|
Quotes & Info
|
| LEN > SEC Filings for LEN > Form 10-Q on 9-Apr-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
9-Apr-2009
Quarterly Report
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included under Item 1 of this Report and our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended November 30, 2008.
Some of the statements in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are "forward-looking statements," as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include statements regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies and prospects. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that these statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. Rather, forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from the activities and results anticipated in forward-looking statements. These factors include those described under the caption "Risk Factors" included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended November 30, 2008. We do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as required by Federal securities laws.
Outlook
The housing market experienced further deterioration during our first quarter of fiscal 2009, driven primarily by mortgage foreclosures, which added inventories to an already oversupplied market, escalating levels of unemployment and a low level of consumer confidence. These conditions continued to drive pricing downward through the use of incentives and price reductions. Given dramatically declining home prices and historically low interest rates, the affordability of homeownership has significantly improved across the country; however, we do not know when the market will stabilize. Whether or not the affordability of housing continues to improve, there could be further deterioration in market conditions, which may lead to additional valuation adjustments in the future.
Our strategy has been to streamline our core homebuilding operations for a return to profitability and to position us for future opportunities. We have continued to make strategic operational changes in order to address the current homebuilding environment by focusing on S,G&A control, efficient low-cost floor plans and market tuned product. S,G&A control has resulted in the centralization of functions and reduction of homebuilding divisions in order to significantly lower overhead costs, while our focus on efficient low-cost floor plans and market tuned product has enabled us to reduce our construction cost per square foot and the number of floor plans we bring to market.
In addition, we continue to focus on managing our inventory levels through curtailing land purchases, reducing home starts and adjusting prices to sell and deliver completed homes. We also continue to diligently work on restructuring, repositioning and reducing our joint ventures, as well as reducing our net recourse indebtedness exposure with regard to joint ventures.
During fiscal 2009, we will continue to focus on homebuilding profitability and on cash generation. While we have not yet recognized the full impact of our strategic initiatives, we believe that our focus on such initiatives will return us to profitability once the market stabilizes.
Overview
We historically have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, variability in quarterly results. Our results of operations for the three months ended February 28, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
Our net loss was $155.9 million, or $0.98 per basic and diluted share, in the first quarter of 2009, compared to a net loss of $88.2 million, or $0.56 per basic and diluted share, in the first quarter of 2008. The net loss was attributable to challenging market conditions that have persisted during the first quarter of 2009 and have impacted all of our operations. Our gross margins decreased due to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets, ("SFAS 144") valuation adjustments and higher sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales during the three months ended February 28, 2009, compared to the same period last year.
Financial information relating to our operations was as follows:
Three Months Ended
February 28, February 29,
(In thousands) 2009 2008
Homebuilding revenues:
Sales of homes $ 522,758 953,066
Sales of land 6,276 40,710
Total homebuilding revenues 529,034 993,776
Homebuilding costs and expenses:
Cost of homes sold 488,576 816,371
Cost of land sold 16,806 67,160
Selling, general and administrative 101,177 175,018
Total homebuilding costs and expenses 606,559 1,058,549
Equity in loss from unconsolidated entities (2,917 ) (22,980 )
Other income (expense), net (47,834 ) (21,793 )
Minority interest income (expense), net 1,734 (234 )
Homebuilding operating loss $ (126,542 ) (109,780 )
Financial services revenues $ 64,029 69,137
Financial services costs and expenses 63,537 78,829
Financial services operating earnings (loss) $ 492 (9,692 )
Total operating loss $ (126,050 ) (119,472 )
Corporate general and administrative expenses (28,031 ) (34,822 )
Loss before (provision) benefit for income taxes $ (154,081 ) (154,294 )
|
Revenues from home sales decreased 45% in the first quarter of 2009 to $522.8 million from $953.1 million in 2008. Revenues were lower primarily due to a 38% decrease in the number of home deliveries and a 12% decrease in the average sales price of homes delivered in 2009. New home deliveries, excluding unconsolidated entities, decreased to 2,136 homes in the first quarter of 2009 from 3,437 homes last year. In the first quarter of 2009, new home deliveries were lower in each of our homebuilding segments and Homebuilding Other, compared to 2008. The average sales price of homes delivered decreased to $244,000 in the first quarter of 2009 from $278,000 in the same period last year, primarily due to reduced pricing. Sales incentives offered to homebuyers were $50,500 per home delivered in the first quarter of 2009, compared to $48,000 per home delivered in the first quarter of 2008.
Homebuilding interest expense (included in cost of homes sold, cost of land sold and other income (expense), net) was $17.0 million in the first quarter of 2009, compared to $32.4 million in the same period last year. The decrease in interest expense was due to decreased deliveries during the first quarter of 2009, compared to the first quarter of 2008.
Our homebuilding debt to total capital ratio as of February 28, 2009 was 51.1%, compared to 49.2% and 38.2%, respectively, as of November 30, 2008 and February 29, 2008. Our net homebuilding debt to total capital ratio as of February 28, 2009 was 37.4%, compared to 35.7% and 24.5%, respectively, as of November 30, 2008 and February 29, 2008. Net homebuilding debt to total capital ratio consists of net homebuilding debt (homebuilding debt less homebuilding cash and cash equivalents) divided by total capital (net homebuilding debt plus stockholders' equity).
Selling, general and administrative expenses were reduced by $73.8 million, or 42%, in the first quarter of 2009, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to reduction in associate headcount, variable selling expenses and fixed costs. As a percentage of revenues from home sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 19.4% in the first quarter of 2009, from 18.4% in the first quarter of 2008, due to lower revenues.
Losses on land sales totaled $10.5 million in the first quarter of 2009, which included $0.2 million of SFAS 144 valuation adjustments and $10.2 million of write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs related to approximately 1,100 homesites under option that we do not intend to purchase. In the first quarter of 2008, losses on land sales totaled $26.5 million, which included $15.5 million of SFAS 144 valuation adjustments and $16.9 million of write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs related to approximately 2,600 homesites that were under option.
Equity in loss from unconsolidated entities was $2.9 million in the first quarter of 2009, compared to equity in loss from unconsolidated entities of $23.0 million in the first quarter of 2008, which included $18.9 million of SFAS 144 valuation adjustments related to assets of unconsolidated entities in which we have investments.
Other income (expense), net, totaled ($47.8) million in the first quarter of 2009, which included $37.2 million of APB 18 valuation adjustments to our investments in unconsolidated entities, compared to other income (expense), net, of ($21.8) million in the first quarter of 2008, which included $29.6 million of APB 18 valuation adjustments to our investments in unconsolidated entities.
Minority interest income (expense), net was $1.7 million and ($0.2) million, respectively, in the first quarter of 2009 and 2008.
Sales of land, equity in loss from unconsolidated entities, other income (expense), net and minority interest income (expense), net may vary significantly from period to period depending on the timing of land sales and other transactions entered into by us and unconsolidated entities in which we have investments.
Corporate general and administrative expenses were reduced by $6.8 million, or 20%, in the first quarter of 2009, compared to the first quarter of 2008. As a percentage of total revenues, corporate general and administrative expenses increased to 4.7% in the first quarter of 2009, from 3.3% in the first quarter of 2008, due to lower revenues.
SFAS 109 requires a reduction of the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance, if based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. As a result of our net loss during the three months ended February 28, 2009, we generated deferred tax assets of $57.7 million and recorded a non-cash valuation allowance in accordance with SFAS 109 against the entire amount of deferred tax assets generated.
Our overall effective income tax rates were (1.2%) and 42.83%, respectively, for the three months ended February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate, compared with the same period during 2008, resulted primarily from the establishment of a deferred tax asset valuation allowance.
Homebuilding Segments
We have grouped our homebuilding activities into four reportable segments, which we refer to as Homebuilding East, Homebuilding Central, Homebuilding West and Homebuilding Houston, based primarily upon similar economic characteristics, geography and product type. Information about homebuilding activities in states that do not have economic characteristics that are similar to those in other states in the same geographic area is grouped under "Homebuilding Other." References in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations to homebuilding segments are to those reportable segments.
At February 28, 2009, our reportable homebuilding segments and Homebuilding Other consisted of homebuilding divisions located in:
East: Florida, Maryland, New Jersey and Virginia
Central: Arizona, Colorado and Texas (1)
West: California and Nevada
Houston: Houston, Texas
Other: Illinois, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina and South Carolina
(1) Texas in the Central reportable segment excludes Houston, Texas, which is its own reportable segment.
Selected Financial and Operational Data
Three Months Ended
February 28, February 29,
(In thousands) 2009 2008
Revenues:
East:
Sales of homes $ 178,372 307,580
Sales of land 2,326 4,439
Total East 180,698 312,019
Central:
Sales of homes 61,902 132,810
Sales of land 807 10,578
Total Central 62,709 143,388
West:
Sales of homes 140,490 312,859
Sales of land 736 16,941
Total West 141,226 329,800
Houston:
Sales of homes 78,621 109,657
Sales of land 2,407 1,824
Total Houston 81,028 111,481
Other:
Sales of homes 63,373 90,160
Sales of land - 6,928
Total Other 63,373 97,088
Total homebuilding revenues $ 529,034 993,776
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Three Months Ended
February 28, February 29,
(In thousands) 2009 2008
Operating earnings (loss):
East:
Sales of homes $ (15,837 ) (4,233 )
Sales of land (5,482 ) (7,708 )
Equity in loss from unconsolidated entities (1,698 ) (15,314 )
Other income (expense), net (9,275 ) 3,730
Minority interest income, net 217 255
Total East (32,075 ) (23,270 )
Central:
Sales of homes (16,991 ) (9,581 )
Sales of land 118 (10,045 )
Equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities (642 ) 1,122
Other income (expense), net (9,131 ) 1,473
Minority interest income (expense), net 44 (327 )
Total Central (26,602 ) (17,358 )
West:
Sales of homes (31,954 ) (20,734 )
Sales of land (1,116 ) (7,179 )
Equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities 244 (7,834 )
Other income (expense), net (26,504 ) (28,487 )
Minority interest income (expense), net 385 (6 )
Total West (58,945 ) (64,240 )
Houston:
Sales of homes 2,383 5,955
Sales of land (917 ) 152
Equity in loss from unconsolidated entities (815 ) (335 )
Other income (expense), net (436 ) 38
Total Houston 215 5,810
Other:
Sales of homes (4,596 ) (9,730 )
Sales of land (3,133 ) (1,670 )
Equity in loss from unconsolidated entities (6 ) (619 )
Other income (expense), net (2,488 ) 1,453
Minority interest income (expense), net 1,088 (156 )
Total Other (9,135 ) (10,722 )
Total homebuilding operating loss $ (126,542 ) (109,780 )
|
Summary of Homebuilding Data
Deliveries:
Three Months Ended
Homes Dollar Value (In thousands) Average Sales Price
February 28, February 29, February 28, February 29, February 28, February 29,
2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008
East 794 1,165 $ 178,372 313,757 $ 225,000 269,000
Central 315 604 61,902 132,809 197,000 220,000
West 409 924 148,116 366,523 362,000 397,000
Houston 405 575 78,620 109,657 194,000 191,000
Other 219 328 63,373 107,799 289,000 329,000
Total 2,142 3,596 $ 530,383 1,030,545 $ 248,000 287,000
|
Of the total homes delivered listed above, 6 homes with a dollar value of $7.6 million and an average sales price of $1,271,000 represent deliveries from unconsolidated entities for the three months ended February 28, 2009, compared to 159 deliveries with a dollar value of $77.5 million and an average sales price of $487,000 for the three months ended February 29, 2008.
Sales Incentives (1):
Three Months Ended
Sales Incentives Average Sales Incentives Sales Incentives as a % of
(In thousands) Per Home Delivered Revenue
February 28, February 29, February 28, February 29, February 28, February 29,
2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008
East $ 42,257 62,302 $ 53,200 54,500 19.2 % 16.8 %
Central 13,733 21,006 43,600 34,800 18.3 % 13.6 %
West 29,059 57,707 72,100 71,800 17.1 % 15.6 %
Houston 12,620 9,796 31,200 17,000 13.8 % 8.2 %
Other 10,242 14,119 46,800 45,400 13.9 % 13.6 %
Total $ 107,911 164,930 $ 50,500 48,000 17.1 % 14.7 %
|
(1) Sales incentives relate to home deliveries during the period, excluding deliveries by unconsolidated entities.
New Orders (2):
Three Months Ended
Homes Dollar Value (In thousands) Average Sales Price
February 28, February 29, February 28, February 29, February 28, February 29,
2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008
East 716 942 $ 155,281 231,002 $ 217,000 245,000
Central 366 569 72,846 122,009 199,000 214,000
West 491 747 161,676 293,082 329,000 392,000
Houston 395 492 74,069 99,277 188,000 202,000
Other 222 295 59,464 83,387 268,000 283,000
Total 2,190 3,045 $ 523,336 828,757 $ 239,000 272,000
|
(2) New orders represent the number of new sales contracts executed with homebuyers, net of cancellations, during the three months ended February 28, 2009 and February 29, 2008.
Of the total new orders listed above, 8 homes with a dollar value of $4.9 million and an average sales price of $612,000 represent new orders from unconsolidated entities for the three months ended February 28, 2009, compared to 62 new orders with a dollar value of $39.3 million and an average sales price of $634,000 for the three months ended February 29, 2008.
Backlog:
Homes Dollar Value (In thousands) Average Sales Price
February 28, February 29, February 28, February 29, February 28, February 29,
2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008
East 711 1,568 $ 180,785 492,862 254,000 314,000
Central 174 250 35,395 56,401 203,000 226,000
West 329 711 122,260 307,071 372,000 432,000
Houston 259 506 53,168 117,960 205,000 233,000
Other 174 363 58,513 178,045 336,000 490,000
Total 1,647 3,398 $ 450,121 1,152,339 273,000 339,000
|
Of the total homes in backlog listed above, 9 homes with a backlog dollar value of $9.3 million and an average sales price of $1,038,000 represent the backlog from unconsolidated entities at February 28, 2009, compared with backlog from unconsolidated entities of 204 homes with a dollar value of $113.9 million and an average sales price of $558,000 at February 29, 2008.
Backlog represents the number of homes under sales contracts. Homes are sold using sales contracts, which are generally accompanied by sales deposits. In some instances, purchasers are permitted to cancel sales contracts if they fail to qualify for financing or under certain other circumstances. We experienced cancellation rates in our homebuilding segments and Homebuilding Other as follows:
Three Months Ended
February 28, February 29,
2009 2008
East 24 % 30 %
Central 18 % 20 %
West 16 % 27 %
Houston 23 % 27 %
Other 20 % 23 %
Total 21 % 26 %
|
Homebuilding East: Homebuilding revenues decreased for the three months ended February 28, 2009, compared to the three months ended February 29, 2008, primarily due to a decrease in the number of home deliveries and average sales price of homes delivered in all of the states in this segment. Gross margins on home sales were $10.8 million, or 6.1%, in 2009, including SFAS 144 valuation . . .
|
|