|
Quotes & Info
|
| MET > SEC Filings for MET > Form 10-Q on 7-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-May-2009
Quarterly Report
For purposes of this discussion, "MetLife" or the "Company" refers to MetLife, Inc., a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1999 (the "Holding Company"), and its subsidiaries, including Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MLIC"). Following this summary is a discussion addressing the consolidated results of operations and financial condition of the Company for the periods indicated. This discussion should be read in conjunction with MetLife, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 ("2008 Annual Report") filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the forward-looking statement information included below, "Risk Factors," and the Company's interim condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations may contain or incorporate by reference information that includes or is based upon forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements give expectations or forecasts of future events. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "project," "intend," "plan," "believe" and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, prospective services or products, future performance or results of current and anticipated services or products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, trends in operations and financial results.
Any or all forward-looking statements may turn out to be wrong. They can be
affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known or unknown risks and
uncertainties. Many such factors will be important in determining MetLife's
actual future results. These statements are based on current expectations and
the current economic environment. They involve a number of risks and
uncertainties that are difficult to predict. These statements are not guarantees
of future performance. Actual results could differ materially from those
expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Risks, uncertainties,
and other factors that might cause such differences include the risks,
uncertainties and other factors identified in MetLife, Inc.'s filings with the
SEC. These factors include: (i) difficult and adverse conditions in the global
and domestic capital and credit markets; (ii) continued volatility and further
deterioration of the capital and credit markets, which may affect the Company's
ability to seek financing or access its credit facilities; (iii) uncertainty
about the effectiveness of the U.S. government's plan to stabilize the financial
system by injecting capital into financial institutions, purchasing large
amounts of illiquid, mortgage-backed and other securities from financial
institutions, or otherwise; (iv) the impairment of other financial institutions;
(v) potential liquidity and other risks resulting from MetLife's participation
in a securities lending program and other transactions; (vi) exposure to
financial and capital market risk; (vii) changes in general economic conditions,
including the performance of financial markets and interest rates, which may
affect the Company's ability to raise capital, generate fee income and
market-related revenue and finance statutory reserve requirements and may
require the Company to pledge collateral or make payments related to declines in
value of specified assets; (viii) defaults on the Company's mortgage and
consumer loans; (ix) investment losses and defaults, and changes to investment
valuations; (x) impairments of goodwill and realized losses or market value
impairments to illiquid assets; (xi) unanticipated changes in industry trends;
(xii) heightened competition, including with respect to pricing, entry of new
competitors, consolidation of distributors, the development of new products by
new and existing competitors and for personnel; (xiii) discrepancies between
actual claims experience and assumptions used in setting prices for the
Company's products and establishing the liabilities for the Company's
obligations for future policy benefits and claims; (xiv) discrepancies between
actual experience and assumptions used in establishing liabilities related to
other contingencies or obligations; (xv) ineffectiveness of risk management
policies and procedures, including with respect to guaranteed benefit riders
(which may be affected by fair value adjustments arising from changes in our own
credit spread) on certain of the Company's variable annuity products;
(xvi) increased expenses relating to pension and post-retirement benefit plans,
(xvii) catastrophe losses; (xviii) changes in assumptions related to deferred
policy acquisition costs ("DAC"), value of business acquired ("VOBA") or
goodwill; (xix) downgrades in MetLife, Inc.'s and its affiliates' claims paying
ability, financial strength or credit ratings; (xx) economic, political,
currency and other risks relating to the Company's international operations;
(xxi) availability and effectiveness of reinsurance or indemnification
arrangements, (xxii) regulatory, legislative or tax changes that may affect the
cost of, or demand for, the Company's products or services;
(xxiii) changes in accounting standards, practices and/or policies;
(xxiv) adverse results or other consequences from litigation, arbitration or
regulatory investigations; (xxv) deterioration in the experience of the "closed
block" established in connection with the reorganization of MLIC; (xxvi) the
effects of business disruption or economic contraction due to terrorism, other
hostilities, or natural catastrophes; (xxvii) MetLife's ability to identify and
consummate on successful terms any future acquisitions, and to successfully
integrate acquired businesses with minimal disruption; (xxviii) MetLife, Inc.'s
primary reliance, as a holding company, on dividends from its subsidiaries to
meet debt payment obligations and the applicable regulatory restrictions on the
ability of the subsidiaries to pay such dividends; and (xxix) other risks and
uncertainties described from time to time in MetLife, Inc.'s filings with the
SEC.
MetLife, Inc. does not undertake any obligation to publicly correct or update any forward-looking statement if MetLife, Inc. later becomes aware that such statement is not likely to be achieved. Please consult any further disclosures MetLife, Inc. makes on related subjects in reports to the SEC.
Executive Summary
MetLife is a leading provider of insurance, employee benefits and financial services with operations throughout the United States and the Latin America, Europe, and Asia Pacific regions. Through its subsidiaries and affiliates, MetLife offers life insurance, annuities, auto and home insurance, retail banking and other financial services to individuals, as well as group insurance and retirement & savings products and services to corporations and other institutions. MetLife is organized into four operating segments: Institutional, Individual, Auto & Home and International, as well as Corporate & Other.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 compared with the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
The Company reported $574 million in net loss available to MetLife, Inc.'s common shareholders and net loss per MetLife, Inc. diluted common share of $0.71 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $615 million in net income available to MetLife, Inc.'s common shareholders and net income per MetLife, Inc. diluted common share of $0.84 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Net income available to MetLife, Inc.'s common shareholders decreased by $1,189 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the 2008 period.
The decrease in net income available to common shareholders was principally due to a decrease in net investment income. Net investment income decreased by $672 million, net of income tax, or 24%, to $2,121 million, net of income tax, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $2,793 million, net of income tax, for the comparable 2008 period. Management attributes $789 million, net of income tax, of this change to a decrease in yields, partially offset by an increase of $117 million, net of income tax, due to growth in average invested assets. Average invested assets are calculated on the cost basis without unrealized gains and losses. The decrease in net investment income attributable to lower yields was primarily due to lower returns on other limited partnership interests, fixed maturity securities, real estate joint ventures, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and mortgage loans. The decrease in net investment income attributable to lower yields was partially offset by increased net investment income attributable to an increase in average invested assets on the cost basis, primarily within cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and mortgage loans. The increase in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments has been accumulated to provide additional flexibility to address potential variations in cash needs while credit market conditions remain distressed. The increases in mortgage loans are driven by the reinvestment of operating cash flows in accordance with our investment portfolio allocation guidelines. The increase in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments was partially offset by a decrease in fixed maturity securities, which was driven by a decrease in the size of the securities lending program and the reinvestment of cash inflows into cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments.
The decrease in net income available to MetLife, Inc.'s common shareholders was also driven by an increase in other expenses of $296 million, net of income tax. The increase in other expenses was driven primarily by an increase in the Individual segment primarily due to an increase in DAC amortization relating to increases in amortization due to separate account balance decreases as a result of poor financial market performance and higher net investment gains primarily due to net derivative gains. Additionally, the increase in other expenses within
Corporate & Other was due primarily to higher MetLife Bank, National Association ("MetLife Bank") costs for compensation, rent, and mortgage loan origination and servicing expenses primarily related to acquisitions in 2008, higher deferred compensation expenses, and higher post employment related costs in the current quarter associated with the implementation of an enterprise-wide cost reduction and revenue enhancement initiative. In addition, the current period includes higher pension and post-retirement benefits across the Individual, Institutional and Auto & Home segments. Partially offsetting these increases, the International segment's other expenses decreased primarily due to impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
The net effect of decreases in premiums, fees and other revenues of $129 million, net of income tax, across all of the Company's operating segments and decreases in policyholder benefit and claims and policyholder dividends of $4 million, net of income tax, was attributable to the decrease in the International segment due primarily to an adverse impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Additionally, the decrease in premiums, fees and other revenues in the Individual segment was primarily due to a decrease in universal life and investment-type product policy fees resulting from lower average separate account balances due to recent unfavorable equity market performance. Partially offsetting these decreases is an increase in premiums, fees and other revenues in Corporate & Other primarily due to an increase in other revenues related to MetLife Bank loan origination and servicing fees from acquisitions in 2008 and income from counterparties on collateral pledged in 2008.
A decrease in interest credited to policyholder account balances of $42 million, net of income tax, resulted from the decline in average crediting rates, which was largely due to the impact of lower short-term interest rates in the current period, offset by an increase solely from growth in the average policyholder account balance all of which occurred within the Institutional segment. Partially offsetting this decrease, interest credited increased within the Individual segment due to higher average general account balances partly offset by lower crediting rates.
Net investment losses increased by $114 million, net of income tax, to a loss of $589 million, net of income tax, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from a loss of $475 million, net of income tax, for the comparable 2008 period. The increase in net investment losses is due primarily to increased losses on fixed maturity securities, equity securities, mortgage loans, and real estate and real estate joint ventures as well as other limited partnership interests partially offset by increased gains on derivatives and foreign currency transaction gains as described more fully under "- Results of Operations - Discussion of Results - The Company."
The remainder of the decrease is principally attributable to changes in the effective tax rate due to the impact of tax preference items and the ratio of such permanent differences to income from continuing operations before provision for income tax as well as the impact of valuation allowances associated with our International operations.
Consolidated Company Outlook
The marketplace continues to react and adapt to the economic crisis and the unusual financial market events that began in 2008 and have remained in the first quarter of 2009. Management still expects the volatility in the financial markets to persist throughout the remainder of 2009. As a result, management anticipates a modest increase, on a constant exchange rate basis, in premiums, fees and other revenues in 2009, with mixed results across the various businesses. While the Company continues to gain market share in a number of product lines, as management expected, premiums, fees and other revenues have been, and may continue to be, impacted by the U.S. and global recession, which may be reflected in, but is not limited to:
• Lower fee income from separate account businesses, including variable annuity and life products in Individual Business.
• A potential reduction in payroll linked revenue from Institutional group insurance customers.
• A decline in demand for certain International and Institutional retirement & savings products.
• A decrease in Auto & Home premiums resulting from a depressed housing market and auto industry.
With the expectation of the turbulent financial markets continuing in 2009, management believes there will be continued downward pressure on net income, specifically net investment income, resulting from lower returns from other limited partnerships, real estate joint ventures, and securities lending. Management also anticipates that its decision to maintain a slightly higher than normal level of short-term liquidity will adversely impact net investment income in 2009. In addition, the resulting impact of the financial markets and the recession on net investment gains (losses) and unrealized investment gains (losses) can and will vary greatly and therefore, is difficult to predict. Also difficult to determine is the impact of own credit, as it varies significantly and this exposure is not hedged.
Certain insurance-related liabilities, specifically those associated with guarantees, are tied to market performance, which in times of depressed investment markets may require management to establish additional liabilities. However, many of the risks associated with these guarantees are hedged. The turbulent financial markets, sustained over a period of time, may also necessitate management to strengthen insurance liabilities that are not associated with guarantees. Management does not anticipate significant changes in the underlying trends that drive underwriting results, with the possible exception of certain trends in the Auto & Home and disability businesses.
Certain expenses may increase due to initiatives such as Operational Excellence. Other charges are also possible as the combination of the downward pressure on net income coupled with the expectations of the financial markets, may necessitate a review of goodwill impairment, specifically within Individual Business. The unusual financial market conditions may cause an increase in DAC amortization. As expected, the Company's pension-related expense for 2009 has increased.
In response to the challenges presented by the unusual economic environment, management continues to focus on disciplined underwriting, pricing, hedging strategies, as well as focused expense management.
Acquisitions and Dispositions
Disposition of Texas Life Insurance Company
On March 2, 2009, the Company sold Cova Corporation ("Cova"), the parent company of Texas Life Insurance Company ("Texas Life") to a third party for $134 million in cash consideration, excluding $1 million of transaction costs. The net assets sold were $101 million, resulting in a gain on disposal of $32 million, net of income tax. The Company has also reclassified $4 million, net of income tax, of the 2009 operations of Texas Life into discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. As a result, the Company recognized income from discontinued operations of $36 million, net of income tax, for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Industry Trends
The Company's segments continue to be influenced by a variety of trends that affect the industry.
Financial and Economic Environment. Our results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the global capital markets and the economy generally, both in the United States and elsewhere around the world. The stress experienced by global capital markets that began in the second half of 2007 continued and substantially increased through 2008. Beginning in mid- September 2008, the global financial markets have experienced unprecedented disruption, adversely affecting the business environment in general, as well as the financial services industry, in particular. This disruption has since moderated somewhat, but the financial markets remain fragile and volatile. The U.S. economy entered a recession in January 2008 and most economists believe this recession has not ended.
Throughout 2008 and continuing in 2009, Congress, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the U.S. Treasury and other agencies of the Federal government took a number of increasingly aggressive actions (in addition to continuing a series of interest rate reductions that began in the second half of 2007) intended to provide liquidity to financial institutions and markets, to avert a loss of investor confidence in particular troubled institutions, to prevent or contain the spread of the financial crisis and to spur economic growth. How and to whom these governmental
institutions distribute amounts available under the governmental programs could have the effect of supporting some aspects of the financial services industry more than others or provide advantages to some of our competitors. Governments in many of the foreign markets in which MetLife operates have also responded to address market imbalances and have taken meaningful steps intended to restore market confidence. We cannot predict whether the U.S. or foreign governments will establish additional governmental programs or the impact any additional measures or existing programs will have on the financial markets, whether on the levels of volatility currently being experienced, the levels of lending by financial institutions the prices buyers are willing to pay for financial assets or otherwise. See "Business - Regulation - Governmental Responses to Extraordinary Market Conditions" in the 2008 Annual Report.
The economic crisis and the resulting recession have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on the financial results of companies in the financial services industry, including the Company. The declining financial markets and economic conditions have negatively impacted our investment income and the demand for and the cost and profitability of certain of our products, including variable annuities and guarantee riders. See "- Results of Operations" and "- Liquidity and Capital Resources."
Demographics. In the coming decade, a key driver shaping the actions of the life insurance industry will be the rising income protection, wealth accumulation and needs of the retiring Baby Boomers. As a result of increasing longevity, retirees will need to accumulate sufficient savings to finance retirements that may span 30 or more years. Helping the Baby Boomers to accumulate assets for retirement and subsequently to convert these assets into retirement income represents an opportunity for the life insurance industry.
Life insurers are well positioned to address the Baby Boomers' rapidly increasing need for savings tools and for income protection. The Company believes that, among life insurers, those with strong brands, high financial strength ratings and broad distribution, are best positioned to capitalize on the opportunity to offer income protection products to Baby Boomers.
Moreover, the life insurance industry's products and the needs they are designed to address are complex. The Company believes that individuals approaching retirement age will need to seek information to plan for and manage their retirements and that, in the workplace, as employees take greater responsibility for their benefit options and retirement planning, they will need information about their possible individual needs. One of the challenges for the life insurance industry will be the delivery of this information in a cost effective manner.
Competitive Pressures. The life insurance industry remains highly competitive. The product development and product life-cycles have shortened in many product segments, leading to more intense competition with respect to product features. Larger companies have the ability to invest in brand equity, product development, technology and risk management, which are among the fundamentals for sustained profitable growth in the life insurance industry. In addition, several of the industry's products can be quite homogeneous and subject to intense price competition. Sufficient scale, financial strength and financial flexibility are becoming prerequisites for sustainable growth in the life insurance industry. Larger market participants tend to have the capacity to invest in additional distribution capability and the information technology needed to offer the superior customer service demanded by an increasingly sophisticated industry client base. We believe that the turbulence in financial markets that began in the latter half of 2008, its impact on the capital position of many competitors, and subsequent actions by regulators and rating agencies have highlighted financial strength as the most significant differentiator from the perspective of customers and certain distributors. In addition, the financial market turbulence and the economic recession have led many companies in our industry to re-examine the pricing and features of the products they offer and may lead to consolidation in the life insurance industry.
Regulatory Changes. The life insurance industry is regulated at the state level, with some products and services also subject to federal regulation. As life insurers introduce new and often more complex products, regulators refine capital requirements and introduce new reserving standards for the life insurance industry. Regulations recently adopted or currently under review can potentially impact the reserve and capital requirements of the industry. In addition, regulators have undertaken market and sales practices reviews of several markets or products, including equity-indexed annuities, variable annuities and group products. We expect the regulation of the financial services industry to receive renewed scrutiny as a result of the disruptions in the financial markets in 2008. It is possible that significant regulatory reforms could be implemented. We cannot predict whether any such reforms
will be adopted, the form they will take or their effect upon us. We also cannot predict how the various government responses to the current financial and economic difficulties will affect the financial services and insurance industries or the standing of particular companies, including our Company, within those industries.
Pension Plans. On August 17, 2006, President Bush signed the Pension Protection Act of 2006 ("PPA") into law. The PPA is a comprehensive reform of defined benefit and defined contribution plan rules. The provisions of the PPA may, over time, have a significant impact on demand for pension, retirement savings, and lifestyle protection products in both the institutional and retail markets. While the impact of the PPA is generally expected to be positive over time, these changes may have adverse short-term effects on the Company's business as plan sponsors may react to these changes in a variety of ways as the new rules and related regulations begin to take effect. In response to the current financial and economic environment, President Bush signed into the law the Worker, Retiree and Employer Recovery Act (the "Employer Recovery Act") in December 2008. This Act is intended to, among other things, ease the transition of certain funding requirements of the PPA for defined benefit plans. The financial and economic environment and the enactment of the Employer Recovery Act may delay the timing or change the nature of qualified plan sponsor actions and, in turn, affect the Company's business.
Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to adopt accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the interim condensed consolidated financial statements. The most critical estimates include those used in determining:
(i) the estimated fair value of investments in the absence of quoted market values;
(ii) investment impairments;
(iii) the recognition of income on certain investment entities;
(iv) the application of the consolidation rules to certain investments;
(v) the existence and estimated fair value of embedded derivatives requiring bifurcation;
(vi) the estimated fair value of and accounting for derivatives;
(vii) the capitalization and amortization of DAC and the establishment and amortization of VOBA;
(viii) the measurement of goodwill and related impairment, if any;
(ix) the liability for future policyholder benefits;
(x) accounting for income taxes and the valuation of deferred income tax assets;
(xi) accounting for reinsurance transactions;
(xii) accounting for employee benefit plans; and
(xiii) the liability for litigation and regulatory matters.
The application of purchase accounting requires the use of estimation techniques in determining the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities . . .
|
|