Search the web
Welcome, Guest
[Sign Out, My Account]
EDGAR_Online

Quotes & Info
Enter Symbol(s):
e.g. YHOO, ^DJI
Symbol Lookup | Financial Search
EACO.OB > SEC Filings for EACO.OB > Form 10-Q on 14-May-2009All Recent SEC Filings

Show all filings for EACO CORP | Request a Trial to NEW EDGAR Online Pro

Form 10-Q for EACO CORP


14-May-2009

Quarterly Report


Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, to the extent that this Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements regarding the financial condition, operating results, business prospects or any other aspect of the Company, please be advised that the Company's actual financial condition, operating results and business performance may differ materially from that projected or estimated by management in forward-looking statements.

Such differences may be caused by a variety of factors, including but not limited to adverse economic conditions, intense competition, including intensification of price competition and entry of new competitors and products, adverse federal, state and local government regulation, inadequate capital, unexpected costs and operating deficits, increases in general and administrative costs, and other specific risks that may be alluded to in this Quarterly Report or in other reports issued by the Company. In addition, the business and operations of the Company are subject to substantial risks that increase the uncertainty inherent in the forward-looking statements. The inclusion of forward looking statements in this Quarterly Report should not be regarded as a representation by management or any other person that the objectives or plans of the Company will be achieved.

Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition, when all of the following conditions exist: (a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists as in the form of a lease document; (b) delivery has occurred, or services have been provided; (c) the Company's price to the lessee is fixed or determinable; and (d) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company leases its properties to tenants under operating leases with terms of over one year. Some of these leases contain scheduled rent increases. We record rent revenue for leases which contain scheduled rent increases on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, in accordance with SFAS No. 13, "Accounting for Leases."

Receivables from tenants are carried net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. An allowance is maintained for estimated losses resulting from the inability of any tenants to meet their contractual obligations under their lease agreements. We determine the adequacy of this allowance by continually evaluating each tenant's receivables considering the tenant's financial condition and security deposits, and current economic conditions. No allowance for uncollectible accounts was determined to be necessary at April 1, 2009.

Long Lived Assets

The Company's accounting policy for the recognition of impairment losses on long-lived assets is considered critical. The Company's policy is to review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For the purpose of the impairment review, assets are tested on an individual basis. The recoverability of the assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying value of each asset to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by such asset. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value. There were no impairment losses recorded during the quarter ended April 1, 2009.

Workers' Compensation Liability

The Company's policy for estimating its workers' compensation liability is considered critical. The Company previously self-insured workers' compensation claims losses up to certain limits. The liability for workers' compensation represents an estimate of the present value of the ultimate cost of uninsured losses which are unpaid as of the balance sheet dates. The estimate is continually reviewed and adjustments to the Company's estimated claim liability, if any, are reflected in current operations. On an annual basis, the Company obtains an actuarial report which estimates its overall exposure based on historical claims and an evaluation of future claims. The Company pursues recovery of certain claims from an insurance carrier. Recoveries, if any, are recognized when realization is reasonably assured.

Deferred Tax Assets

The Company's policy for recording a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets is considered critical. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize their benefit, or that future deductibility is uncertain. In accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes", the Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent the Company believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial performance. SFAS No. 109 further states that forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not required is difficult when there is negative evidence, such as significant decreases in operations. As a result of the Company's recent disposal of significant business operations, the Company concluded that a valuation allowance should be recorded against federal and state net operating losses and certain federal and state tax credits. The utilization of these items requires sufficient taxable income.

- 9 -

Discontinued Operations

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," the Company accounts for the results of operations of a component of an entity that has been disposed or that meets all of the "held for sale" criteria, as discontinued operations, if the component's operations and cash flows have been (or will be) eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity as a result of the disposal transaction and the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction. The "held for sale" classification requires having the appropriate approvals by our management, Board of Directors and shareholders, as applicable, and meeting other criteria. When all of these criteria are met, the component is then classified as "held for sale" and its operations are reported as discontinued operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141R"). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer in a business combination: 1) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; 2) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and 3) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R is effective for business combinations beginning the first annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2008. Therefore, the Company expects to adopt SFAS 141R for any business combinations entered into beginning in 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements" ("SFAS 160"). SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements" to establish accounting and reporting standards for a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This statement clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity and should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements, rather than in the liability or mezzanine section between liabilities and equity. SFAS 160 also requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008; therefore, the Company expects to adopt SFAS 160 at the beginning of 2009. Adoption of SFAS 160 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, "Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" ("SFAS 162"). This statement is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This statement will be effective 60 days following the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendment to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." The adoption of this Statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In April 2009, the FASB Staff Position ("FSP") 107-1 ("FSP 107-1") amended SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments", to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FSP 107-1 also amended APB Opinion No. 28, "Interim financial Reporting" to require disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. FSP 107-1 becomes effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009 if a company also elects to FSP FAS 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Indentifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly", and FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, "Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments". Management is evaluating the impact this FSP will have on the Company's financial statement disclosures.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the condensed financial statements of the Company requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include the Company's workers' compensation liability, the depreciable lives of assets, estimated loss on or impairment of long-lived assets and the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For a full description of the Company's critical accounting policies, see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed on April 2, 2009.

- 10 -

Results of Operations

Comparison of Quarters Ended April 1, 2009 and April 2, 2008

At April 1, 2009, the Company owned two real estate properties for restaurant use, one located in Orange Park, Florida (the "Orange Park Property") and one in Brooksville, Florida (the "Brooksville Property"). The Orange Park Property was vacant during the first quarter ended April 1, 2009. The Brooksville Property was occupied by a third party restaurant operator during the quarter ended April 1, 2009. The Company is obligated for a capital lease at another location located in Deland, Florida (the "Deland Property"). The Deland Property was vacant during the quarter ended April 1, 2009. For the first quarter, until March 27, 2009, the Company was also obligated for a capital lease at a location located in Tampa, Florida (the "Fowler Property"). On March 27, 2009, the Company reached an agreement with the owner of that property to release the Company from obligation under that lease for a lump sum payment of $500,000. In addition, the Company owns an income producing real estate property held for investment in Sylmar, California (the "Sylmar Property") with two industrial tenants.

The Company experienced a decrease of $38,100 or 13% in rental revenue during the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008, due to the Deland Property being vacant during the first quarter of 2009 while occupied during the first quarter of 2008.

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $55,000 or 27% in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized an impairment on three properties, the Deland Property, the Fowler Property and the Brooksville Property. The impairment lowered the values of these three assets, decreasing the depreciable basis going forward. The first quarter of 2009 is the first quarter the assets were depreciated at their new basis.

General and administrative expenses consist mainly of rent and related property insurance expense, legal and other professional fees. General and administrative expenses decreased $131,200 or 30% during the first quarter of 2009 as compared to the first quarter of 2008, due mainly to decreases in property taxes and rent. At the end of fiscal 2007, the Company regained the lease obligation related to the Fowler Property from its assignee, Banner Buffet ("Banner"), who defaulted on the lease. During the first quarter 2008, the Company was required to pay property taxes and back rent related to the default of Banner. These expenses were not required in the first quarter of 2009.

In the quarter ended April 2, 2008, the Company liquidated all of its investment holdings. This resulted in no gain or loss from investments in the first quarter of 2009 versus a gain of $95,700 in the first quarter of 2008.

Interest expense increased by $42,400 or 20% in the quarter ended April 1, 2009 versus the quarter ended April 2, 2008, mainly due to the financing of the Brooksville Property that occurred in the second quarter of 2008. Interest on the loan did not begin until after the end of the first quarter of 2008.

During the first quarter of 2009, the Company reached an agreement with the landlord of the Fowler Property where the landlord released the Company from all past and future obligations for a lump sum payment of $500,000. The resulting gain on the extinguishment of the capital lease obligation for the Fowler Property of $949,300 was recognized in the first quarter of 2009. No such debt extinguishment occurred in 2008.

The Company recognized a loss upon the disposition of the asset related to the Fowler Property of $141,400 in the first quarter of 2009. In addition, the Company disposed of certain equipment being leased by a third party restaurant operator who defaulted on their lease obligation related to that equipment resulting in a further loss on disposition of equipment of $5,000. No dispositions occurred in 2008.

Net income was $292,100 in the first quarter of 2009 compared to net loss of $1,058,300 in the first quarter of 2008, due to the gain on the extinguishment of the debt related to the Fowler Property, decreased by the loss on the disposal of the assets for the Fowler Property. Earnings per share for the quarter was $0.07 in 2009 compared to a loss of $0.27 in 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The accompanying condensed financial statements of the Company have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company incurred significant losses of $1,058,300 and had negative cash flow from operations of $3,330,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008, and had a working capital deficit of $2,197,200 at that date. During the quarter ended April 1, 2009, the working capital deficit increased to $3,061,100. The cash balance at April 1, 2009 was $13,600.

The cash outflows through March 2010 are estimated to total approximately $1,187,000, which will generate an estimated negative cash balance of $1,184,700 in the next twelve months.

The Company currently has estimated equity of $4 to $7 million in its three owned properties, of which $2 million is encumbered by a standby letter of credit to the Florida Self Insurers Guaranty Association ("FSIGA") as collateral for its workers compensation liability. The Company has the ability to sell any or all of these properties to fund operations; however, there can be no assurance that an improvement in operating results will occur or that the Company will successfully implement its plans.

- 11 -

The Company will require additional funds in order to maintain its current operations. In the past, short term funds have been provided by Bisco Industries, Inc. ("Bisco") and management believes the Company can continue borrowing from Bisco if necessary. The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Glen F. Ceiley, is the President and sole shareholder of Bisco. In the long term, the Company expects any capital requirements to be provided through the sale or refinancing of property currently owned. Additional sources of financing may include public or private offerings of equity or debt securities. While management believes it will have access to these financing sources, no assurance can be given that such additional sources of financing will be available on acceptable terms, on a timely basis or at all.

The accompanying condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

In 2008, the Company received bridge loans from Bisco in the amount of approximately $3,040,700, of which $1,575,000 has been repaid. Bisco's sole shareholder and President is Glen F. Ceiley, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. The note agreements do not provide for regularly scheduled payments; however, any remaining outstanding principal balance plus accrued interest is due six months from the date of the note, although the Company believes the loans can be extended through June 2009.

On January 21, 2009, the Company borrowed an additional $50,000 from Bisco to cover fees related to renewing the lines of credit required by FSIGA with regards to the Company's self insured worker's compensation program. The loan accrues interest at 7.5% per annum and principal and interest is due no later than July 21, 2009.

On January 26, 2009, the Company borrowed an additional $60,000 from Bisco to cover operating cash flow requirements through January 2009. The note accrues interest at 7.5% per annum and principal and interest is due no later than July 26, 2009.

On February 17, 2009, the Company borrowed, on a short term basis, $70,000 from Bisco to fund its operations. The note accrues interest monthly at 7.5% per annum and principal and interest is due no later than August 17, 2009.

On March 31, 2009, the Company borrowed, on a short term basis, $500,000 from Bisco to fund the payment related to the buy out of the Fowler Property lease. The note payable accrues interest monthly at 7.5% per annum and principal and interest is due no later than September 30, 2009.

Substantially all of the Company's revenues are derived from rental income. Therefore, the Company has not carried significant receivables or inventories and the primary working capital requirements are lease payments, repayment of debt, legal expenses and payment on the workers' compensation liability.

As stated above, at April 1, 2009, the Company had a working capital deficit of $3,061,100 compared to a working capital deficit of $2,197,200 at December 31, 2008. The increase was due to the borrowing required to pay the owner of the Fowler Property per the terms of the settlement agreement releasing the Company from the obligations associated with that lease, as well as additional borrowing to fund normal operating expenses. Cash used in operating activities was $111,600 in the quarter ended April 1, 2009, compared to cash used in operating activities of $3,330,000 in the quarter ended April 2, 2008. The decrease in cash used in operating activities was primarily due to the payment of two legal settlements with two brokers in the first quarter of 2008. No such payment occurred in 2009.

Cash provided by investing activities was $0 for the first quarter of 2009 versus $1,186,500 in the first quarter months of 2008. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company received $400,000 of previously restricted cash in escrow related to litigation that was settled at the end of fiscal 2007. Also, during the first quarter of 2008, the Company liquidated all of its equity holdings, including securities sold, not yet purchased resulting in a further reduction of restricted cash of $786,500. Cash related to these securities sold, not yet purchased was considered restricted as it was required to repurchase the stock.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $122,900 in the first quarter of 2009 was due to the proceeds received from the related party loan from Bisco of $180,000. The purpose of these loans was to supply the Company with operating cash flow for the first quarter of 2009.

In connection with the Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, Glen Ceiley, dividends are paid quarterly when declared by the Company's Board of Directors. The Company paid no quarterly dividends in the quarter ended April 1, 2009. There were no accrued declared dividends as of April 1, 2009.

The Company is required to pledge collateral for its workers' compensation self-insurance liability with FSIGA. The Company has a total of $1.37 million pledged collateral. Bisco provides $1 million of this collateral. As previously mentioned, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Glen F. Ceiley, is the President and sole shareholder of Bisco. During 2007, the Company received a demand from the Florida Division of Workers' Compensation (the "Division") to post further collateral in the amount of $2,781,500. The Company pledged the amount by posting a standby letter of credit. The letter of credit is collateralized by a certificate of deposit of $769,500 and the equity the Company holds in the Sylmar Property. The Company may be required to increase this collateral pledge from time to time in the future, based on its workers' compensation claim experience and various FSIGA requirements for self-insured companies. Despite the sale of the Company's restaurants, the workers' compensation will remain an ongoing liability for the Company until all claims are paid, which will likely take many years.

The Company entered into a loan agreement with GE Capital for the Orange Park Property in 1996. As of April 1, 2009, the outstanding balance due under the Company's loan with GE Capital was $727,900. In December 2007, the Company refinanced the Sylmar Property with Community Bank. As of April 1, 2009, the outstanding balance due on the Community Bank loan was $5,724,200. In April 2008, the Company completed financing of the Brooksville Property with Zions Bank. Proceeds of the loan were used to partially repay the related party loan received from Bisco. As of April 1, 2009, the outstanding balance due on the Zions Bank loan was $1,199,100. The weighted average interest rate on the Company's loans was 6.2%.

- 12 -

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the financial position, revenues, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures, except for the land leases on the restaurant properties treated as operating leases.

Contractual Financial Obligations

In addition to using cash flow from operations, the Company finances its operations through the issuance of debt, and previously by entering into leases. These financial obligations are recorded in accordance with accounting rules applicable to the underlying transactions, with the result that some are recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet while others are required to be disclosed in the Notes to the financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed on April 2, 2009 and the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q included herein.

  Add EACO.OB to Portfolio     Set Alert         Email to a Friend  
Get SEC Filings for Another Symbol: Symbol Lookup
Quotes & Info for EACO.OB - All Recent SEC Filings
Sign Up for a Free Trial to the NEW EDGAR Online Pro
Detailed SEC, Financial, Ownership and Offering Data on over 12,000 U.S. Public Companies.
Actionable and easy-to-use with searching, alerting, downloading and more.
Request a Trial      Sign Up Now


Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
SEC Filing data and information provided by EDGAR Online, Inc. (1-800-416-6651). All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.