|
Quotes & Info
|
| LION > SEC Filings for LION > Form 10-Q on 8-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
8-May-2009
Quarterly Report
ended December 31, 2008. All percentage and dollar variances noted in the
following analysis are calculated from the balances presented in the
accompanying financial statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report on Form 10-Q may include forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that reflect our
current expectations relating to present or future trends or factors generally
affecting the banking industry and specifically affecting our operations,
markets and products. Without limiting the foregoing, the words "believes",
"expects", "anticipates", "estimates", "projects", "intends", and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions we believe are reasonable
and may relate to, among other things, the deteriorating economy and its impact
on operating results and credit quality, the adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses, changes in interest rates, and litigation results. These forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ
materially from those projected for many reasons, including without limitation,
changing events and trends that have influenced our assumptions. These trends
and events include (1) real estate values in the Atlanta, Georgia, metropolitan
area and in eastern and northern Florida markets; (2) general business and
economic conditions; (3) conditions in the financial markets and economic
conditions generally and the impact of recent efforts to address difficult
market and economic conditions; (4) our liquidity and sources of liquidity;
(5) the terms of the U.S. Treasury Department's (the "Treasury") equity
investment in us; (6) the limitations on executive compensation imposed through
our participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program; (7) a deteriorating
economy and its impact on operations and credit quality; (8) the ability of the
Treasury to unilaterally amend any provision of the purchase agreement we
entered into as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program; (9) unique risks
associated with our construction and land development loans; (10) our ability to
raise capital; (11) the impact of a recession on our consumer loan portfolio and
its potential impact on our commercial portfolio; (12) economic conditions in
Atlanta, Georgia; (13) our ability to maintain and service relationships with
automobile dealers and indirect automobile loan purchasers and our ability to
profitably manage changes in our indirect automobile lending operations;
(14) the accuracy and completeness of information from customers and our
counterparties; (15) changes in the interest rate environment and their impact
on our net interest margin; (16) difficulties in maintaining quality loan
growth; (17) less favorable than anticipated changes in the national and local
business environment, particularly in regard to the housing market in general
and residential construction and new home sales in particular; (18) the impact
of and adverse changes in the governmental regulatory requirements affecting us;
(19) the effectiveness of our controls and procedures; (20) our ability to and
retain skilled people; (21) greater competitive pressures among financial
institutions in our market; (22) changes in political, legislative and economic
conditions; (23) inflation; (24) greater loan losses than historic levels and an
insufficient allowance for loan losses; (25) failure to achieve the revenue
increases expected to result from our investments in our growth strategies,
including our branch additions and in our transaction deposit and lending
businesses; (26) the volatility and limited trading of our common stock; and
(27) the impact of dilution on our common stock.
This list is intended to identify some of the principal factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the
forward-looking statements included herein and are not intended to represent a
complete list of all risks and uncertainties in our business. Investors are
encouraged to read the related section in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K,
including the "Risk Factors" set forth therein. Additional information and other
factors that could affect future financial results are included in our filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our accounting and reporting policies are in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles and conform to general practices within the
financial services industry. Our financial position and
results of operations are affected by management's application of accounting
policies, including estimates, assumptions and judgments made to arrive at the
carrying value of assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues,
expenses and related disclosures. Different assumptions in the application of
these policies, or conditions significantly different from certain assumptions,
could result in material changes in our consolidated financial position or
consolidated results of operations. Critical accounting and reporting policies
include those related to the allowance for loan losses, fair value of mortgage
loans held-for-sale, the capitalization of servicing assets and liabilities and
the related amortization, loan related revenue recognition, and income taxes.
Our accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our consolidated
financial position and consolidated results of operations. Significant
accounting policies have been periodically discussed and reviewed with and
approved by the Board of Directors.
Our critical accounting policies that are highly dependent on estimates,
assumptions and judgment are substantially unchanged from the descriptions
included in the notes to consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Results of Operations
Earnings
For the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a net loss of
$3.4 million compared to net income of $1.1 million for the first quarter of
2008. Net loss available for common equity was $4.2 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009. Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share for the first
quarter of 2009 and 2008 were $(.43) and $.12, respectively. The decrease in net
income for the first quarter of 2009 when compared to the same period in 2008
was primarily due to a $5.0 million increase in the provision for loan losses to
$9.6 million. The increase in the provision for loan losses was due to increased
nonperforming assets and loan charge-offs caused by the continued recession and
slow housing market.
The Company benefited in the first quarter of 2008 from a pretax gain of
$1,252,000 on the mandatory redemption of 29,267 shares of Visa, Inc. common
stock upon Visa's successful initial public offering. In addition, the Company
reversed a pretax $567,000 litigation expense accrual recorded in the fourth
quarter of 2007 to recognize the Company's proportional share of Visa litigation
settlements and litigation reserves.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income decreased $719,000 or 6.1% in the first quarter of 2009
to $11.0 million compared to $11.7 million for the same period in 2008 resulting
primarily from a decrease in loan interest income due to lower interest rates on
loans, and an increase in nonperforming assets.
The average balance of interest-earning assets increased by $43.2 million or
2.7% to $1.660 billion for the first quarter of 2009, when compared to the same
period in 2008. The yield on interest-earning assets for the first quarter of
2009 was 5.73%, a decrease of 113 basis points when compared to the yield on
interest-earning assets for the same period in 2008. The average balance of
loans outstanding for the first quarter of 2009 decreased $22.6 million or 1.5%
to $1.449 billion when compared to the same period in 2008. In addition to the
negative impact of the recession on lending activity, prior to receiving
$48.2 million in TARP capital, management actively worked to constrain lending
in an effort to preserve capital. The yield on average loans outstanding for the
period decreased 110 basis points to 5.94% when compared to the same period in
2008 as a result of a 299 basis point decrease in the average prime lending rate
and the effects of an increase in the level of nonperforming loans from
$37.0 million at March 31, 2008 to $123.5 million at March 31, 2009.
The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased $24.9 million
or 1.7% to $1.485 billion for the first quarter of 2009 and the rate on this
average balance decreased 96 basis points to 3.37% when compared
to the same period in 2008. The 96 basis point decrease in the cost of
interest-bearing liabilities was lower than the 113 basis point decrease in the
yield on interest earning assets, resulting in a 17 basis point decrease in net
interest spread. Net interest margin decreased 23 basis points to 2.71% for the
first quarter of 2009 compared to 2.94% for the same period in 2008. The Bank
manages its net interest spread and net interest margin based primarily on its
loan and deposit pricing. To maintain its deposit market share and to assist in
liquidity management, during 2009 as compared to 2008, the Bank did not decrease
its deposit pricing as much as it lowered its loan rates, which fluctuates with
the change in the prime interest rate.
Provision for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is established and maintained through
provisions charged to operations. Such provisions are based on management's
evaluation of the loan portfolio including loan portfolio concentrations,
current economic conditions, past loan loss experience, adequacy of underlying
collateral, and such other factors which, in management's judgment, require
consideration in estimating loan losses. Loans are charged off or charged down
when, in the opinion of management, such loans are deemed to be uncollectible or
not fully collectible. Subsequent recoveries are added to the allowance.
For all loan categories, historical loan loss experience, adjusted for
changes in the risk characteristics of each loan category, current trends, and
other factors, is used to determine the level of allowance required. Additional
amounts are allocated based on the probable losses of individual impaired loans
and the effect of economic conditions on both individual loans and loan
categories. Since the allocation is based on estimates and subjective judgment,
it is not necessarily indicative of the specific amounts of losses that may
ultimately occur.
The allowance for loan losses for the homogenous pools is allocated to loan
types based on historical net charge-off rates adjusted for any current or
anticipated changes in these trends. The specific allowance for individually
reviewed nonperforming loans and loans having greater than normal risk
characteristics is based on a specific loan impairment analysis.
In determining the appropriate level for the allowance, management ensures
that the overall allowance appropriately reflects a margin for the imprecision
inherent in most estimates of the range of probable credit losses. This
additional amount, if any, is reflected in the overall allowance. Management
believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to provide for losses
inherent in the loan portfolio at March 31, 2009 (see "Asset Quality").
The provision for loan losses for the first three months of 2009 was
$9.6 million compared to $4.6 million for the same period in 2008. The allowance
for loan losses as a percentage of loans at March 31, 2009, was 2.66% compared
to 2.43% at December 31, 2008, and to 1.34% at March 31, 2008. The increase in
the provision in the first three months of 2009 as compared to the same period
in 2008 and the increase in the allowance as a percentage of loans at March 31,
2009, was due to management's assessment of the continued recession and slow
housing market, as well as increased charge-offs in both the residential
construction and consumer loan portfolios. The ratio of net charge-offs to
average loans on an annualized basis for the first three months of 2009
increased to 2.32% compared to .60% for the same period in 2008. The ratio of
net charge-offs to average loans for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 1.36%.
The following schedule summarizes changes in the allowance for loan losses for
the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended Year Ended
March 31, December 31,
2009 2008 2008
Balance at beginning of period $ 33,691 $ 16,557 $ 16,557
Charge-offs:
Commercial, financial and agricultural 299 14 99
SBA 249 - 220
Real estate-construction 3,642 535 9,083
Real estate-mortgage 63 11 332
Consumer installment 3,756 1,869 10,841
Total charge-offs 8,009 2,429 20,575
Recoveries:
Commercial, financial and agricultural 6 - 5
SBA - 56 215
Real estate-construction 9 - 43
Real estate-mortgage - 13 14
Consumer installment 206 249 882
Total recoveries 221 318 1,159
Net charge-offs 7,788 2,111 19,416
Provision for loan losses 9,600 4,600 36,550
Balance at end of period $ 35,503 $ 19,046 $ 33,691
Annualized ratio of net charge-offs to average
loans 2.32 % .60 % 1.36 %
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans
at end of period 2.66 % 1.34 % 2.43 %
|
Substantially all of the consumer installment loan net charge-offs in the
first three months of 2009 and 2008 were from the indirect automobile loan
portfolio. Consumer installment loan net charge-offs increased $1.9 million to
$3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to the same
period in 2008. The national and Atlanta economies continued to decline in the
first three months of 2009, as the continuing economic recession impacted our
consumer lending portfolio. The annualized ratio of net charge-offs to average
consumer loans outstanding was 2.06% and .87% during the first three months of
2009 and 2008, respectively.
Construction loan net charge-offs were $3.6 million in the first three months
of 2009 compared to $535,000 in the same period of 2008. The residential
construction markets continued to show the effects of the recession and slow
housing market, directly contributing to the increase in non-performing and
charged-off real estate construction loans. Management will continue to monitor
closely and aggressively address credit quality and trends in the residential
construction loan portfolio. The residential construction loan portfolio will
require close scrutiny through the next several quarters.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income for the first three months of 2009 was $6.8 million
compared to $5.7 million for the same period in 2008, an increase of
$1.1 million for the quarter. The increase was a result of the Bank's expansion
of its mortgage banking division less decreases in indirect lending activities,
SBA lending activities, and gain on sale of securities.
Income from mortgage banking activities increased $3.5 million to
$3.6 million for the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
In the first quarter of 2009, management made the strategic decision to expand
the mortgage banking operation by hiring over 60 former employees of an Atlanta
based mortgage company which closed down operations. As a result of this
expansion and favorable mortgage interest rates, the Bank originated
approximately $85 million in mortgage loans during the first quarter of 2009
compared to $6 million for the same period in 2008. Origination fee income for
the first quarter of 2009 was $1.2 million compared to $31,000 for the same
period in 2008. Gain on loans sold increased from $29,000 for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 to $749,000 for the same quarter in 2009. In addition, on
January 1, 2009 the Bank elected under FAS 159 to value its loans held-for-sale
at fair value. This valuation along with the mark to
market on the derivatives associated with interest rate lock commitments and
related hedges resulted in the recognition of a mark to market gain of
$1.6 million during the first quarter of 2009 (See Note 7).
Income from indirect lending activities, which includes both net gains from
the sale of indirect automobile loans and servicing and ancillary loan fees on
loans sold, decreased $442,000 or 27.9% in the first quarter of 2009 compared to
2008. The decrease was a result of a reduction in gain on sales due to lower
sales and lower indirect automobile loans serviced for others. With the
continued liquidity and credit crisis, the secondary markets continued to show
little activity during 2009. For the first quarter of 2009, there was one
servicing retained sale of $15 million compared to $27 million in service
retained sales and $24 million in service released sales for the same period in
2008. The average amount of loans serviced for others decreased from
$281 million for the first quarter of 2008 to $233 million for the same period
in 2009, a decrease of $48 million or 17.1% due to monthly principal payments
which exceeded the additional loans serviced for others added because of fewer
servicing retained loan sales.
For the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, income
from SBA lending activities decreased $236,000 or 57.0%, due to a reduction in
the gain on loans sold and a reduction in the volume of loans sold. SBA loans
sold totaled $4.8 million for the first quarter of 2009 compared to $6.7 million
sold in the first quarter of 2008. With the continuing volatility in credit
markets, the market price and thus the profit on loan sales have been less than
they have been for us historically.
Securities gains decreased $1.3 million for the first quarter of 2009
compared to the same period in 2008 because of the 2008 mandatory redemption of
29,267 shares of Visa, Inc. common stock which resulted in the gain of
$1.3 million. Other operating income decreased $320,000 for the first quarter of
2009 compared to 2008 because of lower brokerage fee income, lower insurance
sales commissions and lower gains on sale of other real estate.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense was $14.0 million for the first quarter of 2009, compared
to $11.4 million for the same period in 2008, an increase of $2.6 million or
23.1%. The increase was a result of higher salaries and benefits expense which
increased $983,000 or 14.2% as a result of the expansion of the mortgage
division and the associated commission expense. ORE related expenses, which were
$749,000 in the first quarter of 2009, increased $612,000 compared to the same
period in 2008. The increase was a result of higher foreclosed assets held by
the Bank during 2009. The average ORE balance increased 132.5% to $18.3 million
for the first quarter of 2009 compared to $7.9 million for the same period in
2008. The ORE expense is made up of $523,000 in provision for other real estate
losses and $226,000 in maintenance, real estate taxes, and other related
expenses.
Other significant variances include the reversal of a $567,000 accrual in the
first quarter of 2008 related to the reserve for Fidelity's estimated
proportional share of a settlement of the Visa litigation with Discover
Financial Services which did not reoccur in 2009, an increase of $183,000
related to a higher FDIC assessment, higher fraud losses and higher appraisal
fee expenses. Management expects FDIC insurance expense to increase in 2009 due
to a yet to be determined special assessment.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the first quarter of 2009 was a benefit of
$2.4 million compared to expenses of $295,000 for the same period in 2008. The
income tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2009 was primarily the
result of a pretax loss as well as the recognition of state income tax credits
earned.
Financial Condition
Assets
Total assets were $1.875 billion at March 31, 2009, compared to
$1.763 billion at December 31, 2008, an increase of $112.2 million, or 6.4%.
This increase was due to a $124.1 million increase in investment securities
available-for-sale, and a $51.4 million increase in loans held-for-sale offset
in part by a decrease of $51.9 in loans and a decrease of $12.3 million in cash
and cash equivalents.
Investment securities available-for-sale increased $124.1 million or 96.4% to
$252.9 million at March 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008. The increase was
a result of management's decision to enter into a leveraged purchase transaction
to help offset the preferred stock dividends to be paid on the preferred stock
sold to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in
December 2008. The leveraged purchase transaction allows the Bank to quickly and
prudently increase earning assets to generate interest income. In March, the
Bank purchased $127.7 million in FNMA and GNMA mortgage backed securities and
funded the purchases with $30 million in fixed rate wholesale borrowings and the
remainder from increased deposit balances and excess liquidity. There were no
investment sales during the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Loans held-for-sale increased $51.4 million or 92.0% to $107.2 million at
March 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008. The increase is due to an increase
in mortgage loans held-for-sale as a result of the expanded mortgage operation
in the first quarter of 2009 which resulted in new loan originations totaling
$85 million.
Loans decreased $51.9 million or 3.7% to $1.336 billion at March 31, 2009
compared to $1.388 billion at December 31, 2008. The decrease in loans was
primarily the result of a decrease in consumer installment loans of
$34.4 million or 5.1% to $644.9 million, and a decrease in real estate
construction loans of $16.6 million or 6.8% to $228.6 million. Until receiving
the TARP Capital Purchase Program capital infusion in December of 2008,
management actively engaged in reducing the level of the loan portfolio to
preserve capital ratios. By slowing originations in the consumer installment
portfolio, the normal monthly principal paydowns led to lower outstanding loans.
As the liquidity and credit crisis continued during the first three months of
2009, demand for construction loans continued to be limited and the portfolio
balance continued to decrease including $4.3 million in loans that were
transferred to other real estate.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased 13.4% or $12.3 million to $79.7 million
at March 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008. This balance varies with the
Bank's liquidity needs and is influenced by scheduled loan closings, investment
purchases, timing of customer deposits, and loan sales.
Loans
The following schedule summarizes our total loans at March 31, 2009, and
December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
March 31, December 31,
2009 2008
Loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural $ 129,530 $ 137,988
Tax exempt commercial 7,283 7,508
Real estate - mortgage - commercial 209,847 202,516
Total commercial 346,660 348,012
Real estate - construction 228,578 245,153
Real estate - mortgage - residential 115,971 115,527
Consumer installment 644,932 679,330
Loans 1,336,141 1,388,022
Allowance for loan losses (35,503 ) (33,691 )
Loans, net of allowance $ 1,300,638 $ 1,354,331
Total Loans:
Loans $ 1,336,141 $ 1,388,022
Loans Held-for-Sale:
Residential mortgage 55,691 967
Consumer installment 15,000 15,000
SBA 36,513 39,873
Total loans held-for-sale 107,204 55,840
Total loans $ 1,443,345 $ 1,443,862
|
Asset Quality
The following schedule summarizes our asset quality position at March 31,
2009, and December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
March 31, December 31,
2009 2008
Nonperforming assets:
Nonaccrual loans $ 105,215 $ 98,151
Repossessions 1,860 2,016
Other real estate 16,474 15,063
Total nonperforming assets $ 123,549 $ 115,230
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing $ - $ -
Allowance for loan losses $ 35,503 $ 33,691
Ratio of loans past due and still accruing to loans - % - %
. . .
|
|
|