|
Quotes & Info
|
| JDAS > SEC Filings for JDAS > Form 10-Q on 8-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
8-May-2009
Quarterly Report
Guidance for Second Quarter 2009
Low End High End
Software revenues $17.0 million $22.0 million
Total revenues $85.0 million $92.0 million
|
Historically, the Company has provided annual rather than quarterly
guidance for software revenues, total revenues and GAAP earnings per share. The
reason for doing this has always been that our business does not typically
operate on a 90-day sales cycle, and if the period of time covered by a
projection is shortened (i.e., quarterly vs. annual), we believe it increases
the risk of error, particularly with respect to the estimated timing of software
deals. However, due to the continuing uncertainty of economic conditions, we
modified our approach to providing guidance in 2009.
In light of the continued uncertain economic conditions, however, we have
modified our approach to providing guidance in 2009. Beginning in first quarter
2009 and for the foreseeable future, we will provide quarterly rather than
annual guidance for software revenues and total revenues using fairly wide
ranges in an attempt to mitigate the risks associated with the shortened
forecast window. We believe it is better to give quarterly guidance and to
assume the inherent risk of error, rather than speculate about the economy and
how it might change over the course of the year. We will continue to complement
our quarterly guidance with other qualitative information such as a description
of our pipeline and other important trends that have or may potentially impact
our operating results.
Software sales are a leading indicator for our business. We saw an increase
in the number of deferred software projects in first quarter 2009, particularly
in the Americas region. The majority of these deferrals involved customers in
the retail industry rather than in the manufacturing and distribution
industries. Customers have cited a variety of reasons for the delays. We believe
a primary cause for the delays may be that many retailers begin their new
financial year during the first calendar quarter, and as budgets were finalized
for the upcoming year, a large number of projects were subjected to an
additional review process due to the continuing uncertainty of global economic
conditions. It appears that some of these projects were subsequently cancelled
as a result of the review process while others were simply delayed. We believe
there may be opportunities for about half of the delayed projects to ultimately
go forward and result in software deals over the next two quarters based on the
increased level of activity we have begun to see in our customer base. We also
believe it is possible that software deals may never occur on the other half of
the delayed projects as long as we remain in the current economic environment.
Furthermore, we have seen increased management changes in our target markets.
Such changes generally have a disruptive impact on our ability to close business
as projects are typically put on hold pending the hiring of new executives and
during the period of time they need to assess and approve the underlying
business initiatives.
Our record software sales performance in fourth quarter 2008 was positively
impacted by normal seasonal fluctuations, including a year-end desire by our
customers to spend money on software using their 2008 budgets, rather than risk
losing the funds in 2009. This year-end "budget-flush" spending somewhat reduced
our sales pipeline for first quarter 2009, particularly opportunities involving
transactions ? $1.0 million ("large transactions"). This is consistent with our
historical patterns, and, as we expected, the
decline was temporary in nature. We believe our Americas sales pipeline has been
successfully rebuilt during first quarter 2009, and that we enter second quarter
2009 with a much stronger list of opportunities that include an increased number
of large transactions.
We believe software sales will increase sequentially in second quarter
2009, with the majority of the increase expected to occur in North America. In
addition, whereas software sales in first quarter 2009 were primarily driven by
mid-size software sales opportunities in the $300,000 to $700,000 range, we
believe software sales in second quarter 2009 may be characterized by a strong
performance in large transactions.
We believe the weak economy may be driving some businesses in our target
markets to achieve more process and efficiency improvements in their operations.
We believe this scenario favors our solution offerings as they are designed to
provide a quick return on investment and are squarely targeted at some of the
largest profit drivers in a customer's business. Not only do our solutions
enable companies to free up working capital by increasing inventory turns and
reducing on-hand inventory balances, they can also increase sales by improving
customer service levels. Our solutions also enable cost reductions such reduce
labor and transportation costs. While it is true that the economic crisis has
stressed the operations and results of the weaker companies in our target
market, we believe a much larger percentage will survive, and some will even
take advantage of this situation to expand their market share.
We believe our maintenance services revenue stream is a financial strength
of the Company that provides a solid foundation for our business in difficult
times as long as we are able to maintain our historically high maintenance
retention rates. Excluding any further impacts from currency rate fluctuations,
we expect maintenance services revenues to be flat sequentially in second
quarter 2009 compared to first quarter 2009. Volatility in the foreign currency
exchange rates continues to be a significant risk in our efforts to maximize
maintenance services revenue performance. For example, unfavorable foreign
exchange rate variances reduced first quarter 2009 maintenance services revenues
by $3.0 million compared to first quarter 2008 and by $917,000 compared to
fourth quarter 2008, due primarily to the strengthening of the US Dollar against
European currencies. In addition, we have seen increased pressure from our
customer base to renegotiate or drop support in order to reduce their
maintenance costs. There has also been an increase in attrition due to
bankruptcies and an increase in the number of customers who have opted for
reduced levels of support. We believe we have taken steps to limit the impact of
these sources of maintenance attrition. Attrition in first quarter 2009 was
substantially offset by new maintenance services revenue streams from contracts
signed in fourth quarter 2008.
Our consulting services business continues to under-perform against its
operating plan, and our service margins continue to decline. The consulting
services business has been impacted by product mix, which for several years has
favored solutions that require less implementation services, delays in project
start dates and both competitive and economic pressures on our realized billing
rates. Furthermore, the average length of time between the execution of a
software license and the actual commencement of the related implementation
project appears to be increasing. As a result, the timing of consulting services
revenues on new projects has become more difficult to predict, which has
resulted in increased resource planning and allocation challenges. Although we
have recruited and trained a highly qualified team of consulting resources at
the CoE, we have not yet fully leveraged this investment, nor have we
significantly increased the volume of work and implementation projects cycled
through this facility (see "We Will Continue to Focus on Fully Leveraging Our
Investment in the Center of Excellence" section below). We believe the primary
reason for this lower than expected utilization of the CoE consulting services
resources may be due to a slower internal adoption of our planned mix of
on-shore/off-shore services. In addition, some of our customers still feel more
comfortable having consulting resources on-site at their premises when
implementing our solutions.
We continue to address operational and execution issues in our consulting
services business. As previously announced, we have revamped our market strategy
and approach for these services, including the reorganization of our senior
practice teams in North America in order to ensure greater continuity and
effectiveness in our processes, from services proposal through to final project
execution. As part of the organizational changes, we have combined all of our
services offerings under a single global organization, JDA Services, and the
various service units will share resources, work load, effort, strategy,
business development and customer interactions. We believe this integration
creates new opportunities for efficiencies across the Company, and enables us to
establish new service-based programs and further develop our Managed Services
offering. We believe our Managed Services offering, which is a strategic
initiative for 2009 targeted at both the Tier 1 (retailers and manufacturers
with revenues of ? $5 billion) and Tier 2 (retailers and manufacturers with
revenues of $100 million to $5 billion) markets, will provide customers with
effective alternatives, particularly during the current economic environment, to
reduce their costs of operation, operate effectively with constrained resources,
leverage outside domain expertise to augment their personnel and to improve the
value they derive from their JDA products. We anticipate that a significant
portion of these services will be performed by resources at the CoE.
We Will Continue to Focus on Fully Leveraging Our Investment in the Center
of Excellence. We incurred approximately $5.0 million of incremental costs in
2008 as part of a strategic initiative to expand our operations in India and
create a comprehensive
CoE that encompasses additional off-shore product development activities,
customer implementation services, customer support services and internal
administrative services. The incremental costs were primarily related to the
addition of 188 new associates at the CoE including associates with necessary
skill sets in product development (92 FTE), customer implementation services (43
FTE), customer support services (34 FTE) and internal administrative and other
(19 FTE). The costs of this investment were more than offset by reductions in
our on-shore headcount (66 FTE) that resulted in an overall net cost savings to
the Company of approximately $1.3 million in 2008. We added an additional 44 FTE
at the CoE in first quarter 2009, primarily in product development (33 FTE) and
customer support services (8 FTE) functions.
The CoE has significantly expanded our overall capacity and provides us
with the potential to substantially reduce our operating costs without
compromising the quality of our services. We have not yet fully utilized certain
of the CoE's service capabilities. In particular, we need to increase the
involvement of the CoE's customer implementation resources in our consulting
service projects and more fully embrace changes in the way we structure projects
and deliver our products. Our challenge and focus in 2009 is to more fully
leverage the service capabilities of the CoE and increase the volume of work and
implementation projects cycled through this facility. We believe the primary
reason for this lower than expected utilization of the CoE consulting services
resources may be due to a slower internal adoption of our planned mix of
on-shore/off-shore services.
We believe the CoE provides an improved business model for JDA that
enhances growth potential and operating results by:
† Accelerating the development of new solutions and innovations through
expanded R&D bandwidth;
† Increasing the breadth and competitiveness of our consulting services through a blended delivery offering that combines high value on-shore consulting expertise and project management with lower cost off-shore resources;
† Enhancing our customer support service through faster resolution of complex customer issues;
† Accelerating the development of training content;
† Reducing the total cost of ownership of our solutions;
† Improving our competitiveness against service providers that already operate low cost off-shore facilities, and against small, low-cost on-shore service providers;
† Accelerating the development of common business processes between major departments within JDA;
† Increasing our ability to take advantage of technology to optimize our internal operations; and
† Lowering our operating costs and improving our operating margins.
The CoE is designed to complement and enhance our existing on-shore
business model, not replace it. Our goal is to achieve all of these benefits
without sacrificing our capability to work face-to-face with our customers, most
of which are in the Americas and Europe.
We Will Continue to Actively Look for Strategic Acquisition Opportunities
in 2009. We continue to believe that acquisitions are an integral part of our
overall growth plan and that the current environment is likely to create other
acquisition opportunities at reasonable prices. As a result, we are actively
looking for strategic acquisition opportunities in 2009 that can deliver the
kind of results that we achieved in the acquisition of Manugistics Group, Inc.,
and drive significant accretion for the Company even in these tough economic
times. However, until the availability and terms of credit for acquisitions
approach historical norms, we may not be able to successfully pursue and
complete significant acquisition opportunities.
Share-Based Compensation Expense. We recorded share-based compensation
expense of $1.2 million and $1.2 million related to 2005 Incentive Plan awards
in first quarter 2009 and 2008, respectively, and as of March 31, 2009 we have
included $6.8 million of deferred compensation in stockholders' equity. In
addition, we recorded $169,000 in share-based compensation expense in first
quarter 2009 related to purchase of common stock made under our employee stock
purchase plan. A summary of total share-based compensation by expense category
for first quarter 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
Three Months
Ended March 31,
2009 2008
Cost of maintenance services $ 94 $ 87
Cost of consulting services 211 151
Product development 169 134
Sales and marketing 381 315
General and administrative 555 495
Total stock-based compensation $ 1,410 $ 1,182
|
Proposed Amendment to 2005 Performance Incentive Plan. On February 5, 2009,
the Board approved an amendment to our 2005 Performance Incentive Plan to
increase the number of shares of common stock issuable under the plan from
1,847,000 to 3,847,000 shares of common stock. We are asking for shareholder
approval of this amendment and the additional 2,000,000 shares at our 2009
Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on May 11, 2009.
Cash Incentive Bonus Plan. On January 13, 2009, the Board approved a 2009
cash incentive bonus plan ("Incentive Plan") for our executive officers. The
Incentive Plan provides for $3.3 million in targeted cash bonuses if we are able
to achieve a defined adjusted EBITDA performance threshold goal in 2009. Amounts
are payable quarterly under the plan on the basis of the actual EBITDA achieved
by the Company for the applicable quarter of 2009. A partial pro-rata cash bonus
will be paid if we achieve a minimum adjusted EBITDA performance threshold.
There is no cap on the maximum amount the executives can receive if the Company
exceeds the defined annualized operational and software performance goals.
Treasury Stock Repurchase Program. On March 5, 2009, the Board adopted a
program to repurchase up to $30.0 million of our common stock in the open market
or in private transactions at prevailing market prices during the 12-month
period ending March 10, 2010. During first quarter 2009, we repurchased 229,912
shares of our common stock under this program for $2.5 million at prices ranging
from $10.34 to $11.00 per share.
Resignation of Chief Financial Officer. On April 8, 2009, we announced that
Kristen L. Magnuson will resign her position as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company following a transition period from the
date of the announcement until July 5, 2009 (the "Transition Period"). Pursuant
to Ms. Magnuson's separation agreement, she will receive a lump sum severance
payment of $824,750 and all unvested restricted stock units and performance
shares granted to Ms. Magnuson pursuant to the 2005 Performance Incentive Plan
became immediately vested on April 14, 2009. We will record an additional
share-based compensation charge of $162,000 in second quarter 2009 related to
this accelerated vesting. A summary of Ms. Magnuson's unvested restricted stock
units and performance awards outstanding at the time of her resignation is as
follows:
Unvested Shares to
Type of Award Original Grant Date Vest on April 14, 2009
Restricted Stock Units March 13, 2007 6,805
Restricted Stock Units May 14, 2007 903
Performance Shares February 7, 2008 9,600
|
During the Transition Period, David Alberty will assume the role of principal financial executive, to serve until a permanent Chief Financial Officer is named. Mr. Alberty, 50, has served as our Group Vice President of Accounting, Finance and Treasury since May 2008. From September 2007 to May 2008, Mr. Alberty served as the Company's Group Vice President and Worldwide Controller. From January 2006 to September 2007, Mr. Alberty served as the Company's Vice President of International Accounting and Tax. From December 1999 to January 2006, Mr. Alberty served as the Company's Director of Tax.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain selected financial information
expressed as a percentage of total revenues for first quarter 2009 and 2008 and
certain gross margin data expressed as a percentage of software license revenue,
maintenance services revenue, product revenues or services revenues, as
appropriate:
Three months
Ended March 31,
2009 2008
REVENUES:
Software licenses 18 % 21 %
Maintenance services 52 49
Product revenues 70 70
Consulting services 28 28
Reimbursed expenses 2 2
Service revenues 30 30
Total revenues 100 100
|
COST OF REVENUES: Cost of software licenses 1 1 Amortization of acquired software technology 1 2 Cost of maintenance services 13 12 Cost of product revenues 15 15 Cost of consulting services 23 21 Reimbursed expenses 2 2 Cost of service revenues 25 23 Total cost of revenues 40 38 GROSS PROFIT 60 62 OPERATING EXPENSES: Product development 15 15 Sales and marketing 17 17 General and administrative 13 12 Amortization of intangibles 7 6 Restructuring charges and adjustments to acquisition-related reserves 2 1 Total operating expenses 54 51 OPERATING INCOME 6 11 Interest expense and amortization of loan fees - (3 ) Other income and other, net - 1 INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISON 5 9 Income tax provision 2 3 NET INCOME 3 % 6 % Gross margin on software licenses 96 % 95 % Gross margin on maintenance services 75 % 76 % Gross margin on product revenues 79 % 79 % Gross margin on service revenues 15 % 21 % |
The following table sets forth a comparison of selected financial information, expressed as a percentage change between periods for first quarter 2009 and 2008. In addition, the table sets forth cost of revenues and product development expenses expressed as a percentage of the related revenues:
% Change
Three Months ended March 31,
2009 2008 to 2009 2008
Revenues:
Software licenses $ 15,325 (24 )% $ 20,036
Maintenance 42,997 (6 )% 45,812
Product revenues 58,322 (11 )% 65,848
Service revenues 25,011 (11 )% 28,027
Total revenues 83,333 (11 )% 93,875
Cost of Revenues:
Software licenses 602 (43 )% 1,053
Amortization of acquired software technology 1,008 (33 )% 1,501
Maintenance services 10,549 (6 )% 11,196
Product revenues 12,159 (12 )% 13,750
Service revenues 21,359 (3 )% 22,063
Total cost of revenues 33,518 (6 )% 35,813
Gross Profit 49,815 (14 )% 58,062
Operating Expenses:
Product development 12,573 (8 )% 13,676
Sales and marketing 14,252 (12 )% 16,109
General and administrative 11,026 (5 )% 11,588
37,851 (9 )% 41,373
Amortization of intangibles 6,076 - % 6,076
Restructuring charge 1,430 89 % 756
Operating income $ 4,458 (55 %) $ 9,857
Cost of Revenues as a % of related revenues:
Software licenses 4 % 5 %
Maintenance services 25 % 24 %
Product revenues 21 % 21 %
Service revenues 85 % 79 %
Product development as a % of product revenues 22 % 21 %
|
The following tables set forth selected comparative financial information on revenues in our business segments and geographical regions, expressed as a percentage change between first quarter 2009 and 2008. In addition, the tables set forth the contribution of each business segment and geographical region to . . .
|
|