|
Quotes & Info
|
| VMC > SEC Filings for VMC > Form 10-Q on 5-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
5-May-2009
Quarterly Report
suffer because management's attention is diverted to integration concerns; the impact of the global financial crisis on our business and financial condition; and other assumptions, risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our periodic reports. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in any of our press releases.
First quarter 2008 $ 21
Lower aggregates earnings due to
Lower volumes (84 )
Higher selling prices 7
Lower costs 13
Lower asphalt mix and concrete earnings (4 )
Lower cement earnings (9 )
Lower selling, administrative and general expenses 13
All other (3 )
First quarter 2009 ($46 )
|
Aggregates segment revenues decreased $134.3 million, or 25%, to $401.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with $536.1 million in the first quarter of 2008. Aggregates shipments declined 30% on average and were sharply lower compared with the prior year's first quarter in all markets except the Central Gulf Coast where large energy-related and industrial construction projects have sustained aggregates demand. Overall, aggregates pricing increased 2% from the prior year. The overall increase in the average selling price for aggregates reflects wide variations across Vulcan-served markets. Many
major markets realized price improvement from the prior year above the 2%
average, while markets in the far west reported year-over-year declines in
average selling price. Excluding these western markets, aggregates pricing
improved 4% from the prior year's first quarter. Aggregates pricing in western
markets was lower due to a substantial increase in sales of lower priced
products, including fill material and railroad ballast. Excluding the sales of
lower priced products, aggregates pricing in western markets decreased 3% as
compared with the prior year's first quarter due to lower demand.
First quarter earnings for aggregates declined as the lower shipments more than
offset the earnings effect from price improvement, lower unit costs for diesel
fuel and prudent cost control. Gross profit for the Aggregates segment was
$63.6 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with $126.9 million in the
same period last year. Rationalizing production, reducing operating hours,
streamlining the work force and effectively managing spending levels reduced
aggregates costs versus the prior year. Aggregates unit variable production
costs were flat compared with the prior year's first quarter and cash fixed
costs declined 21% from the prior year.
Asphalt mix and Concrete segment revenues decreased $73.4 million to
$193.2 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with $266.6 million in the
first quarter of 2008. Shipments of asphalt mix and ready-mixed concrete
declined 27% and 32%, respectively. Gross profit for the Asphalt mix and
Concrete segment declined $4.8 million, or 24%, to $15.3 million in the first
quarter of 2009 compared with the first quarter of 2008. Asphalt mix earnings
were higher this quarter as compared with the first quarter of 2008 as material
margins recovered to more normal levels reflecting recent moderation in the cost
of liquid asphalt. Concrete earnings decreased from the prior year's first
quarter due to weaker demand.
As a result of weak demand and lower production levels, Cement segment first
quarter 2009 revenues of $19.7 million and gross profit (loss) of ($1.3) million
declined from the prior year's first quarter levels of $31.1 million and
$7.5 million, respectively.
Selling, administrative and general expenses in the first quarter decreased
$12.9 million, or 14%, from the prior year's first quarter. Cost-saving actions
implemented across Vulcan to align spending levels with weak product demand more
than offset project costs related to the replacement of legacy information
technology systems and higher severance costs. Performance-based compensation
accruals as well as employee expenses, including salaries and benefits, were
lower compared with the prior year. Employment levels across Vulcan were down
14% from the prior year.
In the first quarter of 2009, operating results were a loss of ($1.3) million
versus operating earnings of $66.8 million in the prior year's first quarter.
The unprecedented weak demand was the primary factor in this sharp decline in
profitability. The unit price for diesel fuel decreased 47% from the prior
year's first quarter, increasing operating earnings $13.1 million.
Interest expense of $43.9 million was up slightly from the first quarter of 2008
due to an increase in the weighted-average interest rate offset in part by a
reduction in total debt.
Our effective tax rates from continuing operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 were 29.1% and 32.1%, respectively. These rates include
discrete adjustments in the first quarter of 2009 for the reversal of uncertain
tax position accruals for which the statute of limitations has expired. Our
projected effective tax rate from continuing operations for the first quarter of
2009, excluding discrete adjustments, is 24.2%, a decrease of 6.0 percentage
points from the 30.2% projected effective tax rate for the first quarter of
2008, also excluding discrete adjustments. The decrease in the effective tax
rate primarily results from a greater benefit from statutory depletion partially
offset by an increase in state taxes.
Results from continuing operations were a loss of ($0.29) per diluted share
compared with earnings from continuing operations of $0.13 per diluted share in
the first quarter of 2008.
Discontinued Operations
First quarter pretax losses from discontinued operations were $0.9 million in
both 2009 and 2008. The 2009 loss includes a $0.7 million gain on disposal of
discontinued operations. The net losses primarily reflect charges related to
other general and product liability costs, including legal defense costs,
environmental remediation costs associated with our former Chemicals businesses,
and charges related to a cash transaction bonus payable as described in Note 2
to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
reduction in short-term borrowings primarily resulted from the aforementioned
February 2009 issuance of long-term debt as well as the June 2008 partial
replacement of short-term debt with long-term debt and a 3-year term loan.
Further offsetting the comparative increase in working capital was
$148.7 million of assets held for sale as of March 31, 2008. Additionally,
during the twelve month period ended March 31, 2009, weakness in demand for our
products contributed to a $107.2 million decrease in net accounts and notes
receivable, offset by a decrease in trade payables and other current liabilities
of $87.9 million.
Short-term Borrowings and Investments
Net short-term borrowings and investments consisted of the following (in
thousands of dollars):
March 31 December 31 March 31
2009 2008 2008
Short-term investments
Cash equivalents $ 17,811 $ 3,217 $ 51,023
Medium-term investments 11,530 36,734 0
Total short-term investments $ 29,341 $ 39,951 $ 51,023
Short-term borrowings
Bank borrowings $ 565,000 $ 1,082,500 $ 1,401,300
Commercial paper 100,000 0 791,389
Other notes payable 2,000 0 0
Total short-term borrowings $ 667,000 $ 1,082,500 $ 2,192,689
Net short-term borrowings ($637,659 ) ($1,042,549 ) ($2,141,666 )
Bank borrowings
Maturity 1 to 20 days 2 days 1 to 28 days
Weighted-average interest rate 0.73 % 1.63 % 3.09 %
Commercial paper
Maturity 1 day n/a 1 to 18 days
Weighted-average interest rate 0.82 % n/a 3.34 %
Other notes payable
Maturity 2 months n/a n/a
Weighted-average interest rate n/a n/a n/a
|
Due to the temporary suspension of redemptions, and the uncertainty as to the
timing of such redemptions, $11.5 million as of March 31, 2009 and $36.7 million
as of December 31, 2008 of our short-term investments are classified as
medium-term as explained more fully in Note 5 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements.
We utilize our bank lines of credit as liquidity back-up for outstanding
commercial paper or draw on the bank lines to access LIBOR-based short-term
loans to fund our borrowing requirements. Periodically, we issue commercial
paper for general corporate purposes, including working capital requirements. We
plan to continue this practice from time to time as circumstances warrant.
Our policy is to maintain committed credit facilities at least equal to our
outstanding commercial paper. Unsecured bank lines of credit totaling
$1,675.0 million were maintained at March 31, 2009, of which $175.0 million
expires November 16, 2009 and $1,500.0 million expires November 16, 2012. As of
March 31, 2009, $565.0 million of the lines of credit was drawn. Interest rates
referable to borrowings under these lines of credit are determined at the time
of borrowing based on current market conditions.
As of March 31, 2009, our commercial paper program was rated A-2 and P-2 by
Standard & Poor's and Moody's Investors Services, Inc. (Moody's), respectively.
Both Standard & Poor's and Moody's have
assigned a negative outlook to our commercial paper ratings.
Current Maturities
Current maturities of long-term debt are summarized below (in thousands of
dollars):
March 31 December 31 March 31
2009 2008 2008
3-year floating loan dated 2008 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 0
6.00% 10-year notes issued 1999 250,000 250,000 0
Private placement notes 0 0 33,000
Other notes 1,689 1,685 1,834
Total $ 311,689 $ 311,685 $ 34,834
|
Maturity dates for our $311.7 million of current maturities as of March 31, 2009
are as follows: April 2009 - $250.0 million, June 2009 - $15.0 million,
September 2009 - $15.0 million, December 2009 - $15.0 million, March 2010 -
$15.0 million, and various dates for the remaining $1.7 million. We expect to
retire this debt using available cash or by issuing commercial paper or other
debt securities.
Debt and Capital
The calculations of our total debt as a percentage of total capital are
summarized below (amounts in thousands, except percentages):
March 31 December 31 March 31
2009 2008 2008
Debt
Current maturities of long-term debt $ 311,689 $ 311,685 $ 34,834
Short-term borrowings 667,000 1,082,500 2,192,689
Long-term debt 2,536,211 2,153,588 1,529,672
Total debt $ 3,514,900 $ 3,547,773 $ 3,757,195
Capital
Total debt $ 3,514,900 $ 3,547,773 $ 3,757,195
Shareholders' equity 3,453,330 3,522,736 3,747,019
Total capital $ 6,968,230 $ 7,070,509 $ 7,504,214
Total debt as a percentage of total capital 50.4 % 50.2 % 50.1 %
|
Our debt agreements do not subject us to contractual restrictions with regard to
working capital or the amount we may expend for cash dividends and purchases of
our stock. The percentage of consolidated debt to total capitalization (total
debt as a percentage of total capital), as defined in our bank credit facility
agreements, must be less than 65%. In the future, our total debt as a percentage
of total capital will depend upon specific investment and financing decisions.
We intend to maintain an investment grade rating and expect our operating cash
flows will enable us to reduce our total debt as a percentage of total capital
to a target range of 35% to 40% within the next three to five years, in line
with our historic capital structure targets. We have made acquisitions from time
to time and will continue to pursue attractive investment opportunities. Such
acquisitions could be funded by internally generated cash or issuing debt or
equity securities.
In February 2009, we issued $400.0 million of long-term notes in two related
series (tranches), as follows: $150.0 million of 10.125% coupon notes due
December 2015 and $250.0 million of 10.375% coupon notes due December 2018. The
notes were initially sold to a purchaser pursuant to an exemption from the
Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act), as amended, and subsequently resold
to Berkshire Hathaway pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act. The notes
are presented in our consolidated
balance sheet as of March 31, 2009 net of unamortized discounts from par in the
amounts of $0.5 million for the 2015 notes and $1.8 million for the 2018 notes.
These discounts and the debt issuance costs of the notes are being amortized
using the effective interest method over the respective lives of the notes. The
effective interest rates for these notes are 10.305% for the 2015 notes and
10.584% for the 2018 notes.
The 2008 debt issuances noted below relate primarily to funding the
November 2007 acquisition of Florida Rock. Including the 2007 debt issuances,
these issuances effectively replaced a portion of the short-term borrowings we
incurred to initially fund the cash portion of the acquisition.
In June 2008, we issued $650.0 million of long-term notes in two series
(tranches), as follows: $250.0 million of 5-year 6.30% coupon notes and
$400.0 million of 10-year 7.00% coupon notes. These notes are presented in our
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2009 net of unamortized
discounts from par in the amounts of $0.4 million and $0.4 million,
respectively. These discounts are being amortized using the effective interest
method over the respective lives of the notes. The effective interest rates for
the 5-year and 10-year 2008 note issuances, including the effects of
underwriting commissions and the settlement of the forward starting interest
rate swap agreements, are 7.47% and 7.86%, respectively.
Additionally, in June 2008 we established a $300.0 million 3-year syndicated
term loan with a floating rate based on a spread over LIBOR (1, 2, 3 or 6-month
LIBOR options). As of March 31, 2009, the spread was 1.5 percentage points above
the selected LIBOR option (1-month LIBOR of 0.52%). The spread is subject to
increase if our long-term credit ratings are downgraded. This loan requires
quarterly principal payments of $15.0 million starting in December 2008 and a
termination principal payment of $135.0 million in June 2011.
As of March 31, 2009, Standard & Poor's and Moody's rated our public long-term
debt at the BBB+ and Baa2 level, respectively. Both Standard & Poor's has
assigned a negative outlook to our long-term debt ratings.
Cash Contractual Obligations
. . .
|
|