|
Quotes & Info
|
| OESX > SEC Filings for OESX > Form 10-K on 15-Jun-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
15-Jun-2009
Annual Report
You should read the following discussion together with the financial statements, including the related notes, and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See also "Forward-Looking Statements" and Item 1A. "Risk Factors."
Overview
We design, manufacture and implement energy management systems consisting primarily of high-performance, energy-efficient lighting systems, controls and related services.
We currently generate the substantial majority of our revenue from sales of high intensity fluorescent, or HIF, lighting systems and related services to commercial and industrial customers. We typically sell our HIF lighting systems in replacement of our customers' existing high intensity discharge, or HID, fixtures. We call this replacement process a "retrofit." We frequently engage our customer's existing electrical contractor to provide installation and project management services. We also sell our HIF lighting systems on a wholesale basis, principally to electrical contractors and value-added resellers to sell to their own customer bases.
We have sold and installed more than 1,476,000 of our HIF lighting systems in over 4,500 facilities from December 1, 2001 through March 31, 2009. We have sold our products to 115 Fortune 500 companies, many of which have installed our HIF lighting systems in multiple facilities. Our top direct customers by revenue in fiscal 2009 included Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., Kraft Foods Inc., Ben E. Keith Co., SYSCO Corp., Americold Logistics, LLC and U.S. Foodservice.
Our fiscal year ends on March 31. We call our fiscal years ended March 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, "fiscal 2007," "fiscal 2008" and "fiscal 2009," respectively. Our fiscal first quarter ends on June 30, our fiscal second quarter ends on September 30, our fiscal third quarter ends on December 31 and our fiscal fourth quarter ends on March 31.
Because of the current recessed state of the global economy, especially as it relates to capital equipment manufacturers, we expect our first half of fiscal year 2010 to continue to be impacted by lengthened customer sales cycles and sluggish customer capital spending. To address anticipated reduced profitability as a result of the expected slow first half of fiscal year 2010, we have recently implemented $3.2 million of cost reductions. These cost reductions include headcount reductions, work hour reductions and discretionary spending reductions. We believe these cost reduction efforts will better position us for profitability in the back half of fiscal 2010, dependent upon the economic environment.
Despite near-term economic challenges, we remain optimistic about our long-term financial performance. Our long-term optimism is based upon the considerable size of the existing market opportunity for lighting retrofits, the continued development of our new products and product enhancements, the opportunity for our participation in the replacement part aftermarket and the increasing national recognition of the importance of environmental stewardship, including the recent allocation of stimulus funds for energy efficiency projects.
Revenue and Expense Components
Revenue. We sell our energy management products and services directly to commercial and industrial customers, and indirectly to end users through wholesale sales to electrical contractors and value-added resellers. We currently generate the substantial majority of our revenue from sales of HIF lighting systems and related services to commercial and industrial customers. While our services include comprehensive site assessment, site field verification, utility incentive and government subsidy management, engineering design, project management, installation and recycling in connection with our retrofit installations, we separately recognize service revenue only for our installation and recycling services. Except for our installation and recycling services, all other services are completed prior to product shipment and revenue from such services is included in product revenue because evidence of fair value for these services does not exist. In fiscal 2009, we increased our efforts in selling through our contractor and value-added reseller channels with marketing through mass mailings, participating in national trade organizations and providing training to channel partners on our sales methodologies. These wholesale channels
accounted for approximately 40% of our total revenue volume in fiscal 2009 which was an increase from the 25% of total revenues contributed in fiscal 2008. We believe that this growth trend will moderate in fiscal 2010 and our wholesale mix of total revenues will be comparable to our fiscal 2009 mix.
In October 2008, we introduced to the market a new financing program for our customer's purchase of our energy management systems called the Orion Virtual Power Plant ("OVPP"). The OVPP is structured as a supply contract in which we commit to deliver a defined amount of energy savings at a fixed rate over the life of the contract, typically 60 months. We collect payments from our customers on a monthly basis across the delivery period. This program creates a revenue stream, but may lessen near-term revenues as the payments are recognized as revenue on a monthly basis over the life of the contract versus upfront upon product shipment or project completion. However, we do retain the option to sell the payment stream to a third party finance company, as we have done under the terms of our former financing program, in which case the revenue would be recognized at the net present value of the total future payments from the finance company upon completion of the project. The OVPP program was established to assist customers who are interested in purchasing our energy management systems but who have capital expenditure budget limitations. For fiscal 2009, we recognized $33,000 of revenue from completed OVPP contracts. As of March 31, 2009, customers have signed OVPP supply agreements for expected gross revenue streams of $1.5 million. In the future, we expect an increase in the volume of contracts that utilize the OVPP financing program. Our gross margins on OVPP revenues are similar to gross margins achieved on cash sales.
We recognize revenue on product only sales at the time of shipment. For projects consisting of multiple elements of revenue, such as a combination of product sales and services, we separate the project into separate units of accounting based on their relative fair values for revenue recognition purposes. Additionally, the deferral of revenue on a delivered element may be required if such revenue is contingent upon the delivery of the remaining undelivered elements. We recognize revenue at the time of product shipment on product sales and on services completed prior to product shipment. We recognize revenue associated with services provided after product shipment, based on their fair value, when the services are completed and customer acceptance has been received. When other significant obligations or acceptance terms remain after products are delivered, revenue is recognized only after such obligations are fulfilled or acceptance by the customer has occurred.
Our dependence on individual key customers can vary from period to period as a result of the significant size of some of our retrofit and multi-facility roll-out projects. Our top 10 customers accounted for approximately 39%, 46% and 36% of our total revenue for fiscal 2007, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009, respectively. One customer accounted for approximately 17% of our total revenue for fiscal 2008 while no customers accounted for more than 10% of revenue in fiscal 2009. If large retrofit and roll-out projects become a greater component of our total revenue, we may experience more customer concentration in given periods. The loss of, or substantial reduction in sales volume to, any of our significant customers could have a material adverse effect on our total revenue in any given period and may result in significant annual and quarterly revenue variations.
Our level of total revenue for any given period is dependent upon a number of
factors, including (i) the demand for our products and systems, including our
OVPP program; (ii) the number and timing of large retrofit and multi-facility
retrofit, or "roll-out," projects; (iii) the level of our wholesale sales;
(iv) our ability to realize revenue from our services and our OVPP program,
including whether we decide to retain or resell the expected future cash flows
under our OVPP program and the relative timing of the resultant revenue
recognition; (v) market conditions; (vi) our execution of our sales process;
(vii) our ability to compete in a highly competitive market and our ability to
respond successfully to market competition; (viii) the selling price of our
products and services; (ix) changes in capital investment levels by our
customers and prospects; and (x) customer sales cycles. As a result, our total
revenue may be subject to quarterly variations and our total revenue for any
particular fiscal quarter may not be indicative of future results.
Backlog. We define backlog as the total contractual value of all firm orders received for our lighting products and services. Such orders must be evidenced by a signed proposal acceptance or purchase order from the customer. Our backlog does not include OVPP contracts or national contracts that have been negotiated, but we have not yet received a purchase order for the specific location. As of March 31, 2008, we had a backlog of firm purchase orders of approximately $4.4 million. As of March 31, 2009, we had a backlog of firm purchase orders of approximately $2.8 million. We generally expect this level of firm purchase order backlog to be converted into revenue within the
following quarter. Principally, as a result of the continued lengthening of our customer's purchasing decisions because of current recessed economic conditions and related factors, the continued shortening of our installation cycles and the number of projects sold through national and OVPP contracts, a comparison of backlog from period to period is not necessarily meaningful and may not be indicative of actual revenue recognized in future periods.
Cost of Revenue. Our total cost of revenue consists of costs for: (i) raw
materials, including sheet, coiled and specialty reflective aluminum;
(ii) electrical components, including ballasts, power supplies and lamps;
(iii) wages and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation
charges, for our fabricating, coating, assembly, logistics and project
installation service organizations; (iv) manufacturing facilities, including
depreciation on our manufacturing facilities and equipment, taxes, insurance and
utilities; (v) warranty expenses; (vi) installation and integration; and
(vii) shipping and handling. Our cost of aluminum can be subject to commodity
price fluctuations, which we attempt to mitigate with forward fixed-price,
minimum quantity purchase commitments with our suppliers. We also purchase many
of our electrical components through forward purchase contracts. We buy most of
our specialty reflective aluminum from a single supplier, and most of our
ballast and lamp components from a single supplier, although we believe we could
obtain sufficient quantities of these raw materials and components on a price
and quality competitive basis from other suppliers if necessary. Purchases from
our current primary supplier of ballast and lamp components constituted 28% and
19% of our total cost of revenue for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. Our production
labor force is non-union and, as a result, our production labor costs have been
relatively stable. We have been expanding our network of qualified third-party
installers to realize efficiencies in the installation process. Toward the end
of fiscal 2008, we began to vertically integrate some of our processes performed
at outside suppliers to help us better manage delivery lead time, control
process quality and inventory supply. We installed a coating line and acquired
production fabrication equipment. Each of these production items provides us
with additional capacity to continue to support our potential future revenue
growth. We expect that these processes will help to reduce overall unit costs as
the equipment becomes more fully utilized.
Gross Margin. Our gross profit has been and will continue to be, affected by the
relative levels of our total revenue and our total cost of revenue, and as a
result, our gross profit may be subject to quarterly variation. Our gross profit
as a percentage of total revenue, or gross margin, is affected by a number of
factors, including: (i) our mix of large retrofit and multi-facility roll-out
projects with national accounts; (ii) the level of our wholesale sales;
(iii) our realization rate on our billable services; (iv) our project pricing;
(v) our level of warranty claims; (vi) our level of utilization of our
manufacturing facilities and production equipment and related absorption of our
manufacturing overhead costs; (vii) our level of efficiencies in our
manufacturing operations; and (viii) our level of efficiencies from our
subcontracted installation service providers.
Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses consist of: (i) general and administrative expenses; (ii) sales and marketing expenses; and (iii) research and development expenses. Personnel related costs are our largest operating expense. While we have recently focused on reducing our personnel costs and headcount in certain functional areas, we do nonetheless believe that future opportunities within our business remain strong. As a result, we may choose to selectively add to our sales staff based upon opportunities in regional markets.
Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs for:
(i) salaries and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation
charges, related to our executive, finance, human resource, information
technology and operations organizations; (ii) public company costs, including
investor relations and audit; (iii) occupancy expenses; (iv) professional
services fees; (v) technology related costs and amortization; and
(vi) corporate-related travel.
Our sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of costs for: (i) salaries
and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation charges,
related to our sales and marketing organization; (ii) internal and external
sales commissions and bonuses; (iii) travel, lodging and other out-of-pocket
expenses associated with our selling efforts; (iv) marketing programs;
(v) pre-sales costs; and (vi) other related overhead.
Our research and development expenses consist primarily of costs for:
(i) salaries and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation
charges, related to our engineering organization; (ii) payments to consultants;
(iii) the design and development of new energy management products and
enhancements to our existing energy management system; (iv) quality assurance
and testing; and (v) other related overhead. We expense research and development
costs as incurred.
We have been incurring increased general and administrative expenses in connection with our becoming a public company, including increased accounting, audit, investor relations, legal and support services and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance fees and expenses. Additionally, we anticipate our operating expenses to increase in fiscal 2010 as a result of the completion of our new technology center and the related building occupancy costs. We expense all pre-sale costs incurred in connection with our sales process prior to obtaining a purchase order. These pre-sale costs may reduce our net income in a given period prior to recognizing any corresponding revenue. We also intend to continue to invest in our research and development of new and enhanced energy management products and services.
We recognize compensation expense for the fair value of our stock option awards granted over their related vesting period using the modified prospective method of adoption under the provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Prior to fiscal 2007, we accounted for our stock option awards under the intrinsic value method under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and we did not recognize the fair value expense of our stock option awards in our statements of operations, although we did report our pro forma stock option award fair value expense in the footnotes to our financial statements. We recognized $0.4 million, $1.4 million and $1.6 million of stock-based compensation expense in fiscal 2007, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. As a result of prior option grants, including option grants in fiscal 2009, we expect to recognize an additional $4.8 million of stock-based compensation over a weighted average period of approximately six years. These charges have been, and will continue to be, allocated to cost of product revenue, general and administrative expenses, sales and marketing expenses and research and development expenses based on the departments in which the personnel receiving such awards have primary responsibility. A substantial majority of these charges have been, and likely will continue to be, allocated to general and administrative expenses and sales and marketing expenses.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense is comprised primarily of interest expense on outstanding borrowings under long-term debt obligations described under "- Liquidity and Capital Resources - Indebtedness" below, including the amortization of previously incurred financing costs. We amortize deferred financing costs to interest expense over the life of the related debt instrument, ranging from six to fifteen years.
Dividend and Interest Income. Our dividend income consists of dividends paid on preferred shares that we acquired in July 2006. The terms of these preferred shares provided for annual dividend payments to us of $0.1 million. The preferred shares were sold back to the issuer in June 2008 and all dividends accrued were paid upon sale. We also report interest income earned on our cash and cash equivalents and short term investments. For fiscal 2009, our interest income increased as a result of our investment of the net proceeds from our initial public offering in short-term, interest-bearing, money market funds, bank certificate of deposits and investment-grade securities.
Income Taxes. As of March 31, 2009, we had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $4.9 million for federal tax purposes and $4.8 million for state tax purposes. Included in these loss carryforwards were $4.9 million for federal and $3.8 million for state tax purposes of compensation expenses that were associated with the exercise of nonqualified stock options. The benefit from our net operating losses created from these compensation expenses has not yet been recognized in our financial statements and will be accounted for in our shareholders' equity as a credit to additional paid-in capital as the deduction reduces our income taxes payable. We also had federal tax credit carryforwards of approximately $506,000, of which $170,000 are amounts that have not yet been recognized in our financial statements, and state tax credit carryforwards of $473,000, which is net of the valuation allowance of $24,000. Management believes it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefits of most of these assets and has reserved for an allowance due to our state apportioned income and the potential expiration of the state tax credits due to the carryforwards period. These federal and state net operating losses and credit carryforwards are available, subject to the discussion in the following paragraph, to offset future taxable income and, if not utilized, will begin to expire in varying amounts between 2020 and 2029.
Generally, a change of more than 50% in the ownership of a company's stock, by value, over a three year period constitutes an ownership change for federal income tax purposes. An ownership change may limit a company's ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards attributable to the period prior to such change. In fiscal 2007 and prior to our IPO, past issuances and transfers of stock caused an ownership change for certain tax purposes. When certain ownership changes occur, tax laws require that a calculation be made to establish a limitation on the use of
net operating loss carryforwards created in periods prior to such ownership change. For fiscal year 2008, utilization of our federal loss carryforwards was limited to $3.0 million. There was no limitation that occurred for fiscal 2009.
Accretion of Preferred Stock and Preferred Stock Dividends. Our accretion of redeemable preferred stock and preferred stock dividends consisted of accumulated unpaid dividends on our Series A and Series C preferred stock during the periods that such shares were outstanding. The terms of our Series C preferred stock provided for a 6% per annum cumulative dividend unless we completed a qualified initial public offering or sale. As a result, the carrying amount of our Series C preferred stock were increased each period to reflect the accretion of accumulated unpaid dividends. The obligation to pay these accumulated unpaid dividends was extinguished upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock because our IPO constituted a qualified initial public offering under the terms of our Series C preferred stock. The Series C preferred stock automatically converted into common stock upon closing of our IPO, and the carrying amount of our Series C preferred stock, along with accumulated unpaid dividends, was credited to additional paid-in capital at that time. Our Series A preferred stock was issued beginning in fiscal 2000 and provided for a 12% per annum cumulative dividend. Our Series A preferred stock was converted into shares of our common stock in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2007 as described under "- Conversion of Preferred Stock."
Conversion of Preferred Stock. In fiscal 2005, we offered our holders of then outstanding Series A preferred stock the opportunity to convert each of their Series A preferred shares, together with the accumulated unpaid dividends thereon and their other rights and preferences related thereto, into three shares of our common stock. Since the Series A preferred shareholders had the existing right to convert each of their Series A preferred shares into two shares of common stock, we determined that the increase in the conversion ratio from two to three shares of common stock was an inducement offer. As a result, we accounted for the value of the change in this conversion ratio as an increase to additional paid-in capital and a charge to our accumulated deficit at the time of conversion. In fiscal 2005, 648,010 outstanding Series A preferred shares were converted into shares of our common stock. The remaining 20,000 outstanding Series A preferred shares were converted into shares of our common stock on March 31, 2007. The premium amount recorded for the inducement, calculated using the number of additional common shares offered multiplied by the estimated fair market value of our common stock at the time of conversion, was $1.0 million for fiscal 2005 and $83,000 for fiscal 2007.
Participation Rights of Preferred Stock in Undistributed Earnings. Because all series of our preferred stock participate in all undistributed earnings with the common stock, we allocated earnings to the common shareholders and participating preferred shareholders under the two-class method as required by Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128. The two-class method is an earnings allocation method under which basic net income per share is calculated for our common stock and participating preferred stock considering both accrued preferred stock dividends and participation rights in undistributed earnings as if all such earnings had been distributed during the year. Because our participating preferred stock was not contractually required to share in our losses, in applying the two-class method to compute basic net income per common share, we did not make any allocation to our preferred stock if a net loss existed or if an undistributed net loss resulted from reducing net income by the accrued preferred stock dividends. All of our preferred stock was converted automatically into common stock on a one-for-one basis upon the closing of our IPO and we are no longer required to allocate any undistributed earnings to our preferred shareholders.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the line items of our consolidated statements of operations on an absolute dollar basis and as a relative percentage of our revenue for each applicable period, together with the relative percentage change in such line item between applicable comparable periods set forth below:
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2007 2008 2009
% of % of % % of %
Amount Revenue Amount Revenue Change Amount Revenue Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Product revenue $ 40,201 83.4 % $ 65,359 81.0 % 62.6 % $ 63,008 86.7 % (3.6 )%
Service revenue 7,982 16.6 % 15,328 19.0 % 92.0 % 9,626 13.3 % (37.2 )%
Total revenue 48,183 100.0 % 80,687 100.0 % 67.5 % 72,634 100.0 % (10.0 )%
Cost of product revenue 26,511 55.0 % 42,127 52.2 % 58.9 % 42,235 58.1 % 0.3 %
Cost of service revenue 5,976 12.4 % 10,335 12.8 % 73.0 % 6,801 9.4 % (34.2 )%
Total cost of revenue 32,487 67.4 % 52,462 65.0 % 61.5 % 49,036 67.5 % (6.5 )%
Gross profit 15,696 32.6 % 28,225 35.0 % 79.8 % 23,598 32.5 % (16.4 )%
General and administrative expenses 6,162 12.8 % 10,200 12.6 % 65.5 % 10,451 14.4 % 2.5 %
Sales and marketing expenses 6,459 13.4 % 8,832 10.9 % 36.7 % 11,261 15.5 % 27.5 %
Research and development expenses 1,078 2.2 % 1,832 2.3 % 69.9 % 1,942 2.7 % 6.0 %
Income (loss) from operations 1,997 4.1 % 7,361 9.1 % 268.6 % (56 ) (0.1 )% (100.8 )%
Interest expense (1,044 ) 2.2 % (1,390 ) 1.7 % 33.1 % (167 ) 0.2 % (88.0 )%
Dividend and interest income 201 0.4 % 1,189 1.5 % 491.5 % 1,661 2.3 % 39.7 %
. . .
|
|
|