|
Quotes & Info
|
| HALL > SEC Filings for HALL > Form 10-K on 27-Mar-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
27-Mar-2009
Annual Report
The following discussion should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please see "Risks Associated with Forward-Looking Statements in this Form 10-K" for a discussion of some of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements.
Overview
Hallmark is an insurance holding company which, through its subsidiaries, engages in the sale of property/casualty insurance products to businesses and individuals. Our business involves marketing, distributing, underwriting and servicing our insurance products, as well as providing other insurance related services. We pursue our business activities through subsidiaries whose operations are organized into operating units and are supported by our insurance carrier subsidiaries.
Our non-carrier insurance activities are organized by operating units into the following reportable segments:
· Standard Commercial Segment. The Standard Commercial Segment includes the standard lines commercial property/casualty insurance products and services handled by our AHIS Operating Unit which is comprised of our American Hallmark Insurance Services and ECM subsidiaries.
· Specialty Commercial Segment. The Specialty Commercial Segment primarily includes the excess and surplus lines commercial property/casualty insurance products and services handled by our TGA Operating Unit, the general aviation insurance products and services handled by our Aerospace Operating Unit and the excess commercial automobile and umbrella products handled by our Heath XS Operating Unit. Our TGA Operating Unit is comprised of our TGA, PAAC and TGARSI subsidiaries. Our Aerospace Operating Unit is comprised of our Aerospace Insurance Managers, ASRI and ACMG subsidiaries. Our Heath XS Operating Unit is compromised of our Heath XS, LLC and Hardscrabble Data Solutions, LLC subsidiaries. The TGA and Aerospace Operating Units were acquired effective January 1, 2006 and the Heath XS Operating Unit was acquired August 29, 2008.
· Personal Segment. The Personal Segment includes the non-standard personal automobile, low value dwelling/homeowners, renters and motorcycle insurance products and services handled by our Personal Lines Operating Unit which is comprised of American Hallmark General Agency, Inc. and Hallmark Claims Services, Inc., both of which do business as Hallmark Insurance Company.
The retained premium produced by these reportable segments is supported by the following insurance company subsidiaries:
· American Hallmark Insurance Company of Texas presently retains all of the risks on the commercial property/casualty policies marketed within the Standard Commercial Segment and assumes a portion of the risks on the commercial and aviation property/casualty policies marketed within the Specialty Commercial Segment.
· Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company, which was acquired effective January 1, 2006, presently assumes a portion of the risks on the commercial property/casualty policies marketed within the Specialty Commercial Segment.
· Hallmark Insurance Company presently assumes all of the risks on the personal policies marketed within the Personal Segment and assumes a portion of the risks on the aviation property/casualty products marketed within the Specialty Commercial Segment.
Our insurance company subsidiaries have entered into a pooling arrangement pursuant to which AHIC retains 46.0% of the total net premiums written, HIC retains 34.1% of our total net premiums written and HSIC retains 19.9% of our total net premiums written.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments
The significant accounting policies requiring our estimates and judgments are discussed below. Such estimates and judgments are based on historical experience, changes in laws and regulations, observance of industry trends and information received from third parties. While the estimates and judgments associated with the application of these accounting policies may be affected by different assumptions or conditions, we believe the estimates and judgments associated with the reported consolidated financial statement amounts are appropriate in the circumstances. For additional discussion of our accounting policies, see Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Valuation of investments. We complete a detailed analysis each quarter to assess whether any decline in the fair value of any investment below cost is deemed other-than-temporary. All securities with an unrealized loss are reviewed. We recognize an other-than-temporary impairment loss when an investment's value declines below cost, adjusted for accretion, amortization and previous other-than-temporary impairments and it is determined that the decline is other-than-temporary. Some of the factors considered in evaluating whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary include: (1) our ability and intent to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value; (2) the recoverability of principal and interest for fixed maturity securities, or cost for equity securities; (3) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost for fixed maturity securities, or cost for equity securities; and (4) the financial condition and near-term and long-term prospects for the issuer, including the relevant industry conditions and trends, and implications of rating agency actions and offering prices. When it is determined that an invested asset is other-than-temporarily impaired, the invested asset is written down to fair value, and the amount of the impairment is included in earnings as a realized investment loss. The fair value then becomes the new cost basis of the investment, and any subsequent recoveries in fair value, other than amounts accreted to the expected recovery amount, are recognized at disposition.
We recognize a realized loss when impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary even if a decision to sell an investment has not been made. When we decide to sell a temporarily impaired available-for-sale investment and we do not expect the fair value of the investment to fully recover prior to the expected time of sale, the investment is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired in the period in which the decision to sell is made.
Risks and uncertainties are inherent in our other-than-temporary decline in value assessment methodology. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, incorrect or overly optimistic assumptions about financial condition or liquidity, incorrect or overly optimistic assumptions about future prospects, unfavorable changes in economic or social conditions and unfavorable changes in interest rates or credit ratings.
Deferred policy acquisition costs. Policy acquisition costs (mainly commission, underwriting and marketing expenses) that vary with and are primarily related to the production of new and renewal business are deferred and charged to operations over periods in which the related premiums are earned. Ceding commissions from reinsurers, which include expense allowances, are deferred and recognized over the period premiums are earned for the underlying policies reinsured.
The method followed in computing deferred policy acquisition costs limits the amount of such deferred costs to their estimated realizable value. A premium deficiency exists if the sum of expected claim costs and claim adjustment expenses, unamortized acquisition costs, and maintenance costs exceeds related unearned premiums and expected investment income on those unearned premiums, as computed on a product line basis. We routinely evaluate the realizability of deferred policy acquisition costs. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, there was no premium deficiency related to deferred policy acquisition costs.
Goodwill. Our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 includes goodwill of acquired businesses of $41.1 million. This amount has been recorded as a result of prior business acquisitions accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142") goodwill is tested for impairment annually. We completed our last annual test for impairment during the fourth quarter of 2008 and determined that there was no indication of impairment.
A significant amount of judgment is required in performing goodwill impairment tests. Such tests include estimating the fair value of our reporting units. As required by SFAS 142, we compare the estimated fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. Under SFAS 142, fair value refers to the amount for which the entire reporting unit may be bought or sold. Methods for estimating reporting unit values include market quotations, asset and liability fair values and other valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flows and multiples of earnings or revenues. With the exception of market quotations, all of these methods involve significant estimates and assumptions.
Deferred tax assets. We file a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred federal income taxes reflect the future tax consequences of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year end. Deferred taxes are recognized using the liability method, whereby tax rates are applied to cumulative temporary differences based on when and how they are expected to affect the tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for tax rate changes. A valuation allowance is provided against our deferred tax assets to the extent that we do not believe it is more likely than not that future taxable income will be adequate to realize these future tax benefits.
Reserves for unpaid losses and LAE . Reserves for unpaid losses and LAE are established for claims which have already been incurred by the policyholder but which we have not yet paid. Unpaid losses and LAE represent the estimated ultimate net cost of all reported and unreported losses incurred through each balance sheet date. The reserves for unpaid losses and LAE are estimated using individual case-basis valuations and statistical analyses. These reserves are revised periodically and are subject to the effects of trends in loss severity and frequency. (See, "Item 1. Business - Analysis of Losses and LAE" and "-Analysis of Loss and LAE Reserve Development.")
Although considerable variability is inherent in such estimates, we believe that our reserves for unpaid losses and LAE are adequate. Due to the inherent uncertainty in estimating unpaid losses and LAE, the actual ultimate amounts may differ from the recorded amounts. A small percentage change could result in a material effect on reported earnings. For example, a 1% change in December 31, 2008 reserves for unpaid losses and LAE would have produced a $1.6 million change to pretax earnings. The estimates are continually reviewed and adjusted as experience develops or new information becomes known. Such adjustments are included in current operations.
An actuarial range of ultimate unpaid losses and LAE is developed independent of management's best estimate and is only used to assess the reasonableness of that estimate. There is no exclusive method for determining this range, and judgment enters into the process. The primary actuarial technique utilized is a loss development analysis in which ultimate losses are projected based upon historical development patterns. The primary assumption underlying this loss development analysis is that the historical development patterns will be a reasonable predictor of the future development of losses for accident years which are less mature. An alternate actuarial technique, known as the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method, combines an analysis of loss development patterns with an initial estimate of expected losses or loss ratios. This approach is most useful for recent accident years. In addition to assuming the stability of loss development patterns, this technique is heavily dependent on the accuracy of the initial estimate of expected losses or loss ratios. Consequently, the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method is primarily used to confirm the results derived from the loss development analysis.
The range of unpaid losses and LAE estimated by our actuary as of December 31, 2008 was $127.6 million to $169.0 million. Our best estimate of unpaid losses and LAE as of December 31, 2008 is $156.4 million. Our carried reserve for unpaid losses and LAE as of December 31, 2008 is comprised of $74.6 million in case reserves and $81.8 million in incurred but not reported reserves. In setting this estimate of unpaid losses and LAE, we have assumed, among other things, that current trends in loss frequency and severity will continue and that the actuarial analysis was empirically valid. In the absence of any specific factors indicating actual experience at either extreme of the actuarial range, we have established a best estimate of unpaid losses and LAE which is approximately $8.1 million higher than the midpoint of the actuarial range. We expected our best estimate to move within the actuarial range from year to year due to changes in our operations and changes within the marketplace. Due to the inherent uncertainty in reserve estimates, there can be no assurance that the actual losses ultimately experienced will fall within the actuarial range. However, because of the breadth of the actuarial range, we believe that it is reasonably likely that actual losses will fall within such range.
Our reserve requirements are also interrelated with product pricing and profitability. We must price our products at a level sufficient to fund our policyholder benefits and still remain profitable. Because claim expenses represent the single largest category of our expenses, inaccuracies in the assumptions used to estimate the amount of such benefits can result in our failing to price our products appropriately and to generate sufficient premiums to fund our operations.
Recognition of profit sharing commissions. Profit sharing commission is calculated and recognized when the loss ratio, as determined by a qualified actuary, deviates from contractual targets. We receive a provisional commission as policies are produced as an advance against the later determination of the profit sharing commission actually earned. The profit sharing commission is an estimate that varies with the estimated loss ratio and is sensitive to changes in that estimate.
The following table details the profit sharing commission revenue sensitivity of the Standard Commercial Segment to the actual ultimate loss ratio for each effective quota share treaty at 5.0% above and below the current estimate, which we believe is a reasonably likely range of variance ($ in thousands).
Treaty Effective Dates
7/1/01 7/1/02 7/1/03 7/1/04
Provisional loss ratio 60.0 % 59.0 % 59.0 % 64.2 %
Estimated ultimate loss ratio booked to
at December 31, 2008 63.5 % 64.5 % 67.0 % 57.2 %
Effect of actual 5.0% above estimated
loss ratio at December 31, 2008 - - - $ (2,793 )
Effect of actual 5.0% below estimated
loss ratio at December 31, 2008 $ 1,850 $ 3,055 $ 3,360 $ 2,793
|
The following table details the profit sharing commission revenue sensitivity of the Specialty Commercial Segment for each effective quota share treaty at 5.0% above and below the current estimate, which we believe is a reasonably likely range of variance ($ in thousands).
Treaty Effective Dates
1/1/06 1/1/07 1/1/08
Provisional loss ratio 65.0 % 65.0 % 65.0 %
Estimated ultimate loss ratio booked to at
December 31, 2008 56.2 % 58.3 % 65.0 %
Effect of actual 5.0% above estimated loss ratio
at December 31, 2008 $ (3,096 ) $ (2,350 ) -
Effect of actual 5.0% below estimated loss ratio
at December 31, 2008 $ 1,362 $ 2,021 $ 879
|
Results of Operations
Comparison of Years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
Management overview. During fiscal 2008, our total revenues were $268.7 million, representing an approximately 2% decrease over the $275.2 million in total revenues for fiscal 2007. The decrease in total revenue during 2008 was primarily due to recognized losses on our investment portfolio and lower commission income partially offset by higher earned premium and investment income. Standard Commercial revenues decreased $2.4 million during 2008 due primarily to lower earned premium as a result of increased competition, rate pressure, and deterioration of the economic environment in the United States. Increased retention of business and the acquisition of our Heath XS Operating Unit in 2008 drove the $1.3 million increase in revenue by our Specialty Commercial Segment during 2008 compared to 2007. Revenues from our Personal Segment increased $6.2 million during 2008, due largely to geographic expansion into new states. Corporate revenue decreased $11.6 million during 2008 as compared to 2007 primarily due to recognized losses on our investment portfolio of $11.3 million as compared to recognized gains of $2.6 million during 2007, partially offset by increased investment income of $2.3 million for the period ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period during 2007.
We reported net income of $12.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to $27.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. On a diluted per share basis, net income was $0.62 for fiscal 2008 as compared to $1.34 for fiscal 2007. The decrease in net income was primarily attributable to decreased revenue discussed above and higher loss and LAE due to hurricane related losses during 2008.
Segment information. The following is additional business segment information for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
Year Ended December 31, 2008
Standard Specialty
Commercial Commercial Personal
Segment Segment Segment Corporate Consolidated
(in thousands)
Produced premium (1) $ 80,193 $ 146,054 $ 60,834 $ - $ 287,081
Gross premiums written 80,190 102,825 60,834 - 243,849
Ceded premiums written (4,829 ) (4,093 ) - - (8,922 )
Net premiums written 75,361 98,732 60,834 - 234,927
Change in unearned premiums 4,434 (1,226 ) (1,815 ) - 1,393
Net premiums earned 79,795 97,506 59,019 - 236,320
Total revenues 84,075 127,882 64,475 (7,742 ) 268,690
Losses and loss adjustment
expenses 49,270 55,933 39,042 (1 ) 144,244
Pre-tax income (loss), net of
minority interest 9,683 21,328 8,989 (18,926 ) 21,074
Net loss ratio (2) 61.7 % 57.4 % 66.2 % 61.0 %
Net expense ratio (2) 27.1 % 30.7 % 22.2 % 28.9 %
Net combined ratio (2) 88.8 % 88.1 % 88.4 % 89.9 %
Year Ended December 31, 2007
Standard Specialty
Commercial Commercial Personal
Segment Segment Segment Corporate Consolidated
(in thousands)
Produced premium (1) $ 90,985 $ 151,003 $ 55,916 $ - $ 297,904
Gross premiums written 90,868 102,688 55,916 - 249,472
Ceded premiums written (6,273 ) (4,388 ) - - (10,661 )
Net premiums written 84,595 98,300 55,916 - 238,811
Change in unearned premiums (840 ) (9,589 ) (2,411 ) - (12,840 )
Net premiums earned 83,755 88,711 53,505 - 225,971
Total revenues 86,512 126,550 58,268 3,836 275,166
Losses and loss adjustment expenses 48,480 48,484 35,969 (15 ) 132,918
Pre-tax income (loss) 12,415 28,338 7,523 (6,507 ) 41,769
Net loss ratio (2) 57.9 % 54.7 % 67.2 % 58.8 %
Net expense ratio (2) 27.3 % 31.1 % 23.2 % 27.8 %
Net combined ratio (2) 85.2 % 85.8 % 90.4 % 86.6 %
|
1 Produced premium is a non-GAAP measurement that management uses to track total controlled premium produced by our operations. We believe it is a useful tool for users of our financial statements to measure our premium production whether retained by our insurance company subsidiaries or retained by third party insurance carriers.
2 The net loss ratio is calculated as incurred losses and LAE divided by net premiums earned, each determined in accordance with GAAP. The net expense ratio is calculated as underwriting expenses of our insurance company subsidiaries (which include provisional ceding commissions, direct agent commissions, premium taxes and assessments, professional fees, other general underwriting expenses and allocated overhead expenses) and offset by agency income, divided by net premiums earned, each determined in accordance with GAAP. Net combined ratio is calculated as the sum of the net loss ratio and the net expense ratio.
Standard Commercial Segment. Gross premiums written for the Standard Commercial Segment were $80.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, which was $10.7 million or approximately 12% less than the $90.9 million reported for the same period in 2007. Net premiums written were $75.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $84.6 million reported for the same period in 2007. Increased competition, rate pressure and the deterioration of the general economic environment challenged premium volume growth by the Standard Commercial Segment throughout 2008.
Total revenue for the Standard Commercial Segment of $84.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $2.4 million less than the $86.5 million reported during the year ended December 31, 2007. This approximately 3% decrease in total revenue was primarily due to decreased net premiums earned of $4.0 million and lower processing and service fees of $0.4 million due to the shift from a third party agency structure to an insurance underwriting structure. These decreases in revenue were partially offset by a contingent commission adjustment reducing revenue by $1.9 million in 2008 as compared to a $3.5 million reduction in 2007. The contingent commission adjustments related to adverse loss development on prior accident years. Increased net investment income of $0.3 million during 2008 also partially offset the decreases in revenue discussed above.
Pre-tax income for our Standard Commercial Segment of $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased $2.7 million, or approximately 22%, from the $12.4 million reported for the same period of 2007. Decreased revenue as discussed above was the primary reason for the decrease in pre-tax income, as well as higher losses and LAE of $0.8 million, offset by lower operating expenses of $0.5 million, mostly due to lower production related expenses during 2008 as a result of lower premium production.
The net loss ratio for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 61.7% as compared to the 57.9% reported for the same period of 2007. The net loss ratio was unfavorably impacted by hurricane related losses net of reinsurance recoveries of $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The gross loss ratio before reinsurance was 67.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 56.0% for the same period the prior year. The gross loss results for the year ended December 31, 2008 included $10.9 million of hurricane related losses and $2.4 million of favorable prior year development as compared to $1.7 million of favorable prior year development for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Standard Commercial Segment reported net expense ratios of 27.1% and 27.3% for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Specialty Commercial Segment. The $127.9 million of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $1.3 million higher than the $126.6 million reported for 2007. This increase in revenue was largely due to increased net premiums earned of $8.8 million as a result of the increased retention of business and increased net investment income of $0.3 million. These increases were offset by lower commission income of $7.6 million due primarily to the shift from a third party agency structure to an insurance underwriting structure partially offset by increased commission income in our newly acquired Heath XS Operating Unit.
Pre-tax income for the Specialty Commercial Segment of $21.3 million was $7.0 million lower than the $28.3 million reported in 2007. Increased revenue, discussed above, was offset by increased losses and LAE of $7.4 million and increased operating expenses of $0.7 million due mostly to increased production related expenses related to the acquisition of our Heath XS Operating Unit partially offset by reduced premium production in our TGA and Aerospace Operating Units. Amortization of intangible assets of $0.2 million related to our acquisition of the Heath XS Operating Unit during 2008 also contributed to the decline in pre-tax income. The Specialty Commercial Segment reported a net loss ratio of 57.4% for 2008 as compared to 54.7% for 2007. The net loss ratio was unfavorably impacted by hurricane related losses net of reinsurance recoveries of $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The gross loss ratio before reinsurance was 59.5% for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 53.2% for the same period the prior year. The gross loss results for the year ended December 31, 2008 included $3.5 million of hurricane related losses and $1.2 million of adverse prior year development as compared to $3.8 million of favorable prior year development for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Specialty Commercial Segment reported a net expense ratio of 30.7% for 2008 as compared to 31.1% for 2007.
. . .
|
|