|
Quotes & Info
|
| CTZN > SEC Filings for CTZN > Form 10-Q on 15-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
15-May-2009
Quarterly Report
allowances and provisions, growth opportunities, interest rates, acquisition and
divestiture opportunities, capital and other expenditures and synergies,
efficiencies, cost savings and funding and other advantages expected to be
realized from various activities. The words "may," "could," "should," "would,"
"will," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan,"
"project," "predict," "continue" and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to the Company's
beliefs, plans, strategies, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations,
estimates or intentions that are subject to significant risks or uncertainties
or that are based on certain assumptions. Future results and the actual effect
of plans and strategies are inherently uncertain, and actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements,
depending upon various important factors, risks or uncertainties. Those factors,
many of which are subject to change based on various other factors, including
factors beyond the Company's control, and other factors, including others
discussed in the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders, the Company's Form
10-K, other factors identified in the Company's other filings with the SEC, as
well as other factors identified by management from time to time, could have a
material adverse effect on the Company and its operations or cause its financial
performance to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations,
estimates or intentions expressed in the Company's forward-looking statements.
The impact of technological changes implemented by the Company and the Bank and
by other parties, including third party vendors, which may be more difficult or
more expensive than anticipated or which may have unforeseen consequences to the
Company and its customers.
OVERVIEW. The Company currently operates as a community-oriented financial
institution that accepts deposits from the general public in the communities
surrounding its 24 full-service banking centers. The deposited funds, together
with funds generated from operations and borrowings, are used by the Company to
originate loans. The Company's principal lending activity is the origination of
mortgage loans for the purchase or refinancing of one-to-four family residential
properties. The Company also originates commercial and multi-family real estate
loans, construction loans, commercial loans, automobile loans, home equity loans
and lines of credit and a variety of other consumer loans.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES. As of March 31, 2009, there have been no
changes in the critical accounting policies as disclosed in the Company's Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company's critical accounting
policies are described in the Management's Discussion and Analysis and financial
sections of its 2008 Annual Report. Management believes its critical accounting
policies relate to the Company's securities, allowance for loan losses, mortgage
servicing rights and core deposit intangibles.
COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT MARCH 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
Summary. Total assets decreased $43.6 million, or 2.2%, to $1.917 billion at
March 31, 2009, from $1.961 billion at December 31, 2008, as a result of an
decrease of $40.0 million in net loans to $1.363 billion at March 31, 2009 from
$1.403 billion at December 31, 2008, Total investment securities decreased by
$24.0 million or 7.4% to $300.4 million at March 31, 2009 from $324.3 million at
December 31, 2008. This decrease is due primarily to the combined result of
credit and non-credit related OTTI charges to the Company's non-agency CMO
portfolio totaling $37.4 million, sale of a $13.4 million U.S. government agency
CMO, purchase of U.S. government sponsored agency debt securities totaling
$30.2 million and proceeds from maturity and principal prepayments on mortgage
related securities totaling $10.5 million. OTTI charges to the Company's
non-agency CMO portfolio are indicative of continued downgrades as applied by
the major rating agencies since acquisition of these securities. Since
acquisition of these securities and up to May 11, 2009, $18.8 million, or 7.2%,
of the amortized cost, before OTTI charges realized at March 31, 2009, of the
securities held to maturity portfolio, have been downgraded by the major rating
agencies to levels still considered investment grade. In addition, the remaining
$243.4 million, or 92.8%, of the amortized cost of the securities held to
maturity portfolio have been downgraded to sub-investment grade levels. Similar
security types within the available for sale securities portfolio have also
experienced major rating agency downgrades. Since acquisition date and up to
May 11, 2009, $13.8 million, or 21.8%, of the amortized cost of the available
for sale securities portfolio have been downgraded to levels still considered
investment grade, while the remaining $49.3 million, or 78.2%, has been
downgraded to sub-investment grade levels. These downgrades have occurred as a
result of the continued increase in delinquency levels impacting the residential
real estate markets nationally and, more specifically as delinquency levels are
impacting the underlying collateral of the specific securities receiving
downgrades. The major rating agencies will continue to review these residential
real estate collateralized investment types and could possibly apply further
downgrades to these and other investments within the Company's investment
portfolio. The Asset/Liability Committee will continue to review these
investments and closely monitor their performance. Reference is made to Note 3
for additional information regarding the Company's analysis and review for other
than temporary impairment (OTTI) relating to these securities. This OTTI
analysis will continue to be performed on a quarterly basis. Considering the
above described downgrades and the sensitivity of the various assumptions used
in the Company's OTTI analysis model, there is an increased risk that the
Company will experience additional OTTI charges in future periods related to
it's non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations.
Total net loans decreased during the period by 2.9% or $40.0 million to
$1.363 billion from $1.403 billion at December 31, 2008. Most areas decreased
slightly, with the largest decreases coming in the commercial loans and
commercial real estate loan categories.
Commercial loans decreased by 19.2% or $42.6 million to $179.3 million at
March 31, 2009 from $221.9 million at December 31, 2008 while commercial real
estate increased by $11.8 million to $424.1 million at March 31, 2009 from
$412.3 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease in loans was a result of the
Company's strategy to de-leverage it's balance sheet along with the general
slowdown in the overall economy. We expect lending activity to continue at
reduced levels during 2009 as a result of the current rate environment and the
general economic conditions in the State of Michigan, which are the worst seen
in over 25 years.
Total liabilities decreased by 1.0% or $19.2 million to $1.834 billion at
March 31, 2009 from $1.853 billion at December 31, 2008. The decrease was
primarily the result of a decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank advances of
$122.2 million or 24.6% to $375.0 million at March 31, 2009 from $497.2 million
at December 31, 2008 as the Company decreased its dependence on the FHLB.
Offsetting this decrease, total deposits increased by 4.3% or $55.7 million to
$1.350 billion at March 31, 2009 from $1.295 billion at December 31, 2008. At
the same time, the Company increased its short term borrowings at the Federal
Reserve Bank to $100.0 million at March 31, 2009 from $50.0 million at
December 31, 2008.
While deposit growth has been significant during the first quarter of 2009,
management expects that balances of Federal Reserve and FHLB borrowings may
increase in subsequent periods, depending on future deposit growth and which
borrowing opportunity makes the most economic sense after analyzing maturity and
repricing data and balancing interest rate risk.
Portfolio Loans and Asset Quality. Nonperforming loans totaled $95.7 million
at March 31, 2009 compared to $90.7 million at December 31, 2008, an increase of
5.5% or $5.0 million. This represents an increase to 6.87% of total loans at
March 31, 2009 compared to 6.35% at December 31, 2008. As indicated by the table
below, $11.4 million of the increase in total nonperforming loans resulted from
an increase in nonperforming real estate loans. Other real estate increased by
$1.3 million as a result of foreclosed loans. In the other real estate area,
during the first quarter of 2009, management has noted increases in the number
of property sales and increases in the numbers of offers on properties owned.
While there can be no assurance this trend will continue, management believes
this is a positive trend in the real estate markets. Of the $23.2 million in
real estate and other assets owned, $5.2 million of the balance represents the
sale of foreclosed properties which have been sold under terms of a special loan
program generally requiring no down payment and, as a result, are being
recognized under the installment method of accounting. As a result, as soon as
the borrowers under this financing program repay principal in the amount of 5%,
to a loan-to-value balance of 95%, these financing arrangements will be
transferred into accruing loan status. Performing restructured loans increased
during the quarter by $9.0 million to $14.7 million at March 31, 2009, largely
as the result of the restructure of a large commercial loan to a single
borrower. The loan is based upon a commercial property which recently lost its
sole tenant. The borrower has sufficient indicated cash flow and the collateral
has sufficient value to support the loan based upon a current appraisal. The
borrower has not been late on payments but is experiencing cash flow
difficulties due to global real estate conditions. The overall increase in these
nonperforming categories is overwhelmingly due to a rise in foreclosures
reflecting both weak economic conditions and soft residential real estate values
in many parts of Michigan in which the Company lends to.
The following table sets forth information regarding nonperforming assets (in
thousands):
March 31, December 31,
2009 2008
Nonperforming loans:
Real estate $ 79,618 $ 68,193
Commercial 15,471 22,016
Consumer 599 512
Total 95,688 90,721
Real estate and other assets owned 23,153 21,857
Total nonperforming assets $ 118,841 $ 112,578
Performing restructured loans 14,705 5,719
Total nonperforming assets and performing restructured loans $ 133,546 $ 118,297
Total nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans 6.87 % 6.35 %
Total nonperforming assets and performing restructured loans
as a percentage of total assets 6.96 % 6.03 %
|
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management's periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower's ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to operations and reduced by net charge-offs. The following table sets forth activity in the allowance for loan losses for the interim periods (in thousands):
Three Months
ended March 31,
2009 2008
Balance, beginning of period $ 26,473 $ 21,464
Provision for loan losses 8,058 1,131
Charge-offs (5,111 ) (4,449 )
Recoveries 263 118
Balance, end of period $ 29,683 $ 18,264
Allowance for loan losses to total loans 2.13 % 1.21 %
Allowance for loans losses to nonperforming loans 31.02 % 20.13 %
|
Deposits. Deposits increased $55.7 million, or 4.3%, to $1.350 billion at
March 31, 2009, from $1.295 billion at December 31, 2008. The increases in
deposits came primarily in the NOW and MMDA categories which combined increased
by 15% or $43.7 million at March 31, 2009 over December 31, 2008. At the same
time, retail certificates of deposit increased by $8.0 million to $469.2 million
at March 31, 2009. Partially offsetting these increases, non-interest DDA
deposits decreased by $4.9 million at March 31, 2009 from $86.4 million at
December 31, 2008. Deposit growth continues to be affected by general adverse
economic conditions experienced in the State of Michigan.
COMPARISON OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
AND 2008
Summary. The Company experienced a net loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 of $7.7 million compared to a net income of $1.6 million during
the same period in 2008. Diluted earnings per share for the three month period
ended March 31, 2009, resulted in a loss of $0.96 versus income of $0.21 for the
same period in 2008. Annualized losses as a percentage of average assets during
the three month period ended March 31, 2009, was 1.6% compared with a positive
return of 0.33% during the same period in 2008.
Decreased market values in Michigan's real estate markets and resulting
impact on credit and asset quality have further resulted in lower earnings to
the Company. In response to the negative impact on asset quality and underlying
collateral values, the Company increased its allowance for loan losses as a
percent of portfolio loans during the first quarter of 2009, to 2.13% from 1.85%
at December 31, 2008, resulting in a significant increase in the provision for
loan losses for the quarter. During first quarter 2009, the Company provisioned
$8.1 million for loan losses while recording $4.8 million in net charge-offs
against the allowance for loan losses account. In comparison, the Company added
$1.1 million to the to the allowance for loan losses during the three month
period ended March 31, 2008, and recorded $4.3 million in net charge-offs during
the three month period ended March 31, 2008. Relatedly, costs to repossess and
maintain nonperforming loan collateral increased to $1.5 million during the
first quarter of 2009, an increase of 242% over the $436,000 incurred during the
same period in 2008.
In the first quarter of 2009, as noted in Note 3 to the financial statements,
the Company recorded net losses on available for sale securities of $1.7 million
and net losses on held to maturity securities of $2.9 million. These are the
result of credit impairment losses resulting from the Company's OTTI analysis
performed as of March 31, 2009. Net losses for the three months ended March 31,
2008 were zero.
Partially offsetting the negative impact to earnings during the three month
period ended March 31, 2009, as a result of the factors noted above, was an
increase of $638,000 in net interest income, as well as a $1.5 million increase
in income from mortgage banking activities. Mortgage banking activity has
increased substantially as the result of new government programs to stimulate
the economy and the mortgage markets combined with a substantial decrease in
mortgage interest rates. Occupancy costs, decreased by $211,000 to $2.2 million
for the three month ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period a year
earlier primarily due to decreased
depreciation expense and equipment repairs. Non-performing asset costs increased
to $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to
$436,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 due to the increases in other
real estate held, the costs to maintain the properties and write-downs on the
property values.
The Company recorded a $2.7 million income tax benefit for the three months
ended March 31, 2009, which was offset by an increase of the same amount in the
deferred tax valuation allowance, resulting in no income tax benefit or expense
recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
In order to preserve capital and balance sheet strength during this difficult
economic period, the Board of Directors voted on August 8, 2008, to temporarily
suspend the quarterly common stock cash dividend. Temporary suspension of the
$0.09 per share quarterly dividend will preserve approximately $740,000 of
retained earnings quarterly. Management and the Board of Directors believes this
action will provide added support in navigating through the current economic
downturn, optimize shareholder value and result in better long term returns to
its shareholders. The Bank's ability to pay dividends and other capital
distributions to the Bancorp is generally limited by the Michigan Banking
Commissioner and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Additionally, the
Michigan Banking Commissioner and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation may
prohibit the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Bancorp, which is otherwise
permissible by regulation for safety and soundness reasons.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income, before provision for loan losses,
for the three months ended March 31, 2009, totaled $13.0 million, an increase of
5.2%, as compared to $12.4 million for the same period in the prior year. During
the three months ended March 31, 2009, the net interest spread increased to
2.72% compared to 2.53% for the same period in 2008. Several factors contributed
to the increase. First, the Company has increased the spread it uses to price
new and renewed loans in its portfolio. Secondly, rates on deposits have
decreased as market rates have decreased and certificates of deposit have
matured and/or been re-written into lower rate certificates of deposit. Also
during the first quarter of 2009, the Bank called or had $169.2 million in FHLB
borrowings mature at an average rate of 4.97% while it renewed only $47 million
at rates less than 1%. At the same time it, increased borrowings at the FRB by
$50.0 million at a rate of 0.25%. These factors combined to increase the net
interest margin to 2.86% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 2.82%
for the same period one year earlier.
The following table presents an analysis of net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands).
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
2009 2008 Change in Net Interest Income
Average Average
Average Revenue/ Yield/ Average Revenue/ Yield/
Balance Cost Rate Balance Cost Rate Volume Yield/Rate Net
Assets
Loans (1) $ 1,421,239 $ 20,034 5.72 % $ 1,531,515 $ 24,755 6.56 % $ (1,809 ) $ (2,912 ) $ (4,721 )
Certificates of
deposit 1,996 7 1.42 % 319 4 5.08 % 21 (18 ) 3
Investment securities
(2) 323,264 6,504 8.16 % 206,098 3,920 8.31 % 2,434 151 2,585
FHLB Stock 31,086 313 4.08 % 25,768 264 4.15 % 55 (6 ) 49
Federal funds sold 26,669 3 0.05 % 15,364 111 2.93 % 83 (191 ) (108 )
Interest earning
deposits 38,796 22 0.23 % 1,180 5 1.59 % 150 (132 ) 17
Total interest-earning
assets 1,843,050 $ 26,883 5.92 % 1,780,243 $ 29,058 6.62 % $ 934 $ (3,108 ) $ (2,174 )
Noninterest-earning
assets 119,496 144,896
Total assets $ 1,962,546 $ 1,925,140
Liabilities
Deposits:
NOW $ 218,461 $ 320 0.59 % $ 80,537 $ 101 0.51 % $ 176 $ 43 $ 219
Money market 96,906 483 2.02 % 232,387 1,638 2.86 % (969 ) (187 ) (1,155 )
Savings 106,342 259 0.99 % 118,474 550 1.88 % (57 ) (234 ) (291 )
Certificates of
deposit 829,038 8,169 4.00 % 719,393 8,516 4.80 % 1,316 (1,662 ) (347 )
Total interest bearing
deposits 1,250,747 9,231 2.99 % 1,150,791 10,804 3.81 % 952 (2,525 ) (1,573 )
Federal funds
purchased - - - 4,544 51 4.55 % (52 ) 1 (51 )
FHLB advances 446,044 4,538 4.13 % 500,198 5,844 4.74 % (642 ) (664 ) (1,306 )
Federal reserve
borrowings 64,689 117 0.73 % - - - - 117 117
Total interest-bearing
liabilities 1,761,480 $ 13,886 3.20 % 1,655,533 $ 16,699 4.09 % $ 1,083 $ (3,897 ) $ (2,813 )
Non-interest bearing
deposits 74,685 88,544
Other
noninterest-bearing
liabilities 19,488 10,281
Total liabilities 1,855,653 1,754,358
Equity 106,893 170,782
Total liabilities and
equity $ 1,962,546 $ 1,925,140
Net interest-earning
assets $ 81,570 $ 124,710
Net interest income $ 12,997 $ 12,359 $ (149 ) $ 788 $ 639
Interest rate spread
(3) 2.72 % 2.53 %
Net interest margin as
a percentage of
interest-earning
assets (4) 2.86 % 2.82 %
Ratio of
interest-earning
assets to
interest-bearing
liabilities 104.63 % 107.53 %
|
(1) Balances are net of deferred loan origination fees, undisbursed proceeds of construction loans in process, and include nonperforming loans.
(2) Securities available for sale are not on a tax equivalent basis.
(3) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(4) Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
Provision for Loan Losses. Based upon our detailed analysis of the allowance for loan losses performed at May 8, 2009, the Company recorded a provision for loan losses of $8.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $1.1 million for the same period in the prior year. The provision for loan losses is thoroughly reviewed and is the result of management's analysis of the loan loss allowance, current and forecasted economic conditions in the regional markets where we conduct business, and historical charge off rates in the overall loan portfolio. In order to accurately depict the actual loss inherent in a loan relationship, a determination is made by reviewing a non-performing loan for collateral sufficiency. This entails utilizing any relevant appraisal values and discounting said values for market deterioration, time value of liquidation period, and liquidation costs. Standard discount factors are applied to maintain consistency and reflect current market and economic conditions. The resulting discounted values are reviewed, and adjusted if necessary, every six months. Those factors are 10% for liquidation expense (6% broker commission and 4% other) and a selling period of 2 years for builder direct (speculative) homes . . .
|
|