|
Quotes & Info
|
| JBHT > SEC Filings for JBHT > Form 10-Q on 29-Apr-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
29-Apr-2009
Quarterly Report
You should refer to the attached interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes and also to our Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as you read the following discussion. We may make statements in this report that reflect our current expectation regarding future results of operations, performance and achievements. These are "forward-looking" statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are based on our belief or interpretation of information currently available. You should realize there are many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described. Some of the factors and events that are not within our control and could have a significant impact on future operating results are general economic conditions, cost and availability of fuel, accidents, adverse weather conditions, competitive rate fluctuations, availability of drivers, adverse legal decisions and audits or tax assessments of various federal, state or local taxing authorities. Additionally, our business is somewhat seasonal with slightly higher freight volumes typically experienced during August through early November. You should also refer to Item 1A of our Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008, for additional information on risk factors and other events that are not within our control. Our future financial and operating results may fluctuate as a result of these and other risk factors as described from time to time in our filings with the SEC.
GENERAL
We are one of the largest surface transportation companies in North America. We operate four distinct, but complementary, business segments and provide a wide range of transportation services to a diverse group of customers throughout the continental United States, Canada and Mexico. We generate revenues primarily from the actual movement of freight from shippers to consignees and from serving as a logistics provider by offering or arranging for others to provide the transportation service. We account for our business on a calendar year basis with our full year ending on December 31 and our quarterly reporting periods ending on March 31, June 30 and September 30.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that impact the amounts reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Therefore, the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and associated disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities are affected by these estimates. We evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis, utilizing historical experience, consultation with experts and other methods considered reasonable in the particular circumstances. Nevertheless, actual results may differ significantly from our estimates. Any effects on our business, financial position or results of operations resulting from revisions to these estimates are recognized in the accounting period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
Information regarding our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates can be found in our Annual Report (Form 10-K). The four critical accounting policies that we believe require us to make more significant judgments and estimates when we prepare our financial statements include those relating to self-insurance accruals, revenue equipment, revenue recognition and income taxes. We have discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. In addition, Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the financial statements in our Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008, contains a summary of our critical accounting policies. There have been no material changes to the methodology we apply for critical accounting estimates as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Segments
We operated four segments during the first quarter 2009. The operation of each of these businesses is described in Note 13, Segment Information, of our Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 to Three Months Ended March 31,
2008
Summary of Operating Segment Results
For the Three Months Ended March 31
(in millions)
Operating Revenues Operating Income
2009 2008 % Change 2009 2008
JBI $ 391 $ 437 (10 )% $ 41.3 $ 51.8
DCS 179 228 (21 ) 17.4 18.3
JBT 102 185 (45 ) (5.8 ) 0.0
ICS 56 37 51 4.1 2.0
Subtotal 728 887 (18 )% 57.0 72.1
Inter-segment eliminations (5 ) (9 ) 44 - -
Total $ 723 $ 878 (18 )% $ 57.0 $ 72.1
|
Our total consolidated operating revenues decreased to $723 million for the first quarter 2009, an 18% decrease from $878 million in the first quarter 2008. Lower fuel prices resulted in fuel surcharge (FSC) revenues of $59.2 million during the current quarter, compared with $154.2 million in 2008. If FSC revenues were excluded from both periods, the decrease of 2009 revenue from 2008 was 8%. The decreased level of revenue, excluding FSC, was primarily attributable to lower load volumes in our DCS and JBT segments, partially offset by higher volumes in our Intermodal and ICS segments. The significant decline in JBT revenues was primarily a result of our ongoing long-term strategy to reduce the size of the segment's tractor fleet and weaker demand brought about by the current economic recession. The combined tractor fleet declined from 10,750 units to 9,552 units, with reductions primarily in the JBT segment as we move further away from an asset-heavy truckload model. Containers and trailers grew from 59,600 to 62,904. The growth in trailing equipment was primarily to support additional Intermodal business.
JBI segment revenue decreased 10%, to $391 million during the first quarter 2009, compared with $437 million in 2008. This decrease in segment revenue was primarily a result of the reduction in fuel costs and fuel surcharge revenue partly offset by 5% growth in overall load volume. Operating income of the JBI segment declined to $41.3 million in the first quarter 2009, from $51.8 million in 2008, primarily due to the decline in revenue and a declining length of haul.
DCS segment revenue decreased 21%, to $179 million in the first quarter 2009, from $228 million in 2008. Excluding fuel surcharges, revenue declined 13%, primarily due to a 373 reduction in average trucks, compared to the first quarter 2008. This decline in this segment's truck count reflected fleet reductions in response to changes in customers' business demands. Operating income of our DCS segment decreased to $17.4 million in 2009, from $18.3 million in 2008. This decline in operating income was primarily due to decreased demand. The impact of this decrease in demand was partially offset by a reduction in related equipment rental costs and lower insurance costs due to fewer claims.
JBT segment revenue totaled $102 million for the first quarter 2009, a decrease of 45% from the $185 million in the first quarter 2008. This decrease in revenue was primarily a result of a 33% decrease in load volume, compared to the same quarter a year ago, as demand was much softer in the current quarter. In addition, we have continued to right-size our tractor fleet according to customer demand, which resulted in a reduction of 948 tractors, or 23%, compared to the first quarter 2008. Rate per loaded mile, excluding fuel surcharges, decreased 2.4%, compared to the prior year period, which is attributable to the continued soft demand as well as aggressive pricing from competitors. Our JBT segment operated at a loss of $5.8 million during the first quarter 2009, compared with a loss of approximately $50 thousand during first quarter 2008. This decrease in operating income was the result of decreased revenue, lower tractor utilization, a decline in rate per mile and increased maintenance costs.
ICS segment revenue grew 51%, to $56 million in the first quarter 2009, from $37 million in 2008, which was primarily attributable to increased load volume from both new and existing customers. Operating income of our ICS segment increased to $4.1 million, from $2.0 million in 2008, due to volume growth, as our third-party carrier base grew 15% to over 19,700 carriers by quarter end. Our ICS employee count increased 119% during the first quarter 2009, compared with 2008, which was largely in sales and operations.
Consolidated Operating Expenses
The following table sets forth items in our Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Earnings as a percentage of operating revenues and the percentage
increase or decrease of those items as compared with the prior period.
Three Months Ended March 31
Percentage
Change of
Dollar
Dollar Amounts as a Amounts
Percentage of Total Between
Operating Revenues Quarters
2009 2008 2009 vs. 2008
Total operating revenues 100.0 % 100.0 % (17.7 )%
Operating expenses:
Rents and purchased transportation 41.4 37.6 (9.5 )
Salaries, wages and employee benefits 26.6 24.3 (10.0 )
Fuel and fuel taxes 8.2 15.3 (55.8 )
Depreciation 6.6 5.8 (6.3 )
Operating supplies and expenses 4.9 4.2 (3.2 )
Insurance and claims 1.6 2.0 (33.4 )
General and administrative expenses, net of
asset dispositions 1.2 1.1 (11.3 )
Operating taxes and licenses 1.0 0.9 (14.4 )
Communication and utilities 0.6 0.6 (11.9 )
Total operating expenses 92.1 91.8 (17.4 )
Operating income 7.9 8.2 (20.9 )
Interest income 0.0 0.0 (36.9 )
Interest expense 0.9 1.3 (41.2 )
Equity in loss of affiliated company 0.1 0.1 (26.9 )
Earnings before income taxes 6.9 6.8 (16.9 )
Income taxes 2.6 2.7 (19.0 )
Net earnings 4.3 % 4.1 % (15.5 )%
|
Total operating expenses decreased 17.4% and operating revenues decreased 17.7%, during the first quarter 2009, from the comparable period 2008. Changes in fuel costs and FSC revenues can have an impact on the
comparison of revenues and costs between reporting periods. Operating income declined to $57.0 million during the first quarter 2009, from $72.1 million in 2008.
Rents and purchased transportation costs decreased 9.5% in 2009. This decrease is primarily the result of the lower price of fuel since fuel costs of third-party rail and truck carriers are included in purchased transportation expense. The decrease was partially offset by increased load volume in our JBI and ICS segments.
Salaries, wages and employee benefit costs decreased 10% in 2009 compared with 2008. This decrease is primarily related to reductions in the number of company drivers in our JBT segment, due to the reduction in business demand and freight movement.
Fuel costs decreased 55.8% in 2009, compared with 2008. Our fuel cost per gallon during the current quarter decreased 44% due to the steep decline in fuel prices, compared with first quarter 2008. We have fuel surcharge programs in place with the majority of our customers. These programs typically involve a specified computation based on the change in national, regional or local fuel prices. While these programs may incorporate fuel cost changes as frequently as weekly, most also reflect a specified miles-per-gallon factor and require a certain minimum change in fuel costs (e.g., $.05 per gallon) to trigger a change in fuel surcharge revenue. As a result, some of these programs have a timing lag between when fuel costs change and when this change is reflected in revenues. This lag negatively impacts operating income in times of rapidly increasing fuel costs and positively impacts operating income when fuel costs decrease rapidly.
It is not meaningful to compare the amount of fuel surcharge revenue or the change in fuel surcharge revenue between reporting periods to fuel and fuel taxes expense, or the change of fuel expense between periods, as a significant portion of fuel cost is included in our payments to railroads, dray carriers and other third parties. These payments are classified as purchased transportation expense.
Depreciation expense decreased 6.3% in 2009, which was primarily the result of the reduction in our tractor fleet. Operating supplies and expenses decreased 3.2% primarily due to lower travel expenses, compared with the first quarter 2008. Insurance and claims expense decreased 33.4% in 2009 compared with 2008, primarily due to fewer claim incidents and lower severity of self-insured claims. Operating taxes and licenses decreased by 14.4% due to the decrease in the combined tractor fleet.
General and administrative expenses decreased 11.3% for the current quarter over the comparable period in 2008, primarily as a result of a decrease in driver expenses and corporate advertising. Net gains from sale of revenue equipment were $0.2 million in 2009, compared with $0.4 million in 2008.
Net interest expense decreased in 2009, primarily due to a reduction in debt levels and lower interest rates. Total debt decreased to $629.0 million at March 31, 2009, from $865.2 million at March 31, 2008.
The "equity in loss of affiliated company" item on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings reflects our share of the operating results of Transplace, Inc. (TPI).
Our effective income tax rate was 38.0% in 2009 and 39.0% in 2008. In determining our quarterly provision for income taxes, we use an estimated annual effective tax rate, which is based on our expected annual income, statutory tax rates, best estimate of nontaxable and nondeductible items of income and expense and the ultimate outcome of tax audits.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $73 million during the first three months of 2009, compared with $117 million for the same period 2008. Operating cash flows decreased primarily due to the timing of insurance premium payments, as well as lower earnings. This operating cash flow decrease was partially offset by an increase in cash flows from trade accounts receivable, due to timing of collections. Net cash used in investing activities totaled $53 million in 2009, compared with $57 million in 2008. The lower level of cash used in investing activities during 2009 primarily reflected our strategy of reduced investment in the asset-based operations of our JBT segment.
Net cash used in financing activities decreased to $19 million in 2009, compared to $58 million in 2008, as a result of decreased net payments on outstanding debt during the comparable quarter. This decrease in financing activity outflows was partially offset by an increase in our quarterly dividend payment.
Debt and Liquidity Data:
March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 March 31, 2008
Working capital ratio 1.14 0.97 1.03
Current portion of long-term debt (millions) $ 65.0 $ 118.5 $ 164.0
Total debt (millions) $ 629.0 $ 633.5 $ 865.2
Total debt to equity 1.14 1.20 2.33
Total debt as a percentage of total capital 53 % 54 % 70 %
|
Liquidity
Our need for capital has typically resulted from the acquisition of intermodal containers and chassis, trucks, tractors and trailers required to support our growth and the replacement of older equipment with new, late model equipment. We are frequently able to accelerate or postpone a portion of equipment replacements depending on market conditions. We have, during the past few years, obtained capital through cash generated from operations, revolving lines of credit and long-term debt issuances. We have also periodically utilized operating leases to acquire revenue equipment. To date, none of our operating leases contain any guaranteed residual value clauses.
At March 31, 2009, we were authorized to borrow up to $425 million under two different revolving lines of credit. The first line of credit is supported by a credit agreement with a group of banks for a total amount of $350 million, expiring in March 2012. The applicable interest rate under this agreement is based on either the prime rate or LIBOR, depending upon the specific type of borrowing, plus a margin based on the level of borrowings and our credit rating. At March 31, 2009, we had $164 million outstanding at an average interest rate of 1.26% under this agreement.
Our second line of credit is an Accounts Receivable Securitization program with a revolving credit facility up to $75 million, which matures in July 2009. The applicable interest rate under this agreement is the prevailing A1/P1 commercial paper rate in the market. At March 31, 2009, we had no outstanding balance under this agreement.
Our revolving lines of credit and debt facilities require us to maintain certain covenants and financial ratios. We were in compliance with all covenants and financial ratios at March 31, 2009.
We believe that our liquid assets, cash generated from operations and revolving lines of credit will provide sufficient funds for our operating and capital requirements for the foreseeable future.
Contractual Cash Obligations
As of March 31, 2009
Amounts Due by Period (in millions)
One to
One Year Three Four to After Five
Total Or Less Years Five Years Years
Operating leases $ 5.0 $ 2.3 $ 2.4 $ 0.3 $ 0
Debt payments 629.0 65.0 364.0 100.0 100.0
Interest payments on debt (1) 85.0 26.7 39.1 17.2 2.0
Commitments to acquire revenue
equipment and facilities 235.2 235.2 0 0 0
Total $ 954.2 $ 329.2 $ 405.5 $ 117.5 $ 102.0
|
Our net capital expenditures were approximately $54 million during the first three months of 2009, compared with $60 million for the same period 2008. The $54 million of net capital includes net additions to revenue equipment and non-revenue producing assets, including those recorded in "Other Assets" in our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets that are necessary to contribute to and support the future growth of our various business segments. Capital expenditures in 2009 were primarily for tractor trades, additional intermodal containers, chassis, and other trailing equipment. We are currently committed to spend approximately $235 million during the remainder of 2009, net of $76 million of expected sales proceeds from equipment dispositions. We expect to spend approximately $290 million for net capital expenditures during calendar year 2009. The table above excludes $17.8 million of potential liabilities for uncertain tax positions as we are unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate timing of settlement.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our only off-balance sheet arrangements are related to operating leases for trailing equipment and facilities.
Risk Factors
You should refer to Item 1A of our Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008, under the caption "Risk Factors" for specific details on the following factors and events that are not within our control and could affect our financial results.
† Our business is subject to general economic and business factors, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Recent economic trends and the current tightening of credit in financial markets could adversely affect our ability, and the ability of our suppliers, to obtain financing for operations and capital expenditures.
† We depend on third parties in the operation of our business.
† We derive a significant portion of our revenue from a few major customers, the loss of one or more of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
† Ongoing insurance and claims expenses could significantly reduce our earnings.
† We operate in a regulated industry, and increased direct and indirect costs of compliance with, or liability for violation of, existing or future regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.
† Our operations are subject to various environmental laws and regulations, the violation of which could result in substantial fines or penalties.
† Rapid changes in fuel costs could impact our periodic financial results.
† Difficulty in attracting and retaining drivers, delivery personnel and third-party carriers could affect our profitability and ability to grow.
† We operate in a competitive and somewhat fragmented industry. Numerous factors could impair our ability to maintain our current profitability and to compete with other carriers and private fleets.
† Extreme or unusual weather conditions can disrupt our operations, impact freight volumes and increase our costs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business results.
|
|