Search the web
Welcome, Guest
[Sign Out, My Account]
EDGAR_Online

Quotes & Info
Enter Symbol(s):
e.g. YHOO, ^DJI
Symbol Lookup | Financial Search
TLGD > SEC Filings for TLGD > Form 10-Q on 7-May-2009All Recent SEC Filings

Show all filings for TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS INC \PA\ | Request a Trial to NEW EDGAR Online Pro

Form 10-Q for TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS INC \PA\


7-May-2009

Quarterly Report


Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995.
This MD&A should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K, as amended by Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Form 10-K"). Certain statements contained in this MD&A and elsewhere in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "believe," "expect," "intend," "may," "will," "should," "could," "potential," "continue," "estimate," "plan," or "anticipate," or the negatives thereof, other variations thereon or compatible terminology. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results may differ materially from any forward-looking statement as a result of various factors, including those described in Part II, Item 1A below under "Risk Factors." Overview
Several trends continued across the Company's markets that affected our performance in the first quarter of 2009.
Our customers continued to be impacted by the current economic environment, as businesses and consumers looked for ways to reduce their expenditures. Capital and operating expense budgets of our customers continued to be under pressure as they look to balance potential lower revenues as a result of the recession in the United States and international economies.
Our traditional customer base of incumbent telephone carriers (especially the large domestic carriers) continued to divert their spending from legacy networks as they focused their capital spending on wireless and next-generation wireline projects such as fiber to the home/curb/premise, IPTV, and DSL services. Customer line loss is being driven by competition from wireless and cable providers and also the elimination of second phone lines due to DSL penetration. This has resulted in reduced demand for our copper-based products. In response to these conditions and trends our customers are attempting to reduce their costs, including by reducing the prices of services they purchase from under long term service contracts. As a result, each time a contract is scheduled for renewal, we must show our customers the value of the entire system and the costs saved by maintaining and even extending the system capabilities. Negotiations for the renewal of service agreements with two large customers whose contracts expired on December 31, 2008 have yet to be finalized and the absence of revenue from these sources adversely affected our revenue in the first quarter of 2009.


Table of Contents

As described in the Form 10-K, management completed a comprehensive strategic review of all our businesses in 2008 to address these trends. As a result of the review, we determined that the appropriate strategy for the Company included focusing our strategic efforts and resources on the substantial and growing telecom service assurance market, where we have a significant installed customer base, and use this position to expand into adjacent markets and developing an integrated software platform that will serve multiple applications and products for the telecom industry including the next-generation IP service assurance market.
Products
Services
Our services offerings include software maintenance and support for our operating support systems ("OSS") offerings and hardware maintenance for the test probes, as well as our professional services, which are designed to ensure that all of the components of our customers' test systems operate properly. The primary customers for our services offerings are the large domestic carriers and international customers. We have a number of large service agreements with these customers which cover both software and hardware maintenance for our products. Historically, our services business was comprised of the more traditional POTS-based testability services, and the revenue stream was largely project-based and as such, difficult to predict. During the last few years, and primarily as a result of the Broadband Test Division acquisition, the services business has moved toward more contract-based software maintenance services, the revenue from which is more predictable. Because of this increase, our focus on our software applications as part of our refined strategy, and the decline in revenues from our other product lines, we expect services to continue to comprise a larger percentage of our revenue in the future. During the first quarter of 2009 we finalized a multi-year software maintenance agreement for one of the three major software maintenance contract renewals which were open at the end of 2008. In addition, we also entered into a new, multi-year managed services contract with a large global network equipment provider to provide customer support and engineering services. Telecommunications Test and Measurement Products Our proprietary telecommunications test and measurement products, which include our System Test and MCU® products, enable telephone companies to qualify and troubleshoot broadband DSL and IP services and remotely diagnose problems in POTS lines. Most DSL lines today provide broadband Internet access for residential and business customers, fed from a central or remote office Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer ("DSLAM") and configured with either a shared POTS voice service or "unbundled" from the voice switch entirely (in the case of a competitive local exchange carriers ("CLECs") service offering). Our systems can be used to qualify loops for DSL service as well as ongoing maintenance and repair of these "IP" lines. As telecommunications service providers move to all IP networks and services (voice, video and data), Tollgrade's test systems are positioned to be upgraded to support the testing of these services. POTS lines provide traditional voice service as well as connections for communication devices such as computer modems and fax machines. POTS excludes non-switched and private lines, such as data communications service lines, commonly referred to as "special services."


Table of Contents

An important aspect of efficiently maintaining a telecommunications network is the ability to remotely test, diagnose and locate any service-affecting problems within that network. Tollgrade's System Test Products are made up of a centralized test operating system integrated into the customers' repair handling database systems, and remote test hardware located at telephone companies' central and remote offices. These systems enable local exchange carriers to conduct a full range of fault diagnostics in the "local loop," the portion of the telephone network that connects end users to the central office. In addition, line test systems provide the capability to remotely qualify, deploy and maintain services such as DSL and Integrated Services Digital Network ("ISDN") services which are carried over POTS lines. These test systems reduce the time needed to identify and resolve problems, eliminating or reducing the costs of dispatching a technician to the problem site. Most POTS line test systems, however, were designed only for use over copper wire line; as a result, traditional test systems could not access local loops in which fiber-optic technology had been introduced. Our MCU product line, which is used primarily by large domestic carriers, solved this problem, extending LoopCare™ testing from the central office to the fiber-fed remote Digital Loop Carrier ("DLC") lines by mimicking a digital bypass pair, which is essentially a telephone circuit that connects central test and measurement devices to the copper circuits close to the customer, i.e., "the last mile."
We believe our DigiTest system is well positioned for the present and future of telecommunication network testing, combining our line test system with a next generation test platform to provide a complete test system solution for POTS and DSL local loop prequalification and in-service testing.
During 2008, the Company determined after a thorough strategic review process to reposition itself with a greater focus on its service assurance offerings. The Company intends to build upon the strength of its System Test Products, which are at the center of our service assurance offerings, but with a greater emphasis on expanding our service assurance software solutions. Our System Test product software offerings include four separate OSS: LoopCare, 4TEL, Celerity, and LTSC™, each having an established installed base. LoopCare is also the primary application for broadband DSL testing and can be architected to overlay 4TEL and LTSC to add this functionality to the existing line test application with the addition of the DigiTest measurement platform. We plan to leverage these software incumbencies, and extend testing coverage to next generation network architectures. The implementation of our strategy initially will expand upon existing customer requests for enhanced features and capabilities. Our legacy MCU products plug into DLC systems, the large network transmission systems used by telephone companies to link the copper and fiber-optic portions of the local loop. MCU products allow our customers to extend their line testing capabilities to all of their POTS lines served by a DLC system regardless of whether the system is fed by a copper or fiber optic link. DLC systems, which are located at telephone companies' central offices and at remote sites within local user areas, effectively multiplex the services of a single fiber-optic line into multiple copper lines. In many instances, several DLC systems are located at a single remote site to create multiple local loops that serve several thousand different end-user homes and businesses. Generally, for every DLC remote site, customers will deploy at least two MCU line-testing products. One of three patents for our legacy MCU products will expire during 2010, and we expect that the loss of this patent protection will permit greater competition within this market segment that could cause our revenues from this product line to decline.
Cable Testing Products


Table of Contents

The Company's Cheetah performance and status monitoring products provide a broad network assurance solution for the broadband HFC distribution system found in the cable television industry. Our Cheetah products gather status information and report on critical components within the cable network. The Company's monitoring systems include complete hardware and software solutions that enable efficient HFC plant status monitoring. By providing a constant, proactive view of the health and status of outside plant transmission systems, the products can reduce operating costs and increase subscriber satisfaction. Our cable offerings consist of CheetahXD™ broadband assurance software, our proprietary CheetahNet™ (formerly NetMentor™) software systems, maintenance, head-end controllers, return path switch hardware, both proprietary and DOCSIS® -based transponders and other equipment which gather status and performance reports from power supplies, line amplifiers and fiber optic nodes. Our CheetahIP/HFC service assurance solution allows cable operators to proactively test and monitor VoIP using hardware test probes and software analysis tools. By layering VoIP test point software on to DOCSIS-based transponders, the HFC access network is populated with a Tollgrade test probe that is controlled by a software management system, placing active on-demand and batch VoIP test calls point-to-point across the network for remote fault diagnosis.
We continued to explore strategic opportunities with our cable business during the first quarter of 2009, and on May 1, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Cheetah Technologies, L.P. to sell substantially all of the assets of the Company's cable status monitoring product line (the "Agreement") for a sale price of $3,150,000, subject to adjustment for certain items pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. Closing of the transaction is subject to completion of certain customary closing conditions. The Agreement provides that the transaction is to close within ten business days after completion of the closing conditions or no later than May 15, 2009, unless closing is delayed in accordance with the Agreement.
Electric Utility Monitoring Products
The Company's new product development effort, the LightHouse product line, is being designed to provide power grid monitoring capabilities to electric utilities. Research and investment throughout 2007 and 2008 enabled the general availability of the first release of the product line during the first quarter of 2009. The test system solution currently consists of line mounted sensors, aggregators, and centralized software providing an end to end solution for power providers to efficiently monitor their overhead distribution circuits in real time. A LightHouse sensor, mounted directly on the electrical conductor, will continuously monitor key circuit parameters and transmit data over a wireless network to a central location, reducing time of detecting a problem on the grid, identifying its location and restoring service. LightHouse is intended as an innovative means for electric power utilities to deploy technology to provide real-time grid intelligence to detect faults and help minimize the impact of outages while optimizing the utilization of assets. The system is designed to improve the overall efficiency of energy delivery, improve customer satisfaction and improve the financial performance of the electric utilities. Our Customers
The Company's customers range from the top telecom and cable providers, to numerous independent telecom, cable and broadband providers around the world. Our primary customers for our telco products and services are large domestic and European telecommunications service providers. The


Table of Contents

Company tracks its telco sales by two large customer groups, the first of which includes Qwest, AT&T and Verizon (referred to herein as large domestic carriers), and the second of which includes certain large international telephone service providers in Europe, namely British Telecom, Royal KPN N.V., Belgacom S.A., Deutsche Telecom AG (T-Com) and Telefónica O2 Czech Republic,
a.s. (collectively referred to herein as the "European Telcos"). For the first quarter of 2009, sales to the large domestic customers accounted for approximately 44.4% of the Company's total revenue, compared to approximately 30.4% of total revenue for the first quarter of 2008. Sales to AT&T individually exceeded 10% of the Company's total revenue and comprised 25.5% of the Company's total revenue for the first quarter of 2009, compared to 20.0% of the Company's total revenue for the first quarter of 2008. Sales in the first quarter of 2009 and 2008 to the European Telcos accounted for approximately 21.4% and 29.1% respectively, of total revenue. For the three months ended March 28, 2009, sales to customers in the Americas (excluding the United States) were approximately $1.3 million or 30.2% of international sales; sales to customers in EMEA were $2.8 million or 65.1% of international sales; and sales to customers in Asia Pacific were $0.2 million or 4.7% of international sales. For the three months ended March 29, 2008, sales to customers in the Americas (excluding the United States) were approximately $0.7 million or 11.5% of international sales; sales to customers in EMEA were $5.3 million or 86.9% of international sales; and sales to customers in Asia Pacific were $0.1 million or 1.6% of international sales. Backlog

The Company's order backlog for firm customer purchase orders and signed software maintenance contracts was $13.0 million as of March 28, 2009, compared to a backlog of $16.3 million as of December 31, 2008. The backlog at March 28, 2009 and December 31, 2008 included approximately $9.7 million and $12.1 million, respectively, related to software maintenance contracts, which is primarily earned and recognized as income on a straight-line basis during the remaining terms of these agreements. During the first quarter 2009, the Company finalized a multi-year software maintenance agreement for one of the three major software maintenance contract renewals which had not been completed at the end of 2008. Expected revenue from that signed software maintenance agreement is included in the backlog as of March 28, 2009; however, revenues from the two other agreements that are still under negotiation are not included in backlog.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51," (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This standard defines a noncontrolling interest, previously called a minority interest, as the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. SFAS 160 requires, among other items, that a noncontrolling interest be included in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity separate from the parent's equity; consolidated net income to be reported at amounts inclusive of both the parent's and noncontrolling interest's shares and, separately, the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and noncontrolling interest all on the consolidated statement of operations; and if a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be measured at fair value and a gain or loss be recognized in net income based on such fair value.


Table of Contents

The adoption of SFAS 160 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations," (SFAS 141(R)), which replaces SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," (SFAS 141) but retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS 141, including that the purchase method be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This standard defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control instead of the date that the consideration is transferred. SFAS 141(R) requires an acquirer in a business combination, including business combinations achieved in stages (step acquisition), to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions. It also requires the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from certain contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair values. Additionally, SFAS 141(R) requires acquisition-related costs to be expensed in the period in which the costs are incurred and the services are received instead of including such costs as part of the acquisition price. The impact of the adoption of SFAS 141R will depend on the nature and extent of business combinations occurring on or after the effective date.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," (SFAS 157) as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. See Note 5 for the effect of the adoption of SFAS 157, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The provisions of SFAS 157 will be applied at such time a fair value measurement of a nonfinancial asset or nonfinancial liability is required, which may result in a fair value that is materially different than would have been calculated prior to the adoption of SFAS 157.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets," (FSP FAS 142-3). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," (SFAS 142) in order to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141 (R) and other GAAP. The adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 had no impact on the Financial Statements. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities," (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 had no impact on the Financial Statements.


Table of Contents

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") FAS No. 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments ("FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1"), which amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 107 and APB Opinion No. 28 and requires disclosure about the fair value of its financial instruments whenever it issues summarized financial information for interim reporting periods. FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1 are effective for financial statements issued for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1 on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments ("FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2"), which amends SFAS No. 115 and FSP FAS No. 115-1 and FSP FAS No. 124-1 and conforms changes to other standards including EITF Issue No. 99-20 and AICPA Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer, and improves the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly ("FSP FAS No. 157-4"), which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This FSP also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly and applies to all assets and liabilities within the scope of accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, except in paragraphs 2 and 3 of SFAS No. 157. FSP FAS No. 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of FSP FAS No. 157-4 on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP 132(R)-1, "Employers' Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets." FSP 132(R)-1 amends SFAS 132 (revised 2003), "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits," to provide guidance on an employer's disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. This FSP is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Company does not expect this adoption to have a material impact on our financial statements.


Table of Contents

Application of Critical Accounting Policies The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment based on various assumptions and other factors such as historical experience, economic conditions, and in some cases, actuarial techniques. Actual results may differ from those estimates. A discussion of market risks affecting the Company can be found in "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
A summary of the Company's significant accounting policies are included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and in the critical accounting policies in Management's Discussion and Analysis included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables the Company to provide useful and reliable financial information about the company's operating results and financial condition. There were no changes to our critical accounting policies during the first quarter of 2009.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FIRST QUARTER OF 2009 COMPARED TO FIRST QUARTER OF 2008
Revenues
The Company's revenues for the first quarter of 2009 were $12.0 million compared to revenues of $13.2 million for the first quarter of 2008.
Services revenue consists of installation oversight and product management services provided to customers and fees from software maintenance agreements and service applications. Services revenue was approximately $4.9 million in the . . .

  Add TLGD to Portfolio     Set Alert         Email to a Friend  
Get SEC Filings for Another Symbol: Symbol Lookup
Quotes & Info for TLGD - All Recent SEC Filings
Sign Up for a Free Trial to the NEW EDGAR Online Pro
Detailed SEC, Financial, Ownership and Offering Data on over 12,000 U.S. Public Companies.
Actionable and easy-to-use with searching, alerting, downloading and more.
Request a Trial      Sign Up Now


Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
SEC Filing data and information provided by EDGAR Online, Inc. (1-800-416-6651). All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.