|
Quotes & Info
|
| CSFL > SEC Filings for CSFL > Form 10-Q on 5-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
5-May-2009
Quarterly Report
COMPARISON OF BALANCE SHEETS AT MARCH 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
Overview
Total assets were $1,802,024,000 as of March 31, 2009, compared to $1,333,143,000 at December 31, 2008, an increase of $468,881,000 or 35%. The increase was due primarily from the acquisition of the Ocala branches from the FDIC, growth in correspondent bank deposits (i.e. federal funds purchased), and internally generated deposit growth.
Federal funds sold
Federal funds sold were $108,073,000 at March 31, 2009 (approximately 6.0% of total assets) as compared to $57,850,000 at December 31, 2008 (approximately 4.3% of total assets). We use our available-for-sale securities portfolio, as well as federal funds sold for liquidity management and for investment yields. These accounts, as a group, will fluctuate as a function of loans outstanding, and to some degree the amount of correspondent bank deposits (i.e. federal funds purchased) outstanding.
Investment securities
Securities available-for-sale, consisting primarily of U.S. government agency securities and municipal tax exempt securities, were $617,790,000 at March 31, 2009 (approximately 34% of total assets) compared to $252,080,000 at December 31, 2008 (approximately 19% of total assets), an increase of $365,710,000 or 145%. We use our available-for-sale securities portfolio, as well as federal funds sold for liquidity management and for investment yields. These accounts, as a group, will fluctuate as a function of loans outstanding as discussed above, under the caption "Federal funds sold." The significant increase in our securities available-for-sale during the current period was due to the acquisition of the Ocala branches and the related deposits from the FDIC, the increase in correspondent bank deposits (i.e. federal funds purchased) and internally generated deposit growth. Over time, our loan growth will eventually catch up to the rapid deposit growth we experienced this quarter, and future cash flows generated from our securities portfolio will be reallocated to our loan portfolio. Our securities are carried at fair value. We classify our securities as "available-for-sale" to provide for greater flexibility to respond to changes in interest rates as well as future liquidity needs, as discussed above.
Loans
Lending-related income is the most important component of our net interest income and is a major contributor to profitability. The loan portfolio is the largest component of earning assets, and it therefore generates the largest portion of revenues. The absolute volume of loans and the volume of loans as a percentage of earning assets is an important determinant of net interest margin as loans are expected to produce higher yields than securities and other earning assets. Average loans during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, were $894,676,000, or 55% of average earning assets, as compared to $834,971,000, or 68% of average earning assets, for the quarter ending March 31, 2008. Total loans, net of unearned fees and cost, at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $902,252,000 and $892,001,000, respectively, an increase of $10,251,000, or 1.1%. This represents a loan to total asset ratio of 50% and 67% and a loan to deposit ratio of 69% and 90%, at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Our residential real estate loans totaled $240,184,000 or 27% of our total loans as of March 31, 2009. As with all of our loans, these are originated in our geographical market area in central Florida.
We do not engage in sub-prime lending. As of this same date, our commercial real estate loans totaled $423,930,000, or 47% of our total loans. Construction, development, and land loans totaled $93,186,000, or 10% of our loans. As a group, all of our real estate collateralized loans represent approximately 84% of our total loans at March 31, 2009. The remaining 16% is comprised of commercial loans (10%) and consumer loans (6%).
Loan concentrations are considered to exist where there are amounts loaned to multiple borrowers engaged in similar activities, which collectively could be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions and when the total of such amounts would exceed 25% of total capital. Due to the lack of diversified industry and the relative proximity of markets served, the Company has concentrations in geographic as well as in types of loans funded.
The following table sets forth information concerning the loan portfolio by collateral types as of the dates indicated (dollars are in thousands).
March 31, Dec 31,
2009 2008
Real estate loans
Residential $ 240,184 $ 223,290
Commercial 423,930 434,488
Construction, development, land 93,186 92,475
Total real estate 757,300 750,253
Commercial 91,403 80,523
Consumer and other 54,248 61,939
Gross loans before 902,951 892,715
Unearned fees/costs (699 ) (714 )
Total loans net of unearned fees 902,252 892,001
Allowance for loan losses (13,472 ) (13,335 )
Total loans net of unearned fees and allowance for loan losses $ 888,780 $ 878,666
|
Credit quality and allowance for loan losses
We maintain an allowance for loan losses that we believe is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is a charge to current period earnings and decreased by loan charge-offs net of recoveries of prior period loan charge-offs. Loans are charged against the allowance when management believes collection of the principal is unlikely.
The allowance consists of two components. The first component is an allocation for impaired loans, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 114. Impaired loans are those loans that management has estimated will not repay as agreed upon. Each of these loans is required to have a written analysis supporting the amount of specific allowance allocated to the particular loan, if any. That is to say, a loan may be impaired (i.e. not expected to repay as agreed), but may be sufficiently collateralized such that we expect to recover all principal and interest eventually, and therefore no specific allowance is warranted.
The second component is a general allowance on all of the Company's loans other than those identified as impaired. We group these loans into five general categories with similar characteristics, then apply an adjusted loss factor to each group of loans to determine the total amount of this second
component of our allowance for loan losses. The adjusted loss factor for each category of loans is a derivative of our historical loss factor for that category, adjusted for current internal and external environmental factors, as well as for certain loan grading factors.
In the table below we have shown the two components, as discussed above, of our allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Mar 31, Dec 31, Increase
(amounts are in thousands of dollars) 2009 2008 (decrease)
Impaired loans $ 22,865 $ 24,191 $ (1,326 )
Component 1 (specific allowance) 1,302 1,799 (497 )
Specific allowance as percentage of impaired
loans 5.69 % 7.44 % (175 bps )
Total loans other than impaired loans 879,387 867,810 11,577
Component 2 (general allowance) 12,170 11,536 634
General allowance as percentage of non
impaired loans 1.38 % 1.33 % 5 bps
Total loans 902,252 892,001 10,251
Total allowance for loan losses 13,472 13,335 137
Allowance for loan losses as percentage of
total loans 1.49 % 1.49 % --- bps
|
As shown in the table above, our allowance for loan losses ("ALLL") as a percentage of total loans outstanding was 1.49% at March 31, 2009 and at December 31, 2008. Our ALLL increased by a net amount $137,000 during this three month period. Component 2 (general allowance) increased by $634,000 during the period. This increase is primarily due to changes in this component's environmental risk factors as well as an increase in our loan portfolio. Component 1 (specific allowance) decreased by $497,000. This Component is the result of specific allowance analyses prepared for each of our impaired loans. The table below sets forth the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods presented, in thousands of dollars.
For the three month period ending March 31, 2009 2008
Allowance at beginning of period $ 13,335 $ 10,828
Charge-offs
Real estate loans
Residential (313 ) (226 )
Commercial (417 ) -
Construction, development, land (622 ) -
Total real estate loans (1,352 ) (226 )
Commercial (184 ) -
Consumer and other (61 ) (72 )
Total charge-offs (1,597 ) (298 )
Recoveries
Real estate loans
Residential 4 78
Commercial 5 -
Construction, development, land - -
Total real estate loans 9 78
Commercial 11 6
Consumer and other 11 40
Total recoveries 31 124
Net charge-offs (1,566 ) (174 )
Provision for loan losses 1,703 604
Allowance at end of period $ 13,472 $ 11,258
|
Nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets
Non-performing loans consist of non-accrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest. Non-performing assets consist of non-performing loans plus repossessed real estate owned ("OREO") and repossessed assets other than real estate. We place loans on nonaccrual status when the loan becomes 90 days past due as to interest or principal, or when the full timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain, unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual, is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. Non performing loans as a percentage of total loans were 2.45% at March 31, 2009, compared to 2.23% at December 31, 2008.
Non performing assets (which we define as non performing loans, as defined above, plus (a) OREO (i.e. real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure); and (b) other repossessed assets that are not real estate), were $34,442,000 at March 31, 2009, compared to $24,835,000 at December 31, 2008. Non performing assets as a percentage of total assets was 1.91% at March 31, 2009, compared to 1.86% at December 31, 2008.
As shown in the table below, the largest component of non performing loans is non accrual loans, which as of March 31, 2009 management had identified a total of $20,819,000 (77 loans). Of this amount approximately $3,437,000 or 17% are residential real estate loans (25 loans); approximately $8,945,000 or 43% are commercial real estate loans (17 loans); approximately $6,974,000 or 33% are construction, acquisition and development, and land loans (15 loans); approximately $1,238,000 or 6% are commercial loans (10 loans); and $225,000 or 1% are consumer and all other loans (10 loans).
We have no construction or development loans with national builders. We do business with local builders and developers that have typically been long time customers. As indicated above, non accrual construction, acquisition and development, and land loans totaled $6,974,000 at March 31, 2009. The second largest loan in this category is for $1,034,000 and is collateralized by five newly completed townhouses. We also have one single family construction loan for $566,000. The remaining 14 loans ($5,374,000) in this category are all either developed lots or other land related loans. The largest loan is for $2,250,000 and is collateralized by four river front building lots plus 38 building lots in a residential subdivision. Two of these fifteen loans have a specific allowance which in the aggregate totals $75,000.
OREO at March 31, 2009 was $11,903,000, which represents 24 single family homes ($2,205,000), seven mobile homes with land ($492,000), eleven commercial real estate properties ($4,430,000) and various parcels of land including residential building lots, land acquisition, development and construction ($4,776,000).
The following table sets forth information regarding the components of nonperforming assets at the dates indicated (in thousands of dollars).
Mar. 31 Dec. 31
2009 2008
Non-accrual loans $ 20,819 $ 19,863
Past due loans 90 days or more and still accruing interest 1,304 50
Total non-performing loans 22,123 19,913
Other real estate owned 11,903 4,494
Repossessed assets other than real estate 416 428
Total non-performing assets $ 34,442 $ 24,835
Total non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans 2.45 % 2.23 %
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total
assets 1.91 % 1.86 %
Allowance for loan losses $ 13,472 $ 13,335
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of
non-performing loans 61 % 67 %
|
We continually analyze our loan portfolio in an effort to recognize and resolve problem assets as quickly and efficiently as possible. As of March 31, 2009, we believe the allowance for loan losses was adequate. However, we recognize that many factors can adversely impact various segments of the market. Accordingly, there is no assurance that losses in excess of such allowance will not be incurred.
Bank premises and equipment
Bank premises and equipment was $62,401,000 at March 31, 2009 compared to $61,343,000 at December 31, 2008, an increase of $1,058,000 or 2%. This amount is the result of purchases totaling $1,809,000 less $751,000 of depreciation expense. Our purchases during the quarter included a parcel of land acquired for a future branch site in Polk County (approximately $1,000,000), continued construction cost on a branch office building in Lake County (approximately $500,000), and the remaining amount (approximately $309,000) was spent on furniture, fixtures and equipment purchases.
Deposits
Total deposits were $1,311,684,000 at March 31, 2009, compared to $993,800,000 at December 31, 2008, an increase of $317,884,000 or 32%. Most of this increase is due to our acquisition of the Ocala branches from the FDIC, whereby we acquired approximately $178,000,000 of deposits. The rest of the growth was internally generated and included several large deposits from several local municipalities.
The table below sets forth our deposits by type and as a percentage to total deposits at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (amounts shown in the table are in thousands of dollars).
% of % of
Mar 31, 2009 total Dec 31, 2008 total
Demand - non-interest bearing $ 209,906 16 % $ 141,229 14 %
Demand - interest bearing 160,227 12 % 143,510 14 %
Savings and money market accounts 261,930 20 % 222,367 23 %
Time deposits 679,621 52 % 486,694 49 %
Total deposits $ 1,311,684 100 % $ 993,800 100 %
|
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
Our subsidiary banks enter into borrowing arrangements with our retail business customers by agreements to repurchase ("securities sold under agreements to repurchase") under which the banks pledge investment securities owned and under their control as collateral against the one-day borrowing arrangement. These short-term borrowings totaled $26,856,000 at March 31, 2009 compared to $26,457,000 at December 31, 2008.
Federal funds purchased
Federal funds purchased are overnight deposits from correspondent banks. We commenced accepting correspondent bank deposits during September 2008. Federal funds purchased acquired from other than our correspondent bank deposits are included with Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowed funds as described below. At March 31, 2009 we had $209,973,000 of correspondent bank deposits or federal funds purchased, compared to $88,976,000 at December 31, 2008. This growth along with the Ocala deposit acquisition and the deposit growth internally generated were the primary reasons for the asset growth we experienced during the current quarter.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowed funds
From time to time, we borrow either through Federal Home Loan Bank advances or Federal Funds Purchased, other than correspondent bank deposits (i.e. federal funds purchased) listed above. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were as follows (amounts are in thousands of dollars).
Mar 31, 2009 Dec 31, 2008
Daily overnight advances, at March 31, 2009 the
interest rate is 0.62% $ 3,000 $ -
Daily overnight advances, at December 31, 2008 the
interest rate is 0.46% - 6,750
Matures February 2, 2009, interest rate is fixed
at 2.72% - 10,000
Matures June 29, 2009, interest rate is fixed at
1.18% 3,000 3,000
Matures January 7, 2011, interest rate is fixed at
3.63% 3,000 3,000
Matures June 27, 2011, interest rate is fixed at
3.93% 3,000 3,000
Matures January 11, 2010, interest rate is fixed
at 1.04% 3,000 -
Matures January 12, 2010, interest rate is fixed
at 1.04% 3,000 -
Matures July 12, 2010, interest rate is fixed at
1.50% 3,000 -
Matures January 10, 2011, interest rate is fixed
at 1.84% 3,000 -
Matures January 21, 2011, interest rate is fixed
at 1.97% 3,000 -
Matures December 30, 2011, interest rate is fixed
at 2.30% 3,000 -
Matures January 21, 2012, interest rate is fixed
at 2.30% 3,000 -
Total $ 33,000 $ 25,750
|
Corporate debentures
We formed CenterState Banks of Florida Statutory Trust I (the "Trust") for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. On September 22, 2003, we issued a floating rate corporate debenture in the amount of $10,000,000. The Trust used the proceeds from the issuance of a trust preferred security to acquire the corporate debenture of the Company. The trust preferred security essentially mirrors the corporate debenture, carrying a cumulative preferred dividend at a variable rate equal to the interest rate on the corporate debenture (three month LIBOR plus 305 basis points). The corporate debenture and the trust preferred security each have 30-year lives. The trust preferred security and the corporate debenture are callable by the Company or the Trust, at their respective option after five years, and sooner in specific events, subject to prior approval by the Federal Reserve Board, if then required. The Company has treated the trust preferred security as Tier 1 capital up to the maximum amount allowed under the Federal Reserve guidelines for federal regulatory purposes.
In September 2004, Valrico Bancorp Inc. ("VBI") formed Valrico Capital Statutory Trust ("Valrico Trust") for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. On September 9, 2004, VBI issued a floating rate corporate debenture in the amount of $2,500,000. The Trust used the proceeds from the issuance of a trust preferred security to acquire the corporate debenture. On April 2, 2007, the Company
acquired all the assets and assumed all the liabilities of VBI pursuant to the merger agreement, including VBI's corporate debenture and related trust preferred security discussed above. The trust preferred security essentially mirrors the corporate debenture, carrying a cumulative preferred dividend at a variable rate equal to the interest rate on the corporate debenture (three month LIBOR plus 270 basis points). The corporate debenture and the trust preferred security each have 30-year lives. The trust preferred security and the corporate debenture are callable by the Company or the Valrico Trust, at their respective option after five years, and sooner in specific events, subject to prior approval by the Federal Reserve, if then required. The Company has treated the trust preferred security as Tier 1 capital up to the maximum amount allowed under the Federal Reserve guidelines for federal regulatory purposes.
Stockholders' equity
Stockholders' equity at March 31, 2009, was $180,024,000, or 10.0% of total assets, compared to $179,165,000, or 13.4% of total assets at December 31, 2008. The increase in stockholders' equity was due to the following items:
$179,165,000 Total stockholders' equity at December 31, 2008
772,000 Net income during the period
(998,000) Dividends paid and/or accrued, common and preferred
1,686,000 Net increase in market value of securities available for sale, net
of deferred taxes
57,000 Employee stock options exercised
104,000 Employee stock option expense consistent with SFAS #123(R)
(5,000) Other
$180,781,000 Total stockholders' equity at March 31, 2009
|
The federal bank regulatory agencies have established risk-based capital requirements for banks. These guidelines are intended to provide an additional measure of a bank's capital adequacy by assigning weighted levels of risk to asset categories. Banks are also required to systematically maintain capital against such "off- balance sheet" activities as loans sold with recourse, loan commitments, guarantees and standby letters of credit. These guidelines are intended to strengthen the quality of capital by increasing the emphasis on common equity and restricting the amount of loan loss reserves and other forms of equity such as preferred stock that may be included in capital. As of March 31, 2009, each of our four subsidiary banks exceeded the minimum capital levels to be considered "well capitalized" under the terms of the guidelines.
Selected consolidated capital ratios at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are presented in the table below.
Actual Well capitalized Excess
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount
March 31, 2009
Total capital (to risk weighted assets) $ 165,819 15.3 % $ 108,491 > 10 % $ 57,328
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets) 152,347 14.0 % 65,095 > 6 % 87,252
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) 152,347 9.5 % 79,908 > 5 % 72,439
December 31, 2008
Total capital (to risk weighted assets) $ 170,164 17.4 % $ 97,648 > 10 % $ 72,516
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets) 157,944 16.2 % 58,589 > 6 % 99,355
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) 157,944 12.6 % 62,751 > 5 % 95,193
|
COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
Overview
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $772,000 or $0.03 per share basic and diluted, compared to $1,111,000 or $0.09 per share basic and diluted for the same period in 2008. Our average earning assets increased by . . .
|
|