|
Quotes & Info
|
| WM > SEC Filings for WM > Form 10-Q on 30-Jul-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
30-Jul-2009
Quarterly Report
In an effort to keep our shareholders and the public informed about our business, we may make "forward-looking statements." Forward-looking statements usually relate to future events and anticipated revenues, earnings, cash flows or other aspects of our operations or operating results. Forward-looking statements generally include statements containing:
• projections about accounting and finances;
• plans and objectives for the future;
• projections or estimates about assumptions relating to our performance; and
• our opinions, views or beliefs about the effects of current or future events, circumstances or performance.
You should view these statements with caution. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, circumstances or events. They are based on the facts and circumstances known to us as of the date the statements are made. All phases of our business are subject to uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which we do not control. Any of these factors, either alone or taken together, could have a material adverse effect on us and could change whether any forward-looking statement ultimately turns out to be true. Additionally, we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of future events, circumstances or developments. The following discussion should be read together with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.
Some of the risks that we face and that could affect our business and financial statements for 2009 and beyond include the following:
• continued volatility and further deterioration in the credit markets, inflation, higher interest rates and other general and local economic conditions may negatively affect the volumes of waste generated, our liquidity, our financing costs and other expenses;
• economic conditions may negatively affect parties with whom we do business, which could result in late payments or the uncollectability of receivables as well as the non-performance of certain agreements, including expected funding under our credit agreement, which could negatively impact our liquidity and results of operations;
• competition may negatively affect our profitability or cash flows, our price increases may have negative effects on volumes, and price roll-backs and lower than average pricing to retain and attract customers may negatively affect our average yield on our collection and disposal business;
• we may be unable to maintain or expand margins if we are unable to control costs or raise prices;
• we may not be able to successfully execute or continue our operational or other margin improvement plans and programs, including: pricing increases; passing on increased costs to our customers; reducing costs; and divesting under-performing assets and purchasing accretive businesses, the failures of which could negatively affect our revenues and margins;
• weather conditions cause our quarter-to-quarter results to fluctuate, and harsh weather or natural disasters may cause us to temporarily shut down operations;
• possible changes in our estimates of costs for site remediation requirements, final capping, closure and post-closure obligations, compliance and regulatory developments may increase our expenses;
• regulations may negatively impact our business by, among other things, restricting our operations, increasing costs of operations or requiring additional capital expenditures;
• climate change legislation, including possible limits on carbon emissions, may negatively impact our results of operations by increasing expenses related to tracking, measuring and reporting our greenhouse gas emissions and increasing operating costs and capital expenditures that may be required to comply with any such legislation;
• if we are unable to obtain and maintain permits needed to open, operate, and/or expand our facilities, our results of operations will be negatively impacted;
• limitations or bans on disposal or transportation of out-of-state, cross-border, or certain categories of waste, as well as mandates on the disposal of waste, can increase our expenses and reduce our revenue;
• fuel price increases or fuel supply shortages may increase our expenses or restrict our ability to operate;
• increased costs or the inability to obtain financial assurance or the inadequacy of our insurance coverages could negatively impact our liquidity and increase our liabilities;
• possible charges as a result of shut-down operations, uncompleted development or expansion projects or other events may negatively affect earnings;
• fluctuations in commodity prices may have negative effects on our operating results;
• trends requiring recycling, waste reduction at the source and prohibiting the disposal of certain types of waste could have negative effects on volumes of waste going to landfills and waste-to-energy facilities;
• efforts by labor unions to organize our employees may increase operating expenses and we may be unable to negotiate acceptable collective bargaining agreements with those who have chosen to be represented by unions, which could lead to labor disruptions, including strikes and lock-outs, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows;
• negative outcomes of litigation or threatened litigation or governmental proceedings may increase our costs, limit our ability to conduct or expand our operations, or limit our ability to execute our business plans and strategies;
• problems with the operation of our current information technology or the development and deployment of new information systems could decrease our efficiencies and increase our costs;
• the adoption of new accounting standards or interpretations may cause fluctuations in reported quarterly results of operations or adversely impact our reported results of operations; and
• we may reduce or permanently eliminate our dividend or share repurchase program, reduce capital spending or cease acquisitions if cash flows are less than we expect and we are not able to obtain capital needed to refinance our debt obligations, including near-term maturities, on acceptable terms.
General
Our principal executive offices are located at 1001 Fannin Street, Suite 4000, Houston, Texas 77002. Our telephone number at that address is (713) 512-6200. Our website address is http://www.wm.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K are all available, free of charge, on our website as soon as practicable after we file the reports with the SEC. Our stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "WMI."
We are the leading provider of integrated waste services in North America. Using our vast network of assets and employees, we provide a comprehensive range of waste management services. Through our subsidiaries we provide collection, transfer, recycling, disposal and waste-to-energy services. In providing these services, we actively pursue projects and initiatives that we believe make a positive difference for our environment, including recovering and processing the methane gas produced naturally by landfills into a renewable energy source. Our customers include commercial, industrial, municipal and residential customers, other waste management companies, electric utilities and governmental entities.
Overview
Our operating results for the second quarter of 2009 have been negatively affected by an economic environment that continues to present challenges. Income from operations in the second quarter of 2009 was $534 million, or 18.1% of revenues, compared with $632 million, or 18.1% of revenues, in the second quarter of 2008. Net income attributable to Waste Management, Inc. was $247 million, or $0.50 per diluted share, for the quarter compared with $318 million, or $0.64 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2008. In order to
meaningfully compare these results, it is important to note that the weakened recycling commodities markets in the current year caused a $59 million decrease in our income from operations and a $0.07 decrease in our diluted earnings per share. In addition, during the second quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $5 million in connection with the current year restructuring and a pre-tax charge of $2 million due to changes in our expectations related to the operating life of a landfill in our Southern Group.
In the second quarter of 2009, our revenues were $3.0 billion compared with $3.5 billion for the second quarter of 2008. Consistent with the first quarter of 2009, over 60% of the decline in our revenues was caused by market conditions that do not relate to our collection and disposal operations; specifically, commodity price and demand impacts related to recyclable materials, fuel and energy prices, and foreign currency translation. The remaining decrease in revenues can be attributed to volume declines due to the slowdown in the economy, which is significantly affecting the volumes of our more economically sensitive landfill and industrial collection operations. These revenue declines were partially offset by internal revenue growth from yield in our collection and disposal operations, which increased our second quarter 2009 revenues by $85 million, or 2.4%, reflecting our commitment to pricing even in the current economic environment.
Our operating expenses decreased by $395 million in the second quarter of 2009 as compared with the prior-year period and our operating costs as a percentage of revenues declined from 62.5% in the second quarter of 2008 to 60.5% of revenues in the current period. A significant portion of the decrease in these expenses is due to lower cost of goods sold as a result of the weakened recycling commodities markets, lower direct and indirect fuel costs and lower overall costs due to the decrease in volumes. We were also able to manage our fixed and variable operating costs as volumes declined. Our selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $35 million in the second quarter of 2009 as compared with the prior year, although as a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative costs increased from 10.3% in the second quarter of 2008 to 10.9% in the current period. We have been successful in controlling and lowering many of our selling, general and administrative costs, including labor and related benefits and travel and entertainment, largely as a result of our January 2009 restructuring. However, these cost savings were offset, in part, by increased professional fees due to litigation costs and business development costs for our expansion of waste-to-energy internationally, as well as an increased provision for bad debts due to the economic environment.
As is our practice, we are including free cash flow, which is a non-GAAP measure of liquidity, in our disclosures because we use this measure in the evaluation and management of our business. We also believe it is indicative of our ability to pay our quarterly dividends, repurchase common stock, fund acquisitions and other investments and, in the absence of refinancings, to repay our debt obligations. Free cash flow is not intended to replace "Net cash provided by operating activities," which is the most comparable GAAP measure. However, we believe free cash flow gives investors greater insight into how we view our liquidity. Nonetheless, the use of free cash flow as a liquidity measure has material limitations because it excludes certain expenditures that are required or that we have committed to, such as declared dividend payments and debt service requirements.
We calculate free cash flow as shown in the table below (in millions), which may not be the same as similarly titled measures presented by other companies:
Three Months Six Months
Ended Ended
June 30, June 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 548 $ 570 $ 1,067 $ 1,131
Capital expenditures(a) (258 ) (273 ) (583 ) (486 )
Proceeds from divestitures of businesses (net of cash
divested) and other sales of assets 7 24 12 38
Free cash flow $ 297 $ 321 $ 496 $ 683
|
(a) The increase in capital expenditures when comparing the first six months of 2009 with the prior-year period can generally be attributed to timing differences associated with cash payments for the previous year's fourth quarter accrued capital spending. The remaining increase in capital expenditures is largely due to the purchase of a permitted landfill development project in our Southern Group during the first quarter of 2009.
We believe that our ability to generate over $1 billion in cash flow from operations during the first half of 2009 in spite of this challenging economic environment is an indication of the strength and resilience of our solid waste business. Our continued ability to generate cash flows in line with our expectations has allowed us to continue to make capital investments that are intended to sustain and grow our business. Given the strength of our operating cash flow during the first half of the year and our current expectations for the remainder of 2009, we have decided to resume our share repurchases in the third quarter. We have a solid balance sheet and our operations consistently demonstrate that we can generate strong and consistent cash flows. As a result, during the second half of 2009, we expect to return value to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividends while continuing to make capital investments to sustain and grow our business.
Basis of Presentation of Consolidated and Segment Financial Information
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 157 - In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 157 with respect to non-financial assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis. The application of the fair value framework established by SFAS No. 157 to these fair value measurements did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
SFAS No. 141(R) - In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, which establishes principles for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in the financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. This statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 141(R). The portions of the statement that relate to business combinations completed on or before January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Further, business combinations completed in 2009 have not been material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, to the extent that future business combinations are material, our adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly impact our accounting and reporting for future acquisitions, principally as a result of (i) expanded requirements to value acquired assets, liabilities and contingencies at their fair values when such amounts can be determined; and (ii) the requirement that acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized as a part of the cost of the acquisition.
SFAS No. 160 - In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of ARB No. 51, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The standard also establishes that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. We adopted SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009. The presentation and disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 160, which must be applied retrospectively for all periods presented, have resulted in reclassifications to our prior period consolidated financial information and the remeasurement of our 2008 effective tax rate.
SFAS No. 165 - In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. We have adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 165, which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date and time the financial statements were issued on July 30, 2009. No material subsequent events have occurred since June 30, 2009 that required recognition or disclosure in our current period financial statements.
Reclassifications
Segments - During the first quarter of 2009, we transferred responsibility for the oversight of day-to-day recycling operations at our material recovery facilities and secondary processing facilities to the management teams of our geographic Groups. We believe that by integrating the management of these aspects of our recycling operations with the remainder of our solid waste business we can ensure that we are focusing on maximizing the profitability and return on invested capital of all aspects of our business as well as more efficiently providing comprehensive environmental solutions to our customers. As a result of this operational change, we also changed the way we review the financial results of our geographic Groups. Beginning in 2009, the financial results of our material recovery facilities and secondary processing facilities are included as a component of their respective geographic Group or segment and the financial results of our recycling brokerage business and electronics recycling services are included as part of our "Other" operations. We have reflected the impact of this change for all periods presented to provide financial information that consistently reflects our current approach to managing our geographic Group operations.
New Accounting Pronouncement Pending Adoption
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS No. 167 replaces FIN 46's quantitative-based assessment for determining which enterprise has a controlling interest in a variable interest entity with an approach that is primarily qualitative. This qualitative approach focuses on identifying the enterprise that has (i) the power to direct the activities of the variable interest entity that can most significantly impact the entity's performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 also requires an ongoing assessment of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity rather than a reassessment only upon the occurrence of specific events as currently required by FIN 46. SFAS No. 167 is effective for the Company January 1, 2010. We currently are in the process of assessing the provisions of SFAS No. 167 and have not determined whether the adoption of SFAS No. 167 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
In preparing our financial statements, we make numerous estimates and assumptions that affect the accounting for and recognition and disclosure of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses. We must make these estimates and assumptions because certain information that we use is dependent on future events, cannot be calculated with a high degree of precision from data available or simply cannot be readily calculated based on generally accepted methodologies. In some cases, these estimates are particularly difficult to determine and we must exercise significant judgment. In preparing our financial statements the most difficult, subjective and complex estimates and the assumptions that deal with the greatest amount of uncertainty relate to our accounting for landfills, environmental remediation liabilities, asset impairments and self-insurance reserves and recoveries, as described in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Actual results could differ materially from the estimates and assumptions that we use in the preparation of our financial statements.
Results of Operations
Operating Revenues
We manage and evaluate our operations primarily through our Eastern, Midwest,
Southern, Western, and Wheelabrator (which includes our waste-to-energy
facilities and independent power production plants, or IPPs) Groups. These five
operating Groups are our reportable segments. Shown below (in millions) is the
contribution to revenues during each period provided by our five operating
Groups and our Other waste services:
Three Months Six Months
Ended Ended
June 30, June 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Eastern $ 756 $ 884 $ 1,448 $ 1,681
Midwest 723 881 1,372 1,655
Southern 840 957 1,673 1,889
Western 785 872 1,542 1,706
Wheelabrator 212 225 413 438
Other 146 233 278 464
Intercompany (510 ) (563 ) (964 ) (1,078 )
Total $ 2,952 $ 3,489 $ 5,762 $ 6,755
|
The mix of operating revenues from our major lines of business is reflected in the table below (in millions):
Three Months Six Months
Ended Ended
June 30, June 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Collection $ 1,999 $ 2,237 $ 3,951 $ 4,375
Landfill 663 786 1,263 1,471
Transfer 366 424 687 804
Wheelabrator 212 225 413 438
Recycling 165 324 308 644
Other 57 56 104 101
Intercompany (510 ) (563 ) (964 ) (1,078 )
Total $ 2,952 $ 3,489 $ 5,762 $ 6,755
|
The following table provides details associated with the period-to-period change in revenues (dollars in millions) along with an explanation of the significant components of the current period changes:
Period-to-Period Change Period-to-Period Change
for the Three Months Ended for the Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2009 vs. 2008 2009 vs. 2008
As a% of As a% of As a% of As a% of
Related Total Related Total
Amount Business(a) Company(b) Amount Business(a) Company(b)
Average yield:
Collection, landfill and transfer $ 87 3.2 % 2.5 % $ 171 3.2 % 2.5 %
Waste-to-energy disposal(c) (2 ) (1.8 ) (0.1 ) (2 ) (0.9 ) -
Collection and disposal(c) 85 3.0 2.4 169 3.1 2.5
Recycling commodity (165 ) (48.7 ) (4.8 ) (343 ) (50.8 ) (5.1 )
Electricity(c) (22 ) (25.0 ) (0.6 ) (31 ) (18.1 ) (0.5 )
Fuel surcharges and mandated fees (116 ) (57.1 ) (3.3 ) (180 ) (50.7 ) (2.6 )
Total (218 ) (6.3 ) (6.3 ) (385 ) (5.7 ) (5.7 )
Volume (299 ) (8.6 ) (564 ) (8.4 )
Internal revenue growth (517 ) (14.9 ) (949 ) (14.1 )
Acquisition 21 0.6 44 0.7
Divestitures (13 ) (0.3 ) (25 ) (0.4 )
Foreign currency translation (28 ) (0.8 ) (63 ) (0.9 )
$ (537 ) (15.4 )% $ (993 ) (14.7 )%
|
(a) Calculated by dividing the increase or decrease for the current year period by the prior-year period's related business revenue, adjusted to exclude the impacts of divestitures for the current year period (total of $13 million and $25 million for the three and six-month periods, respectively). The table below summarizes the related business revenues for each prior-year . . .
|
|