|
Quotes & Info
|
| KBH > SEC Filings for KBH > Form 10-Q on 10-Jul-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
10-Jul-2009
Quarterly Report
Results of Operations
OVERVIEW
Revenues are generated from our homebuilding operations and our financial
services operations. The following table presents a summary of our results for
the six months and three months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
Six Months Ended May 31, Three Months Ended May 31,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Revenues:
Homebuilding $ 688,666 $ 1,428,402 $ 382,925 $ 637,094
Financial services 3,165 4,887 1,545 1,971
Total $ 691,831 $ 1,433,289 $ 384,470 $ 639,065
Pretax income (loss):
Homebuilding $ (149,211 ) $ (534,159 ) $ (87,938 ) $ (258,342 )
Financial services 6,056 10,957 4,355 3,012
Total pretax loss (143,155 ) (523,202 ) (83,583 ) (255,330 )
Income tax benefit (expense) 6,700 (900 ) 5,200 (600 )
Net loss $ (136,455 ) $ (524,102 ) $ (78,383 ) $ (255,930 )
Basic and diluted loss per share $ (1.78 ) $ (6.77 ) $ (1.03 ) $ (3.30 )
|
Operating conditions remained turbulent throughout the second quarter of 2009,
the result of both the prolonged housing market downturn and the broader-based
economic recession. As in the first quarter of 2009, a general oversupply of new
and resale homes, rising foreclosure activity, and tight mortgage lending
standards continued to exert downward pressure on home selling prices and land
values, and job market weakness constrained consumer demand for housing. At the
same time, however, historically low home prices compared to median income
levels and low interest rates pushed housing affordability to an all-time high
in the second quarter of 2009 and there are indications that this may be
moderating the imbalance of supply and demand in certain housing markets. In
certain of our served markets during the second quarter, overall inventory
levels fell, prices began to show signs of stabilizing and consumer confidence
rose. Against these mixed market signals, we experienced lower year-over-year
revenues, homes delivered and net orders in the 2009 second quarter, but
narrowed our net loss for the quarter considerably from the year-earlier
quarter. These results reflect the actions we have taken in pursuit of our three
primary strategic goals: generating cash and maintaining a strong balance sheet;
restoring our homebuilding operations to profitability; and positioning our
business to capitalize on an eventual housing market recovery when it occurs.
The timing of a sustained housing market recovery remains uncertain, however,
and we cannot predict whether or to what extent any of the positive trends in
the second quarter will continue for the third and fourth quarters of 2009.
Looking forward, we currently anticipate that continued difficult market
conditions will result in our reporting a lower number of homes delivered and
lower revenues on a year-over-year basis through the remainder of our 2009
fiscal year.
Our total revenues of $384.5 million for the quarter ended May 31, 2009
decreased 40% from $639.1 million for the quarter ended May 31, 2008, due to a
decline in housing revenues. Housing revenues totaled $380.8 million in the
second quarter of 2009, down 40% from $636.7 million in the year-earlier
quarter, due to a 37% decrease in homes delivered and a 5% decline in the
average selling price. We use the term "home" in this discussion and analysis to
refer to a single-family residence, whether it is a single-family home or other
type of residential property. We delivered 1,761 homes at an average selling
price of $216,200 in the second quarter of 2009 compared with 2,810 homes
delivered at an average selling price of $226,600 in the second quarter of 2008.
Each of our homebuilding segments experienced year-over-year decreases in both
homes delivered and average selling prices during the second quarter.
The number of homes we delivered in the second quarter of 2009 decreased from
the year-earlier quarter, mainly due to a 38% reduction in the number of active
communities we operated. "Active communities" are those that deliver five or
more homes in a particular reporting period. We have strategically reduced our
overall active community count over the past several quarters to align our
business operations with the significantly reduced home sales activity we have
experienced relative to the peak levels of a few years ago. We have done this
primarily by exiting underperforming markets, operating fewer communities in
weaker markets and curtailing land acquisitions and development activities. As a
result of these efforts, our inventory balance of $1.89 billion at May 31, 2009
was 27% lower than the $2.61 billion balance at May 31, 2008. Our ongoing
strategic transition to the new The Open Series™product line, which is described
further below under "Outlook," also contributed to our lower year-over-year
active community count in the second quarter of 2009 as it temporarily reduced
the number of homes delivered in some transitioning communities.
Our average selling prices declined in the second quarter of 2009 relative to
the year-earlier quarter due to targeted price reductions we implemented in
response to intense competition, and to our roll-out of product at lower price
points compared to our pre-existing product.
Included in our total revenues were financial services revenues of $1.6 million
in the three months ended May 31, 2009 and $2.0 million in the three months
ended May 31, 2008. Financial services revenues decreased in the second quarter
of 2009 primarily due to the lower number of homes we delivered in the period
compared to a year ago, which reduced the title and insurance services revenue
generated by our financial services segment.
We generated a net loss of $78.4 million, or $1.03 per diluted share, for the
three months ended May 31, 2009, compared to a net loss of $255.9 million, or
$3.30 per diluted share, for the year-earlier period. The improvement in our
financial results reflected a significant reduction in our total charges for
inventory and joint venture impairments and land option contract abandonments,
an increase in our housing gross profit margin, and lower selling, general and
administrative expenses. Our net loss for the quarter ended May 31, 2009
included pretax, noncash charges of $49.5 million for inventory and joint
venture impairments and land option contract abandonments. In the year-earlier
quarter, our net loss included $176.5 million of similar charges, as well as a
$24.6 million goodwill impairment charge. Our housing gross profit margin,
excluding inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges,
improved year-over-year to 12.7% from 8.7%, mainly due to our ongoing
implementation of initiatives to roll-out more cost-effective product, reduce
direct construction costs and increase operating efficiencies, consistent with
the principles of our KBnxt operational business model. Our selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased 39% to $72.6 million in the second quarter of
2009, down from $119.1 million in the year-earlier quarter, reflecting the
operational consolidations and workforce reductions that we have implemented
over the past several quarters to reduce our overhead costs.
For the six months ended May 31, 2009, our Company-wide revenues totaled
$691.8 million, down 52% from $1.43 billion for the six months ended May 31,
2008. Included in our total revenues were financial services revenues of
$3.2 million in the first six months of 2009 and $4.9 million in the
year-earlier period. Our net loss for the six months ended May 31, 2009 totaled
$136.5 million, or $1.78 per diluted share, including pretax, noncash charges of
$81.8 million for inventory and joint venture impairments and land option
contract abandonments, and an after-tax $54.4 million valuation allowance charge
against net deferred tax assets to fully reserve the tax benefits generated from
our pretax loss in the period. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, we
reported a net loss of $524.1 million, or $6.77 per diluted share, including
pretax, noncash charges of $400.5 million for inventory and joint venture
impairments and land option contract abandonments, and $24.6 million for
goodwill impairment, and an after-tax $198.9 million valuation charge against
the net deferred tax assets generated during the period.
Consistent with our operational goal of maintaining a strong cash position and
balance sheet, we ended the 2009 second quarter with $1.10 billion of cash and
cash equivalents and restricted cash, no cash borrowings under the Credit
Facility and no public debt maturities until 2011. Our debt balance at May 31,
2009 was $1.71 billion, down $229.8 million from the end of our 2008 fiscal
year, mainly due to the maturity and repayment of our $200 Million Senior
Subordinated Notes on December 15, 2008.
Our backlog at May 31, 2009 comprised of 3,804 new home orders, representing
projected future housing revenues of approximately $796.9 million, compared to a
backlog at May 31, 2008 of 6,233 new home orders representing potential future
housing revenues of approximately $1.47 billion. Our lower backlog at the end of
the second quarter of 2009 compared to the year-earlier quarter primarily
reflected lower inventory levels, a lower active community count, lower net
orders and lower average selling prices.
Our homebuilding operations generated 2,910 net orders in the second quarter of
2009, down 31% from 4,200 net orders in the year-earlier quarter. However, our
net orders rose 59% from the 1,827 net orders generated in the first quarter of
2009. This sequential increase reflected a seasonal increase in demand and
strong sales of the new The Open Series product in communities where we have
introduced it. The positive response we have received to The Open Series in the
first six months of 2009 has exceeded our preliminary internal expectations, and
we believe the sales momentum generated by this product will help us achieve
favorable year-over-year net order comparisons in the third and fourth quarters
of 2009. As a percentage of gross orders, our second-quarter cancellation rate
improved to 20% from 28% in the first quarter of 2009 and 27% in the second
quarter of 2008. Our cancellation rates as a percentage of gross orders improved
in each of our homebuilding segments in the second quarter of 2009. As a
percentage of beginning backlog, the cancellation rate also improved to 27% in
the second quarter of 2009 from 31% in the first quarter of 2009 and 33% in the
second quarter of 2008.
HOMEBUILDING
We have grouped our homebuilding activities into four reportable segments, which
we refer to as West Coast, Southwest, Central and Southeast. As of May 31, 2009,
these segments consisted of ongoing operations located in the following states:
West Coast - California; Southwest - Arizona and Nevada; Central - Colorado and
Texas; and Southeast - Florida, North Carolina and South Carolina.
The following table presents a summary of certain financial and operational data
for our homebuilding operations (dollars in thousands, except average selling
price):
Six Months Ended May 31, Three Months Ended May 31,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Revenues:
Housing $ 685,260 $ 1,363,433 $ 380,806 $ 636,719
Land 3,406 64,969 2,119 375
Total 688,666 1,428,402 382,925 637,094
Costs and expenses:
Construction and land costs
Housing 662,876 1,520,091 373,453 748,098
Land 4,892 148,390 3,357 7,742
Total 667,768 1,668,481 376,810 755,840
Selling, general and administrative
expenses 133,769 246,703 72,594 119,065
Goodwill impairment - 24,570 - 24,570
Total 801,537 1,939,754 449,404 899,475
Operating loss $ (112,871 ) $ (511,352 ) $ (66,479 ) $ (262,381 )
Homes delivered 3,206 5,738 1,761 2,810
Average selling price $ 213,700 $ 237,600 $ 216,200 $ 226,600
Housing gross margin 3.3 % -11.5 % 1.9 % -17.5 %
Selling, general and administrative
expenses as a percent of housing
revenues 19.5 % 18.1 % 19.1 % 18.7 %
Operating loss as a percent of
homebuilding revenues -16.4 % -35.8 % -17.4 % -41.2 %
|
The following tables present homes delivered, net orders and cancellation rates (based on gross orders) by reporting segment and with respect to our unconsolidated joint ventures for the three-month and six-month periods ended May 31, 2009 and 2008, and ending backlog at May 31, 2009 and 2008:
Three Months Ended May 31,
Homes Delivered Net Orders Cancellation Rates
Segment 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008
West Coast 569 603 928 977 16 % 29 %
Southwest 241 534 359 760 18 21
Central 525 863 1,048 964 20 31
Southeast 426 810 575 1,499 26 26
Total 1,761 2,810 2,910 4,200 20 % 27 %
Unconsolidated joint
ventures 55 74 45 131 31 % 24 %
Six Months Ended May 31,
Homes Delivered Net Orders Cancellation Rates
Segment 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008
West Coast 920 1,217 1,387 1,516 20 % 34 %
Southwest 508 1,274 581 946 22 32
Central 972 1,762 1,670 1,195 23 45
Southeast 806 1,485 1,099 1,992 27 34
Total 3,206 5,738 4,737 5,649 23 % 36 %
Unconsolidated joint
ventures 78 149 73 179 39 % 31 %
May 31,
Backlog - Value
Backlog - Homes (In Thousands)
Segment 2009 2008 2009 2008
West Coast 1,048 1,489 $ 334,600 $ 516,073
Southwest 421 978 72,429 222,279
Central (a) 1,419 1,444 228,723 260,404
Southeast 916 2,322 161,104 467,141
Total 3,804 6,233 $ 796,856 $ 1,465,897
Unconsolidated joint ventures 62 239 $ 24,118 $ 101,748
|
(a) The ending backlog amounts at May 31, 2009 have been adjusted to reflect the consolidation of a previously unconsolidated joint venture in the second quarter of 2009.
Revenues. Homebuilding revenues decreased by $254.2 million, or 40%, to $382.9 million in the three months ended May 31, 2009 from $637.1 million in the year-earlier quarter, due to a decrease in housing revenues. Housing revenues of $380.8 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009 decreased by $255.9 million, or 40%, from $636.7 million in the year-earlier quarter, due to a 37% decrease in homes delivered and a 5% decline in the average selling price. We delivered 1,761 homes in the second quarter of 2009, down from 2,810 homes delivered in the year-earlier quarter, largely due to a 38% reduction in our active community count. We have strategically reduced our community count over the past several quarters to align our business operations with the significantly reduced home sales activity we have experienced relative to the peak levels of a few years ago. We expect our lower active community count to reduce the number of homes
we deliver and the amount of revenues we generate from our housing operations on
a year-over-year basis for the remainder of our 2009 fiscal year.
Our overall average selling price of $216,200 for the three months ended May 31,
2009 decreased from $226,600 in the year-earlier period. Year-over-year, average
selling prices declined 4% in our West Coast segment, 23% in our Southwest
segment, 8% in our Central segment and 15% in our Southeast segment, due to
downward pricing pressures. These pressures included - to varying degrees
depending on local market circumstances - difficult economic and job market
conditions, intense competition from homebuilders and sellers of existing and
foreclosed homes, and our roll-out of product at lower price points compared to
pre-existing product to meet consumer demand for more affordable homes. We
expect our overall average selling price to decrease further in 2009 as these
downward pricing pressures are likely to continue.
Homebuilding revenues for the six months ended May 31, 2009 decreased by
$739.7 million, or 52%, to $688.6 million from $1.43 billion for the
year-earlier period, due to lower housing and land sale revenues. Housing
revenues for the six months ended May 31, 2009 totaled $685.3 million, down 50%
from $1.36 billion in the year-earlier period, reflecting a 44% decrease in the
number of homes delivered and a 10% decline in our average selling price. Our
total number of homes delivered decreased to 3,206 in the first six months of
2009 from 5,738 in the first six months of 2008, largely due to the reduction in
the number of active communities we operated between periods. Reflecting the
downward pricing pressures described above, our average selling price decreased
to $213,700 in the first six months of 2009 from $237,600 in the corresponding
period of 2008.
Revenues from land sales totaled $2.1 million in the three months ended May 31,
2009, compared to $.4 million in the year-earlier period. For the six months
ended May 31, 2009, revenues from land sales totaled $3.4 million compared to
$65.0 million for the corresponding period of 2008. Generally, land sale
revenues fluctuate with our decisions to maintain or decrease our land ownership
position in certain markets based upon the volume of our holdings, our marketing
strategy, the strength and number of competing developers entering particular
markets at given points in time, the availability of land in markets we serve
and prevailing market conditions. Land sale revenues for the six months ended
May 31, 2009 decreased substantially compared to the six months ended May 31,
2008 as we sold a greater volume of land in the year-earlier period that no
longer fit our marketing strategy, rather than hold it for future development.
Operating Loss. Our homebuilding business generated operating losses of
$66.5 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009 and $262.4 million for the
three months ended May 31, 2008, mainly due to losses from housing operations.
Our homebuilding operating losses represented negative 17.4% of homebuilding
revenues in the second quarter of 2009 and negative 41.2% of homebuilding
revenues in the year-earlier quarter. The homebuilding operating loss improved
on a percentage basis in the three months ended May 31, 2009 compared to the
year-earlier period due to an increase in our housing gross margin, partly
offset by an increase in our selling, general and administrative expenses as a
percent of revenues.
Within our housing operations, the second quarter 2009 operating loss decreased
from the year-earlier quarter, largely due to lower pretax, noncash charges for
inventory impairments and land option contract abandonments, an improved gross
margin and lower selling, general and administrative expenses. Inventory
impairment and land option contract abandonment charges totaled $42.3 million in
the second quarter of 2009, down from $174.4 million in the second quarter of
2008. Of the inventory-related charges recorded in the 2009 second quarter, 68%
related to our West Coast segment, 3% related to our Southwest segment, 4%
related to our Central segment and 25% related to our Southeast segment.
The inventory impairments we recorded in the second quarters of 2009 and 2008
reflected declining asset values in certain markets due to the difficult
economic and housing market conditions in both periods, including a persistent
oversupply of new and resale homes, rising foreclosure activity, heightened
competition for sales, and turmoil and tightening in the consumer mortgage
lending and other credit markets. The charges for land option contract
abandonments reflected our termination of land option contracts on projects that
no longer met our investment standards. Our housing gross margin, including
inventory-related charges, improved 19.4 percentage points to positive 1.9% in
the second quarter of 2009 from negative 17.5% in the year-earlier quarter.
Excluding the inventory-related charges of $41.0 million in the second quarter
of 2009 and $167.1 million in the second quarter of 2008, our housing gross
margin would have been positive 12.7% in 2009 and positive 8.7% in 2008. This
improvement reflects the combined impact of our initiatives to roll-out more
cost-effective product, such as the new The Open Series product line, reduce
direct construction
costs and increase operating efficiencies, consistent with the principles of our
KBnxt operational business model. To a lesser extent, our margins were favorably
impacted by the inventory-related charges we took in prior quarters.
Company-wide land sales generated a loss of $1.2 million in the three months
ended May 31, 2009, including $1.3 million of pretax, noncash impairment charges
related to planned future land sales. In the three months ended May 31, 2008,
land sales produced a loss of $7.4 million, which included $7.3 million of
similar impairment charges.
As of May 31, 2009, the aggregate carrying value of inventory that had been
impacted by pretax, noncash impairment charges was $888.4 million, representing
148 communities and various other land parcels. As of November 30, 2008, the
aggregate carrying value of inventory that had been impacted by pretax, noncash
impairment charges was $1.01 billion, representing 163 communities and various
other land parcels.
Selling, general and administrative expenses in the three months ended May 31,
2009 decreased by $46.5 million, or 39%, to $72.6 million from $119.1 million in
the year-earlier quarter. The year-over-year decrease was driven by the
operational consolidations and workforce reductions we have implemented over the
past several quarters to adjust our operations to the significantly reduced home
sales activity we have experienced relative to the peak levels of a few years
ago. Most of the cost reductions in the second quarter of 2009 were related to
salaries and other payroll-related expenses, stemming from a 42% decrease in our
personnel from the year-earlier quarter. As a percent of housing revenues,
selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 19.1% in the three
months ended May 31, 2009 from 18.7% in the corresponding 2008 period, largely
due to the sharp year-over-year decline in our housing revenues. Our selling,
general and administrative expenses as a percent of housing revenues in the
second quarter of 2009 decreased by one percentage point compared to the first
quarter of 2009. We expect, however, that our selling, general and
administrative expenses as a percent of housing revenues in 2009 will remain
above year-earlier and historical levels in part due to our strategic decision
to maintain an operational platform that can effectively respond to the
long-term growth opportunities that we expect will arise as housing markets
stabilize.
Our homebuilding operations posted operating losses of $112.9 million for the
first six months of 2009 and $511.4 million for the first six months of 2008,
due to losses from both housing operations and land sales. As a percentage of
homebuilding revenues, the operating loss improved to negative 16.4% in the
first six months of 2009 compared to negative 35.8% in the first six months of
2008, largely due to an increase in our housing gross margin to positive 3.3% in
the first six months of 2009 from negative 11.5% for the corresponding period of
2008. Our housing gross margin improved in 2009 primarily due to a decrease in
pretax, noncash charges for inventory impairments and land option contract
abandonments, and the favorable impact of our operational initiatives designed
to reduce direct construction costs and increase operating efficiencies. In the
six months ended May 31, 2009, the housing gross margin reflected $65.7 million
of inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges compared to
$277.4 million of similar charges in the year-earlier period. Company-wide land
sales generated a loss of $1.5 million in the first six months of 2009,
including $1.3 million of impairment charges related to future land sales. In
the first six months of 2008, land sales produced losses of $83.4 million,
including $84.5 million of similar impairment charges.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $112.9 million, or
46%, to $133.8 million in the six months ended May 31, 2009 from $246.7 million
in the corresponding period of 2008. As a percentage of housing revenues,
selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 19.5% in the first six
months of 2009 from 18.1% in the year-earlier period, primarily due to the
substantial year-over-year decline in our housing revenues.
Interest Income. Interest income, which is generated from short-term investments
and mortgages receivable, totaled $1.8 million in the three months ended May 31,
2009 and $9.5 million in the three months ended May 31, 2008. For the six months
ended May 31, 2009, interest income totaled $5.3 million compared to
$22.6 million in the year-earlier period. Generally, increases and decreases in
. . .
|
|