocation of capital to well
located properties within our target markets and are currently marketing for
sale approximately $2.0 billion of conventional and affordable assets located
primarily outside these target markets. During the six months ended June 30,
2009, we sold 30 properties (including one unconsolidated property), primarily
outside these target markets, for gross proceeds of $374.4 million; proceeds net
of transaction related costs and debt repayments were $125.2 million.
We expect the financial and economic conditions for the remainder of 2009 to
continue to be very difficult and we will continue to evaluate our activities
and organizational structure, and intend to adjust as necessary.
The following discussion and analysis of the results of our operations and
financial condition should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1.
Results of Operations
Overview
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to June 30, 2008
We reported net loss attributable to Aimco of $18.4 million and net loss
attributable to Aimco common stockholders of $29.9 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009, compared to net income attributable to Aimco of
$256.0 million and net income attributable to Aimco common stockholders of
$239.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, decreases of $274.4
million and $269.0 million, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we reported net loss attributable to
Aimco of $43.0 million and net loss attributable to Aimco common stockholders of
$67.6 million, compared to net income attributable to Aimco of $231.3 million
and net income attributable to Aimco common stockholders of $200.9 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2008, decreases of $274.3 million and
$268.5 million, respectively.
These decreases were principally due to the following items, all of which are
discussed in further detail below:
• a decrease in income from discontinued operations, primarily related to
the volume of sales in 2008 and the related number of properties included
in discontinued operations in 2008 as compared to 2009;
• a decrease in asset management and tax credit revenues, primarily due to a reduction in promote income, which is income earned in connection with the disposition of properties owned by our consolidated joint ventures; and
• an increase in depreciation and amortization expense, primarily related to completed redevelopments and capital expenditures.
The effects of these items on our operating results were partially offset by:
• a decrease in earnings allocable to noncontrolling interests, primarily
due to a decrease in gains on sales in 2009 as compared to 2008;
• a decrease in general and administrative expenses, primarily related to reductions in personnel and related expenses from our organizational restructuring initiated during the fourth quarter 2008; and
• an increase in net operating income associated with property operations, primarily related to affordable properties and completed redevelopments.
The following paragraphs discuss these and other items affecting the results of
our operations in more detail.
Business Segment Operating Results
We have two reportable segments: real estate (owning, operating and redeveloping
apartments) and investment management (portfolio strategy, capital allocation,
joint ventures, tax credit syndication, acquisitions, dispositions and other
transaction activities). Our chief operating decision maker, as defined in FASB
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures About Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information, uses various generally accepted
industry financial measures to assess the performance and financial condition of
the business, including: NAV; FFO; AFFO; same store property operating results;
net operating income; Free Cash Flow; Economic Income; financial coverage
ratios; and leverage as shown on our balance sheet. Our chief operating decision
maker emphasizes net operating income as a key measurement of segment profit or
loss. Segment net operating income is generally defined as segment revenues less
direct segment operating expenses.
Real Estate Segment
Our real estate segment involves the ownership and operation of properties that
generate rental and other property-related income through the leasing of
apartment units. Our real estate segment's net operating income also includes
income from property management services performed for unconsolidated
partnerships and unrelated parties.
The following table summarizes our real estate segment's net operating income
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Real estate segment revenues:
Rental and other property revenues $ 320,852 $ 316,970 $ 643,010 $ 633,727
Property management revenues,
primarily from affiliates 1,340 1,415 2,983 3,519
322,192 318,385 645,993 637,246
Real estate segment expenses:
Property operating expenses 142,914 141,213 292,108 294,945
Property management expenses 472 1,254 1,905 2,589
143,386 142,467 294,013 297,534
Real estate segment net operating
income $ 178,806 $ 175,918 $ 351,980 $ 339,712
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008, real estate segment net operating income increased $2.9 million,
or 1.6%. This increase was due to an increase in real estate segment revenues of
$3.8 million, or 1.2%, offset by an increase in real estate segment expenses of
$0.9 million, or 0.6%.
The increase in revenues from our real estate segment during the three months
ended June 30, 2009, was primarily attributed to our conventional redevelopment
and affordable properties. Revenues related to our conventional redevelopment
properties increased by $4.4 million based on more units in service at these
properties in 2009, and revenue related to our affordable properties increased
$3.6 million, primarily due to higher average physical occupancy and rents
during 2009. Revenues related to properties acquired subsequent to June 30, 2008
also resulted in a $1.3 million increase in revenues during 2009. These
increases were partially offset by a $5.4 million, or 2.6%, decrease in revenues
from our conventional same store properties, due to a decrease of 2.1% in
average physical occupancy and lower average rent ($13 per unit).
Real estate segment expenses increased by approximately $0.9 million, or 0.6%,
in the three months ended June 30, 2009. Casualty losses increased by
$2.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to an increase in losses
incurred by our consolidated properties. Expenses related to our conventional
redevelopment properties increased by $0.9 million due to more units in service
at these properties in 2009. These increases were partially offset by a
$1.1 million decrease in property management expenses related to consolidated
properties and a $0.8 million decrease in property management expense related to
our unconsolidated properties, both due primarily to reductions in personnel and
related costs resulting from our organization restructuring (see Note 4 in our
condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1), and a $0.3 million
decrease in expenses related to our conventional same store properties.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008, real estate segment net operating income increased $12.3 million,
or 3.6%. This increase was due to an increase in real estate segment revenues of
$8.8 million, or 1.4%, and a decrease in real estate segment expenses of
$3.5 million, or 1.2%.
The increase in revenues from our real estate segment during the six months
ended June 30, 2009, was primarily attributed to our conventional redevelopment
and affordable properties. Revenues related to our conventional redevelopment
properties increased by $9.2 million based on more units in service at these
properties in 2009, and revenue related to our affordable properties increased
$5.8 million, primarily due to higher average physical occupancy and rents
during 2009. Revenues related to properties acquired subsequent to June 30, 2008
also resulted in a $2.4 million increase in revenues during 2009. These
increases were partially offset by a $7.2 million, or 1.7%, decrease in revenues
from our conventional same store properties, due to a decrease of 1.6% in
average physical occupancy and lower average rent ($6 per unit).
Real estate segment expenses decreased by approximately $3.5 million, or 1.2%,
in the six months ended June 30, 2009. Expenses related to our property
management activities, related to consolidated and unconsolidated properties,
decreased by $2.9 million, due primarily to reductions in personnel and related
costs resulting from our organization restructuring (see Note 4 in our condensed
consolidated financial statements in Item 1). Casualty losses decreased by
$1.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to a decrease in losses incurred by
our consolidated properties during these periods. Expenses related to our
conventional same store properties also decreased by $1.7 million, primarily due
to decreases in marketing expense, contract services and leasing commissions,
partially offset by an increase in property insurance. These decreases were
partially offset by a $2.2 million increase in expenses related to our
conventional redevelopment properties due to more units in service at these
properties in 2009, and increases of $0.5 million and $0.4 million related to
properties acquired subsequent to June 30, 2008 and affordable properties,
respectively.
Investment Management Segment
Our investment management segment includes activities and services related to
our owned portfolio of properties as well as services provided to affiliated
partnerships. Activities and services that fall within investment management
include portfolio strategy, capital allocation, joint ventures, tax credit
syndication, acquisitions, dispositions and other transaction activities. Within
our owned portfolio, we refer to these activities as "Portfolio Management," and
their benefit is seen in property operating results and in investment gains. For
affiliated partnerships, we refer to these activities as "Asset Management," for
which we are separately compensated through fees paid by third party investors.
The expenses of this segment consist primarily of the costs of departments that
perform these activities. These activities are conducted in part by our taxable
subsidiaries, and the related net operating income may be subject to income
taxes.
Transactions occur on varying timetables; thus, the income varies from period to
period. We have affiliated real estate partnerships for which we have identified
a pipeline of transactional opportunities. As a result, we view asset management
fees as a predictable part of our core business strategy. Asset management
revenue includes certain fees that were earned in a prior period, but not
recognized at that time because collectibility was not reasonably assured. Those
fees may be recognized in a subsequent period upon occurrence of a transaction
or a high level of the probability of occurrence of a transaction within
12 months, or improvement in operations that generates sufficient cash to pay
the fees.
The following table summarizes the net operating income from our investment management segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended, Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Asset management and tax credit
revenues $ 13,091 $ 38,175 $ 23,029 $ 51,027
Investment management expenses 4,716 5,807 8,506 10,194
Investment segment net operating
income (1) $ 8,375 $ 32,368 $ 14,523 $ 40,833
|
(1) Excludes
certain items
of income and
expense, which
are included
in our
consolidated
statements of
income in:
other
expenses, net;
interest
income;
interest
expense; gain
on
dispositions
of
unconsolidated
real estate
and other;
income tax
benefit;
income from
discontinued
operations,
and
noncontrolling
interests in
consolidated
real estate
partnerships.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008, net operating income from investment management decreased
$24.0 million. This decrease is primarily attributable to a $25.9 million
decrease in promote income, which is income earned in connection with the
disposition of properties owned by our consolidated joint ventures, partially
offset by a $1.1 million decrease in investment management expenses.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008, net operating income from investment management decreased
$26.3 million. This decrease is primarily attributable to a $30.1 million
decrease in promote income, partially offset by a $0.8 million increase in
revenues associated with our affordable housing tax credit syndication business,
including syndication fees and other revenue earned in connection with these
arrangements, and a $1.7 million decrease in investment management expenses.
Other Operating Expenses (Income)
Depreciation and Amortization
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008, depreciation and amortization increased $16.6 million, or 15.7%.
This increase primarily relates to depreciation for properties acquired
subsequent to June 30, 2008, completed redevelopments and other capital projects
recently placed in service.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008, depreciation and amortization increased $36.3 million, or 17.7%.
This increase primarily relates to depreciation for properties acquired
subsequent to June 30, 2008, completed redevelopments and other capital projects
recently placed in service.
Provision for Operating Real Estate Impairment Losses
Real estate and other long-lived assets to be held and used are stated at cost,
less accumulated depreciation and amortization, unless the carrying amount of
the asset is not recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of a property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of
its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate of the
undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If
the carrying amount exceeds the estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash
flows, we recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds
the estimated fair value of the property.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized impairment
losses of $5.0 million and $5.5 million respectively, related to properties
classified as held for use as of June 30, 2009. We recognized no such impairment
losses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
General and Administrative Expenses
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008, general and administrative expenses decreased $9.2 million, or
33.9%. This decrease is primarily attributable to reductions in personnel and
related expenses associated with our organizational restructuring initiated
during the fourth quarter 2008 (see Note 4 of the condensed consolidated
financial statements in Item 1 for additional information) and reduced incentive
compensation costs.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008, general and administrative expenses decreased $10.4 million, or
21.6%. This decrease is primarily attributable to reductions in personnel and
related expenses.
For the year ending December 31, 2009, we estimate the reductions in personnel
and related expenses associated with our organizational restructuring will
reduce our consolidated general and administrative expenses by approximately
$20.0 million to $30.0 million as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.
Other Expenses, Net
Other expenses, net includes franchise taxes, risk management activities,
partnership administration expenses and certain non-recurring items.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008, other expenses, net decreased by $6.5 million. The decrease is
primarily attributable to a $4.8 million write-off of certain communications
hardware and capitalized costs (see Note 4 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements in Item 1) in 2008, and a net reduction of $3.5 million in
costs related to certain litigation matters.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008, other expenses, net decreased by $11.7 million. The decrease is
primarily attributable to a $4.8 million write-off of certain communications
hardware and capitalized costs (see Note 4 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements in Item 1) in 2008, a net reduction of $3.2 million in
costs related to certain litigation matters, and a $4.5 million reduction in
expenses of our self insurance activities, related to a decrease in casualty
losses on less than wholly owned properties from 2008 to 2009.
Interest Income
Interest income consists primarily of interest on notes receivable from
non-affiliates and unconsolidated real estate partnerships, interest on cash and
restricted cash accounts, and accretion of discounts on certain notes receivable
from unconsolidated real estate partnerships. Transactions that result in
accretion occur infrequently and thus accretion income may vary from period to
period.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008, interest income increased $0.5 million. The increase is primarily
attributable to a $4.1 million adjustment to accretion on certain discounted
notes during the three months ended June 30, 2008, resulting from a change in
the timing and amount of collection. This increase was partially offset by a
$1.5 million decrease in accretion income related to a note receivable for which
we ceased accretion following impairment of the note in 2008 and a decrease of
$1.9 million due to lower interest rates on notes receivable, cash and
restricted cash balances and lower average balances during 2009.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008, interest income decreased $5.7 million. The decrease is primarily
attributable to a decrease of $4.9 million due to lower interest rates on notes
receivable, cash and restricted cash balances and lower average balances, and a
$2.7 million decrease in accretion income related to a note receivable for which
we ceased accretion following impairment of the note in 2008. These decreases
were partially offset by a $2.3 million net adjustment to accretion on certain
discounted notes during the six months ended June 30, 2008, resulting from a
change in the timing and amount of collection.
Interest Expense
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008, interest expense, which includes the amortization of deferred
financing costs, increased by $1.1 million, or 1.2%. Interest expense related to
property loans payable increased by $2.9 million primarily due to increased
pre-payment penalties resulting from increased refinancing activities and
. . .
|
|