|
Quotes & Info
|
| UBSI > SEC Filings for UBSI > Form 10-Q on 11-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
11-May-2009
Quarterly Report
accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments, which are
reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, are based on
information available as of the date of the financial statements. Actual results
could differ from these estimates. These policies, along with the disclosures
presented in the other financial statement notes and in this financial review,
provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the
financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation
techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the
methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has
identified the determination of the allowance for credit losses, the valuation
of investment securities and the related other-than-temporary impairment
analysis, the accounting for and the valuation of derivative instruments, and
the calculation of the income tax provision to be the accounting areas that
require the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most
subject to revision as new information becomes available.
As explained in Note 4, Allowance for Credit Losses to the unaudited
consolidated financial statements, the allowance for credit losses represents
management's estimate of the probable credit losses inherent in the lending
portfolio. Determining the allowance for credit losses requires management to
make forecasts of losses that are highly uncertain and require a high degree of
judgment. At March 31, 2009, the allowance for loan losses was $62.4 million and
is subject to periodic adjustment based on management's assessment of current
probable losses in the loan portfolios. Such adjustment from period to period
can have a significant impact on United's consolidated financial statements. To
illustrate the potential effect on the financial statements of our estimates of
the allowance for loan losses, a 10% increase in the allowance for loan losses
would have required $6.2 million in additional allowance (funded by additional
provision for credit losses), which would have negatively impacted first quarter
of 2009 net income by approximately $4.3 million, or $0.10 per common share.
Management's evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and
the appropriate provision for credit losses is based upon a quarterly evaluation
of the loan portfolio and lending related commitments. This evaluation is
inherently subjective and requires significant estimates, including estimates
related to the amounts and timing of future cash flows, value of collateral,
losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and
consideration of current economic trends, all of which are susceptible to
constant and significant change. The allowance allocated to specific credits and
loan pools grouped by similar risk characteristics is reviewed on a quarterly
basis and adjusted as necessary based upon subsequent changes in circumstances.
In determining the components of the allowance for credit losses, management
considers the risk arising in part from, but not limited to, charge-off and
delinquency trends, current economic and business conditions, lending policies
and procedures, the size and risk characteristics of the loan portfolio,
concentrations of credit, and other various factors. Additional information
relating to United's allowance for credit losses including the methodology used
to determine the allowance for credit losses is described in Note 4. A
discussion of the factors leading to changes in the amount of the allowance for
credit losses is included in the Provision for Credit Losses section of this
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (MD&A). As discussed in the MD&A, the increase in the allowance for
credit losses in the first quarter of 2009 as compared to the first quarter of
2008 can be directly attributed to the current economic environment. Additional
information relating to United's loans is included in Note 3, Loans to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Accounting estimates are used in the presentation of the investment portfolio
and these estimates impact the presentation of United's financial condition and
results of operations. United classifies its investments in debt and equity
securities as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale in accordance with
Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities." Securities held to maturity are accounted for using
historical costs, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of
discounts. Securities available for sale are accounted for at fair value, with
the net unrealized gains and losses, net of income tax effects, presented as a
separate component of stockholders' equity. When available, fair values of
securities are based on quoted prices or prices obtained from third party
vendors. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may
determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing
models that consider observable market data. Prices obtained from third party
vendors that do not reflect forced liquidation or distressed sales are not
adjusted by management. Where prices reflect forced liquidation or distressed
sales, as is the case with United's portfolio of pooled trust preferred
securities, management estimates fair value based on a discounted cash flow
methodology using appropriately adjusted discount rates reflecting
nonperformance and liquidity risks. Due to the subjective nature of this
valuation process, it is possible that the actual fair values of these
securities could differ from the estimated amounts, thereby affecting United's
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The potential impact
to United's financial position, results of operations or cash flows for changes
in the valuation process cannot be reasonably estimated.
If the estimated value of investments is less than the cost or amortized cost,
management evaluates whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred
that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.
If such an event or change has occurred, management must exercise judgment to
determine the nature of the potential impairment (i.e., temporary or other than
temporary) in order to apply the appropriate accounting treatment. For example,
available for sale securities for which there is an unrealized loss that is
deemed to be "other than temporary" are written down to fair value with the
write-down recorded as a realized loss and included in securities gains
(losses) on the income statement rather than as a separate component of
stockholders' equity on the balance sheet. Given the recent disruptions in the
financial markets, the decision to recognize other than temporary impairment on
investments securities has become more difficult as complete information is not
always available and market conditions and other relevant factors are subject to
rapid changes. Therefore, the other than temporary impairment assessment has
become a critical accounting policy for United. For additional information on
management's consideration of investment valuation and other than temporary
impairment, see Note 2, Investment Securities, and Note 11, Fair Value
Measurements, to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
United uses derivative instruments as part of its risk management activities to
protect the value of certain assets and liabilities against adverse price or
interest rate movements. All derivative instruments are carried at fair value on
the balance sheet. United considers derivative instruments to be a critical
accounting policy due to the complexity and judgment associated with the
implementation of the accounting guidance and because carrying assets and
liabilities at fair value inherently result in more financial statement
volatility. The accounting policies utilized by the Company to record
derivatives reflect the guidance in SFAS No.133 "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities" and other related accounting guidance. In
accordance with the guidance, all derivatives are recognized as either assets or
liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value. Fair values and the information
used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are
provided by third parties. Accounting for changes in the fair value of a
particular derivative differs depending on whether the derivative has been
designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship, and further, on the
type of hedging relationship. At March 31, 2009, United has one derivative
designated as a cash flow hedge and three derivatives designated as fair value
hedges. The application of hedge accounting requires significant judgment to
interpret the relevant accounting guidance, as well as to
assess hedge effectiveness, identify similar hedged item groupings and measure
changes in the fair value of the hedged items. At March 31, 2009, United also
has three derivatives not included in hedge relationships. Such derivatives
consist of interest rate swaps used for interest rate management purposes and
derivatives executed with commercial banking customers to facilitate their
interest rate management strategies. Gains and losses on other derivative
financial instruments are included in noninterest income and noninterest
expense, respectively. Management believes that its methods of addressing these
judgmental areas and applying the guidance are in accordance with GAAP and
consistent with industry practices. Interpretations of SFAS No.133 and related
guidance continue to change and evolve. Future interpretations could result in
material changes to United's accounting for derivative financial instruments and
related hedging activities. Although such changes may not have a material effect
on financial condition, they could have a material adverse effect on United's
results of operations in the period they occur. However, the potential impact to
United's operating results for such changes cannot be reasonably estimated.
Additional information relating to United's use of derivatives is included in
Note 10, Derivative Financial Instruments, to the unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
United's calculation of income tax provision is inherently complex due to the
various different tax laws and jurisdictions in which we operate and requires
management's use of estimates and judgments in its determination. The current
income tax liability also includes income tax expense related to our uncertain
tax positions as required in SFAS 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes" as
interpreted by FASB Interpretation FIN 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes". Changes to the estimated accrued taxes can occur due to changes in tax
rates, implementation of new business strategies, resolution of issues with
taxing authorities and recently enacted statutory, judicial and regulatory
guidance. These changes can be material to the Company's operating results for
any particular reporting period. The analysis of the income tax provision
requires the assessments of the relative risks and merits of the appropriate tax
treatment of transactions, filing positions, filing methods and taxable income
calculations after considering statutes, regulations, judicial precedent and
other information. United strives to keep abreast of changes in the tax laws and
the issuance of regulations which may impact tax reporting and provisions for
income tax expense. United is also subject to audit by federal and state
authorities. Because the application of tax laws is subject to varying
interpretations, results of these audits may produce indicated liabilities which
differ from United's estimates and provisions. United continually evaluates its
exposure to possible tax assessments arising from audits and records its
estimate of probable exposure based on current facts and circumstances. The
potential impact to United's operating results for any of the changes cannot be
reasonably estimated. See Note 14, Income Taxes, to the unaudited consolidated
financial statements for information regarding United's FIN 48 disclosures.
Any material effect on the financial statements related to these critical
accounting areas are further discussed in Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
USE OF FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
On January 1, 2008, United adopted SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" (SFAS
157) to determine the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair
value hierarchy established in SFAS 157, which also clarifies that fair value of
certain assets and liabilities is an exit price, representing the amount that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants. FAS 157 establishes a three-level
hierarchy for disclosure of assets and liabilities recorded at
fair value. The classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is
based on whether the inputs in the methodology for determining fair value are
observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market-based information
obtained from independent sources (Level 1 or Level 2), while unobservable
inputs reflect management's estimate of market data (Level 3). For assets and
liabilities that are actively traded and have quoted prices or observable market
data, a minimal amount of subjectivity concerning fair value is needed. Prices
and values obtained from third party vendors that do not reflect forced
liquidation or distressed sales are not adjusted by management. When quoted
prices or observable market data are not available, management's judgment is
necessary to estimate fair value.
At March 31, 2009, approximately 17.81% of total assets, or $1.42 billion,
consisted of financial instruments recorded at fair value. Of this total,
approximately 70.70% or $1.01 billion of these financial instruments used
valuation methodologies involving observable market data, collectively Level 1
and Level 2 measurements, to determine fair value. Approximately 29.30% or
$416.64 million of these financial instruments were valued using unobservable
market information or Level 3 measurements. At March 31, 2009, only
$18.24 million or less than 1% of total liabilities was recorded at fair value.
This entire amount was valued using methodologies involving observable market
data. United does not believe that any changes in the unobservable inputs used
to value the financial instruments mentioned above would have a material impact
on United's results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. See Note 11,
Fair Value Measurements, to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for
additional information regarding SFAS 157 and its impact on United's financial
statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
United's total assets as of March 31, 2009 were $7.98 billion which was a
decline of $117.37 million or 1.45% from December 31, 2008. The decrease was
primarily the result of decreases in cash and cash equivalents and investment
securities of $30.48 million or 14.27% and $67.04 million or 5.19%,
respectively. Portfolio loans were relatively flat, declining $36.56 million or
less than 1%. The decrease in total assets is reflected in a corresponding
decrease in total liabilities of $137.65 million or 1.87% from year-end 2008.
The decrease in total liabilities was due mainly to a reduction of
$156.35 million or 9.59% in borrowings. Deposits were relatively flat,
increasing $14.73 million less than 1% while accrued expenses and other
liabilities increased $3.83 million or 4.54% from year-end 2008. Shareholders'
equity increased $20.27 million or 2.75% from year-end 2008. The following
discussion explains in more detail the changes in financial condition by major
category.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2009 declined $30.48 million or 14.27%
from year-end 2008. Of this total decrease, cash and due from banks and federal
funds sold decreased $36.52 million or 19.13% and $1.20 million or 14.15%,
respectively, while interest-bearing deposits with other banks increased
$7.24 million. During the first three months of 2009, net cash of $23.90 million
and $99.82 million was provided by operating activities and investing
activities, respectively. Net cash of $154.20 million was used in financing
activities. See the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for data on
cash and cash equivalents provided and used in operating, investing and
financing activities for the first three months of 2009 and 2008.
Securities
Total investment securities at March 31, 2009 decreased $67.04 million or 5.19%
from year-end 2008. Securities available for sale declined $55.94 million or
5.10%. This change in securities available for sale reflects $85.58 million in
sales, maturities and calls of securities, $25.59 million in purchases, and an
increase of $4.07 million in market value. Securities held to maturity decreased
$11.23 million or 9.64% from year-end 2008 due to calls and maturities of
securities. Other investment securities were relatively flat, only declining
$130 thousand or less than 1% from year-end 2008. The amortized cost and
estimated fair value of investment securities, including types and remaining
maturities, is presented in Note 2 to the unaudited Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Loans
Loans held for sale increased $549 thousand or 63.25% as loan originations
exceeded loan sales in the secondary market during the first three months of
2009. Portfolio loans, net of unearned income, were relatively flat, decreasing
$36.56 million or less than 1% from year-end 2008 due mainly to a decrease in
commercial loans (not secured by real estate) of $36.51 million or 2.86%.
Single-family residential real estate loans and commercial real estate loans
were relatively flat from year-end 2008, declining $14.32 million and
$3.05 million, respectively. Both of these decreases were less than 1%. These
decreases were partially offset by increases from year-end 2008 in construction
loans of $13.38 million or 2.22% and installment loans of $3.38 million or
1.01%.
The following table summarizes the changes in the loan categories since year-end
2008:
March 31 December 31
(Dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 $ Change % Change
Loans held for sale $ 1,417 $ 868 $ 549 63.25 %
Commercial, financial, and agricultural $ 1,238,428 $ 1,274,937 $ (36,509 ) (2.86 %)
Real Estate:
Single family residential 1,901,035 1,915,355 (14,320 ) (0.75 %)
Commercial 1,644,260 1,647,307 (3,047 ) (0.18 %)
Construction 615,371 601,995 13,376 2.22 %
Other 245,124 245,214 (90 ) (0.04 %)
Consumer 339,132 335,750 3,382 1.01 %
Less: Unearned income (5,754 ) (6,403 ) 649 (10.14 %)
Total Loans, net of unearned income $ 5,977,596 $ 6,014,155 $ (36,559 ) (0.61 %)
|
For a further discussion of loans see Note 3 to the unaudited Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other Assets
Other assets increased $20.05 million or 8.33% from year-end 2008 due mainly to
increases of $11.95 million in OREO due to new foreclosures as a result of the
current economic conditions, $5.07 million in deferred tax assets and
$3.76 million in income taxes receivable. The increases in deferred tax assets
and
income taxes receivable for the first quarter of 2009 were due to a tax benefit
associated with net operating loss carryforwards and a positive adjustment to
income taxes as a result of a recently concluded state tax examination,
respectively. Partially offsetting these increases from year-end 2008 was a
decrease in core deposit intangibles of $704 thousand due to amortization.
Deposits
Total deposits at March 31, 2009 were relatively flat, increasing $14.73 million
or less than 1% from year-end 2008. In terms of composition, noninterest-bearing
deposits increased $87.89 million or 9.70% while interest-bearing deposits
decreased $73.16 million or 1.54% from December 31, 2008. The increase in
noninterest-bearing deposits was due mainly to increases in commercial
noninterest bearing deposits of $69.74 million or 11.11% and personal
noninterest bearing deposits of $12.82 million or 5.28%.
The decrease in interest-bearing deposits was due mainly to a decline in time
deposits under $100,000 of $276.12 million or 14.64%. Most of this decline was
due mainly to a shift in Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service
(CDARS) balances to certificate of deposits over $100,000 as a result of the
temporary increase in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance
coverage from $100,000 to $250,000. Interest bearing money market accounts
(MMDAs) decreased $34.78 million or 2.58%. Time deposits over $100,000 increased
$181.46 million or 17.94%. Regular savings balances increased $20.63 million or
6.40% and interest-bearing checking deposits increased $35.64 million or 20.36%.
The table below summarizes the changes in the deposit categories since year-end
2008:
March 31 December 31
2009 2008 $ Change % Change
(Dollars In thousands)
Demand deposits $ 461,549 $ 419,091 $ 42,458 10.13 %
Interest-bearing checking 210,709 175,065 35,644 20.36 %
Regular savings 343,105 322,478 20,627 6.40 %
Money market accounts 1,844,124 1,833,472 10,652 0.58 %
Time deposits under $100,000 1,610,138 1,886,256 (276,118 ) (14.64 %)
Time deposits over $100,000 1,193,055 1,011,592 181,463 17.94 %
Total deposits $ 5,662,680 $ 5,647,954 $ 14,726 0.26 %
|
Borrowings
Total borrowings at March 31, 2009 decreased $156.35 million or 9.59% during the
first three months of 2009. Since year-end 2008, short-term borrowings decreased
$231.17 million or 29.70% due to a $162 million reduction in overnight FHLB
borrowings. Federal funds purchased increased $23.25 million or 18.14% while
securities sold under agreements to repurchase decreased $91.75 million or
21.12% since year-end 2008. Long-term borrowings increased $74.81 million or
8.77% since year-end 2008 as long-term FHLB advances increased $74.92 million or
11.22%.
The table below summarizes the change in the borrowing categories since year-end 2008:
March 31 December 31
2009 2008 $ Change % Change
(Dollars In thousands)
Federal funds purchased $ 151,435 $ 128,185 $ 23,250 18.14 %
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase 342,673 434,425 (91,752 ) (21.12 %)
Overnight FHLB advances 50,000 212,000 (162,000 ) (76.42 %)
TT&L note option 3,047 3,710 (663 ) (17.87 %)
Long-term FHLB advances 742,459 667,538 74,921 11.22 %
Issuances of trust preferred capital
securities 185,040 185,147 (107 ) (0.06 %)
Total borrowings $ 1,474,654 $ 1,631,005 $ (156,351 ) (9.59 %)
|
For a further discussion of borrowings see Notes 7 and 8 to the unaudited Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities at March 31, 2009 increased $3.83 million
or 4.54% from year-end 2008 mainly as a result of an increase in income taxes
payable of $7.15 million due to a timing difference in payments. Interest
payable decreased $974 thousand due to a decline in borrowings and derivative
liabilities decreased $769 thousand due to a change in value while accrued
employee and other accrued expenses declined $1.03 million and $1.18 million,
respectively, due to payments.
Shareholders' Equity
Shareholders' equity at March 31, 2009 increased $20.27 million or 2.75% from
. . .
|
|