|
Quotes & Info
|
| FRE > SEC Filings for FRE > Form 10-Q on 12-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
12-May-2009
Quarterly Report
You should read this MD&A in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and our 2008 Annual Report.
Freddie Mac was chartered by Congress in 1970 to stabilize the nation's residential mortgage market and expand opportunities for home ownership and affordable rental housing. Our statutory mission is to provide liquidity, stability and affordability to the U.S. housing market. Our participation in the secondary mortgage market includes providing our credit guarantee for residential mortgages originated by mortgage lenders and investing in mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities. We refer to our investments in mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities as our mortgage-related investments portfolio. Through our credit guarantee activities, we securitize mortgage loans by issuing PCs to third-party investors. We also resecuritize mortgage-related securities that are issued by us or Ginnie Mae as well as private, or non-agency, entities. We also guarantee multifamily mortgage loans that support housing revenue bonds issued by third parties and we guarantee other mortgage loans held by third parties. Securitized mortgage-related assets that back PCs and Structured Securities that are held by third parties are not reflected as our assets. Our Structured Securities represent beneficial interests in pools of PCs and certain other types of mortgage-related assets. We earn management and guarantee fees for providing our guarantee and performing management activities (such as ongoing trustee services, administration of pass-through amounts, paying agent services, tax reporting and other required services) with respect to issued PCs and Structured Securities. Our management activities are essential to and inseparable from our guarantee activities. We do not provide or charge for the activities separately. The management and guarantee fee is paid to us over the life of the related PCs and Structured Securities and reflected in earnings, as management and guarantee income, as it is accrued.
We had a net loss attributable to Freddie Mac of $9.9 billion for the first quarter of 2009 and a deficit in total equity of $6.0 billion as of March 31, 2009. Our financial results for the first quarter of 2009 reflect the adverse conditions in the U.S. mortgage markets. Deterioration of market conditions, including declining home prices, higher mortgage delinquency rates and higher loss severities, contributed to large credit-related expenses and other-than-temporary impairments for the first quarter of 2009.
We continue to operate under the conservatorship that commenced on September 6, 2008, conducting our business under the direction of FHFA as our Conservator. During the conservatorship, the Conservator has delegated certain authority to the Board of Directors to oversee, and management to conduct, day-to-day operations so that the company can continue to operate in the ordinary course of business.
We are working with our Conservator to, among other things, help distressed homeowners through adverse times. Currently, we are primarily focusing on initiatives that support the Making Home Affordable Program announced by the Obama Administration in February 2009 (previously known as the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan). The MHA Program includes (i) Home Affordable Refinance, which gives eligible homeowners with loans owned or guaranteed by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae an opportunity to refinance into more affordable monthly payments, and (ii) the Home Affordable Modification program, which commits U.S. government, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae funds to keep eligible homeowners in their homes by preventing avoidable foreclosures. We will play an additional role under the Home Affordable Modification program as the compliance agent for foreclosure prevention activities. As the
program compliance agent, we will conduct examinations and review servicer compliance with the published rules for the program with respect to mortgages owned or guaranteed by us, Fannie Mae and banks and by trusts backing non-agency mortgage-related securities and report results to Treasury. We will also advise and consult with Treasury about the design, results and future improvement of the MHA Program. At present, it is difficult for us to predict the full impact of these initiatives on us. However, we are devoting significant internal resources to their implementation and, to the extent our servicers and borrowers participate in these programs in large numbers, it is likely that the costs we incur will be substantial.
There is significant uncertainty as to whether or when we will emerge from conservatorship, as it has no specified termination date, and as to what changes may occur to our business structure during or following our conservatorship, including whether we will continue to exist. However, we are not aware of any current plans of our Conservator to significantly change our business structure in the near-term.
Significant recent developments with respect to the conservatorship, our business and the MHA Program include the following:
• At March 31, 2009, the unpaid principal balance of our mortgage-related investments portfolio was $867.1 billion, compared to $804.8 billion at December 31, 2008. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we grew our mortgage-related investments portfolio to acquire and hold increased amounts of mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities to provide additional liquidity to the mortgage market, subject to the limitation on the size of such portfolio set forth in the Purchase Agreement.
• On March 4, 2009, we announced two new mortgage initiatives under the MHA Program. First, we announced the Freddie Mac Relief Refinance MortgageSM, which is our business implementation of Home Affordable Refinance. We began purchasing these mortgages in April 2009. This mortgage product is designed to assist borrowers with Freddie Mac-owned mortgages who are current on their mortgage payments but who have been unable to refinance due to declining property values and tightening credit terms. Second, we announced our support for the Home Affordable Modification program, which began in March 2009 and is designed to help more at-risk borrowers stay in their homes by lowering their monthly payments. As part of our support for this program, we have directed our servicers to ensure that every possible effort is made to achieve a successful workout for delinquent borrowers through the new Home Affordable Modification program or Freddie Mac's other workout options before completing a foreclosure.
• Effective March 13, 2009, David M. Moffett resigned from his position as Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors, John A. Koskinen, previously our non-executive Chairman of the Board, was appointed Interim Chief Executive Officer and Robert R. Glauber was appointed interim non-executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Koskinen will also be performing the functions of principal financial officer on an interim basis following the death of David Kellermann, our Acting Chief Financial Officer, on April 22, 2009. Mr. Moffett has agreed to return to the company temporarily as a consultant to Mr. Koskinen to provide advice and assistance in connection with Mr. Koskinen's functioning as principal financial officer. In addition, the Board is working to appoint a permanent Chief Executive Officer and a permanent Chief Financial Officer. Following the appointment of a Chief Executive Officer, the Board expects that Mr. Koskinen will return to the position of non-executive Chairman of the Board.
• On March 18, 2009, the Federal Reserve announced that it was increasing its planned purchases of (i) our direct obligations and those of Fannie Mae and the FHLBs from $100 billion to $200 billion and (ii) mortgage-related securities issued by us, Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae from $500 billion to $1.25 trillion. According to information provided by the Federal Reserve, it held $24.9 billion of our direct obligations and had net purchases of $163.1 billion of our mortgage-related securities under this program as of April 29, 2009.
• According to information provided by Treasury, it held $124.3 billion of mortgage-related securities issued by us and Fannie Mae as of March 31, 2009 under the purchase program it announced in September 2008.
• On March 31, 2009, we received $30.8 billion in funding from Treasury under the Purchase Agreement, which increased the aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock to $45.6 billion as of that date. On such date, we also paid dividends of $370 million in cash on the senior preferred stock to Treasury for the first quarter of 2009 at the direction of the Conservator.
• On April 28, 2009, the Obama Administration announced the details of its effort under the MHA Program to achieve greater affordability for homeowners by lowering payments on their second mortgages. This program provides for the modification or extinguishment of junior liens in cases in which the first mortgage has been modified under the MHA Program, and includes incentive payments to servicers and borrowers, as well as compensation to investors under certain circumstances. Incentive fees to a borrower whose junior mortgage has
been modified are expected to take the form of reduction of the outstanding principal amount of that borrower's first mortgage. It is possible, but not certain, that we will have to pay these fees by reducing the outstanding principal of first mortgages that we own or guarantee. We directly own or guarantee an immaterial amount of second mortgages. We are still evaluating the potential impact of the program on our first mortgages in our single-family mortgage portfolio.
• On May 6, 2009, FHFA, acting on our behalf in its capacity as Conservator,
and Treasury amended the Purchase Agreement to, among other items:
(i) increase the funding available under the Purchase Agreement from
$100 billion to $200 billion: (ii) increase the limit on our
mortgage-related investments portfolio as of December 31, 2009 from
$850 billion to $900 billion; and (iii) revise the limit on our aggregate
indebtedness and the method of calculating such limit. The amendment also
expands the category of persons covered by the restrictions on executive
compensation contained in the Purchase Agreement. For more information, see
"LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - Liquidity - Actions of Treasury, the
Federal Reserve and FHFA."
To address our deficit in net worth as of March 31, 2009, FHFA has submitted a draw request, on our behalf, to Treasury under the Purchase Agreement in the amount of $6.1 billion. We expect to receive these funds by June 30, 2009. Upon funding of the $6.1 billion draw request:
• the aggregate liquidation preference on the senior preferred stock owned by Treasury will increase from $45.6 billion to $51.7 billion;
• the corresponding annual cash dividends payable to Treasury will increase to $5.2 billion, which exceeds our annual historical earnings in most periods; and
• the amount remaining under Treasury's announced funding commitment will be $149.3 billion, which does not include the initial liquidation preference of $1 billion reflecting the cost of the initial funding commitment (as no cash was received).
Our implementation of the MHA Program requires us, in some cases, to modify loans when default is imminent even though the borrower's mortgage payments are current. In our 2008 Annual Report, we disclosed the possibility that, if current loans were modified and were purchased from PC pools under this program, our guarantee might not be eligible for an exception from derivative accounting under SFAS 133, thereby requiring us to account for our guarantee as a derivative instrument. In April, we obtained confirmation from regulatory authorities of an interpretation that modifications of currently performing loans where default is reasonably foreseeable will not alter our ability to apply the exception from derivative accounting under SFAS 133. As a result, we will not recognize any pre-tax charge relating to the initial impact of accounting for our guarantee as a derivative. For a further discussion of this issue, see "BUSINESS - Our Business and Statutory Mission - Recent Developments Impacting Our Business" in our 2008 Annual Report.
We are dependent upon the continued support of Treasury and FHFA in order to continue operating our business. We also receive substantial support from the Federal Reserve. Our ability to access funds from Treasury under the Purchase Agreement is critical to keeping us solvent and avoiding the appointment of a receiver by FHFA under statutory mandatory receivership provisions.
Under conservatorship, we have changed certain business practices to provide support for the mortgage market in a manner that serves public policy and other non-financial objectives but that may not contribute to profitability. Some of these changes increased our expenses or required us to forego revenue opportunities in the near term. It is not possible at present to estimate the extent to which these costs may be offset, if at all, by the prevention or reduction of potential future costs of loan defaults and foreclosures due to these changes in business practices.
For more information on the terms of the conservatorship, the powers of our Conservator and certain of the initiatives, programs and agreements described above, see "BUSINESS - Conservatorship and Related Developments" in our 2008 Annual Report.
Housing and Economic Conditions and Impact on First Quarter 2009 Results
Our financial results for the first quarter of 2009 reflect the continuing adverse conditions in the U.S. mortgage markets, which deteriorated dramatically during the last half of 2008 and have continued to deteriorate in 2009. As a result, we experienced significantly higher credit-related expenses for the first quarter of 2009 as compared to the first quarter of 2008. Our provision for credit losses was $8.8 billion in the first quarter of 2009 compared to $1.2 billion in the first quarter of 2008, principally due to increased estimates of incurred losses caused by the deteriorating economic conditions, evidenced by our increased rates of delinquency and foreclosure; increased mortgage loan loss severities;
and, to a much lesser extent, concerns about the failure or potential failure of certain of our seller/servicer counterparties to perform under their recourse or repurchase obligations to us.
Home prices nationwide declined an estimated 1.4% in the first quarter of 2009 based on our own internal index, which is based on properties underlying our single-family mortgage portfolio. The percentage decline in home prices in the last twelve months has been particularly large in the states of California, Florida, Arizona and Nevada, where we have significant concentrations of mortgage loans. Unemployment rates also worsened significantly, and the national unemployment rate increased to 8.5% at March 31, 2009 as compared to 7.2% at December 31, 2008. However, certain states have experienced much higher unemployment rates, such as California, Florida, Nevada and Michigan, where the unemployment rate reached 11.2%, 9.7%, 10.4% and 12.6%, respectively, at March 31, 2009. Both consumer and business credit tightened considerably during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, as financial institutions have been more cautious in their lending activities. Although there was improvement in credit and liquidity conditions toward the end of the quarter, there is a continuation of higher, or wide, credit spreads for both mortgage and corporate loans.
These macroeconomic conditions and other factors, such as our temporary suspensions of foreclosure transfers of occupied homes, contributed to a substantial increase in the number and aging of delinquent loans in our single-family mortgage portfolio during the first quarter of 2009. While temporary suspensions of foreclosure transfers reduced our charge-offs and REO activity during the first quarter of 2009, our provision for credit losses includes expected losses on those foreclosures currently suspended. We also observed a continued increase in market-reported delinquency rates for mortgages serviced by financial institutions, not only for subprime and Alt-A loans but also for prime loans, and we experienced an increase in delinquency rates for all product types during the first quarter of 2009. This delinquency data suggests that continuing home price declines and growing unemployment are significantly affecting behavior by a broader segment of mortgage borrowers. Additionally, as the slump in the U.S. housing market has persisted for more than a year, increasing numbers of borrowers that began with significant equity are now "underwater," or owing more on their mortgage loans than their homes are currently worth. Our loan loss severities, or the average amount of recognized losses per loan, also continued to increase in the first quarter of 2009, especially in the states of California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona, where home price declines have been more severe and where we have significant concentrations of mortgage loans with higher average loan balances than in other states.
The continued deterioration in economic and housing market conditions during the first quarter of 2009 also led to a further decline in the performance of the non-agency mortgage-related securities in our mortgage-related investments portfolio. Furthermore, the mortgage-related securities backed by subprime, MTA, Alt-A and other loans, have significantly greater concentrations in the states that are undergoing the greatest stress, including California, Florida, Arizona and Nevada. As a result of these and other factors, we recognized $7.1 billion of other-than-temporary security impairments primarily on available-for-sale non-agency securities in the first quarter of 2009.
Consolidated Results of Operations
Net loss attributable to Freddie Mac was $9.9 billion and $151 million for the first quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net loss increased in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008, principally due to losses on investment activities, increased credit-related expenses, which consist of the provision for credit losses and REO operations expense, and increased losses on loans purchased. These loss and expense items for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were partially offset by higher net interest income and lower losses on our guarantee asset in the first quarter of 2009, compared to the first quarter of 2008. As a result of the net loss, at March 31, 2009, our liabilities exceeded our assets under GAAP and the Director of FHFA has submitted a draw request under the Purchase Agreement in the amount of $6.1 billion to Treasury. We expect to receive such funds by June 30, 2009.
Net interest income was $3.9 billion for the first quarter of 2009, compared to $798 million for the first quarter of 2008. As compared to the first quarter of 2008, we held higher amounts of fixed-rate agency mortgage-related securities in our mortgage-related investments portfolio and had significantly lower interest rates on our short- and long- term borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Non-interest income (loss) was $(3.1) billion for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to non-interest income (loss) of $614 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The increase in non-interest loss in the first quarter of 2009 was primarily due to higher losses on investment activity, which were partially offset by lower losses on our guarantee asset. Increased losses on investment activity during the first quarter of 2009 were principally attributed to $7.1 billion of security impairments primarily recognized on available-for-sale non-agency mortgage-related securities backed by subprime, MTA and Alt-A and other loans during the quarter.
Non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 totaled $11.6 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively. This includes credit-related expenses of $9.1 billion and $1.4 billion for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The significant increase in our provision for credit losses was due to continued credit deterioration in our single-family credit guarantee portfolio, primarily from further increases in delinquency rates and higher loss severities on a per-property basis. Credit deterioration has been largely driven by declines in home prices and regional economic conditions. REO operations expense increased primarily as a result of higher foreclosure acquisition volume and higher losses on REO dispositions, partially offset by a decrease in market-based writedowns of existing REO inventory.
Non-interest expense, excluding credit-related expenses discussed above, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 totaled $2.5 billion compared to $535 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Losses on loans purchased increased to $2.0 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $51 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, due to higher volumes of loan modifications of loans in our PCs in the first quarter of 2009, which will cause our purchases of these loans out of the PCs to increase. Administrative expenses totaled $372 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, down from $397 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, primarily due to a reduction in the use of consultants and other cost reduction measures during the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008.
Segment Earnings
Our operations consist of three reportable segments, which are based on the type of business activities each performs - Investments, Single-family Guarantee and Multifamily. Certain activities that are not part of a segment are included in the All Other category. We manage and evaluate performance of the segments and All Other using a Segment Earnings approach, subject to the conduct of our business under the direction of the Conservator.
In managing our business, we present the operating performance of our segments using Segment Earnings. Segment Earnings differs significantly from, and should not be used as a substitute for, net loss as determined in accordance with GAAP.
The objectives set forth for us under our charter and by our Conservator, as well as the restrictions on our business under the Purchase Agreement with Treasury, may negatively impact our Segment Earnings and the performance of individual segments. See "MD&A - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Segment Earnings" in our 2008 Annual Report.
Segment Earnings is calculated for the segments by adjusting GAAP net loss for certain investment-related activities and credit guarantee-related activities. Segment Earnings includes certain reclassifications among income and expense categories that have no impact on net loss but provide us with a meaningful metric to assess the performance of each segment and our company as a whole. Segment Earnings does not include the effect of the establishment of the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, net. For more information on Segment Earnings, including the adjustments made to GAAP net loss to calculate Segment Earnings and the limitations of Segment Earnings as a measure of our financial performance, see "CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Segment Earnings" and "NOTE 16: SEGMENT REPORTING" to our consolidated financial statements.
Table 1 presents Segment Earnings by segment and the All Other category and includes a reconciliation of Segment Earnings to net loss prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Table 1 - Reconciliation of Segment Earnings to GAAP Net Loss
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2009 2008
(in millions)
Segment Earnings, net of taxes:
Investments $ (1,572 ) $ 113
Single-family Guarantee (5,485 ) (458 )
Multifamily 140 98
All Other - (4 )
Reconciliation to GAAP net loss:
Derivative- and foreign currency denominated debt-related adjustments 1,558 (1,194 )
Credit guarantee-related adjustments (1,398 ) (174 )
Investment sales, debt retirements and fair value-related adjustments 28 1,525
Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments (100 ) (110 )
Total pre-tax adjustments 88 47
Tax-related adjustments(1) (3,022 ) 53
Total reconciling items, net of taxes (2,934 ) 100
Net loss attributable to Freddie Mac $ (9,851 ) $ (151 )
|
(1) Includes a non-cash charge related to the establishment of a partial valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, net of approximately $3.1 billion that is not included in Segment Earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis
During the first quarter of 2009, total assets increased by $96 billion to $947 billion while total liabilities increased by $71.4 billion to $953 billion. Total equity (deficit) was $(6.0) billion at March 31, 2009 compared to $(30.6) billion at December 31, 2008.
Our cash and other investments portfolio increased by $35.1 billion during the first quarter of 2009 to $99.4 billion, with a $23.9 billion increase in securities purchased under agreements to resell and a $8.4 billion increase in highly liquid shorter-term cash and cash equivalent assets. On March 31, 2009, we received $30.8 billion from Treasury under the Purchase Agreement pursuant to a draw request that FHFA submitted to Treasury on our behalf. The unpaid principal balance of our mortgage-related investments portfolio increased 8%, or $62.3 billion, during the first quarter of 2009 to $867.1 billion. The increase in our mortgage-related investments portfolio resulted from our acquiring and holding increased amounts of mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities to provide additional liquidity to the mortgage market, and, to a lesser degree, more favorable investment opportunities for agency securities as a result of a broad market decline driven by a lack of liquidity in the market. Deferred tax assets, net decreased $2.1 billion during the first quarter of 2009 to $13.3 billion, primarily attributable to the decline in the net loss in AOCI, net of taxes, as discussed below.
Short-term debt increased by $18.2 billion during the first quarter of 2009 to $453.3 billion, and long-term debt increased by $48.3 billion to $456.2 billion. . . .
|
|