Overview

Ames National Corporation is a bank holding company established in 1975 that owns and operates five bank subsidiaries in central Iowa. The following discussion is provided for the consolidated operations of the Company and its Banks, First National Bank, Ames, Iowa (First National), State Bank & Trust Co. (State Bank), Boone Bank & Trust Co. (Boone Bank), Randall-Story State Bank (Randall-Story Bank) and United Bank & Trust NA (United Bank). The purpose of this discussion is to focus on significant factors affecting the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company does not engage in any material business activities apart from its ownership of the Banks. Products and services offered by the Banks are for commercial and consumer purposes including loans, deposits and trust services. The Banks also offer investment services through a third-party broker dealer. The Company employs twelve individuals to assist with financial reporting, human resources, audit, compliance, marketing, technology systems and the coordination of management activities, in addition to 177 full-time equivalent individuals employed by the Banks.

The Company's primary competitive strategy is to utilize seasoned and competent Bank management and local decision making authority to provide customers with faster response times and more flexibility in the products and services offered. This strategy is viewed as providing an opportunity to increase revenues through creating a competitive advantage over other financial institutions. The Company also strives to remain operationally efficient to provide better profitability while enabling the Company to offer more competitive loan and deposit rates.

The principal sources of Company revenues and cash flow are: (i) interest and fees earned on loans made by the Banks; (ii) securities gains and dividends on equity investments held by the Company and the Banks; (iii) service charges on deposit accounts maintained at the Banks; (iv) interest on fixed income investments held by the Banks; and (v) fees on trust services provided by those Banks exercising trust powers. The Company's principal expenses are: (i) interest expense on deposit accounts and other borrowings; (ii) salaries and employee benefits; (iii) data processing costs associated with maintaining the Bank's loan and deposit functions; and (iv) occupancy expenses for maintaining the Banks' facilities. The largest component contributing to the Company's net income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on earning assets (primarily loans and investments) and interest paid on interest bearing liabilities (primarily deposits and other borrowings). One of management's principal functions is to manage the spread between interest earned on earning assets and interest paid on interest bearing liabilities in an effort to maximize net interest income while maintaining an appropriate level of interest rate risk.

The Company had net income of $2,441,000, or $0.26 per share, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to net income of $2,901,000, or $0.31 per share, for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Total equity capital as of March 31, 2009 totaled $104 million or 11.9% of total assets at the end of the quarter.

The Company's earnings for the first quarter decreased $460,000 from the $2,901,000 earned a year ago. The lower quarterly earnings can be primarily attributed to increased FDIC deposit insurance assessments, increased other real estate owned costs and security losses. The increase in the FDIC assessments of $439,000 is due primarily to higher deposit assessment rates for 2009 which are expected to negatively impact future quarters. The increase in other real estate owned costs of $397,000 is due primarily to impairment write downs of certain other real estate owned and an increased volume of other real estate owned. Securities losses of $351,000 in 2009 decreased noninterest income when compared to security gains of $248,000 in 2008. The security losses in 2009 were primarily attributable to the sale of certain corporate bonds, as the Company continues to lower its holdings of corporate bonds and thus reducing its risk in the corporate bond portfolio. Impairment of securities totaling $23,000 in 2009 related to a corporate bond issue of MGIC Investment Corporation. As of March 31, 2009, the carrying and fair value of the other-than-temporarily impaired securities totaled $734,000. Management believes that additional impairment charges may be necessary on investment securities in future quarters if financial and economic conditions do not improve as perceived by bond investors.

Positive income items for the quarter included an increase in net interest income in 2009 over 2008 of $216,000, or 3%. The improvement in net interest income is attributable to lower funding costs as market interest rates paid on deposits have been more favorable for the Company in 2009. The Company's net interest margin was 3.97% for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 compared to 4.11% for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 and 3.78% for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.

Net loan charge-offs for the quarter totaled $77,000, compared to net charge-offs of $44,000 in the first quarter of 2008. The provision for loan losses for the first quarter of 2009 totaled $230,000 compared to the provision for loan losses of $110,000 for the same period in 2008 due to higher specific allowance for loan losses on impaired loans, offset in part by a lower general reserve due to a decrease in loan balances.

The following management discussion and analysis will provide a review of important items relating to:

· Challenges

· Key Performance Indicators and Industry Results

· Income Statement Review

· Balance Sheet Review

· Asset Quality and Credit Risk Management

· Liquidity and Capital Resources

· Forward-Looking Statements and Business Risks

Challenges

Management has identified certain challenges that may negatively impact the Company's revenues in the future and is attempting to position the Company to best respond to those challenges.

· On March 16, 2009, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") informed the Company's lead bank, First National, of the OCC's decision to establish individual minimum capital ratios for First National in excess of the capital ratios that would otherwise be imposed under applicable regulatory standards. The OCC is requiring First National to maintain, on an ongoing basis, until June 30, 2009, Tier 1 Leverage Capital of 8.5% of Adjusted Total Assets and to achieve and maintain by no later than June 30, 2009 Tier 1 Leverage Capital of 9% of Adjusted Total Assets and Total Risk Based Capital of 11% of Risk-Weighted Assets. As of March 31, 2009, First National exceeded the 9% Tier 1 and 11% Risk Based capital requirements. Failure to maintain the individual minimum capital ratios established by the OCC could result in additional regulatory action against First National.

· On July 16, 2008, the Company's lead bank, First National, entered into an informal Memorandum of Understanding with the OCC regarding First National's commercial real estate loan portfolio, including actions to be taken with respect to commercial real estate risk management procedures, credit underwriting and administration, appraisal and evaluation process, problem loan management, credit risk ratings recognition and loan review procedures. Since entering into the Memorandum, management has been actively pursuing the corrective actions required by the Memorandum in an effort to address the deficiencies noted in administration of its commercial real estate loan portfolio.

· The Company and affiliate banks have invested in certain corporate bond issues whose financial condition may further deteriorate requiring additional impairment charges. Additional impairment charges may be necessary on investment securities in future periods if financial and economic conditions do not improve as perceived by bond investors.

· Banks have historically earned higher levels of net interest income by investing in longer term loans and securities at higher yields and paying lower deposit expense rates on shorter maturity deposits. If the yield curve was to flatten or invert in 2009, the Company's net interest margin may compress and net interest income may be negatively impacted. Historically, management has been able to position the Company's assets and liabilities to earn a satisfactory net interest margin during periods when the yield curve is flat or inverted by appropriately managing credit spreads on loans and maintaining adequate liquidity to provide flexibility in an effort to hold down funding costs. Management would seek to follow a similar approach in dealing with this challenge in 2009.

· While interest rates declined in the latter part of 2008 and may remain low during 2009, interest rates may eventually increase and may present a challenge to the Company. Increases in interest rates may negatively impact the Company's net interest margin if interest expense increases more quickly than interest income. The Company's earning assets (primarily its loan and investment portfolio) have longer maturities than its interest bearing liabilities (primarily deposits and other borrowings); therefore, in a rising interest rate environment, interest expense will increase more quickly than interest income as the interest bearing liabilities reprice more quickly than earning assets. In response to this challenge, the Banks model quarterly the changes in income that would result from various changes in interest rates. Management believes Bank earning assets have the appropriate maturity and repricing characteristics to optimize earnings and the Banks' interest rate risk positions.

· The Company's market in central Iowa has numerous banks, credit unions, and investment and insurance companies competing for similar business opportunities. This competitive environment will continue to put downward pressure on the Banks' net interest margins and thus affect profitability. Strategic planning efforts at the Company and Banks continue to focus on capitalizing on the Banks' strengths in local markets while working to identify opportunities for improvement to gain competitive advantages.

· A substandard performance in the Holding Company's equity portfolio could lead to a reduction in the realized security gains or an other-than-temporary impairment, thereby negatively impacting the Company's earnings. The Holding Company invests capital that may be utilized for future expansion in a portfolio of various common stocks with an estimated fair market value of approximately $4.6 million as of March 31, 2009. The Holding Company focuses on stocks that have historically paid dividends in an effort to lessen the negative effects of a bear market. However, this strategy did not prove successful in the first quarter of 2009 and 2008 as problems in the general economy caused a significant decline in the fair value and dividend rates of the Holding Company's equity portfolio. Unrealized losses in the Holding Company's equity portfolio totaled $3.6 million as of March 31, 2009. This compares to unrealized losses in the Holding Company of $1.2 million as of December 31, 2008.

· The economic conditions for commercial real estate developers in the Des Moines metropolitan area deteriorated in 2008. This deterioration has contributed to the Company's increased level of non-performing assets. During the third quarter of 2008, the Company foreclosed on two real estate properties (other real estate owned) totaling $10.5 million in the Des Moines market. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has impaired loans totaling $4.0 million with six Des Moines area development companies with specific reserves totaling $164,000. The Company has additional credit relationships with real estate developers in the Des Moines area that, presently, have collateral values sufficient to cover loan balances. However, these loans may become impaired in the future if economic conditions do not improve or become worse. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has a limited number of such credits and is actively engaged with the customers to minimize credit risks.

During 2009, management will be focusing its efforts, in part, on steps necessary to improve the Company's capital position given the ongoing negative developments in the national and local economies and the uncertainty of the timing and improvement of economic conditions. An increased level of capital will enable the Company to better accommodate any impairment losses in the investment portfolio and any provision for loan losses with respect to the Company's commercial real estate loan portfolio that may be recorded during the year due to the asset quality of the Company's investment securities portfolio and commercial real estate loan portfolio. To this end, the Company recently announced that the quarterly dividend to be paid on May 15, 2009 will be reduced to $0.10 per shares as compared to the previous dividend of $0.28 per share declared in the fourth quarter of 2008.

Key Performance Indicators and Industry Results

Certain key performance indicators for the Company and the industry are presented in the following chart. The industry figures are compiled by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and are derived from 8,305 commercial banks and savings institutions insured by the FDIC. Management reviews these indicators on a quarterly basis for purposes of comparing the Company's performance from quarter to quarter against the industry as a whole.

Selected Indicators for the Company and the Industry

                Quarter Ended
                  March 31,                                       Year Ended December 31,
                    2009                     2008                           2007                          2006
                   Company         Company        Industry *       Company        Industry       Company        Industry

Return on
assets                   1.15 %         0.74 %           0.12 %         1.30 %         0.86 %         1.34 %         1.28 %

Return on
equity                   9.32 %         5.89 %           1.24 %         9.89 %         8.17 %         9.99 %        12.34 %

Net interest
margin                   3.97 %         3.94 %           3.18 %         3.39 %         3.29 %         3.29 %         3.31 %

Efficiency
ratio                   58.76 %        67.40 %          59.02 %        53.71 %        59.37 %        52.27 %        56.79 %

Capital ratio           12.39 %        12.57 %           7.49 %        13.20 %         7.98 %        13.38 %         8.23 %

*Latest available data

Key performances indicators include:

· Return on Assets

This ratio is calculated by dividing net income by average assets. It is used to measure how effectively the assets of the Company are being utilized in generating income. The Company's annualized return on average assets was 1.15% and 1.33%, respectively, for the three month periods ending March 31, 2009 and 2008. The decline in this ratio in 2009 from the previous period is the result of increased FDIC insurance assessments, increased other real estate owned costs and security losses.

· Return on Equity

This ratio is calculated by dividing net income by average equity. It is used to measure the net income or return the Company generated for the shareholders' equity investment in the Company. The Company's return on average equity was 9.32% and 10.38%, respectively for the three month periods ending March 31, 2009 and 2008. The decline in this ratio in 2009 from the previous period is the result of increased FDIC insurance assessments, increased other real estate owned costs and security losses.

· Net Interest Margin

The net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was 3.97% compared to 3.78% for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The ratio is calculated by dividing net interest income by average earning assets. Earning assets are primarily made up of loans and investments that earn interest. This ratio is used to measure how well the Company is able to maintain interest rates on earning assets above those of interest-bearing liabilities, which is the interest expense paid on deposits and other borrowings. The Company's net interest margin has improved primarily as the result of lower interest expense on deposits and other borrowings.

· Efficiency Ratio

This ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expense by net interest income and noninterest income. The ratio is a measure of the Company's ability to manage noninterest expenses. The Company's efficiency ratio was 58.8% and 50.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in the efficiency ratio was due primarily to increased FDIC insurance assessments, increased other real estate owned costs and security losses.

· Capital Ratio

The average capital ratio is calculated by dividing average total equity capital by average total assets. It measures the level of average assets that are funded by shareholders' equity. Given an equal level of risk in the financial condition of two companies, the higher the capital ratio, generally the more financially sound the company. The Company's capital ratio is significantly higher than the industry average.

Industry Results

The FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile reported the following results for the fourth quarter of 2008:

Industry Reports First Quarterly Loss Since 1990

Expenses associated with rising loan losses and declining asset values overwhelmed revenues in the fourth quarter of 2008, producing a net loss of $26.2 billion at insured commercial banks and savings institutions. This is the first time since the fourth quarter of 1990 that the industry has posted an aggregate net loss for a quarter. The (0.77%) quarterly return on assets (ROA) is the worst since the (1.10%) in the second quarter of 1987. A year ago, the industry reported $575 million in profits and an ROA of 0.02%. High expenses for loan-loss provisions, sizable losses in trading accounts, and large write downs of goodwill and other assets all contributed to the industry's net loss. A few very large losses were reported during the quarter-four institutions accounted for half of the total industry loss-but earnings problems were widespread. Almost one out of every three institutions (32%) reported a net loss in the fourth quarter. Only 36% of institutions reported year-over-year increases in quarterly earnings, and only 34% reported higher quarterly ROAs.

Provisions for Loan Losses Are More than Double Year-Earlier Total

Insured banks and thrifts set aside $69.3 billion in provisions for loan and lease losses during the fourth quarter, more than twice the $32.1 billion that they set aside in the fourth quarter of 2007. Loss provisions represented 50.2% of the industry's net operating revenue (net interest income plus total noninterest income), the highest proportion since the second quarter of 1987 when provisions absorbed 53.2% of net operating revenue. As in the fourth quarter of 2007, a few institutions reported unusually large trading losses, while others took substantial charges for impairment of goodwill. Trading activities produced a $9.2 billion net loss in the quarter, compared to a loss of $11.2 billion a year earlier. These are the only two quarters in the past 25 years in which trading revenues have been negative. Goodwill impairment charges and other intangible asset expenses rose to $15.8 billion, from $11.5 billion in the fourth quarter of 2007. Other negative earnings factors included a $6.0-billion (12.8%) year-over-year decline in noninterest income, and $8.1 billion in realized losses on securities and other assets in the quarter, more than twice the $3.7 billion in losses realized a year earlier. The reduction in noninterest income was driven by declines in servicing income (down $3.1 billion from a year earlier) and securitization income (down $2.6 billion, or 52.3%).

Average Net Interest Margin at Community Banks Falls to 20-Year Low

Net interest income totaled $97.0 billion in the fourth quarter, an increase of $4.5 billion (4.9%) from the fourth quarter of 2007. The average net interest margin (NIM) was 3.34% in the quarter, up slightly from 3.32% a year earlier but lower than the 3.37% average in the third quarter. The year-over-year margin improvement was confined mostly to larger institutions. More than half of all institutions (56%) reported lower NIMs. At institutions with less than $1 billion in assets, the average margin was 3.66%, compared to 3.85% a year earlier and 3.78% in the third quarter. This is the lowest quarterly NIM for this size group of institutions since the second quarter of 1988. At larger institutions, the average NIM improved from 3.24% a year earlier to 3.30%, slightly below the 3.32% average of the third quarter. When short-term interest rates are low and declining, it is more difficult for banks to reduce the rates they pay for deposits without causing deposit outflows. The cost of short-term nondeposit liabilities, in contrast, tends to follow movements in short-term interest rates more closely. Community banks fund more than two-thirds of their assets with domestic interest-bearing deposits, whereas larger institutions fund less than half of their assets with these deposits. As rates fell in the fourth quarter, average funding costs declined at larger institutions but remained unchanged at community banks.

Full-Year Earnings Fall to Lowest Level in 18 Years

Net income for all of 2008 was $16.1 billion, a decline of $83.9 billion (83.9%) from the $100 billion the industry earned in 2007. This is the lowest annual earnings total since 1990, when the industry earned $11.3 billion. The ROA for the year was 0.12%, the lowest since 1987, when the industry reported a net loss. Almost one in four institutions (23.4%) was unprofitable in 2008, and almost two out of every three institutions (62.5%) reported lower full-year earnings than in 2007. Loss provisions totaled $174.3 billion in 2008, an increase of $105.1 billion (151.9%) compared to 2007. Total noninterest income was $25.5 billion (10.9%) lower as a result of the industry's first-ever full-year trading loss ($1.8 billion), a $5.8-billion (27.4%) decline in securitization income, and a $6.8-billion negative swing in proceeds from sales of loans, foreclosed properties, and other assets. As low as the full-year earnings total was, it could easily have been worse. If the effect of failures and purchase accounting for mergers that occurred during the year is excluded from reported results, the industry would have posted a net loss in 2008. The magnitude of many year-over-year income and expense comparisons is muted by the impact of these structural changes and their accounting treatments.

Quarterly Net Charge-Off Rate Matches Previous High

Net loan and lease charge-offs totaled $37.9 billion in the fourth quarter, an increase of $21.6 billion (132.2%) from the fourth quarter of 2007. The annualized quarterly net charge-off rate was 1.91%, equaling the highest level in the 25 years that institutions have reported quarterly net charge-offs (the only other time the charge-off rate reached this level was in the fourth quarter of 1989). The year-over-year increase in quarterly net charge-offs was led by real estate construction and development loans (up $6.1 billion, or 448.1%), closed-end 1-4 family residential mortgage loans (up $4.6 billion, or 206.1%), commercial and industrial (C&I) loans (up $3.0 billion, or 97.3%), and credit cards (up $2.5 billion, or 60.1%). Charge-offs in all major loan categories increased from a year ago. Real estate loans accounted for almost two thirds of the total increase in charge-offs (64.7%).

Noncurrent Loans Register Sizable Increase in the Fourth Quarter

The amount of loans and leases that were noncurrent rose sharply in the fourth quarter, increasing by $44.1 billion (23.7%). Noncurrent loans totaled $230.7 billion at year-end, up from $186.6 billion at the end of the third quarter. More than two-thirds of the increase during the quarter (69.3%) came from loans secured by real estate. Noncurrent closed-end 1-4 family residential mortgages increased by $18.5 billion (24.1%) during the quarter, while noncurrent C&I loans rose by $7.6 billion (43.0%). Noncurrent home equity loans increased by $3.0 billion (39.0%) and noncurrent loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential real estate increased by $2.9 billion (20.2%). In the 12 months ended December 31, total noncurrent loans at insured institutions increased by $118.8 billion (107.2%). At the end of the year, the percentage of loans and leases that were noncurrent stood at 2.93%, the highest level since the end of 1992. Real estate construction loans had the highest noncurrent rate of any major loan category at year-end, at 8.51%, up from 7.30% at the end of the third quarter.

Reserve Coverage Ratio Slips to 16-Year Low

Total reserves increased by $16.5 billion (10.5%) in the fourth quarter. Insured institutions added $31.5 billion more in loss provisions to reserves than they took out in charge-offs, but the impact of purchase accounting from a few large mergers in the quarter limited the overall growth in industry reserves. The growth in reserves, coupled with a decline in industry loan balances, caused the industry's ratio of reserves to total loans to increase during the quarter from 1.96% to 2.20%, a 14-year high. However, the increase in reserves did not keep pace with the sharp rise in noncurrent loans, and the industry's ratio of reserves to noncurrent loans fell from 83.9% to 75.0%. This is the lowest level for the "coverage ratio" since the third quarter of 1992.

Income Statement Review

The following highlights a comparative discussion of the major components of net income and their impact for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion contained in this Item 2 and other disclosures included within this report are based, in part, on the Company's audited consolidated financial statements. These statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The financial information contained in these statements is, for the most part, based on the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. However, the preparation of these statements requires management to make certain estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.

The Company's significant accounting policies are described in the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" contained in the Company's Annual Report. Based on its consideration of accounting policies that involve the most complex and subjective estimates and judgments, management has identified its most critical accounting policies to be those related to the allowance for loan losses, valuation of other real estate owned and the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment of certain financial instruments.

Allowance for loan losses

. . .