|
Quotes & Info
|
| TTEC > SEC Filings for TTEC > Form 10-Q on 11-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
11-May-2009
Quarterly Report
As globalization of the world's economy continues to accelerate, businesses are
increasingly competing on a large-scale basis due to rapid advances in
technology and telecommunications that permit cost-effective real-time global
communications and ready access to a highly skilled worldwide labor force. As a
result of these developments, companies have increasingly outsourced business
processes to third-party providers in an effort to enhance or maintain their
competitive position while increasing shareholder value through improved
productivity and profitability.
We believe that our revenue will continue to grow over the long-term as global
demand for our services is being fueled by the following trends:
Integration of front- and back-office business processes to provide
increased operating efficiencies and an enhanced customer experience
especially in light of the weakening global economic environment. Companies
have realized that integrated business processes reduce operating costs and
allow customer needs to be met more quickly and efficiently resulting in
higher customer satisfaction and brand loyalty thereby improving their
competitive position. A majority of our historic revenue has been derived
from providing customer-facing front-office solutions to our clients. Given
that our global delivery centers are also fully capable of providing
back-office solutions, we are uniquely positioned to grow our revenue by
winning more back-office opportunities and providing the services during
non-peak hours with minimal incremental investment. Furthermore, by
spreading our fixed costs across a larger revenue base and increasing our
asset utilization, we expect our profitability to improve over time.
Increasing percentage of company operations being outsourced to most capable third-party providers. Having experienced success with outsourcing a portion of their business processes, companies are increasingly inclined to outsource a larger percentage of this work. We believe companies will continue to consolidate their business processes with third-party providers, such as TeleTech, who are financially stable and able to invest in their business while also demonstrating an extensive global operating history and an ability to cost effectively scale to meet their evolving needs.
Increasing adoption of outsourcing across broader groups of industries. Early adopters of the business process outsourcing trend, such as the media and communications industries, are being joined by companies in other industries, including healthcare, retail and financial services. These companies are beginning to adopt outsourcing to improve their business processes and competitiveness. For example, we have seen an increase in interest of our services for companies in the healthcare, retail and financial services industries. We believe the number of other industries that will adopt or increase their level of outsourcing will continue to grow, further enabling us to increase and diversify our revenue and client base.
Focus on speed-to-market by companies launching new products or entering new geographic locations. As companies broaden their product offerings and seek to enter new emerging markets, they are looking for outsourcing providers that can provide speed-to-market while reducing their capital and operating risk. To achieve these benefits, companies are seeking BPO providers with an extensive operating history, an established global footprint, the financial strength to invest in innovation to deliver more strategic capabilities and the ability to scale and meet customer demands quickly. Given our financial stability, geographic presence in 17 countries and our significant investment in standardized technology and processes, clients increasingly select TeleTech because we can quickly ramp large, complex business processes around the globe in a short period of time while assuring a high-quality experience for our client's customers.
Our Strategy
Our objective is to become the world's largest, most technologically advanced
and innovative provider of onshore, offshore and work from home BPO solutions.
Companies within the Global 1000 are our primary client targets due to their
size, global nature, focus on outsourcing and desire for the global, scalable
integrated process solutions that we offer. We have developed, and continue to
invest in, a broad set of capabilities designed to serve this growing client
need. These investments include our TeleTech@Home offering which allows our
employees to serve clients from their homes. This capability has enhanced the
flexibility of our offering allowing clients to choose our onshore, offshore or
work from home employees to meet their outsourced business process needs. In
addition, we have begun to offer 'hosted services' where clients can license any
aspect of our global network and proprietary applications. While the revenue
from these offerings is small relative to our consolidated revenue, we believe
it will continue to grow as these services become more widely adopted by our
clients. We aim to further improve our competitive position by investing in a
growing suite of new and innovative business process services across our
targeted industries.
Our business strategy to increase revenue, profitability and our industry
position includes the following elements:
Deepen and broaden our relationships with existing clients;
Win business with new clients and focus on targeted industries where we expect accelerating adoption of business process outsourcing;
Continue to invest in innovative proprietary technology and new business offerings;
Continue to improve our operating margins through increased asset utilization of our globally diverse centers; and
Selectively pursue acquisitions that extend our capabilities, geographic reach and/or industry expertise.
Our First Quarter 2009 Financial Results
In 2009, our first quarter revenue decreased 17.3% to $304.0 million over the
year-ago period, which includes a decrease of $35.9 million due to fluctuations
in foreign currency rates. Our first quarter 2009 income from operations
decreased 29.4% to $20.3 million or 6.7% of revenue in 2009 from $28.8 million
or 7.8% of revenue in the year-ago period. This decrease is due to softness of
existing client volumes in light of the current global recessionary economic
environment and the continued migration of several of our clients to our
offshore delivery centers. Income from operations in 2009 and 2008 included
$2.3 million and $2.2 million of asset impairment and restructuring charges,
respectively. Excluding these charges, our income from operations in 2009
decreased 27.1% to $22.6 million or 7.4% of revenue from $31.0 million or 8.4%
of revenue in 2008 excluding similar items.
We have experienced growth in our offshore delivery centers, which primarily
serve clients located in other countries. Our offshore delivery capacity now
spans seven countries with approximately 25,400 workstations and currently
represents 67% of our global delivery capabilities. Revenue in these offshore
locations was $146 million and grew to 48% of our total revenue in the first
quarter of 2009. While historically it was primarily US-based clients that were
willing to utilize our offshore delivery capabilities, we have increasingly seen
clients in Europe and Asia Pacific willing to utilize our offshore delivery
capabilities and expect this trend to continue with clients in other countries.
In light of this trend, we plan to continue to selectively expand into new
offshore markets. For example, we believe we are one of the first multi-national
BPO providers to enter the African continent. As we grow our offshore delivery
capabilities and our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations increase, we
continue to actively manage this risk via a multi-currency hedging program
designed to minimize operating margin volatility.
Our strong financial position due to our cash flow from operations and low debt
levels allowed us to finance a significant portion of our capital needs and
stock repurchases through internally generated cash flows. At March 31, 2009, we
had $91.2 million of cash and cash equivalents and a total debt to total
capitalization ratio of 13.1%.
Business Overview
Our BPO business provides outsourced business process and customer management
services for a variety of industries through global delivery centers. Effective
January 1, 2009, we completed certain organizational changes focused on
streamlining the structure of our organization to more closely align our
reporting structure with our client base and increase management accountability.
Beginning in the first quarter of 2009, our North American BPO segment is
comprised of sales to all clients based in North America (encompassing the U.S.
and Canada), while our International BPO is comprised of sales to all clients
based in all countries outside of North America. TeleTech revised previously
reported operating segment information to conform to its new operating segments
in effect as of January 1, 2009.
BPO Services
The BPO business generates revenue based primarily on the amount of time our
associates devote to a client's program. We primarily focus on large global
corporations in the following industries: automotive, cable, financial services,
government, healthcare, logistics, media and entertainment, retail, technology,
travel and leisure and wireline and wireless telecommunications. Revenue is
recognized as services are provided. The majority of our revenue is from
multi-year contracts, and we expect that trend to continue. However, we do
provide certain client programs on a short-term basis.
We have historically experienced annual attrition of existing client programs of
approximately 7% to 15% of our revenue. Attrition of existing client programs
during the first three months of 2009 was 2%, which is lower than the three
months ended March 31, 2008. We believe that this is attributable to our
investment in an account management and operations team focused on client
service.
The BPO industry is highly competitive. We compete primarily with the in-house
business processing operations of our current and potential clients. We also
compete with certain companies that provide BPO on an outsourced basis. Our
ability to sell our existing services or gain acceptance for new products or
services is challenged by the competitive nature of the industry. There can be
no assurance that we will be able to sell services to new clients, renew
relationships with existing clients, or gain client acceptance of our new
products.
Our goal in both the North American and the International BPO segments is to
improve our revenue and profitability by:
Capitalizing on the favorable trends in the global outsourcing environment,
which we believe will include more companies that want to:
- Adopt or increase BPO services;
- Consolidate outsourcing providers with those that have a solid financial position, capital resources to sustain a long-term relationship and globally diverse delivery capabilities across a broad range of solutions;
- Modify their approach to outsourcing based on total value delivered versus the lowest priced provider; and
- Better integrate front- and back-office processes.
Deepening and broadening relationships with existing clients;
Winning business with new clients and focusing on targeted high growth industry verticals;
Continuing to diversify revenue into higher-margin offerings such as professional services, talent acquisition, learning services and our hosted TeleTech OnDemand capabilities;
Increasing capacity utilization during peak and non-peak hours;
Scaling our work-from-home initiative to increase operational flexibility; and
Completing select acquisitions that extend our core BPO capabilities or vertical expertise.
Our ability to renew or enter into new multi-year contracts, particularly large
complex opportunities, is dependent upon the macroeconomic environment in
general and the specific industry environments in which our clients operate. A
continued weakening of the U.S. or the global economy could lengthen sales
cycles or cause delays in closing new business opportunities.
Our potential clients typically obtain bids from multiple vendors and evaluate
many factors in selecting a service provider, including, among other factors,
the scope of services offered, the service record of the vendor and price. We
generally price our bids with a long-term view of profitability and,
accordingly, we consider all of our fixed and variable costs in developing our
bids. We believe that our competitors, at times, may bid business based upon a
short-term view, as opposed to our longer-term view, resulting in a lower price
bid. While we believe that our clients' perceptions of the value we provide
results in our being successful in certain competitive bid situations, there are
often situations where a potential client may prefer a lower cost.
Our industry is labor intensive and the majority of our operating costs relate
to wages, employee benefits and employment taxes. An improvement in the local or
global economies where our delivery centers are located could lead to increased
labor related costs. In addition, our industry experiences high personnel
turnover and the length of training time required to implement new programs
continues to increase due to increased complexities of our clients' businesses.
This may create challenges if we obtain several significant new clients or
implement several new, large scale programs and need to recruit, hire and train
qualified personnel at an accelerated rate.
As discussed above, to some extent our profitability is influenced by the number
of new client programs entered into within the period. For new programs we defer
revenue related to initial training ("Training Revenue") when training is billed
as a separate component from production rates. Consequently, the corresponding
training costs associated with this revenue, consisting primarily of labor and
related expenses ("Training Costs"), are also deferred. In these circumstances,
both the Training Revenue and Training Costs are amortized straight-line over
the life of the contract. In situations where Training Revenue is not billed
separately, but rather included in the production rates, there is no deferral as
all revenue is recognized over the life of the contract and the associated
training expenses are expensed as incurred. As of March 31, 2009, we had
deferred start-up training revenue, net of costs, of $8.1 million that will be
recognized into our income from operations over the remaining life of the
corresponding contracts (approximately 16 months).
We may have difficulties managing the timeliness of launching new or expanded
client programs and the associated internal allocation of personnel and
resources. This could cause slower than anticipated revenue growth and/or higher
than expected costs primarily related to hiring, training and retaining the
required workforce, either of which could adversely affect our operating
results.
Quarterly, we review our capacity utilization and projected demand for future
capacity. In conjunction with these reviews, we may decide to consolidate or
close under-performing delivery centers, including those impacted by the loss of
a client program, in order to maintain or improve targeted utilization and
margins. In addition, because clients may request that we serve their customers
from international delivery centers with lower prevailing labor rates, in the
future, we may decide to close one or more of our delivery centers, even though
it is generating positive cash flow, because we believe that the future profits
from conducting such work outside the current delivery center may more than
compensate for the one-time charges related to closing the facility.
Our profitability is influenced by our ability to increase capacity utilization
in our delivery centers. We attempt to minimize the financial impact resulting
from idle capacity when planning the development and opening of new delivery
centers or the expansion of existing delivery centers. As such, management
considers numerous factors that affect capacity utilization, including
anticipated expirations, reductions, terminations, or expansions of existing
programs and the potential size and timing of new client contracts that we
expect to obtain.
We continue to win new business with both new and existing clients. To respond
more rapidly to changing market demands, to implement new programs and to expand
existing programs, we may be required to commit to additional capacity prior to
the contracting of additional business, which may result in idle capacity. This
is largely due to the significant time required to negotiate and execute large,
complex BPO client contracts and the difficulty of predicting specifically when
new programs will launch.
We internally target capacity utilization in our delivery centers at 80% to 90%
of our available workstations. As of March 31, 2009, the overall capacity
utilization in our multi-client centers was 71% and is lower than the prior year
due to softness of existing client volumes in light of the current global
recessionary economic environment and the continued migration of several of our
current clients to our off shore delivery centers. The table below presents
workstation data for our multi-client centers as of March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Dedicated and managed centers (8,565 and 9,948 workstations as of March 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively) are excluded from the workstation data as unused
workstations in these facilities are not available for sale to other clients.
Our utilization percentage is defined as the total number of utilized production
workstations compared to the total number of available production workstations.
We may change the designation of shared or dedicated centers based on the normal
changes in our business environment and client needs.
March 31, 2009 March 31, 2008
Total Total
Production Production
Workstations In Use % In Use Workstations In Use % In Use
Multi-client centers
Sites open <1 year 4,748 2,438 51 % 5,387 2,885 54 %
Sites open >1 year 24,478 18,374 75 % 22,533 18,220 81 %
Total multi-client centers 29,226 20,812 71 % 27,920 21,105 76 %
|
Recent Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of
recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management's Discussion and Analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses as well as the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. We regularly review our estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions, which are based upon historical
experience and on various other factors believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Reported amounts and disclosures may have been different had management used
different estimates and assumptions or if different conditions had occurred in
the periods presented. Below is a discussion of the policies that we believe may
involve a high degree of judgment and complexity.
Revenue Recognition
For each client arrangement, we determine whether evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery of our service has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable
and collection is reasonably assured. If all criteria are met, we recognize
revenue at the time services are performed. If any of these criteria are not
met, revenue recognition is deferred until such time as all of the criteria are
met.
Our BPO segments recognize revenue under three models:
Production Rate - Revenue is recognized based on the billable time or
transactions of each associate, as defined in the client contract. The rate per
billable time or transaction is based on a pre-determined contractual rate. This
contractual rate can fluctuate based on our performance against certain
pre-determined criteria related to quality and performance.
Performance-Based - Under performance-based arrangements, we are paid by our
clients based on the achievement of certain levels of sales or other
client-determined criteria specified in the client contract. We recognize
performance-based revenue by measuring our actual results against the
performance criteria specified in the contracts. Amounts collected from clients
prior to the performance of services are recorded as deferred revenue, which is
recorded in Other Short-Term Liabilities or Other Long-Term Liabilities in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Hybrid - Hybrid models include production rate and performance-based elements.
For these types of arrangements, we allocate revenue to the elements based on
the relative fair value of each element. Revenue for each element is recognized
based on the methods described above.
Certain client programs provide for adjustments to monthly billings based upon
whether we meet or exceed certain performance criteria as set forth in the
contract. Increases or decreases to monthly billings arising from such contract
terms are reflected in revenue as earned or incurred.
Periodically, we make certain expenditures related to acquiring contracts or
provide up-front discounts for future services to existing clients (recorded as
Contract Acquisition Costs in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets).
Those expenditures are capitalized and amortized in proportion to the expected
future revenue from the contract, which in most cases results in straight-line
amortization over the life of the contract. Amortization of these costs is
recorded as a reduction of revenue.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109 Accounting for
Income Taxes ("SFAS 109"), which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences of transactions that
have been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Under this method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference
between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using
tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to
. . .
|
|