|
Quotes & Info
|
| SRZ > SEC Filings for SRZ > Form 8-K on 30-Jun-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
30-Jun-2009
Other Events
• in addition to corporate governance measures that it already has implemented or is in the process of implementing, the Company has agreed to (1) require independent directors to certify that they are independent under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and to give prompt notification of any changes in their status that would render them no longer independent and (2) implement a minimum two-year vesting period, with appropriate exceptions, for stock option awards to employees. In addition, Paul J. Klaassen, the Company's non-executive chairman, and the Company have agreed that the 700,000 stock options granted to Mr. Klaassen in conjunction with his previous employment agreement executed in September 2000 will be repriced from (a) $8.50 per share, the price set on September 11, 2000 by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board based on the prior day's closing price, to (b) $13.09 per share, the closing price on the business day prior to November 10, 2000, the date on which the Company's full Board approved the terms of the employment agreement; and
• the plaintiffs could apply to the court for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses, with the Company and/or its insurers agreeing to pay the amount awarded not to exceed $1.0 million. (On June 26, 2009, the court approved an award to the plaintiffs of attorneys' fees and expenses totaling $1.0 million, the entire amount of which will be paid by insurance within 10 days.)
As also previously disclosed, the settlement of the District of Columbia stockholder derivative action includes a release that encompasses the claims at issue in the previously disclosed Delaware stockholder derivative lawsuit entitled Young, et al. v. Klaassen, et al. Counsel for the plaintiffs in the Delaware action participated in the negotiated resolution of the District of Columbia action, they will share in the fee award in the District of Columbia action, and they have agreed not to seek an award of fees in the Delaware action. Once the order of dismissal in the District of Columbia action becomes final for purposes of preclusion under Delaware law, the parties have agreed to jointly apply to the Delaware Court of Chancery for an order and final judgment dismissing the Delaware action with prejudice on the grounds that the settlement in the District of Columbia action conclusively resolved the claims in the Delaware action.
|
|