Search the web
Welcome, Guest
[Sign Out, My Account]
EDGAR_Online

Quotes & Info
Enter Symbol(s):
e.g. YHOO, ^DJI
Symbol Lookup | Financial Search
BBGI > SEC Filings for BBGI > Form 10-K on 27-Mar-2009All Recent SEC Filings

Show all filings for BEASLEY BROADCAST GROUP INC | Request a Trial to NEW EDGAR Online Pro

Form 10-K for BEASLEY BROADCAST GROUP INC


27-Mar-2009

Annual Report


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

We are a radio broadcasting company whose primary business is operating radio stations throughout the United States. We own and operate 44 radio stations in the following markets: Philadelphia, PA, Atlanta, GA, Boston, MA, Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Las Vegas, NV, West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL, Ft. Myers-Naples, FL, Wilmington, DE, Greenville-New Bern-Jacksonville, NC, Augusta, GA and Fayetteville, NC. We refer to each group of radio stations that we own in each radio market as a market cluster.

Recent Developments

On March 13, 2009, our credit facility was amended to, among other things, reduce the maximum commitment under the revolving credit loan, increase the interest rate margin, revise certain financial covenants, reduce the aggregate dollar amount of Company shares we are able to repurchase, and reduce the amount of dividends we are able to pay on our common stock.

We tested our FCC broadcasting licenses for impairment during the fourth quarter of 2008. As a result of the testing, we recorded impairment losses of $46.6 million related to the FCC broadcasting licenses in our Wilmington, DE, Las Vegas, NV, Augusta, GA, West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL, Atlanta, GA and Boston, MA market clusters. The impairment losses were primarily due to a decrease in projected revenue growth rates in these markets. Advertising revenue declined moderately during the first three quarters then significantly during the fourth quarter of 2008, which determined the timing of the impairment test. For further discussion, see "Critical Accounting Estimates" below.

We tested our goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter of 2008. As a result of the testing, we recorded impairment losses of $15.9 million related to the goodwill recorded in our Wilmington, DE, Las Vegas, NV and Augusta, GA market clusters. The impairment losses were primarily due to a decrease in projected revenue growth rates in these markets. Advertising revenue declined moderately during the first three quarters then significantly during the fourth quarter of 2008, which determined the timing of the impairment test. For further discussion, see "Critical Accounting Estimates" below.

We continue to be impacted by deteriorating general economic conditions, which have caused a downturn in the advertising industry. The decreased demand for advertising has negatively impacted our revenues. We expect the current environment to continue for some time and for our revenues to be adversely impacted during that time. We will continue to review our operating costs and expenses in non-essential areas in response to the expected decrease in revenues.

Financial Statement Presentation

The following discussion provides a brief description of certain key items that appear in our financial statements and general factors that impact these items.

Net Revenue. Our net revenue is primarily derived from the sale of advertising airtime to local and national advertisers. Net revenue is gross revenue less agency commissions, generally 15% of gross revenue. Local revenue generally consists of advertising airtime sales to advertisers in a radio station's local market either directly to the advertiser or through the advertiser's agency. National revenue generally consists of advertising airtime sales to agencies purchasing advertising for multiple markets. National sales are generally facilitated by our national representation firm, which serves as our agent in these transactions.


Table of Contents

The advertising rates that we are able to charge and the number of advertisements that we can broadcast without jeopardizing listener levels generally determine our net revenue. Advertising rates are primarily based on the following factors:

• a radio station's audience share in the demographic groups targeted by advertisers as measured principally by quarterly reports issued by the Arbitron Ratings Company;

• the number of radio stations, as well as other forms of media, in the market competing for the attention of the same demographic groups;

• the supply of, and demand for, radio advertising time; and

• the size of the market.

Our net revenue is affected by general economic conditions, competition and our ability to improve operations at our market clusters. Seasonal revenue fluctuations are also common in the radio broadcasting industry and are primarily due to variations in advertising expenditures by local and national advertisers. Our revenues are typically lowest in the first calendar quarter of the year.

A growing source of revenue comes from our radio station websites primarily through the sale of advertiser promotions and advertising on our websites and the sale of advertising airtime during audio streaming of our radio stations over the internet. Our radio station websites contributed approximately $4.2 million or 3.1% and $5.8 million or 4.8% of net revenue during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

We use trade sales agreements to reduce cash paid for operating costs and expenses by exchanging advertising airtime for goods or services; however, we endeavor to minimize trade revenue in order to maximize cash revenue from our available airtime. The following summary table presents a comparison of our trade sales revenue and expenses.

                                        Year ended December 31
                                          2007          2008
                     Trade revenue    $  4,375,755   $ 3,901,243
                     Trade expenses   $  4,260,658   $ 4,191,554

Operating Costs and Expenses. Our operating costs and expenses consist primarily of (1) programming, engineering, and promotional expenses, reported as cost of services, and selling, general and administrative expenses incurred at our radio stations, (2) general and administrative expenses, including compensation and other expenses, incurred at our corporate offices, and (3) depreciation and amortization. We strive to control our operating expenses by centralizing certain functions at our corporate offices and consolidating certain functions in each of our market clusters.

Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was approximately 42% in 2007 and 37% in 2008, which differs from the federal statutory rate of 34% due to the effect of state income taxes and certain of our expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if:

• it requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made; and

• changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been selected could have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.


Table of Contents

Impairment of FCC Broadcasting Licenses. As of December 31, 2008, FCC broadcasting licenses with an aggregate carrying amount of $191.7 million represented 72.5% of our total assets. We are required to test our FCC broadcasting licenses for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that our licenses might be impaired. The annual test, which is performed as of December 31, compares the fair value of our licenses with their carrying amounts. If the carrying amounts of the licenses exceeds their fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. We combine our licenses into reporting units based on our market clusters for impairment testing purposes. We estimate the fair value of our licenses using discounted future cash flows. The discounted cash flow model includes certain assumptions including: (i) the projected growth rate for radio advertising revenue in each market, (ii) average market share and profit margin for each class of license in each market, (iii) estimated capital start-up capital costs, and (iv) the determination of an appropriate discount rate. If we had made different assumptions or used different estimates the fair value of our licenses could have been materially different.

As a result of our annual test during the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded impairment losses of $46.6 million related to the FCC broadcasting licenses in our Wilmington, DE, Las Vegas, NV, Augusta, GA, West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL, Atlanta, GA and Boston, MA market clusters. The impairment losses were indicative of a trend in the broadcasting industry and were not unique to the Company. The losses represented 19.6% of the aggregate carrying amount of our FCC broadcasting licenses prior to the impairment and were primarily due to a decrease in projected revenue growth rates in these markets. Advertising revenue declined moderately during the first three quarters then significantly during the fourth quarter of 2008 which determined the timing of the impairment test. There can be no assurance that additional impairments of our FCC broadcasting licenses will not occur in future periods.

Impairment of Goodwill. As of December 31, 2008, goodwill with an aggregate carrying amount of $13.6 million represented 5.2% of our total assets. We are required to test our goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that our goodwill might be impaired. Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of each of our reporting units to their carrying amount, including goodwill. For the purpose of testing our goodwill for impairment, we have identified our market clusters as our reporting units. We use internally-generated estimates of future cash flows to determine the fair value of each reporting unit. These estimates required management judgment and if we had made different assumptions the fair value of our reporting units could have been materially different. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with its goodwill carrying amount to measure the amount of impairment, if any. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. In other words, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

As a result of our annual test during the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded impairment losses of $15.9 million related to the goodwill recorded in our Wilmington, DE, Las Vegas, NV and Augusta, GA market clusters. The impairment losses represented 53.8% of the aggregate carrying amount of our goodwill prior to the impairment and were primarily due to a decrease in projected revenue growth rates in these markets. Advertising revenue declined moderately during the first three quarters then significantly during the fourth quarter of 2008 which determined the timing of the impairment test. There can be no assurance that impairments of our goodwill will not occur in future periods.


Table of Contents

Impairment of Property and Equipment. We are required to assess the recoverability of our property and equipment whenever an event has occurred that may result in an impairment loss. If such an event occurs, we will compare estimates of related future undiscounted cash flows to the carrying amount of the asset. If the future undiscounted cash flow estimates are less than the carrying amount of the asset, we will reduce the carrying amount to the estimated fair value. The determination of when an event has occurred and estimates of future cash flows and fair value all require management judgment. The use of different assumptions or estimates may result in alternative assessments that could be materially different. We did not identify any events that may have resulted in an impairment loss on our property and equipment in 2008. There can be no assurance that impairment of our property and equipment will not occur in future periods.

Valuation of Accounts Receivable. We continually evaluate our ability to collect our accounts receivable. Our ongoing evaluation includes review of specific accounts at our radio stations, the current financial condition of our customers and our historical write-off experience. This ongoing evaluation requires management judgment and if we had made different assumptions about these factors, the allowance for doubtful accounts could have been materially different.

Recent Pronouncements

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations which replaces SFAS 141, Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. SFAS 141(R) also requires the acquirer in a business combination achieved in stages to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well at the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values. SFAS 141(R) applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Adoption of SFAS 141(R) will not have an impact on our results of operations or financial position but may have an impact on accounting for future business combinations.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS
141 (revised 2007), and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. FSP 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. Adoption of FSP 142-3 will not have an impact on our results of operations or financial position but may have an impact on accounting for future acquisitions.


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2007

The following summary table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 with respect to certain of our key financial measures. These changes illustrated in the table are discussed in greater detail below. This section should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to financial statements included in Item 8 of this report.

                                        Year ended December 31,                   Change
                                        2007              2008                 $              %
Net revenue                         $ 133,883,080     $ 121,448,681      $ (12,434,399 )     (9.3 )%
Cost of services                       48,228,776        40,799,415         (7,429,361 )    (15.4 )
Selling, general and
administrative expenses                48,269,043        45,930,853         (2,338,190 )     (4.8 )
Corporate general and
administrative expenses                10,215,468         9,010,095         (1,205,373 )    (11.8 )
Impairment losses                       2,150,659        62,482,506         60,331,847         NM
Interest expense                       13,773,934         8,950,385         (4,823,549 )    (35.0 )
Loss on extinguishment of
long-term debt                            366,599                -            (366,599 )       NM
Other non-operating expenses               49,965           425,202            375,237         NM
Income tax expense (benefit)            3,494,870       (18,139,323 )      (21,634,193 )       NM
Net income (loss)                       4,771,271       (30,549,462 )      (35,320,733 )       NM

Net Revenue. The $12.4 million decrease in net revenue during the year ended December 31, 2008 was partially due to a $4.1 million decrease at our Miami-Fort Lauderdale market cluster, which was primarily due to the absence of revenue from broadcasting the Florida Marlins baseball games, which contributed $1.9 million in 2007. The decrease in net revenue was also due to an additional $2.2 million decrease at our Miami-Fort Lauderdale market cluster, a $3.6 million decrease at our Fort Myers-Naples market cluster, a $2.6 million decrease at our Las Vegas market cluster, and a $1.0 million decrease at our Greenville-New Bern-Jacksonville market cluster due to weaker performance in those clusters.

Cost of Services. The $7.4 million decrease in cost of services during the year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily due to a $5.0 million decrease at our Miami-Fort Lauderdale market cluster that was primarily due to the non-renewal of the Florida Marlins baseball team program rights agreement, which cost $3.9 million in 2007. The decrease in cost of services was also due to an additional $1.1 million decrease at our Miami-Fort Lauderdale market cluster, a $0.7 million decrease at our Las Vegas market cluster primarily due to a promotional campaign in 2007 for one of our radio stations in that market. Cost of services also decreased at eight of our nine other market clusters and were comparable to 2007 at the remaining market cluster.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The $2.3 million decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily due to a $1.0 million decrease at our Miami-Fort Lauderdale market cluster, a $1.0 million decrease at our Las Vegas market cluster primarily due to lower sales commissions as a result of the decrease in net revenue in those markets. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.5 million increase at our Philadelphia market cluster.

Corporate General and Administrative Expenses. The $1.2 million decrease in corporate general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily due to a decrease in stock-based and cash compensation expense.

Impairment Losses. We tested our FCC broadcasting licenses and goodwill for impairment as of December 31, 2008 in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. As a result of the testing, we recorded impairment losses of $46.6 million related to the FCC broadcasting licenses in


Table of Contents

our Wilmington, DE, Las Vegas, NV, Augusta, GA, West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL, Atlanta, GA and Boston, MA market clusters and impairment losses of $15.9 million related to the goodwill recorded in our Wilmington, DE, Las Vegas, NV and Augusta, GA market clusters. The impairment losses were primarily due to a decrease in projected revenue growth rates in these markets. For further discussion, see "Critical Accounting Estimates" above.

Interest Expense. The $4.8 million decrease in interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily due to a decrease in our borrowing costs and voluntary repayments of borrowings under our credit facility.

Loss on Extinguishment of Long-Term Debt. In connection with an amendment to our credit facility in 2007, we recorded a $0.4 million loss on extinguishment of long-term debt during the year ended December 31, 2008.

Non-Operating Expenses. The increase in non-operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily due to other-than-temporary impairment losses of $0.4 million on our investments in MIVA and ioWorldMedia.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit). The decrease in income taxes was primarily due to a deferred tax benefit of $24.1 million related to the impairment losses $62.5 million on our FCC broadcasting licenses and goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2008. If we were to exclude the impairment losses in 2007 and 2008, our effective tax rate would have been comparable for both periods.

Net Income (Loss). As a result of the factors described above, the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $30.5 million compared to a net income of $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview. Our primary sources of liquidity are internally generated cash flow and our revolving credit loan. Our primary liquidity needs have been, and for the next twelve months and thereafter are expected to continue to be, for working capital, debt service, and other general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures and radio station acquisitions. Historically, our capital expenditures have not been significant. In addition to property and equipment associated with radio station acquisitions, our capital expenditures have generally been, and are expected to continue to be, related to the maintenance of our studio and office space and the technological improvement, including upgrades necessary to broadcast HD Radio, and maintenance of our broadcasting towers and equipment. We have also purchased or constructed office and studio space in some of our markets to facilitate the consolidation of our operations.

As of December 31, 2008, our credit facility permitted us to repurchase up to $50.0 million of our common stock and on June 10, 2004, our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to $25.0 million of our Class A common stock over a one-year period from the date of authorization, which was extended on May 12, 2005 for one additional year. On May 24, 2006, our board of directors authorized us to increase the remaining balance under our previous authorization from $21.3 million to $25.0 million and to extend the repurchase period to May 23, 2007. Effective May 24, 2007, our board of directors authorized the extension of the repurchase period for one additional year. Effective May 24, 2008, our board of directors authorized the extension of the repurchase period for one additional year. From June 10, 2004 to February 28, 2009, we repurchased 2.6 million shares of our Class A common stock for an aggregate $13.8 million. Effective March 13, 2009, our amended credit facility prohibits us from repurchasing additional shares of our common stock until our consolidated total debt is less than 5 times our consolidated operating cash flow at which time we are permitted to repurchase up to an aggregate of $10.0 million of our common stock. We are permitted to repurchase up to $0.5 million of our common stock per year in connection with vesting of restricted stock.

As of December 31, 2008, our credit facility permitted us to pay cash dividends on our common stock in an amount up to an aggregate of $10.0 million per year. During the year ended December 31, 2008 we paid $5.5 million for cash dividends. Effective March 13, 2009, our amended credit facility prohibits us from paying cash


Table of Contents

dividends on our common stock until our consolidated total debt is less than 5 times our consolidated operating cash flow at which time we are permitted to pay cash dividends in an amount up to an aggregate of $5.0 million per year.

We expect to provide for future liquidity needs through one or a combination of the following sources of liquidity:

• internally generated cash flow;

• our credit facility;

• additional borrowings, other than under our existing credit facility, to the extent permitted thereunder; and

• additional equity offerings.

We believe that we will have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to permit us to provide for our liquidity requirements and meet our financial obligations for the next twelve months. However, continuation or worsening of the economic downturn in the United States or in the markets we serve, poor financial results, unanticipated acquisition opportunities or unanticipated expenses could give rise to defaults under our credit facility, additional debt servicing requirements or other additional financing or liquidity requirements sooner than we expect and we may not secure financing when needed or on acceptable terms.

Our ability to reduce our total debt ratio, as defined by our credit facility, by increasing operating cash flow and/or decreasing long-term debt will determine how much, if any, of the remaining commitments under the revolving portion of our credit facility will be available to us in the future. Continuation or worsening of the economic downturn in the United States or in the markets we serve, poor financial results or unanticipated expenses could result in our failure to maintain or lower our total leverage ratio and we may not be permitted to make any additional borrowings under the revolving portion of our credit facility.

The following summary table presents a comparison of our capital resources for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 with respect to certain of our key measures affecting our liquidity. The changes set forth in the table are discussed in greater detail below. This section should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to financial statements included in Item 8 of this report.

                                                          Year ended December 31,
                                                          2007              2008
Net cash provided by operating activities             $  18,856,812     $  22,243,958
Net cash used in investing activities                   (47,912,502 )      (1,412,383 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities      27,059,966       (23,928,690 )

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                (1,995,724 )      (3,097,115 )

Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $3.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due to a $6.6 million decrease in cash paid for station operating expenses, a $4.6 million decrease in cash paid for interest, and a $1.0 million increase in cash refunded for income taxes. These increases were partially offset by a $9.2 million decrease in cash receipts from the sale of advertising airtime.

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily due to cash payments for capital . . .

  Add BBGI to Portfolio     Set Alert         Email to a Friend  
Get SEC Filings for Another Symbol: Symbol Lookup
Quotes & Info for BBGI - All Recent SEC Filings
Sign Up for a Free Trial to the NEW EDGAR Online Pro
Detailed SEC, Financial, Ownership and Offering Data on over 12,000 U.S. Public Companies.
Actionable and easy-to-use with searching, alerting, downloading and more.
Request a Trial      Sign Up Now


Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
SEC Filing data and information provided by EDGAR Online, Inc. (1-800-416-6651). All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.