|
Quotes & Info
|
| BHE > SEC Filings for BHE > Form 10-Q on 8-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
8-May-2009
Quarterly Report
References in this report to "the Company," "Benchmark," "we," or "us" mean
Benchmark Electronics, Inc. together with its subsidiaries. The following
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements
are identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to historical or
current facts. They use words such as "anticipate," "believe," "intend," "plan,"
"projection," "forecast," "strategy," "position," "continue," "estimate,"
"expect," "may," "will," or the negative of those terms or other variations of
them or comparable terminology. In particular, statements, express or implied,
concerning future operating results or the ability to generate sales, income or
cash flow are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions,
including those discussed under Part II, Item 1A of this report. The future
results of our operations may differ materially from those expressed in these
forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these
results are beyond our ability to control or predict. Undue reliance should not
be placed on any forward-looking statements. Should one or more of these risks
or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual outcomes may vary materially from those indicated.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.
OVERVIEW
We are in the business of manufacturing electronics and provide our services to
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) of computers and related products for
business enterprises, medical devices, industrial control equipment, testing and
instrumentation products, and telecommunication equipment. The services that we
provide are commonly referred to as electronics manufacturing services (EMS). We
offer our customers comprehensive and integrated design and manufacturing
services, from initial product design to volume production and direct order
fulfillment. Our manufacturing and assembly operations include printed circuit
boards and subsystem assembly, box build and systems integration, the process of
integrating subsystems and, often, downloading and integrating software, to
produce a fully configured product. We also provide specialized engineering
services, including product design, printed circuit board layout, prototyping,
and test development. We believe that we have developed strengths in the
manufacturing process for large, complex, high-density printed circuit boards as
well as the ability to manufacture high and low volume products in lower cost
regions such as Brazil, China, Malaysia, Mexico, Romania and Thailand.
We believe that our global manufacturing presence increases our ability to be responsive to our customers' needs by providing accelerated time-to-market and time-to-volume production of high quality products. These capabilities should enable us to build stronger strategic relationships with our customers and to become a more integral part of their operations. Our customers face challenges in planning, procuring and managing their inventories efficiently due to customer demand fluctuations, product design changes, short product life cycles and component price fluctuations. We employ production management systems to manage their procurement and manufacturing processes in an efficient and cost-effective manner so that, where possible, components arrive on a just-in-time, as-and-when needed basis. We are a significant purchaser of electronic components and other raw materials, and can capitalize on the economies of scale associated with our relationships with suppliers to negotiate price discounts, obtain components and other raw materials that are in short supply, and return excess components. Our expertise in supply chain management and our relationships with suppliers across the supply chain enables us to reduce our customers' cost of goods sold and inventory exposure.
We recognize revenue from the sale of circuit board assemblies, systems and excess inventory when the goods are shipped, title and risk of ownership have passed, the price to the buyer is fixed and determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue from design, development and engineering services is recognized when the services are performed and collectibility is reasonably certain. Such services provided under fixed price contracts are accounted for using the percentage of completion method. We assume no significant obligations after product shipment as we typically warrant workmanship only. Therefore, our warranty provisions are immaterial.
Our cost of sales includes the cost of materials, electronic components and other materials that comprise the products we manufacture, the cost of labor and manufacturing overhead, and adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory. Our procurement of materials for production requires us to commit significant working capital to our operations and to manage the purchasing, receiving, inspection and stocking of materials. Although we bear the risk of fluctuations in the cost of materials and excess scrap, we periodically negotiate cost of materials adjustments with our customers. Our gross margin for any product depends on the sales price, the proportionate mix of the cost of materials in the product and the cost of labor and manufacturing overhead allocated to the product. We typically have the potential to realize higher gross margins on products where the proportionate level of labor and manufacturing overhead is greater than that of materials. As we gain experience in manufacturing a product, we usually achieve increased efficiencies, which result in lower labor and manufacturing overhead costs for that product and higher gross margins. Our operating results are impacted by the level of capacity utilization of manufacturing facilities. Operating income margins have generally improved during periods of high production volume and high capacity utilization. During periods of low production volume, we generally have idle capacity and reduced operating income margins.
Summary of Results
Sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased 27% to $496.8 million
compared to $684.3 million for the same period of 2008 primarily as a result of
the broad-based economic downturn that has been impacting businesses worldwide
since mid 2008. During the first quarter of 2009, we saw the markets we serve
continue to deteriorate. Like many of our customers, we saw double digit
sequential declines in sales in the first quarter. These declines were broad
based and impacted customers in all industries that we serve. Sales to customers
in the computers and related products for business enterprises industry,
industrial control equipment industry, medical devices industry, and the testing
and instrumentation products industry declined 37%, 4%, 29% and 84%,
respectively, from 2008 to 2009. In 2009, these declines were partially offset
by sales increases to customers in the telecommunication equipment (1%)
industry. Our new customer and new program ramps contributed to our sales in the
first quarter, but not enough to offset the overall decline in sales. Sales to
our largest customer, Sun Microsystems, Inc., represented 13% of our sales in
the first quarter 2009 compared to 19% of our sales in the first quarter of
2008. Sales to this customer decreased $65.5 million from $129.4 million in the
first quarter of 2008 to $63.9 million in the first quarter of 2009 due to
reduced demand.
Our future sales are dependent on the success of our customers, some of which operate in businesses associated with rapid technological change and consequent product obsolescence. Developments adverse to our major customers or their products, or the failure of a major customer to pay for components or services, could have an adverse effect on us. Recent unfavorable economic conditions and uncertainty because of fluctuating circumstances in the global financial markets is impacting businesses around the globe. The global economic downturn has had a negative impact on demand for our customers' products and thus has adversely affected our sales.
Our gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased to 6.4% in the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 6.6% in same period of 2008 primarily due to lower sales volumes which resulted in under-absorbed fixed costs. We do experience fluctuations in gross profit from period to period. Different programs can contribute different gross profits depending on factors such as the types of services involved, location of production, size of the program, complexity of the product, and level of material costs associated with the various products. New programs can contribute relatively less to our gross profit in their early stages when manufacturing volumes are usually lower, resulting in inefficiencies and unabsorbed manufacturing overhead costs. In addition, new and higher volume programs remain subject to competitive constraints that could exert downward pressure on our margins. During periods of low production volume, we generally have idle capacity and reduced gross profit.
In response to the overall economic downturn, we have undertaken initiatives to restructure our business operations with the intention of improving utilization and realizing cost savings in the future. The process of restructuring entails, among other activities, moving production between facilities, reducing staff levels, realigning our business processes and reorganizing our management. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recognized $1.1 million (pre-tax) of restructuring charges, primarily employee termination costs associated with the involuntary terminations of employees in connection with reductions in workforce of certain facilities.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations is based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Our significant accounting policies are
summarized in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The preparation
of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis,
we evaluate our estimates, including those related to allowance for doubtful
accounts, inventories, deferred taxes, impairment of long-lived assets, and
contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and
on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates. We
believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant
judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Our accounts receivable balance is recorded net of allowances for amounts not
expected to be collected from our customers. Because our accounts receivable are
typically unsecured, we periodically evaluate the collectibility of our accounts
based on a combination of factors, including a particular customer's ability to
pay as well as the age of the receivables. To evaluate a specific customer's
ability to pay, we analyze financial statements, payment history, third-party
credit analysis reports and various information or disclosures by the customer
or other publicly available information. In cases where the evidence suggests a
customer may not be able to satisfy its obligation to us, we set up a specific
allowance in an amount we determine appropriate for the perceived risk. If the
financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an
impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be
required.
Inventory obsolescence reserve
We purchase inventory based on forecasted demand and record inventory at the
lower of cost or market. We reserve for estimated obsolescence as necessary in
an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and estimated
market value based on assumptions of future demands and market conditions. We
evaluate our inventory valuation on a quarterly basis based on current and
forecasted usage and the latest forecasts of product demand and production
requirements from our customers. Customers frequently make changes to their
forecasts, requiring us to make changes to our inventory purchases, commitments,
and production scheduling and may require us to cancel open purchase commitments
with our vendors. This process may lead to on-hand inventory quantities and
on-order purchase commitments that are in excess of our customers' revised
needs, or parts that become obsolete before use in production. We record
inventory reserves on excess and obsolete inventory. These reserves are
established on inventory which we have determined that our customers are not
responsible for or on inventory which we believe our customers will be unable to
fulfill their obligation to ultimately purchase. If actual market conditions are
less favorable than those we projected, additional inventory write-downs may be
required.
Income Taxes
We estimate our income tax provision in each of the jurisdictions in which we
operate, including estimating exposures related to examinations by taxing
authorities. We must also make judgments regarding the ability to realize the
deferred tax assets. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax
assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While we have
considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning
strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event we
were to subsequently determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax
assets in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the valuation
allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made.
Similarly, should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part
of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the valuation
allowance would reduce income in the period such determination was made.
We are subject to examination by tax authorities for varying periods in various U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions. During the course of such examinations disputes occur as to matters of fact and/or law. Also, in most tax jurisdictions the passage of time without examination will result in the expiration of applicable statutes of limitations thereby precluding the taxing authority from conducting an examination of the tax period(s) for which such statute of limitations has expired. We believe that we have adequately provided for our tax liabilities.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and
equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The recoverability of assets
to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an
asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated
by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated
undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge would be recognized by the
amount that the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the
asset.
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment, and is tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss would be recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset's fair value. Goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level, which we have determined to be consistent with our operating segments as defined in Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this report by determining the fair values of the reporting units using a discounted cash flow model and comparing those fair values to the carrying values, including goodwill, of the reporting unit. Our annual goodwill impairment analysis as of December 31, 2008 indicated there was an impairment of goodwill in two of our reporting units, the Americas and Europe, primarily due to a decline in our market capitalization and recent market turmoil. Accordingly, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2008 totaling $247.5 million. As of March 31, 2009, we had net goodwill of approximately $37.9 million. Circumstances that may lead to future impairment of goodwill include unforeseen decreases in future performance or industry demand and the restructuring of our operations as a result of a change in our business strategy or other factors.
Stock-Based Compensation
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004) and the
Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107),
we began recognizing stock-based compensation expense in our consolidated
statement of income on January 1, 2006. The fair value of each option grant is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Option pricing models require the input of subjective assumptions, including the
expected life of the option and the expected stock price volatility. Judgment is
also required in estimating the number of option awards that are expected to
vest as a result of satisfaction of time-based vesting schedules. If actual
results or future changes in estimates differ significantly from our current
estimates, stock-based compensation could increase or decrease. See Note 2 to
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this report.
Recently Enacted Accounting Principles
See Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion
of recently enacted accounting principles.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents the percentage relationship that certain items in
our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income bear to sales for the periods
indicated. The financial information and the discussion below should be read in
conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
thereto in Item 1 of this report. The 2008 Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 1 of this report reflect the correction of an immaterial
error related to stock-based compensation expense. See Note 1 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this report.
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2009 2008
Sales 100.0 % 100.0 %
Cost of sales 93.6 93.4
Gross profit 6.4 6.6
Selling, general and administrative expenses 4.1 3.5
Restructuring charges 0.2 -
Income from operations 2.1 3.1
Other income, net 0.0 0.7
Income before income taxes 2.1 3.8
Income tax expense 0.2 0.5
Net income 1.9 % 3.3 %
|
Sales
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2009 2008
Computers and related products for business enterprises 44 % 51 %
Telecommunication equipment 23 17
Industrial control equipment 19 14
Medical devices 13 13
Testing and instrumentation products 1 5
100 % 100 %
|
Sales to customers in the computers and related products for business enterprises industry, industrial control equipment industry, medical devices industry and the testing and instrumentation products industry declined 37%, 4%, 29% and 84%, respectively, from 2008 to 2009. In 2009, these declines were partially offset by a 1% increase in sales to customers in the telecommunication equipment industry.
A substantial percentage of our sales have been made to a small number of customers, and the loss of a major customer, if not replaced, would adversely affect us. Sales to our largest customer decreased $65.5 million from $129.4 million in the first quarter of 2008 to $63.9 million in the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to reduced demand.
Our future sales are dependent on the success of our customers, some of which operate in businesses associated with rapid technological change and consequent product obsolescence. Developments adverse to our major customers or their products, or the failure of a major customer to pay for components or services, could have an adverse effect on us. Recent unfavorable economic conditions and uncertainty because of fluctuating circumstances in the global financial markets is negatively impacting our customers.
Our international operations are subject to the risks of doing business abroad. These risks have not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations through March 31, 2009. However, we can make no assurances that there will not be an adverse impact in the future. See Part II, Item 1A for factors pertaining to our international sales and fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currency and for further discussion of potential adverse effects in operating results associated with the risks of doing business abroad. During the first three months of 2009 and 2008, 48% and 47%, respectively, of our sales were from our international operations.
Gross Profit
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Restructuring Charges
Interest Income
Interest Expense
Income Tax Expense
Net Income . . .
|
|