|
Quotes & Info
|
| TSN > SEC Filings for TSN > Form 10-Q on 4-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
4-May-2009
Quarterly Report
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Description of the Company
We are the world's largest meat protein company and the second-largest food production company in the Fortune 500 with one of the most recognized brand names in the food industry. We produce, distribute and market chicken, beef, pork, prepared foods and related allied products. Our operations are conducted in four segments: Chicken, Beef, Pork and Prepared Foods. Some of the key factors influencing our business are customer demand for our products; the ability to maintain and grow relationships with customers and introduce new and innovative products to the marketplace; accessibility of international markets; market prices for our products; the cost of live cattle and hogs, raw materials and grain; and operating efficiencies of our facilities.
Overview
? Chicken Segment - Second quarter fiscal 2009 operating results improved
$240 million as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2009 due to
decreased grain costs and reduced losses from our commodity risk
management activities related to grain and energy purchases. Sales volume
for the quarter was also up as inventory levels were reduced.
? Beef Segment - Operating income was $28 million in the second quarter of
fiscal 2009, despite a reduction in sales volume.
? Pork Segment - Operating margins were $29 million, or 3.4%, down compared
to the same period last year, as fiscal 2008 was a record year for the
pork segment due to the strong domestic and export demand.
? Prepared Foods Segment - Operating margins were $19 million, or 2.8%, and
included $15 million in charges for the closing of the Ponca City,
Oklahoma, processed meats plant.
? Liquidity - In March 2009, we replaced our then existing $1.0 billion
revolving credit facility set to expire in fiscal 2010 with a new $1.0
billion revolving credit facility which expires in March 2012. In
addition, we issued $810 million of senior notes. In conjunction with
these transactions, we paid down and terminated our accounts receivable
securitization agreement. These transactions helped to strengthen our
liquidity position and resulted in over $1.1 billion in total cash
(including restricted cash) at March 28, 2009.
? Dispositions - In March 2009, we completed the sale of the beef
processing, cattle feed yard and fertilizer assets of three of our
Alberta, Canada subsidiaries (collectively, Lakeside) to XL Foods Inc., a
Canadian-owned beef processing business, and an entity affiliated with XL
Foods Inc. We received total consideration of $145 million. This included
(a) $43 million cash received at closing, (b) $78 million of
collateralized notes receivable from either XL Foods or an affiliated
entity to be recovered throughout the next two years and (c) $24 million
of XL Foods Preferred Stock to be recovered over the next five years. In
addition to consideration received from XL Foods, we also have
approximately $12 million of net cash inflows expected from clearing
receivable and payable balances.
in millions, Three Months Ended
except per share
data Six Months Ended
March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008 March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008
Net income $ (104) $ (5)
(loss) $ (216) $ 29
Net income (0.28) (0.02)
(loss) - per
diluted share (0.58) 0.08
|
Second quarter of fiscal 2009 - Net income (loss) includes the following items:
? The impact of changing the method of recognizing interim income taxes.
Second quarter and six months of fiscal 2009 - Net income (loss) includes the
following items:
? $15 million charge related to the closing of our Ponca City, Oklahoma,
processed meats plant.
Second quarter and six months of fiscal 2008 - Net income (loss) included the
following items:
? $17 million charge related to the restructuring of our Emporia, Kansas,
beef operation;
? $13 million charge related to the closing of our Wilkesboro, North
Carolina, cooked products poultry plant;
? $12 million charge related to the impairment of packaging equipment; and
? $5 million in charges related to software impairments.
Six months of fiscal 2008 - Net income (loss) included the following items:
? $18 million non-operating gain related to the sale of an investment; and
? $6 million of severance charges related to the FAST initiative.
Outlook
? Chicken - We expect to continually improve through the latter half of
fiscal 2009. We should see an improvement in pricing into the summer
months, while grain prices are currently at more stable levels as compared
to the previous several quarters. We have worked through the majority of
our long grain positions, with the exception of those related to our
cost-plus customers.
? Beef - Fed cattle supplies should be adequate into the summer and fall.
Domestic demand will largely depend on the overall economy, while
international demand has improved recently.
? Pork - While we expect hog supplies will be lower than the record highs
experienced in 2008, we should have sufficient supplies to run our
business effectively. We feel we should be able to manage margins within
our normalized range.
? Prepared Foods - We expect the increased demand for our products will
continue, while margins should hold within our normalized range.
? In April 2009, pork product values declined sharply with the initial label
of the H1N1 flu as swine flu. Additionally, the live hog prices and CME
lean hog futures markets declined sharply. It is currently too early to
determine the impact on our pork and prepared foods
businesses. Management is monitoring this situation closely and making
adjustments where needed.
Summary of Results - Continuing Operations
Sales
in millions Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008 March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008
Sales $ 6,307 $ 6,336 $ 12,828 $ 12,812
Change in average sales price (5.1 )% (0.9 )%
Change in sales volume 4.9 % 1.1 %
Sales growth (decline) (0.5 )% 0.1 %
|
Second quarter - Fiscal 2009 vs Fiscal 2008
? The decline in sales included lower average sales prices, which accounted
for a decrease of approximately $283 million. This decrease was driven by
a reduction in average sales prices in the Beef segment. In addition,
inventory reductions and recent acquisitions in the Chicken segment led
to an overall decrease in average sales prices, as most of the inventory
reduction related to commodity products shipped internationally and sales
volume from recent acquisitions are on average lower priced products.
? Sales were positively impacted by higher sales volume, which accounted
for an increase of approximately $254 million. This included an increase
in Chicken segment sales volume, which was driven by inventory reductions
and sales volumes related to recent acquisitions. This was partially
offset by reductions in Beef and Pork segment volumes, due primarily to
lower export sales volumes.
Six months - Fiscal 2009 vs Fiscal 2008
? Sales were positively impacted by higher sales volume, which accounted
for an increase of approximately $26 million. This included an increase
in Chicken segment sales volume, which was driven by inventory reductions
and sales volumes related to recent acquisitions. This was partially
offset by reductions in Beef and Pork segment volumes, due primarily to
lower export sales volumes.
? The decline in sales included lower average sales prices, which accounted
for a decrease of approximately $10 million. This decrease was driven by
a reduction in average sales prices in the Beef segment. In addition,
inventory reductions and recent acquisitions in the Chicken segment led
to an overall decrease in average sales prices, as most of the inventory
reduction related to commodity products shipped internationally and sales
volume from recent acquisitions are on average lower priced products.
These decreases were partially offset by increases in average sales
prices in our Pork and Prepared Foods segments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost of Sales
in millions Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008 March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008
Cost of sales $ 6,054 $ 6,021 $ 12,557 $ 12,182
Gross margin $ 253 $ 315 $ 271 $ 630
Cost of sales 96.0 % 95.0
as a
percentage of
sales % 97.9 % 95.1 %
|
Second quarter - Fiscal 2009 vs Fiscal 2008
? Cost of sales increased $33 million. Higher sales volume increased cost of
sales $236 million, offset partially by a reduction in cost per pound
reducing cost of sales $203 million.
? Increase due to net losses of $63 million in the second quarter of
fiscal 2009, as compared to net gains of $43 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2008, from our commodity risk management activities
related to grain and energy purchases, which exclude the impact from
related physical purchase transactions that will impact current and
future period operating results.
? Increase in average live hog costs of approximately $34 million.
? Decrease in average domestic live cattle costs of approximately $195
million.
Six months - Fiscal 2009 vs Fiscal 2008
? Cost of sales increased $375 million. Cost per pound contributed to a $378
million increase, as sales volume increases in the Chicken and Prepared
Foods segments were offset by sales volume decreases in the Beef and Pork
segments.
? Increase due to net losses of $251 million in the six months of fiscal
2009, as compared to net gains of $70 million in the six months of
fiscal 2008, from our commodity risk management activities related to
grain and energy purchases, which exclude the impact from related
physical purchase transactions that will impact current and future
period operating results.
? Increase in grain costs in the Chicken segment of approximately $172
million.
? Increase in average live hog costs of approximately $89 million.
? Increase in Prepared Foods raw material costs of approximately $40
million.
? Decrease in average domestic live cattle costs of approximately $286
million.
Selling, General and Administrative
in millions Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, March 29, March 28, March 29,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Selling, general and $ 209 $ 231 $ 425 $ 446
administrative expenses
As a percentage of sales 3.3 % 3.6 % 3.3 % 3.5 %
|
Second quarter - Fiscal 2009 vs Fiscal 2008
? Decrease of $16 million related to advertising and sales promotions.
Six months - Fiscal 2009 vs Fiscal 2008
? Decrease of $25 million related to advertising and sales promotions.
? Increase of $8 million related to negative investment returns on
company-owned life insurance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Charges
in millions Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008 March 29,
March 28, 2009 2008
Other charges $ 15 $ 30 $ 15 $ 36
|
Second quarter and six months of fiscal 2009
? Includes $15 million charge related to the closing of our Ponca City,
Oklahoma, processed meats plant.
Second quarter and six months of fiscal 2008
? Includes $17 million charge related to the restructuring of our Emporia,
Kansas, beef operation.
? Includes $13 million charge related to the closing of our Wilkesboro, North
Carolina, cooked products poultry plant.
Six months of fiscal 2008
? Includes $6 million of severance charges related to the FAST initiative.
Interest Expense
in millions Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008 March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008
Cash $ 66 $ 54
interest
expense $ 123 $ 106
Noncash 8 1
interest
expense 14 2
Total 74 55
Interest
Expense 137 108
|
Fiscal 2009 vs Fiscal 2008
? Cash interest expense includes interest expense related to the coupon
rates for senior notes, commitment/letter of credit fees incurred on our
revolving credit facility, as well as other miscellaneous recurring cash
payments. The increase is due primarily to higher average weekly
indebtedness of approximately 10% and 12%, respectively, for the three and
six months ending March 28, 2009, as compared to the same periods last
year. We also had an increase in the overall average borrowing rates.
? Noncash interest expense primarily includes interest related to the
amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts/premiums on note
issuances. The increase is primarily due to debt issuance costs incurred
on the new credit facility, the 2014 Notes and amendment fees paid in
December 2008 on our then existing credit agreements. In addition, we had
a slight increase due to the accretion of the debt discount on the 2014
Notes. Noncash interest expense for the six months ending March 28, 2009,
includes a $3 million unrealized loss on our interest rate swap.
Other (Income) Expense, net
in millions Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008 March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008
Other (income) expense, net $ 3 $ (4) $ 21 $ (23)
|
Six months of fiscal 2009
? Includes $19 million in foreign currency exchange loss.
Six months of fiscal 2008
? Includes $18 million non-operating gain related to the sale of an investment.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective Tax Rate
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008 March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008
Effective tax rate (108.9)% 35.9% 34.0% 34.1%
|
Second quarter and six months of fiscal 2009 - The effective tax rate was impacted
by:
? the change in method from estimated annual to year to date;
? tax planning in foreign jurisdictions;
? general business credits;
? amounts relating to company-owned life insurance and certain other
nondeductible expense items; and
? state and foreign valuation allowances.
Second quarter and six months of fiscal 2008 - The effective tax rate was impacted
by:
? the Domestic Production Deduction;
? general business credits;
? amounts related to company-owned life insurance and certain other
nondeductible expense items; and
? composition of income and loss between domestic and foreign operations.
Segment Results
We operate in four segments: Chicken, Beef, Pork and Prepared Foods. The
following table is a summary of sales and segment profit (loss), which we
measure at the operating income (loss) level.
in millions Sales
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008 March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008
Chicken $ 2,360 $ 2,158 $ 4,594 $ 4,260
Beef 2,419 2,720 5,082 5,581
Pork 844 824 1,722 1,660
Prepared Foods 684 634 1,430 1,311
Total $ 6,307 $ 6,336 $ 12,828 $ 12,812
in
millions Operating Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008 March 28, 2009 March 29, 2008
Chicken $ (46 ) $ (45 ) $ (332 ) $ 3
Beef 28 6 28 (62 )
Pork 29 69 84 148
Prepared
Foods 19 24 54 59
Other (1 ) - (3 ) -
Total $ 29 $ 54 $ (169 ) $ 148
|
Chicken Segment Results
in millions
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, March 29, March 28, March 29,
2009 2008 Change 2009 2008 Change
Sales $ 2,360 $ 2,158 $ 202 $ 4,594 $ 4,260 $ 334
Sales Volume
Change 14.7 % 9.8 %
Avg. Sales Price
Change (4.7 )% (1.8 )%
Operating Income
(Loss) $ (46) $ (45) $ (1 ) $ (332) $ 3 $ (335 )
Operating Margin (1.9) % (2.1) % (7.2) % 0.1 %
|
Second quarter and six months of fiscal 2008
? Includes $13 million charge related to the closing of our Wilkesboro,
North Carolina, cooked products plant.
? Includes $5 million in charges related to software impairments.
Second quarter and six months - Fiscal 2009 vs Fiscal 2008 ? Operating results were impacted positively by increased sales volume, partially offset by lower average sales prices. The increase in sales volume for both the second quarter and six months of fiscal 2009 was due to inventory reductions and sales volume related to recent acquisitions. The inventory reductions and recent acquisitions led to an overall decrease in average sales prices, as most of the inventory reduction related to commodity products shipped internationally and sales volume from recent acquisitions are on average lower priced products. Operating results were adversely impacted in the second quarter and six months of fiscal 2009, as compared to the same periods of fiscal 2008, by a decline of $106 million and $321 million, respectively, from our commodity risk management activities related to grain and energy purchases. These amounts exclude the impact from related physical purchase transactions, which impact current and future period operating results. As compared to the same periods of fiscal 2008, operating results were also adversely impacted in the six months of fiscal 2009 by an increase in grain costs of $172 million, while we had a slight benefit from a reduction in grain costs during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Beef Segment Results
in millions
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, March 29, March 28, March 29,
2009 2008 Change 2009 2008 Change
Sales $ 2,419 $ 2,720 $ (301 ) $ 5,082 $ 5,581 $ (499 )
Sales Volume
Change (3.2 )% (7.1 )%
Avg. Sales Price
Change (8.2 )% (1.9 )%
Operating Income
(Loss) $ 28 $ 6 $ 22 $ 28 $ (62 ) $ 90
Operating Margin 1.2 % 0.2 % 0.6 % (1.1 )%
|
Second quarter and six months of fiscal 2008
? Includes $17 million charge related to the restructuring of our Emporia,
Kansas, operation.
? Includes $8 million charge related to the impairment of packaging
equipment.
Second quarter and six months - Fiscal 2009 vs Fiscal 2008 ? Operating results as compared to the same periods in 2008 were impacted positively by lower average live prices, offset by lower average sales prices and decreased sales volume. Operating results were impacted in the second quarter and six months of fiscal 2009 by a decline of $6 million and an improvement of $35 million, respectively, from our commodity risk management activities related to forward futures contracts for live cattle as compared to the same periods of fiscal 2008. These amounts exclude the impact from related physical sale and purchase transactions, which impact current and future period operating results.
Pork Segment Results
in millions
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, March 29, March 28, March 29,
2009 2008 Change 2009 2008 Change
Sales $ 844 $ 824 $ 20 $ 1,722 $ 1,660 $ 62
Sales Volume
Change (1.2 )% (3.0 )%
Avg. Sales Price
Change 3.7 % 7.0 %
Operating Income $ 29 $ 69 $ (40 ) $ 84 $ 148 $ (64 )
Operating Margin 3.4 % 8.4 % 4.9 % 8.9 %
|
Second quarter and six months of fiscal 2008 ? Includes $4 million charge related to the impairment of packaging equipment.
Second quarter and six months - Fiscal 2009 vs Fiscal 2008 ? Operating results as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2008 were impacted positively by increased average sales prices, offset by higher average live prices and decreased sales volume. Operating results were impacted in the second quarter and six months of fiscal 2009 by a decline of $17 million and $37 million, respectively, from our commodity risk management activities related to forward futures contracts for live hogs as compared to the same periods of fiscal 2008. These amounts exclude the impact from related physical sale and purchase transactions, which impact current and future period operating results. Operating results were negatively impacted by higher operating costs as compared to the same periods of fiscal 2008.
Prepared Foods Segment Results
in millions
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 28, March 29, March 28, March 29,
2009 2008 Change 2009 2008 Change
Sales $ 684 $ 634 $ 50 $ 1,430 $ 1,311 $ 119
Sales Volume
Change 5.1 % 4.4 %
Avg. Sales Price
Change 2.7 % 4.5 %
Operating Income $ 19 $ 24 $ (5 ) $ 54 $ 59 $ (5 )
Operating Margin 2.8 % 3.8 % 3.8 % 4.5 %
|
Second quarter and six months of fiscal 2009 ? Includes $15 million charge related to the closing of our Ponca City, Oklahoma, processed meats plant.
Second quarter and six months - Fiscal 2009 vs Fiscal 2008 ? Operating results were impacted positively by higher average sales prices and increased sales volumes, offset in the six months of fiscal 2009 by higher raw material costs.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our cash needs for working capital, capital expenditures and growth opportunities are expected to be met with current cash on hand, cash flows provided by operating activities, or short-term borrowings. Based on our current expectations, we believe our liquidity and capital resources will be sufficient to operate our business. However, we may take advantage of opportunities to generate additional liquidity or refinance through capital markets transactions. The amount, nature and timing of any capital markets transactions will depend on our operating performance and other circumstances, our then-current commitments and obligations, the amount, nature and timing of our capital requirements, any limitations imposed by our current credit arrangements and overall market conditions.
|
|