|
Quotes & Info
|
| THFF > SEC Filings for THFF > Form 10-Q on 8-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
8-May-2009
Quarterly Report
Non-Interest Expenses
The Corporation's non-interest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
compared to the same period in 2008 increased by $274 thousand or 1.7%. FDIC
insurance increased for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as compared to
the three months ended March 31, 2008. The increase in 2009 is due to an overall
increase in the assessment by the FDIC effective January 1, 2009. Insurance
assessments range from 0.12% to 0.50% of total deposits for the first quarter
2009 assessment period only. The first quarter 2009 final assessment rate will
not be finalized by the FDIC until the end of June 2009. All expense recorded is
an estimate of the actual assessment rate. Effective April 1, 2009, insurance
assessments will range from 0.07% to 0.78%, depending on an institution's risk
classification, as well as its unsecured debt, secured liability and brokered
deposits. In addition, under an interim rule, the FDIC proposes to impose a 20
basis point emergency special assessment on insured depository institutions on
June 30, 2009. The emergency special assessment would be collected on
September 30, 2009. The interim rule also authorizes the FDIC to impose an
additional emergency special assessment after June 30, 2009, of up to 10 basis
points, if necessary to maintain public confidence in federal deposit insurance.
Income tax expense for the quarter of $1.1 million was 50% less than the first
quarter of 2008 as income before tax was less and the effective tax rate
decreased from 24.9% to 20.3% as tax exempt income was a higher proportion of
total income for the quarter.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Corporation's provision for loan losses increased $905 thousand for the
first three months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. Net charge-offs
for the first three months of 2009 were higher by $248 thousand and the volume
of impaired and non-performing loans both increased. The allowance for loan
losses has increased from 1.11% of gross loans, or $16.3 million at December 31,
2008 to 1.15% of gross loans, or $17.0 million at March 31, 2009. Based on
management's analysis of the current portfolio, an evaluation that includes
consideration of historical loss experience, non-performing loans trends, and
probable incurred losses on identified problem loans, management believes the
allowance is adequate.
Non-performing Loans
Non-performing loans consist of (1) non-accrual loans on which the ultimate
collectability of the full amount of interest is uncertain, (2) loans which have
been renegotiated to provide for a reduction or deferral of interest or
principal because of a deterioration in the financial position of the borrower,
and (3) loans past due ninety days or more as to principal or interest. At
December 31, 2008 there were a significant volume of loans that were identified
as impaired that were not initially put on non-accrual. These loans were put on
non-accrual in the first quarter of 2009. A summary of non-performing loans at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 follows:
(000's)
March 31, December 31,
2009 2008
Non-accrual loans $ 24,183 $ 12,486
Restructured loans 97 98
Accruing loans past due over 90 days 5,173 3,624
$ 29,453 $ 16,208
Ratio of the allowance for loan losses as a
percentage of non-performing loans 58 % 100 %
|
The following loan categories comprise significant components of the nonperforming loans:
(000's)
March 31, December 31,
2009 2008
Non-accrual loans
1-4 family residential $ 2,348 $ 1,835
Commercial loans 20,310 9,210
Installment loans 1,525 1,441
$ 24,183 $ 12,486
Past due 90 days or more
1-4 family residential $ 1,036 $ 1,495
Commercial loans 3,740 1,582
Installment loans 397 547
$ 5,173 $ 3,624
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity and Liquidity
First Financial Corporation has established risk measures, limits and policy
guidelines for managing interest rate risk and liquidity. Responsibility for
management of these functions resides with the Asset Liability Committee. The
primary goal of the Asset Liability Committee is to maximize net interest income
within the interest rate risk limits approved by the Board of Directors.
Interest Rate Risk
Management considers interest rate risk to be the Corporation's most significant
market risk. Interest rate risk is the exposure to changes in net interest
income as a result of changes in interest rates. Consistency in the
Corporation's net interest income is largely dependent on the effective
management of this risk.
The Asset Liability position is measured using sophisticated risk management
tools, including earning simulation and market value of equity sensitivity
analysis. These tools allow management to quantify and monitor both short-term
and long-term exposure to interest rate risk. Simulation modeling measures the
effects of changes in interest rates, changes in the shape of the yield curve
and the effects of embedded options on net interest income. This measure
projects earnings in the various environments over the next three years. It is
important to note that measures of interest rate risk have limitations and are
dependent on various assumptions. These assumptions are inherently uncertain
and, as a result, the model cannot precisely predict the impact of interest rate
fluctuations on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated
results due to timing, frequency and amount of interest rate changes as well as
overall market conditions. The Committee has performed a thorough analysis of
these assumptions and believes them to be valid and theoretically sound. These
assumptions are continuously monitored for behavioral changes.
The Corporation from time to time utilizes derivatives to manage interest rate
risk. Management continuously evaluates the merits of such interest rate risk
products but does not anticipate the use of such products to become a major part
of the Corporation's risk management strategy.
The table below shows the Corporation's estimated sensitivity profile as of
March 31, 2009. The change in interest rates assumes a parallel shift in
interest rates of 100 and 200 basis points. Given a 100 basis point increase in
rates, net interest income would increase 0.21% over the next 12 months and
increase 1.84% over the following 12 months. Given a 100 basis point decrease in
rates, net interest income would increase 2.12% over the next 12 months and
increase 2.09% over the following 12 months. These estimates assume all rate
changes occur overnight and management takes no action as a result of this
change.
Basis Point Percentage Change in Net Interest Income
Interest Rate Change 12 months 24 months 36 months
Down 200 2.83 % 2.80 % 2.76 %
Down 100 2.12 2.09 2.06
Up 100 0.21 1.84 4.06
Up 200 -0.62 2.46 7.04
|
Typical rate shock analysis does not reflect management's ability to react and thereby reduce the effect of rate changes, and represents a worst-case scenario.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity is measured by each bank's ability to raise funds to meet the
obligations of its customers, including deposit withdrawals and credit needs.
This is accomplished primarily by maintaining sufficient liquid assets in the
form of investment securities and core deposits. The Corporation has
$12.9 million of investments that mature throughout the coming 12 months. The
Corporation also anticipates $185.2 million of principal payments from
mortgage-backed securities. Given the current rate environment, the Corporation
anticipates $33.9 million in securities to be called within the next 12 months.
With these sources of funds, the Corporation currently anticipates adequate
liquidity to meet the expected obligations of its customers.
Financial Condition
Comparing the first quarter of 2009 to the same period in 2008, net loans are up
4.1% or $57.5 million. Deposits are down $11.3 million at March 31, 2009, a 0.7%
decrease from the balances at the same time in 2008 primarily from reduced
public funds deposits. The investment portfolio and federal funds sold declined
by $51.6 million. Shareholders' equity increased $2.7 million. The financial
performance increased book value per share 0.8% to $22.56 at March 31, 2009 from
$22.38 at March 31, 2008. Book value per share is calculated by dividing the
total shareholders' equity by the number of shares outstanding.
Capital Adequacy
As of March 31, 2009, the most recent notification from the respective
regulatory agencies categorized the subsidiary banks as well capitalized under
the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well
capitalized the banks must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based
and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or
events since that notification that management believes have changed the bank's
category. Below are the capital ratios for the Corporation and lead bank.
March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 To Be Well Capitalized
Total risk-based capital
Corporation 17.78 % 17.32 % N/A
First Financial Bank 17.54 % 17.11 % 10.00 %
Tier I risk-based capital
Corporation 16.81 % 16.40 % N/A
First Financial Bank 16.72 % 16.34 % 6.00 %
Tier I leverage capital
Corporation 12.89 % 12.72 % N/A
First Financial Bank 12.79 % 12.64 % 5.00 %
|
|
|