|
Quotes & Info
|
| SGMA > SEC Filings for SGMA > Form 10-K on 17-Jul-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
17-Jul-2009
Annual Report
In addition to historical financial information, this discussion of the
business of SigmaTron International, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries
Standard Components de Mexico S.A., and AbleMex S.A. de C.V., SigmaTron
International Trading Co., and its wholly-owned foreign enterprise Wujiang
SigmaTron Electronics Co., Ltd. ("SigmaTron China"), and its procurement branch
SigmaTron Taiwan (collectively the "Company") and other Items in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements concerning the Company's
business or results of operations. Words such as "continue," "anticipate,"
"will," "expect," "believe," "plan," and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the
current expectations of the Company. Because these forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties, the Company's plans, actions and actual results
could differ materially. Such statements should be evaluated in the context of
the risks and uncertainties inherent in the Company's business including the
Company's continued dependence on certain significant customers; the continued
market acceptance of products and services offered by the Company and its
customers; pricing pressures from our customers, suppliers and the market; the
activities of competitors, some of which may have greater financial or other
resources than the Company; the variability of our operating results; the
results of long-lived assets impairment testing; the variability of our
customers' requirements; the availability and cost of necessary components and
materials; the ability of the Company and our customers to keep current with
technological changes within our industries; regulatory compliance; the
continued availability and sufficiency of our credit arrangements; changes in
U.S., Mexican, Chinese or Taiwanese regulations affecting the Company's
business; the current turmoil in the global economy and financial markets; the
stability of the U.S., Mexican, Chinese and Taiwanese economic systems, labor
and political conditions; currency exchange fluctuations; and the ability of the
Company to manage its growth. These and other factors which may affect the
Company's future business and results of operations are identified throughout
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and as risk factors and may be detailed
from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These statements speak as of the date of such filings, and the
Company undertakes no obligation to update such statements in light of future
events or otherwise unless otherwise required by law.
Overview
The Company operates in one business segment as an independent provider of
EMS, which includes printed circuit board assemblies and completely assembled
(box-build) electronic products. In connection with the production of assembled
products, the Company also provides services to its customers, including
(1) automatic and manual assembly and testing of products; (2) material sourcing
and procurement; (3) design,
manufacturing and test engineering support; (4) warehousing and shipment
services; and (5) assistance in obtaining product approval from governmental and
other regulatory bodies. The Company provides these manufacturing services
through an international network of facilities located in the United States,
Mexico, China and Taiwan.
The Company relies on numerous third-party suppliers for components used in
the Company's production process. Certain of these components are available only
from single sources or a limited number of suppliers. In addition, a customer's
specifications may require the Company to obtain components from a single source
or a small number of suppliers. The loss of any such suppliers could have a
material impact on the Company's results of operations, and the Company may be
required to operate at a cost disadvantage compared to competitors who have
greater direct buying power from suppliers. The Company does not enter into
purchase agreements with major or single-source suppliers. The Company believes
that ad-hoc negotiations with its suppliers provides flexibility, given that the
Company's orders are based on the needs of its customers, which constantly
change.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the
Securities and Exchange Commission and listing requirements subsequently adopted
by Nasdaq in response to Sarbanes-Oxley, have required changes in corporate
governance practices, internal control policies and audit committee practices of
public companies. These rules and regulations could also make it more difficult
for us to attract and retain qualified members for our board of directors,
particularly to serve on our audit committee. In addition, if the Company
receives a qualified opinion on the adequacy of its internal control over
financial reporting, shareholders and the Company's lenders could lose
confidence in the reliability of the Company's financial statements. This could
have a material adverse impact on the value of the Company's stock and the
Company's liquidity.
Sales can be a misleading indicator of the Company's financial performance.
Sales levels can vary considerably among customers and products depending on the
type of services (consignment and turnkey) rendered by the Company and the
demand by customers. Consignment orders require the Company to perform
manufacturing services on components and other materials supplied by a customer,
and the Company charges only for its labor, overhead and manufacturing costs,
plus a profit. In the case of turnkey orders, the Company provides, in addition
to manufacturing services, the components and other materials used in assembly.
Turnkey contracts, in general, have a higher dollar volume of sales for each
given assembly, owing to inclusion of the cost of components and other materials
in net sales and cost of goods sold. Variations in the number of turnkey orders
compared to consignment orders can lead to significant fluctuations in the
Company's revenue levels. However, the Company does not believe that such
variations are a meaningful indicator of the Company's gross margins.
Consignment orders accounted for less than 5% of the Company's revenues for the
year ended April 30, 2009.
In the past, the timing and rescheduling of orders have caused the Company to
experience significant quarterly fluctuations in its revenues and earnings, and
the Company expects such fluctuations to continue. The uncertainty associated
with the worldwide economy in general and the United States economy specifically
make forecasting difficult. All of the Company's customer's markets remain
volatile. The Company believes it will continue to see lower revenues and more
volatility until at least the fall of 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies:
Management Estimates and Uncertainties - The preparation of consolidated
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Significant estimates made in preparing the consolidated
financial statements include depreciation and amortization periods, the
allowance for doubtful accounts, reserves for inventory and valuation of
long-lived assets. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates.
Revenue Recognition - Revenues from sales of the Company's electronic
manufacturing services business are recognized when the product is shipped to
the customer. In general, it is the Company's policy to
recognize revenue and related costs when the order has been shipped from our
facilities, which is also the same point that title passes under the terms of
the purchase order except for consignment inventory. Consignment inventory is
shipped from the Company to an independent warehouse for storage or shipped
directly to the customer and stored in a segregated part of the customer's own
facility. Upon the customer's request for inventory, the consignment inventory
is shipped to the customer if the inventory was stored offsite or transferred
from the segregated part of the customer's facility for consumption, or use, by
the customer. The Company recognizes revenue upon such transfer. The Company
does not earn a fee for storing the consignment inventory. The Company generally
provides a 90 day warranty for workmanship only and does not have any
installation, acceptance or sales incentives, although the Company has
negotiated longer warranty terms in certain instances. The Company assembles and
tests assemblies based on customers' specifications. Historically, the amount of
returns for workmanship issues has been de minimis under the Company's standard
or extended warranties. Any returns for workmanship issues received after each
period end are accrued in the respective financial statements.
Inventories - Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
determined by the first-in, first-out method. The Company establishes inventory
reserves for valuation, shrinkage, and excess and obsolete inventory. The
Company records provisions for inventory shrinkage based on historical
experience to account for unmeasured usage or loss. Actual results differing
from these estimates could significantly affect the Company's inventories and
cost of products sold. The Company records provisions for excess and obsolete
inventories for the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated
realizable value based on assumptions about future product demand and market
conditions. Actual product demand or market conditions could be different than
that projected by management.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - The Company reviews its long-lived assets
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An asset is considered
impaired if its carrying amount exceeds the future undiscounted net cash flow
the asset is expected to generate. If such asset is considered to be impaired,
the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles - In December 2007, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
("SFAS") No. 141(R), Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") (805-10-10-1)
"Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141(R)") which replaces SFAS No. 141, "Business
Combinations." The FASB has since codified FASB 141(R) as Accounting Standards
Codification ("ASC") 805-10-10-1. This Statement retains the fundamental
requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (formerly
referred to as purchase method) is to be used for all business combinations and
that an acquirer is identified for each business combination. This Statement
defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more
businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as
of the date that the acquirer achieves control. This Statement requires an
acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquire at the acquisition date, measured at
their fair values. This Statement requires the acquirer to recognize
acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs separately from the business
combination as period expense. This Statement is effective for business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The
Company will implement SFAS No. 141(R) for any business combinations occurring
subsequent to April 30, 2009.
In January 2008, the Company changed the date of its annual goodwill
impairment test from the last day of the fiscal year to the first day of the
fiscal fourth quarter. The impairment test procedures were carried out during
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 and up to the time of the filing of the
Company's Form 10-K for fiscal year 2008, which allowed the Company additional
time to complete the required analysis. The Company believes that the resulting
change in accounting principle related to the annual testing date did not delay,
accelerate or avoid an impairment charge. The Company determined that the change
in accounting principle related to the annual testing date was preferable under
the circumstances and did not result in adjustments to the Company's financial
statements when applied retrospectively. During the fiscal year 2008, the
Company performed its annual goodwill impairment testing and the carrying value
of the Company's reporting unit exceeded the fair value indicating a goodwill
impairment. The Company completed the second step of the goodwill impairment
test used to measure the amount of the impairment loss by comparing the implied
fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the
goodwill. As a result of this
impairment analysis, the Company recorded an impairment charge for the full
amount of goodwill ($9.3 million) during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008.
The impairment was due to continuing customer pricing pressures and uncertain
economic conditions as well as the Company's declining stock price during fiscal
2008.
New Accounting Standards:
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements"
("SFAS 157"), (ASC 820-10-05-1), which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for
the Company beginning on May 1, 2008. In November 2007, the FASB agreed to a
one-year deferral of the effective date of SFAS 157 for all non-financial assets
and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis. There was no significant impact
from adoption of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities on the Company's
financial statements and none are expected when SFAS 157 is adopted for
non-financial assets and liabilities.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 "The Fair Value Options for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities" ("SFAS No. 159"), (ASC 820-10-10-1).
SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and
financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for
which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS
No. 159 was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company did not elect the fair value option pursuant to SFAS 159.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 141(R), Accounting
Standards Codification ("ASC") (805-10-10-1) "Business Combinations" ("SFAS
141(R)") which replaces SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations." The FASB has
since codified FASB 141(R) as Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC")
805-10-10-1. This Statement retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141
that the acquisition method of accounting (formerly referred to as purchase
method) is to be used for all business combinations and that an acquirer is
identified for each business combination. This Statement defines the acquirer as
the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business
combination and establishes the acquisition date as of the date that the
acquirer achieves control. This Statement requires an acquirer to recognize the
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquire at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values. This Statement
requires the acquirer to recognize acquisition-related costs and restructuring
costs separately from the business combination as period expense. This Statement
is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. The Company will implement SFAS No. 141(R) for any business
combinations occurring subsequent to April 30, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin
No. 51" ("SFAS 160"), (ASC 810-10-65-1). SFAS 160 establishes accounting
reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties
other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the
parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent's ownership
interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160 also establishes disclosure requirements
that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and
the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company has determined that SFAS
160 will not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations
and financial condition.
Results of Operations:
FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2009 COMPARED
TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2008
Net sales decreased 20.3% to $133,744,642 in fiscal year 2009 from
$167,810,994 in the prior year. The Company's sales decreased in fiscal year
2009 in the industrial electronics, fitness, telecommunications, life sciences,
appliance, gaming and semiconductor marketplaces as compared to the prior year.
The decrease in revenue for the fiscal year end 2009 is a result of our
customers' decreased demand for product based on
their forecast, which we believe is attributable to the global economic slowdown
and the recent financial crisis. The Company anticipates sales will remain soft
in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and anticipates sales to slowly
increase in late calendar 2009.
The Company's sales in a particular industry are driven by the fluctuating
forecasts and end-market demand of the customers within that industry. Sales to
customers are subject to variations from period to period depending on customer
order terminations, the life cycle of customer products and product transition.
Sales to the Company's five largest customers accounted for 63% of net sales for
fiscal years 2009 and 2008.
Gross profit decreased to $15,974,902 or 11.9% of net sales in fiscal year
2009 compared to $19,563,390 or 11.7% of net sales in the prior year. The
decrease in the Company's gross profit in total dollars is due to decreased
revenue levels and decreased plant capacity utilization. The Company has
continued to lower its cost structure during the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2009 and will continue cost cutting initiatives based on customer's demand for
product. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2009, the Company
reduced its worldwide headcount, through attrition and lay-offs. Further the
Company implemented salary reductions for all non-union U.S. employees beginning
February 2009. There can be no assurance that sales levels or gross margins will
not continue to decrease in future periods.
Selling and administrative expenses decreased in fiscal year 2009 to
$11,591,440 or 8.7% of net sales compared to $12,375,458 or 7.4% of net sales in
fiscal year 2008. The decrease in total dollars is primarily due to a decrease
in sales commissions, insurance expense, amortization expense, bonus expense,
legal fees and other professional fees. This decrease in total dollars was
partially offset by an increase in sales and IT salaries in fiscal year 2009
compared to the prior year. The increase in selling and administrative expenses
as a percent of net sales in fiscal year 2009 is due to the 20% decrease in net
sales.
During fiscal year 2008, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment
testing and the carrying value of the Company's reporting unit exceeded the fair
value indicating a goodwill impairment. The Company completed the second step of
the goodwill impairment test used to measure the amount of impairment loss by
comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the
carrying amount of the goodwill. As a result of this impairment analysis, the
Company recorded an impairment charge for the full amount of goodwill
($9.3 million) during the year ended April 30, 2008. The impairment was due to
continuing customer pricing pressures and uncertain economic conditions as well
as the Company's declining stock price during fiscal 2008.
Interest expense decreased to $1,710,817 in fiscal year 2009 compared to
$2,667,473 in fiscal year 2008. The interest expense decreased due to decreased
borrowings under its revolving credit facility, term loan and capital leases and
lower interest rates. Interest expense for fiscal year 2010 may increase if
interest rates or borrowings increase during fiscal year 2010.
In fiscal year 2009, the income tax expense from operations was $936,278
compared to $1,655,518 in income tax expense in fiscal year 2008. The effective
tax rate for the year ended April 30, 2009 was 32%. The lower effective tax rate
was a result of the tax holiday for the China operation. The Company recorded
income tax expense in fiscal 2008 despite a pre-tax loss due primarily to the
fact that the goodwill impairment charge of $9.3 million related to
non-deductible goodwill which is treated as a permanent difference between book
and tax income (loss).
The Company reported net income of $1,955,847 in fiscal year 2009. Basic and
diluted earnings per share was $0.51 for fiscal year 2009 compared to basic and
diluted loss per share of ($1.69) for the year ended April 30, 2008. Excluding
the goodwill impairment charge, net income was $2,842,109 for fiscal year 2008,
which resulted in diluted earnings per share of $0.74 for fiscal year 2008
compared to $0.51 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009. We believe the
Non-Gaap measure is a meaningful disclosure of the operating performance of the
Company as it is an alternative measure utilized by investors, management and
the Board of Directors. See the following Non-Gaap Reconciliation.
Non-Gaap Reconciliation*
Twelve Months
Ended
April 30, 2008
Income (loss) Reconciliation:
Net income before goodwill impairment $ 2,842,109
Goodwill impairment charge 9,298,945
Net loss ($6,456,836 )
EPS Reconciliation:
Net income per common share - assuming dilution before goodwill
impairment $ 0.74
Goodwill impairment charge ($2.43 )
Net loss per common share - assuming dilution ($1.69 )
Weighted average number of common equivalent shares outstanding -
assuming dilution 3,811,832
|
* A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company's performance, financial position, or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
Operating Activities.
Cash flow provided by operating activities was $10,844,265 for the year ended
April 30, 2009, compared to $4,163,469 for the prior fiscal year. Cash flow
provided by operating activities in fiscal year 2009 was primarily the result of
a $9,944,685 decrease in accounts receivable, a reduction in inventory levels,
the result of the non-cash effect of depreciation and amortization and net
income. Net cash provided by operations in fiscal year 2009 was partially offset
by a $9,190,622 reduction in accounts payable. The decrease in accounts payable
and accounts receivable is due to payments in the ordinary course of business,
coupled with the Company's reduced sales in fiscal year 2009. The decrease in
inventory was the result of our customers' decreased demand for product based on
their forecasts, which we believe is attributable to the global economic
slowdown and financial crisis. The Company's working capital requirements have
decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in sales volume during fiscal
2009.
Cash flow provided by operating activities was $4,163,469 for the year ended
April 30, 2008. Cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result
of net income (excluding the goodwill impairment charge) net of the non-cash
effect of depreciation and amortization and an increase in trade accounts
payable. Trade accounts payable increased due to timing of payment to vendors.
Cash provided by operating activities in 2008 was partially offset by an
increase in accounts receivable of $6,530,677 due to timing of cash receipts
from a significant customer. The Company's inventories increased by $1,774,698.
The primary reason for the increase in inventories was customer safety stock
requirements and the startup of new programs with new and existing customers.
Investing Activities.
During fiscal year 2009, the Company purchased approximately $1,180,000 in
machinery and equipment for various operating facilities. The Company executed a
five year capital lease to finance approximately $360,000 of these acquisitions
in fiscal year 2009. The Company decided to postpone the planned expansion of
the China facility announced in July 2008 in response to the current economic
conditions. The Company anticipates that it will make additional machinery and
equipment purchases in fiscal year 2010 of approximately $2 million.
In fiscal year 2008, the Company purchased approximately $2,400,000 in
machinery and equipment. The Company executed a five year sale lease back
agreement for approximately $615,000 for certain acquisitions made during fiscal
year 2008, which has been treated for accounting purposes as a capital lease.
Financing Activities.
The Company has a revolving credit facility under which the Company may
borrow up to the lesser of (i) $32 million or (ii) an amount equal to the sum of
85% of the receivable borrowing base and the lesser of $16 million or a
percentage of the inventory borrowing base. As of April 30, 2009, $18,746,696
was outstanding under the revolving credit facility. There was approximately
$7.8 million of unused availability under the revolving credit facility as of
April 30, 2009. In June 2008, the Company amended the revolving credit facility
to extend the term of the agreement until September 30, 2010 from September 30,
2009 and to amend certain financial covenants.
. . .
|
|