|
Quotes & Info
|
| KMGB > SEC Filings for KMGB > Form 10-Q on 9-Jun-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
9-Jun-2009
Quarterly Report
We manufacture, formulate and distribute specialty chemicals globally. We operate businesses engaged in electronic chemicals, industrial wood preservation chemicals and animal health pesticides. Our electronic chemicals are used in the manufacturing of semiconductors. Our wood preserving chemicals, penta and creosote, are used by our industrial customers primarily to extend the useful life of utility poles and railroad crossties. Our animal health pesticides are used on cattle, other livestock and poultry to protect the animals from flies and other pests.
Results of Operations
Three and Nine Month Periods Ended April 30, 2009 compared with Three and Nine Month Periods Ended April 30, 2008
Segment Data
Segment data is presented for our five reportable segments for the three and
nine month periods ended April 30, 2009 and 2008.
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
April 30, April 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
(Amounts in thousands)
Sales
Electronic Chemicals - North America $ 14,284 $ 20,451 $ 53,027 $ 27,339
Electronic Chemicals - International 2,960 5,662 12,028 7,383
Penta 6,914 5,890 19,883 19,819
Creosote 18,211 14,288 50,249 40,084
Animal Health 3,500 3,968 7,122 8,409
Total sales for reportable segments $ 45,869 $ 50,259 $ 142,309 $ 103,034
|
The segment data should be read with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Net Sales
Net sales decreased $4.4 million, or 8.7%, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 as compared with the same period of the prior year, and for the nine month comparison, net sales increased in fiscal year 2009 by $39.3 million, or 38.1%, to $142.3 million as compared with $103.0 million in fiscal year 2008.
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, the electronic chemicals North America segment had net sales of $14.3 million and the international segment had net sales of $3.0 million, decreases of $6.2 million, or 30.2%, and $2.7 million, or 47.7%, respectively, over the prior year period. For the nine month period in fiscal year 2009, electronic chemicals North America had net sales of $53.0 million and the international segment had net sales of $12.0 million, increases of $25.7 million, or 94.0%, and $4.6 million, or 62.9%, over the same period in fiscal year 2008. We realized lower net sales for the three month ended period as compared to the prior year period as demand softened in both segments beginning in the second quarter from the effect of the economic downturn in the semiconductor industry. Although the nine month period reflected the impact of the economic downturn, sales were higher for the current year period as compared with the prior year because the prior year included only four months of sales since our acquisition of the electronic chemicals business. Although we saw some improvement in the North America segment late in the third quarter, we expect challenging market conditions in our two electronic chemicals segments through the balance of the fiscal year. We are now beginning to experience increased pricing pressure from our customers in electronic chemicals.
Penta net sales increased $1.0 million, or 17.4%, to $6.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 as compared to the prior year period, and for the full nine month period net sales remained relatively flat at $19.9 million. Increased sales for the three month period were due to higher volumes. Creosote net sales increased in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, as compared with the prior year period, by $3.9 million, or 27.5%, to $18.2 million. For the full nine months of fiscal year 2009, creosote net sales were up $10.2 million, or 25.4%, to $50.2 million. Higher prices were partially offset by a small volume decline in the third quarter, while the increase for the full nine months came from higher prices as compared with prior year period. Demand by railroads for crossties treated with creosote held steady in the first nine months near the top of the historical range, despite the current economic uncertainty.
Railroads generally react to lessened rail traffic by slowing maintenance programs, but we continue to believe that sales will be relatively stable in the remainder of the calendar year.
Net sales of animal health pesticides decreased by $468,000, or 11.8%, to $3.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 as compared with the prior year period. Net sales in that segment decreased $1.3 million, or 15.3%, to $7.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 as compared with the prior fiscal year. Seasonal usage of animal health pesticides is dependent on varying seasonal patterns, weather conditions and weather-related pressure from pests, as well as customer marketing programs and requirements. Although energy prices have dropped significantly from recent highs, our farm and livestock customers continue to be impacted by the effect of high costs for feed, fuel, and fertilizer. Additionally, livestock, dairy and poultry markets are under stress from the current economic conditions, and because of that our distributors appear to be reluctant to build inventory of our animal health products in advance of the selling season as they normally would. Our revenue from the animal health pesticides segment is seasonal and weighted to the third and fourth quarters. Revenues from products subject to significant seasonal variations represented less than 10% of our fiscal year 2008 revenues.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased by $271,000, or 1.8%, to $15.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 from $15.1 million in the same quarter of the prior year. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased to 33.5% in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 from 30.0% in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. For the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, gross profit increased $12.6 million, or 39.3%, to $44.6 million from $32.0 million. As a percentage of sales, gross profit was 31.4% in the nine month period in fiscal year 2009 as compared to 31.1% in fiscal year 2008.
Gross profit increased in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 because of the added sales from our electronic chemicals business. Price increases and cost initiatives in electronic chemicals were implemented after we acquired the business, contributing to improved margins in electronic chemicals. Gross profits in our wood treating segment increased for both the three and nine months ended April 30, 2009 while our animal health segment increased for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 but was down for the nine month period as compared with the same periods of the prior year. Approximately 80% of the increase in gross profit in the penta segment was due to higher sales for the third quarter period, while lower costs contributed to a higher gross profit for the nine month ended period. In our creosote segment, the increase in gross profit for the three and nine month periods was due to higher sales price offset in part by higher raw material costs. The decline in gross profit in the animal health segment was due primarily to lower revenues. For the nine month period in fiscal year 2009 gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased in the penta segment but declined in our animal health and creosote segments.
With the decline in oil prices and economic activity, raw material prices have declined. For example, the cost of the solvent used to formulate our penta solutions declined significantly in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 toward 2008 levels, and the cost of other raw materials have declined. We expect to benefit from lower raw material costs for the balance of the fiscal year relative to the prior year. Other companies may include certain of the costs that we record in cost of sales as selling, general and administrative expenses, and may include certain of the costs that we record in selling, general and administrative expenses as a component of cost of sales, resulting in a lack of comparability between our gross profit and that reported by other companies.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased $1.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 to $9.9 million, or 21.6% of net sales, from $11.2 million, or 22.3% of net sales, for the same quarter of the prior fiscal year. In the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $10.6 million to $33.1 million, or 23.3% of net sales, from $22.6 million, or 21.9% of net sales. Selling, general and administrative expenses associated with our two electronic chemicals segments were approximately $6.2 million and $20.3 million for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal year 2009, respectively, and $7.0 million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. Although we discontinued transitional services with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. at the end of September 2008, we incurred substantial costs for transitional services until then, along with fees to consultants assisting in the integration of the business. Those fees were approximately $434,000 for the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. We purchased transitional services from Air Products in the first two months of the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, while at the same time we had built and staffed our post-transition infrastructure so we could complete training and testing. We believe that the redundant infrastructure added approximately $600,000 of additional expense in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009. As part of our effort to reduce costs and inventory, in the third quarter we temporarily curtailed production at our Milan facility. Although that effort had the desired cost-reducing effect, we expensed in the third quarter approximately $655,000 of non-variable manufacturing costs that would normally have been absorbed as part of the cost of inventory.
Outside of electronic chemicals, selling, general and administrative expense was flat in the third quarter and in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 as compared with the prior year periods. Although we incurred greater expenses over the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 to expand our infrastructure supporting the electronic chemicals business, those expenses have been offset by reductions in other areas such as in warehouse costs and the completion of our amortization of certain wood treating intangible assets.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $732,000 in the third quarter and $2.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 as compared with $1.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in the same periods of fiscal year 2008. The increase was due to interest on the substantially larger indebtedness we incurred to fund the acquisition of the electronic chemicals business in fiscal year 2008.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate from continuing operations was 40.5% and 36.7% in the third quarter of fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the nine month period, our effective tax rate was 39.5% in fiscal year 2009 as compared with 37.2% in the prior year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities was $9.0 million and $9.3 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net income adjusted for depreciation and amortization increased cash to $10.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009. Although reductions in accounts receivable trade and other contributed $9.8 million to cash, increases in inventories used $4.2 million of cash in the first nine months of this fiscal year. Approximately 70% of that increase was from our electronic chemicals business and the balance was attributable to our animal health segment. A reduction in accounts payable, primarily attributable to our electronic chemicals business, used $7.1 million in cash in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009.
Net cash used in investing activities in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 was $5.7 million as compared with $71.5 million in the prior year period. We made additions to property, plant and equipment of $2.4 million during the first nine months of fiscal year 2009. Of that amount, approximately $1.4 million of the additions was for our electronic chemicals business, primarily for the purchase of software and shipping containers, and $496,000 was for the purchase of additional land adjacent to our facility in Matamoros. We also spent $2.9 million in the period in connection with the acquisition of the electronic chemicals business to purchase inventory and accounts receivable pertaining to sales in Israel that was owned as of the end of September 2008 by Air Products as our distributor there.
In the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, we made principal payments of $8.1 million on our term loan borrowings, $4.1 million of which went to pay term indebtedness incurred when we purchased the electronic chemicals business. Of the total principal payments in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, $4.0 million was used to pay the principal outstanding on seller-financed indebtedness incurred when we purchased certain penta assets in fiscal year 2006. We prepaid that indebtedness in full in October 2008 from available cash. We had additional net borrowings under our revolving line of $4.8 million in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, and we paid dividends of $665,000. It is our policy to pay dividends from available cash after taking into consideration our profitability, capital requirements, financial condition, growth, business opportunities and other factors which our board of directors may deem relevant.
Working Capital
We have a revolving line of credit under an amended and restated credit agreement. At April 30, 2009, we had borrowed $10.0 million under that revolving facility, and our net borrowing base availability was $20.0 million. Management believes that our current credit facility, combined with cash flows from operations, will adequately provide for our working capital needs for current operations for the next twelve months. We also believe that cash provided by operations in the balance of the fiscal year will allow us to pay off the amount now borrowed under our revolving credit facility by the end of fiscal year 2009. As of May 31, 2009, we had repaid another $5.0 million of our revolving facility, and had only $5.0 million of borrowings outstanding under it.
Long Term Obligations
To finance the acquisition of the electronic chemicals business, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement and a note purchase agreement. The new credit agreement replaced and refinanced our existing credit agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association. The new credit facility included a revolving loan facility of $35.0 million and a term loan facility of $35.0 million. The amended and restated facility was entered into with Wachovia Bank, National Association, Bank of America, N.A., The Prudential Insurance Company of America, and Pruco Life Insurance Company. Advances under the revolving loan and the term loan mature on December 31, 2012. They each bear interest at varying rate of LIBOR plus a margin based on our funded debt to EBITDA.
Ratio of Funded Debt to EBITDA Margin Equal to or greater than 3.0 to 1.0 2.75 % Equal to or greater than 2.5 to 1.0, but less than 3.0 to 1.0 2.50 % Equal to or greater than 2.0 to 1.0, but less than 2.5 to 1.0 2.25 % Equal to or greater than 1.5 to 1.0, but less than 2.0 to 1.0 2.00 % Less than 1.5 to 1.0 1.75 % |
Currently, advances bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.75% but that rate will decrease to LIBOR plus 2.5% based on third quarter-end ratios. Through December 31, 2010 principal payments on the term loan will be $458,333 per month and will then become $666,667 per month for the balance of the term prior to maturity. At April 30, 2009, the amount outstanding on the revolving facility was $10.0 million, and the amount outstanding on the term loan was $27.7 million.
We also entered into a $20.0 million note purchase agreement with the Prudential Insurance Company of America. Advances under the note purchase agreement mature on December 31, 2014, and bear interest at 7.43% per annum. Principal is payable at maturity. At April 30, 2009, $20.0 million was outstanding under the note purchase agreement.
Loans under the amended and restated credit facility and the note purchase agreement are secured by our assets, including inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, intangible assets, and real property. The credit facility and the note purchase agreement have restrictive covenants, including maintaining a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25 to 1 through July 31, 2008 and 1.5 to 1.0 thereafter, and a ratio of funded debt to EBITDA, as amended effective January 30, 2009, of 3.5 to 1.0 through January 31, 2009, 3.25 to 1.0 from February 1, 2009 through April 30, 2009, and 3.0 to 1.0 thereafter. We must also maintain a debt to capitalization ratio of not more than 60% through April 30, 2009, 50% from then until April 30, 2010, and 45% thereafter. For purposes of calculating these financial covenant ratios, we use a pro forma EBITDA, but add back extraordinary or non-recurring expense or loss as may be approved by our lenders. Our lenders have approved adding back approximately $1.0 million in integration costs incurred in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 in connection with our acquisition of the electronic chemicals business. On April 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all our debt covenants.
Our purchase of certain penta assets from Basic Chemical Company in fiscal 2006 was financed in part by a $10.0 million loan from the seller. The indebtedness was payable in five equal annual installments of $2.0 million plus interest at 4% per annum. On October 30, 2008, we prepaid the $4.0 million principal owing on that indebtedness in full.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements, such as financing or unconsolidated variable interest entities.
Recent Accounting Standards
Recent Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted.
In November 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") ratified Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 08-7, "Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets." EITF 08-7 refers to intangible assets acquired in a business combination or asset acquisition that an entity does not intend to actively use but intends to hold as defensive intangible assets to prevent others from obtaining access to them. Historically, these assets have been typically allocated little or no value. EITF 08-7 requires defensive intangible assets to be accounted for as a separate identifiable asset recognized at fair value with an assigned useful life. The effective date of EITF 08-7 is for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will adopt EITF 08-7 on August 1, 2009 and apply the requirements prospectively to intangible assets acquired on or after that date. The impact of adoption on the Company's consolidated financial statements cannot be currently evaluated and will depend on the nature and significance of any future acquisitions.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("FAS") 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets." FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors an entity should consider when developing renewal or extension assumptions for determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets under FAS 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." FSP FAS 142-3 is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of recognized intangible assets under FAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of assets under FAS 141R and other GAAP. The guidance also requires expanded disclosure related to an entity's intangible assets. The guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset shall be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date and the disclosure requirements shall be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years and early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that FSP FAS 142-3 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 141(R), "Business Combinations." FAS 141(R) establishes revised principles and requirements for the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities in a business combination. FAS 141(R) requires (i) recognition of the fair values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities at the acquisition date, (ii) contingent consideration to be recorded at fair value at acquisition date, (iii) transaction costs to be expenses as incurred, (iv) pre-acquisition contingencies to be accounted for at acquisition date at fair value and (v) costs of a plan to exit an activity or terminate or relocate employees to be accounted for as post-combination costs. In February 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1, "Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in Business Combinations that Arise from Contingencies," to amend certain provisions of FAS 141(R) related to the accounting for contingencies. FAS 141(R) and FSP FAS 141(R)-1 are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will adopt FAS 141(R) and FSP FAS 141(R)-1 on August 1, 2009 and apply the requirements prospectively to business combinations that occur after the date of adoption. The impact of adoption on the Company's consolidated financial statements cannot be currently evaluated and will depend on the nature and significance of any future acquisitions.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards.
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." FAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. FAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted FAS 159 on August 1, 2008. The Company did not elect the fair value option for any of its assets and liabilities, and as a result there was no impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, "Accounting for Fair Value Measurements." FAS 157 defines fair value, and establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement 157" to defer the effective date for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a non-recurring basis until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB also issued FSP FAS 157-1, "Application of FASB Statement 157 to FASB Statement 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements that Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13," which excludes FAS 13, "Accounting for Leases" ("FAS 13"), as well as other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements on lease classification or measurement under FAS 13. The provisions of FAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) were effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning August 1, 2008. The Company accordingly adopted the provisions of FAS 157 for these items on August 1, 2008, which did not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.
The Company elected to apply the deferral under FSP FAS 157-2, and accordingly, will not apply FAS 157 to its goodwill, indefinite-lived intangibles and non-financial assets measured at fair value for annual impairment assessment, until fiscal year 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Our critical accounting policies are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2008.
Disclosure Regarding Forward Looking Statements
We are including the following discussion to inform our existing and potential security holders generally of some of the risks and uncertainties that can affect us and to take advantage of the "safe harbor" protection for forward-looking statements that applicable
federal securities law affords. From time to time, our management or persons acting on our behalf make forward-looking statements to inform existing and potential security holders about our company. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our operations. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated by reference in this report that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate may occur in the future, including such things as future capital expenditures, business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, growth of our business and operations, plans and references to future successes may be considered forward-looking statements. Also, when we use words such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "intend," "plan," "project," "forecast," "may," "should," "budget," "goal," "expect," "probably" or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements. Many risks and uncertainties may impact the matters addressed in these forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made and we will not update forward-looking statements unless the securities laws require us to do so.
Some of the key factors which could cause our future financial results and performance to vary from those expected include:
† the loss of primary customers;
† our ability to implement productivity improvements, cost reduction initiatives or facilities expansions;
† market developments affecting, and other changes in, the demand for our products and the introduction of new competing products;
† availability or increases in the price of our primary raw materials or active ingredients;
† the timing of planned capital expenditures;
† our ability to identify, develop or acquire, and market additional product . . .
|
|