|
Quotes & Info
|
| SJT > SEC Filings for SJT > Form 10-Q on 11-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
11-May-2009
Quarterly Report
Holders of Units are referred to herein as "Unit Holders." Subsequent to the
Conveyance of the Royalty, through a series of assignments and mergers,
Southland Royalty's successor became BROG. On March 31, 2006, a subsidiary of
ConocoPhillips completed its acquisition of Burlington Resources, Inc., BROG's
parent. As a result, ConocoPhillips became the parent of Burlington Resources,
Inc., which in turn, is the parent of BROG.
The function of the Trustee is to collect the net proceeds attributable to
the Royalty ("Royalty Income"), to pay all expenses and charges of the Trust and
distribute the remaining available income to the Unit Holders. The Trust does
not operate the Underlying Properties and, in fact, is not empowered to carry on
any business activity. The Trust has no employees, officers or directors. All
administrative functions of the Trust are performed by the Trustee.
BROG is the principal operator of the Underlying Properties. A very high
percentage of the Royalty Income is attributable to the production and sale by
BROG of natural gas from the Underlying Properties. Accordingly, the market
price for natural gas produced and sold from the San Juan Basin heavily
influences the amount of Royalty Income distributed by the Trust and, by
extension, the price of the Units.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
The Trust received Royalty income of $9,550,576 and interest income of $2,605
during the first quarter of 2009. There was no change in cash reserves. After
deducting administrative expenses of $583,745, distributable income for the
quarter was $8,969,436 ($0.192440 per Unit). In the first quarter of 2008,
Royalty income was $25,576,418, interest income was $164,379, there was no
change in cash reserves, administrative expenses were $610,074 and distributable
income was $25,130,723 ($0.539184 per Unit). Based on 46,608,796 Units
outstanding, the per-Unit distributions during the first quarter of 2009 were as
follows:
January $ .041447
February .098890
March .052103
Quarter Total $ .192440
|
The Royalty income distributed in the first quarter of 2009 was lower than
that distributed in the first quarter of 2008. The average gas price decreased
from $6.97 per Mcf for the first quarter of 2008 to $4.04 per Mcf for the first
quarter of 2009. Gas volumes decreased slightly in the quarter ended March 31,
2009 as compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2008. BROG has informed the
Trust that the decrease in reported volumes was due primarily to the natural
production decline curve. Interest income was lower for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 as compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2008, primarily due to
additional interest BROG paid to the Trust in the first quarter of 2008 as a
result of the granting of certain audit exceptions, and also due to higher
interest rates in the first quarter of 2008. Administrative expenses were lower
in 2009 primarily as a result of differences in timing in the receipt and
payment of these expenses.
The capital costs attributable to the Underlying Properties for the first
quarter of 2009 and deducted by BROG in calculating Royalty income were
approximately $9.9 million. BROG has informed the Trust that the 2009 budget for
capital expenditures for the Underlying Properties is $25.2 million. In
addition, BROG estimates that during 2009 it will incur capital expenses in the
amount of approximately $12.1 million attributable to the capital budgets for
2008 and prior years. Approximately 12% of the planned expenditures attributable
to the 2009 budget will be on Fruitland Coal formation projects with the
remainder to be spent on conventional projects. BROG reports that based on its
actual capital requirements, the pace of regulatory approvals, the mix of
projects and swings in the price of natural gas, the actual capital expenditures
for 2009 could range from $10 million to $45 million.
BROG anticipates 431 projects in 2009 at an estimated cost of $25.2 million.
Approximately $6 million of that budget is allocable to 49 new wells, including
39 wells scheduled to be dually completed in the Mesaverde and Dakota formations
and four wells projected to be drilled to formations producing coal seam gas.
Approximately $7.1 million will be spent on workovers and facilities projects.
Of the $12.1 million attributable to the budgets for prior years, approximately
$6.9 million is allocable to new wells, and the $5.2 million balance will be
applied to miscellaneous capital projects such as workovers and operated
facility projects. BROG also anticipates that the possible implementation of new
rules minimizing surface disturbances, requiring the implementation of
closed-loop systems for the disposal of drilling fluids and cuttings, and
restricting the use of open reserve pits could reduce the number of projects due
to increased compliance costs.
BROG has informed the Trust that lease operating expenses and property taxes
were $8,992,827 and $276,732, respectively, for the first quarter of 2009, as
compared to $8,083,988 and $245,295, respectively, for the first quarter of
2008. BROG reports that lease operating expenses were higher in the first
quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008 primarily because
demand-related increases in the cost of contract services and materials have not
yet been mitigated by the decline in natural gas sales prices. New drilling
results in increases in salt water disposal and compression costs. Additionally,
the overhead rate determined by the Council of Petroleum Accountants Societies
was adjusted in April 2008 to 7.7%, from the previous rate of 6.4%.
BROG has reported to the Trustee that during the first quarter of 2009, 11
gross (5.18 net) coal seam wells and 27 gross (3.77 net) conventional wells were
completed on the Underlying Properties. Seven gross (3.48 net) coal seam wells
and 20 gross (2.58 net) conventional wells were in progress at March 31, 2009.
There were three gross (2.56 net) coal seam wells and 23 gross (0.41 net)
conventional wells completed on the Underlying Properties as of March 31, 2008.
Four gross (1.44 net) coal seam wells and 21 gross (1.42 net) conventional wells
were in progress at March 31, 2008.
There were 3,903 gross (1,137 net) producing wells being operated subject to
the Royalty as of December 31, 2008, calculated on a well bore basis and not
including multiple completions as separate wells.
"Gross" acres or wells, for purposes of this discussion, means the entire
ownership interest of all parties in such properties, and BROG's interest
therein is referred to as the "net" acres or wells. A "payadd" is the completion
of an additional productive interval in an existing completed zone in a well.
Royalty income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 is associated with actual gas and oil production during November 2008 through January 2009 from the Underlying Properties. Gas and oil sales from the Underlying Properties for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2009 2008
Gas:
Total sales (Mcf) 8,558,550 8,559,117
Mcf per day 93,028 93,033
Average price (per Mcf) $ 4.04 $ 6.97
Oil:
Total sales (Bbls) 10,982 12,698
Bbls per day 119 138
Average price (per Bbl) $ 40.50 $ 88.58
|
Gas and oil sales attributable to the Royalty for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2009 2008
Gas sales (Mcf) 2,522,083 4,723,823
Oil sales (Bbls) 3,302 6,922
|
Sales volumes attributable to the Royalty are determined by dividing the net
profits received by the Trust and attributable to oil and gas, respectively, by
the prices received for sales volumes from the Underlying Properties, taking
into consideration production taxes attributable to the Underlying Properties.
Since the oil and gas sales attributable to the Royalty are based on an
allocation formula that is dependent on such factors as price and cost,
including capital expenditures, the aggregate production volumes from the
Underlying Properties may not provide a meaningful comparison to volumes
attributable to the Royalty.
During the first quarter of 2009, average gas prices were $2.93 per Mcf lower
than the average prices reported during the first quarter of 2008 due to
decreases in gas prices in domestic markets generally, including the posted
index prices applicable to gas sold from the San Juan Basin. The average price
per barrel of oil during the first quarter of 2009 was $48.08 per barrel lower
than that received for the first quarter of 2008.
BROG previously entered into three contracts for the sale of all volumes of
gas produced from the Underlying Properties to ChevronTexaco Natural Gas, a
division of Chevron U.S.A. Inc. ("ChevronTexaco"), Coral Energy Resources, L.P.
("Coral"), and PNM Gas Services ("PNM"), respectively. In March 2008, both
ChevronTexaco and Coral notified BROG of their election to terminate their
respective contracts effective March 31, 2009. Requests for proposal were
circulated to potential purchasers of the packages of gas covered by the
expiring contracts. Neither BROG nor PNM gave notice of termination with respect
to the PNM contract and, by agreement of the parties, the term of that contract
has been extended through at least March 31, 2011. On December 11, 2008, the New
Mexico Public Regulatory Commission approved the sale of the gas utility assets
of PNM to New Mexico Gas Company, Inc. ("NMGC") and, effective as of January 30,
2009, the PNM contract was assigned to and assumed by NMGC.
BROG has now entered into four new contracts effective April 1, 2009, for the
sale of all gas produced from the Underlying Properties other than the gas
covered by the NMGC contract. The new purchasers are Chevron Natural Gas, a
division of Chevron USA, Inc., Pacific Gas and Electric Company, BP Energy
Company and Macquarie Cook Energy LLC. All four of the new contracts and the
pre-existing NMGC contract provide for (i) the delivery of such gas at various
delivery points through March 31, 2011 and from year-to-year thereafter, until
terminated by either party on 12 months' notice; and (ii) the sale of such gas
at prices which fluctuate in accordance with the published indices for gas sold
in the San Juan Basin of northwestern New Mexico. Although the primary term of
the Chevron contract continues until March 31, 2011, a portion of the gas
covered by that contract will be remarketed for sale after March 2010.
Confidentiality agreements with purchasers of gas produced from the
Underlying Properties prohibit public disclosure of certain terms and conditions
of gas sales contracts with those entities, including specific pricing terms and
gas receipt points. Such disclosure could compromise the ability to compete
effectively in the marketplace for the sale of gas produced from the Underlying
Properties.
Calculation of Royalty Income
Royalty income received by the Trust for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively, was computed as shown in the following table:
CALCULATION OF ROYALTY INCOME
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2009 2008
Gross proceeds of sales from the Underlying Properties:
Gas proceeds $ 34,594,861 $ 53,108,214
Oil proceeds 444,735 1,124,793
Total 35,039,596 54,233,007
Less production costs:
Severance tax - Gas 3,126,253 5,436,476
Severance tax - Oil 42,796 117,911
Lease operating expense and property tax 9,269,559 8,329,283
Capital expenditures 9,866,887 6,247,446
Total 22,305,495 20,131,116
Net profits 12,734,101 34,101,891
Net overriding royalty interest 75 % 75 %
Royalty income $ 9,550,576 $ 25,576,418
|
Contractual Obligations
Under the Indenture governing the Trust, the Trustee is entitled to an
administrative fee for its administrative services and the preparation of
quarterly and annual statements of: (i) 1/20 of 1% of the first $100 million of
the annual gross revenue of the Trust, and 1/30 of 1% of the annual gross
revenue of the Trust in excess of $100 million and (ii) the Trustee's standard
hourly rates for time in excess of 300 hours annually, provided that the
administrative fee due under items (i) and (ii) above will not be less than
$36,000 per year (as adjusted annually to reflect the increase (if any) in the
Producers Price Index as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, since December 31, 2003).
Effects of Securities Regulation
As a publicly-traded trust listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the
"NYSE"), the Trust is and will continue to be subject to extensive regulation
under, among others, the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (which contains many of the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002),
and the rules and regulations of the NYSE. Issuers failing to comply with such
authorities risk serious consequences, including criminal as well as civil and
administrative penalties. In most instances, these laws, rules, and regulations
do not specifically address their applicability to publicly-traded trusts, such
as the Trust. In particular, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 provides for the
adoption by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") and NYSE
of certain rules and regulations that may be impossible for the Trust to
literally satisfy because of its nature as a pass-through trust. It is the
Trustee's intention to follow the Commission's and NYSE's rulemaking closely,
attempt to comply with such rules and regulations and, where appropriate,
request relief from these rules and regulations. However, if the Trust is unable
to comply with such rules and regulations or to obtain appropriate relief, the
Trust may be required to expend presently unknown but potentially material costs
to amend the Indenture that governs the Trust to allow for compliance with such
rules and regulations. To date, the rules implementing the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 have generally made appropriate accommodation for passive entities such as
the Trust.
Critical Accounting Policies
In accordance with the Commission's staff accounting bulletins and consistent
with other royalty trusts, the financial statements of the Trust are prepared on
the following basis:
• Royalty income recorded for a month is the amount computed and paid
pursuant to the Conveyance by BROG to the Trustee for the Trust. Royalty
income consists of the proceeds received by BROG from the sale of
production from the Underlying Properties less accrued production costs,
development and drilling costs, applicable taxes, operating charges, and
other costs and deductions, multiplied by 75%. The calculation of net
proceeds by BROG for any month includes adjustments to proceeds and costs
for prior months and impacts the Royalty income paid to the Trust and the
distribution to Unit Holders for that month.
• Trust expenses recorded are based on liabilities paid and cash reserves established from Royalty income for liabilities and contingencies.
• Distributions to Unit Holders are recorded when declared by the Trustee.
• The Conveyance which transferred the Royalty to the Trust provides that any excess of development and production costs applicable to the Underlying Properties over gross proceeds from such properties must be recovered from future net proceeds before Royalty income is again paid to the Trust.
The financial statements of the Trust differ from financial statements
prepared in accordance with GAAP because revenues are not accrued in the month
of production; certain cash reserves may be established for contingencies which
would not be accrued in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP;
expenses are recorded when paid instead of when incurred; and amortization of
the Royalty calculated on a unit-of-production basis is charged directly to the
Trust corpus instead of an expense.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Trust invests in no derivative financial instruments, and has no foreign
operations or long-term debt instruments. The Trust is a passive entity and is
prohibited from engaging in a trade or business, including borrowing
transactions, other than as periodically necessary to pay expenses, liabilities
and
obligations of the Trust that cannot be paid out of cash held by the Trust. The
amount of any such borrowings is unlikely to be material to the Trust. The Trust
is also permitted to hold short-term investments acquired with funds held by the
Trust pending distribution to Unit Holders and funds held in reserve for the
payment of Trust expenses and liabilities. Because of the short-term nature of
these borrowings and investments and certain limitations upon the types of such
investments which may be held by the Trust, the Trustee believes that the Trust
is not subject to any material interest rate risk. The Trust is not permitted to
engage in transactions in foreign currencies which could expose the Trust or
Unit Holders to any foreign currency related market risk. The Trust is not
permitted to market the gas, oil or natural gas liquids from the Underlying
Properties; BROG is responsible for such marketing.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
The Trust maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Trust's
filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's
rules and forms. Due to the pass-through nature of the Trust, BROG provides much
of the information disclosed in this Form 10-Q and the other periodic reports
filed by the Trust with the Commission. Consequently, the Trust's ability to
timely disclose relevant information in its periodic reports is dependent upon
BROG's delivery of such information. Accordingly, the Trust maintains disclosure
controls and procedures designed to ensure that BROG accurately and timely
accumulates and delivers such relevant information to the Trustee and those who
participate in the preparation of the Trust's periodic reports to allow for the
preparation of such periodic reports and any decisions regarding disclosure.
The Indenture does not require BROG to update or provide information to the
Trust. However, the Conveyance transferring the Royalty to the Trust obligates
BROG to provide the Trust with certain information, including information
concerning calculations of net proceeds owed to the Trust. Pursuant to the
settlement of litigation in 1996 between the Trust and BROG, BROG agreed to
newer, more formal financial reporting and audit procedures as compared to those
provided in the Conveyance.
In order to help ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information
required to be disclosed in the Trust's periodic reports, the Trust employs
independent public accountants, joint interest auditors, marketing consultants,
attorneys and petroleum engineers. These outside professionals advise the
Trustee in its review and compilation of this information for inclusion in this
Form 10-Q and the other periodic reports provided by the Trust to the
Commission.
The Trustee has evaluated the Trust's disclosure controls and procedures as
of March 31, 2009 and has concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures
are effective, at the "reasonable assurance" level, to ensure that material
information related to the Trust is gathered on a timely basis to be included in
the Trust's periodic reports. In reaching its conclusion, the Trustee has
considered the Trust's dependence on BROG to deliver timely and accurate
information to the Trust. Additionally, during the quarter ended March 31, 2009
there were no changes in the Trust's internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust's
internal control over financial reporting. The Trustee has reviewed neither the
Trust's disclosure controls and procedures nor the Trust's internal control over
financial reporting in concert with management, a board of directors or an
independent audit committee. The Trust does not have, nor does the Indenture
provide for, officers, a board of directors or an independent audit committee.
|
|