|
Quotes & Info
|
| SMTC > SEC Filings for SMTC > Form 10-K on 26-Mar-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
26-Mar-2009
Annual Report
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
As discussed in "Forward Looking and Cautionary Statements" earlier in this report, this Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward looking statements, including as a result of the risks described in the cautionary statements in Item 1A "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, in our other filings with the SEC, and in material incorporated herein and therein by reference. We undertake no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We design, produce and market a broad range of products that are sold principally to customers in the high-end consumer, industrial, computing and communications end-markets. The high-end consumer market includes handheld products, set-top boxes, digital televisions, digital video recorders, Bluetooth headsets and other consumer equipment. Included in the industrial customer base are automated meter reading, military and aerospace, medical, automated test equipment, security, automotive, home automation, and other industrial equipment. The computing market includes desktops, servers, notebooks, graphics, printers, and other computer peripherals. The communications market includes base stations, optical networks, switches and routers, wireless LAN, and other communication infrastructure equipment. Our end-customers are primarily original equipment manufacturers and their suppliers, including Alcatel, Apple, Cisco, Compal Electronics, Dell, Hewlett Packard, Intel, LG Electronics, Motorola, Nokia Siemens Networks, Phonak, Quanta Computer, Research In Motion, Samsung, Sanyo, Siemens, and Sony.
We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is probable. Product design and engineering revenue is recognized during the period in which services are performed. We defer revenue recognition on shipment of certain products to distributors where return privileges exist until the products are sold through to end-users. Gross profit is equal to our net sales less our cost of sales. Our cost of sales includes materials, depreciation on fixed assets used in the manufacturing process, shipping costs, direct labor and overhead. We determine the cost of inventory by the first-in, first-out method. Our operating costs and expenses generally consist of selling, general and administrative (SG&A), product development and engineering costs (R&D), costs associated with acquisitions, and other operating related charges.
Most of our sales to customers are made on the basis of individual customer purchase orders. Many customers include liberal cancellation provisions in their purchase orders. Trends within the industry toward shorter lead-times and "just-in-time" deliveries have resulted in our reduced ability to predict future shipments. As a result, we rely on orders received and shipped within the same quarter for a significant portion of our sales. Sales made directly to customers during fiscal year 2009 were 45% of net sales. The remaining 55% of net sales were made through independent distributors.
We divide and operate our business based on two reportable segments: Standard Semiconductor Products and Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products. We evaluate segment performance based on net sales and operating income of each segment. We do not track segment data or evaluate segment performance on additional financial information. We do not track balance sheet items by individual reportable segments. As such, there are no separately identifiable segment assets nor are there any separately identifiable statements of income data (below operating income). The Standard Semiconductor Products segment makes up the vast majority of overall sales and includes our Power Management, Protection, Advanced Communication and Sensing product lines. The Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products segment includes our line of assembly and rectifier devices, which are the remaining products from our founding as a supplier into the military and aerospace market.
Our business involves reliance on foreign-based entities. Most of our outside subcontractors and suppliers, including third-party foundries that supply silicon wafers, are located in foreign countries, including China, Taiwan, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, Germany, Israel and Canada. For the fiscal year ended January 25, 2009, approximately 40% of our silicon, in terms of cost of wafers purchased, was manufactured in China. Foreign sales for fiscal year 2009 constituted approximately 79% of our net sales. Approximately 58% of foreign sales in fiscal year 2009 were to customers located in the Asia-Pacific region. The remaining foreign sales were primarily to customers in Europe, Canada, and Mexico.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate and discuss with our audit committee our estimates, including those related to our allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns, inventory reserves, asset impairments and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, which together form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Our critical accounting policies and estimates do not vary between our two reportable segments. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect the significant judgments and estimates we use in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Accounting for Temporary and Long-Term Investments
Our temporary and long-term investments consist of government, bank and corporate obligations. Temporary investments mature within twelve months of the balance sheet date. Long-term investments have maturities in excess of one year from the date of the balance sheet. We classify our investments as "available for sale" because we expect to possibly sell some securities prior to maturity. We include any unrealized gain or loss, net of tax, in the comprehensive income portion of our Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity.
After determining the fair value of our available-for-sale investments, gains or losses on these investments are recorded to other comprehensive income, until either the investment is sold or we determine that a decline in value is other-than-temporary. Determining whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary requires management judgment based on the specific facts and circumstances of each investment. For investments in debt instruments, these judgments primarily consider: the financial condition and liquidity of the issuer, the issuer's credit rating, and any specific events that may cause us to believe that the debt instrument will not mature and be paid in full; and our ability and intent to hold the investment to maturity. If management decides not to hold an investment until maturity, it may result in the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We evaluate the collectability of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. If we are aware of a customer's inability to meet its financial obligations to us, we record an allowance to reduce the net receivable to the amount we reasonably believe we will be able to collect from the customer. For all other customers, we recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, the current business environment, the size and number of certain large accounts and our historical experience. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate or if economic conditions worsen, additional allowances may be required in the future.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is probable. We defer revenue recognition on shipment of products to certain customers, principally distributors, where return privileges exist until these products are sold through to end-users or the return privilege lapses. The estimated deferred gross margin on these sales, where there are no outstanding receivables, are recorded on the balance sheet under the heading of "Deferred Revenue." We record a provision for estimated sales returns in the same period as the related revenues are recorded. We base these estimates on historical sales returns and other known factors. Actual returns could be different from our estimates and current provisions for sales returns and allowances, resulting in future charges to earnings.
Inventory Valuation
Our inventories are stated at lower of cost or market and consist of materials, labor and overhead. We determine the cost of inventory by the first-in, first-out method. At each balance sheet date, we evaluate our ending inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. This evaluation includes analyses of sales levels by product and projections of future demand. In order to state our inventory at lower of cost or market, we maintain reserves against our inventory. If future demand or market conditions are less favorable than our projections, a write-down of inventory may be required, and would be reflected in cost of goods sold in the period the revision is made.
Contingencies and Litigation
We are involved in various disputes and litigation matters as a claimant and as defendant. We record any amounts recovered in these matters when collection is certain. We record liabilities for claims against us when the losses are probable and reasonably estimable. Any amounts recorded are based on reviews by outside counsel, in-house counsel and management. Actual results may differ from estimates.
Stock-Based Compensation
In fiscal year 2007, we adopted SFAS No.123 (revised 2004), "Share Based Payment" ("SFAS 123(R)"), which requires all companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments (including stock options) at fair value. SFAS 123(R) requires us to apply a valuation model, which includes estimates and assumptions on the rate of forfeiture and expected life of options and stock price volatility. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the adoption of SFAS 123 (R). If any of the assumptions used in the valuation model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period and actual results may differ from estimates.
Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with SFAS 142, the Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if the Company believes indicators of impairment exist. The value of our intangible assets, including goodwill, could be impacted by future adverse changes such as: (i) any future declines in our operating results, (ii) a decline in the valuation of technology company stocks, including the valuation of our common stock, (iii) a significant slowdown in the worldwide economy and the semiconductor industry or (iv) any failure to meet the performance projections included in our forecasts of future operating results. In the process of our annual impairment review, we primarily use the income approach methodology of valuation that includes the discounted cash flow method as well as other generally accepted valuation methodologies to determine the fair value of the assets. Significant management judgment is required in the forecasts of future operating results that are used in the discounted cash flow method of valuation. The estimates we have used are consistent with the plans and estimates that we use to manage our business. It is possible, however, that the plans and estimates used may be incorrect. If our actual results, or the plans and estimates used in future impairment analysis, are lower than the original estimates used to assess the recoverability of these assets, we could incur additional impairment charges in a future period.
The Company accounts for other purchased intangible assets, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS 144"), which requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment, such as reductions in demand or significant economic slowdowns in the semiconductor industry, are present. Reviews are performed to determine whether the carrying value of an asset is impaired, based on comparisons to undiscounted expected future cash flows. If this comparison indicates that there is impairment, the impaired asset is written down to fair value, which is typically calculated using: (i) quoted market prices and/or (ii) discounted expected future cash flows utilizing a discount rate consistent with the guidance provided in FASB Concepts Statement No. 7, Using Cash Flow Information and Present Value in Accounting Measurements. Impairment is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.
Accounting for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax liability together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Generally, to the extent we change a valuation allowance, the change is recorded through the tax provision in the statement of operations. For fiscal year 2009 and prior, release of a valuation allowance established against a pre-acquisition XEMICS net operating loss carryforward was recorded to goodwill. After the required adoption of SFAS 141R Business Combinations in fiscal year 2010, any release of valuation allowances related to the XEMICS net operating loss carryforward will be recorded as a reduction to tax expense. Management periodically evaluates our deferred tax assets to assess whether it is likely that the deferred tax assets will be realized.
We adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" ("FIN 48") in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant management estimates are required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax impact is uncertain. The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. As a result of the adoption of FIN 48 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, we recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on the two-step process prescribed within the interpretation. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this requires us to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision in the period of change.
Although we believe the estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be different than what is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals. Should additional taxes be assessed as a result of an audit or litigation, a material effect on our income tax provision and net income in the period or periods for which that determination is made could result.
Under SFAS 123(R), the income tax effects of share-based payments are recognized for financial reporting purposes only if such awards are expected to result in a tax deduction. SFAS 123(R) prohibits recognition of a deferred tax asset for an excess tax benefit (that is, a tax benefit that exceeds the amount of compensation cost recognized for the award for financial reporting purposes) that has not been realized. In determining when an excess tax benefit is realized, we have elected to follow the ordering provision of the tax law.
In addition to the risks to the effective tax rate discussed above, the effective tax rate reflected in forward-looking statements is based on current enacted tax law. Significant changes in enacted tax law could materially affect these estimates.
Results of Operations
Fiscal Year 2009 Compared With Fiscal Year 2008
Net Sales. Net sales for fiscal year 2009 were $294.8 million, an increase of 4% from $284.8 million for fiscal year 2008. While fiscal year 2009 revenue grew modestly, revenue during the fourth quarter was $62.7 million, down 20 percent from the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 and down 21 percent when compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2009. Deteriorating global economic conditions resulted in reduced demand for our customer's end products, which caused a severe reduction in orders of our component products. Demand and orders were further reduced during the fourth quarter as our customers began to work down their inventories, resulting in fewer replacement orders.
Presented below is our estimate of sales by end-market.
End-Markets
(fiscal years, in thousands)
January 25, 2009 January 27, 2008
Net Sales % total Net Sales % total Change
Computer $ 52,860 18 % $ 54,293 19 % (3 )%
Communications 52,479 18 % 48,537 17 % 8 %
High-End Consumer 111,341 37 % 112,178 39 % (1 )%
Industrial/Other 78,140 27 % 69,782 25 % 12 %
Net sales $ 294,820 100 % $ 284,790 100 % 4 %
|
Within the industrial category, higher revenue was driven by increased capacity to service strong demand for our Power Discrete products targeted at military, medical and other industrial applications. This strength was partially offset by lower sales in support of the automated test equipment market. Within the high-end consumer and the computing groups, higher unit sales of our protection products were offset by lower average selling prices, and weakness in overall demand for power management products. Within the communications group, revenue benefited from higher unit sales of our protection products.
Details on net sales by reportable segment are presented below.
Reportable Segment
(fiscal years, in thousands)
January 25, 2009 January 27, 2008
Net Sales % total Net Sales % total Change
Standard Semiconductor Products $ 263,119 89 % $ 260,035 91 % 1 %
Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products 31,701 11 % 24,755 9 % 28 %
Net Sales $ 294,820 100 % $ 284,790 100 % 4 %
|
Sales of Standard Semiconductor Products were strong in the first three quarters of fiscal year 2009, but demand dropped significantly in the fourth quarter as a result of deteriorating macro economic conditions.
Sales of our Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products increased by 28% in fiscal year 2009 due to strong demand for these products used mostly in military, medical and certain industrial applications.
Gross Profit. Gross profit was $159.6 million and $156.3 million for fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively. Gross profit for fiscal year 2009 was positively impacted by a 4% increase in net sales. Our gross margin was 54.1% for fiscal year 2009, down from 54.9% in fiscal year 2008. Gross profit margins for fiscal year 2009 were negatively impacted by product revenue mix. Our strategy is to develop new products that offer more advanced and more complex features than the competition, which in turn generally provides for higher gross margin. However, margin improvements may be offset by price erosion due to competition and other factors tied to industry conditions.
Operating Costs and Expenses. Operating costs and expenses were $117.7 million and $113.1 million for fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively, an increase of 4%. Detailed below are the operating costs and expenses for fiscal years 2009 and 2008. Fiscal years 2009 and 2008 include $14.3 million and $14.7 million of stock-based compensation expense, respectively. Stock-based compensation in fiscal year 2009 benefited from the reversal of $1.7 million of expense attributable to performance grants that are no longer expected to vest. See Note 8 to the financial statements included in this report for additional information regarding performance awards and the reversal of this equity based compensation expense.
Operating Costs & Expenses
(fiscal years, in thousands)
January 25, 2009 January 27, 2008
Costs/Exp. % sales Costs/Exp. % sales Change
Selling, general and administrative $ 72,890 25 % $ 74,263 26 % (2) %
Product development and engineering 41,405 14 % 43,064 15 % (4) %
Acquisition related items 1,091 0 % 1,102 0 % (1) %
Restructuring costs 2,310 1 % - - 100 %
Insurance related legal expenses - - % (5,339 ) (1 )% (100) %
Total operating costs and expenses $ 117,696 40 % $ 113,090 40 % 4 %
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal years 2009 and 2008 include approximately $2.5 million and $6.2 million, respectively, for legal, accounting, tax and other professional services in connection with matters related to our historical stock option practices, including the government inquiries, the related litigation, and other matters associated with or stemming from the restatement and the underlying circumstances. These expenses include claims for advancement of legal expenses to current and former directors, officers and employees. These expenses also include charges related to compensating optionees who were prevented from exercising expiring or lapsing options during the restatement process. See Notes 10 and 13 to the financial statements included in this report for additional information regarding expenses related to the historical stock option matters.
Operating costs for fiscal year 2009 include a $2.3 million charge related to restructuring costs. See Note 15 to the financial statements included in this report for additional information regarding restructuring costs.
Operating costs and expenses for fiscal year 2008 includes $1.2 million of legal fees and expenses related to litigation by the Company seeking insurance recovery of amounts associated with resolution of a past customer dispute. Also included in fiscal year 2008 operating expenses is a $6.5 million gain associated with the settlement by the remaining insurance company defendants.
Operating Income. Operating income was $41.9 million in fiscal year 2009, down from operating income of $43.2 million in fiscal year 2008. Operating income in fiscal year 2009 benefited from the $1.7 million reversal of equity based compensation discussed above and a 4% increase in sales. These favorable factors were offset by slightly lower margins resulting from higher sales from lower gross margin products. Operating income in fiscal year 2009 was also unfavorably impacted by a $2.3 million restructuring charge. Fiscal year 2008 operating income benefited from a $6.5 million insurance recovery.
We evaluate segment performance based on net sales and operating income of each segment. Detailed below is operating income by reportable segment.
Reportable Segment
(fiscal years, in thousands)
January 25, 2009 January 27, 2008
Op. Income % total Op. Income % total Change
Standard Semiconductor Products $ 30,221 72 % $ 32,793 76 % (8) %
Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products 11,670 28 % 10,394 24 % 12 %
Total operating income $ 41,891 100 % $ 43,187 100 % (3) %
|
Certain corporate level expenses not directly attributable to a segment are allocated to the segments based on percentage of sales. Beginning with the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, these allocated expenses include expenses associated with the Company's investigation into its historical stock option practices, the restatement of its historical financial statements, and related matters. See Notes 10 and 13 to the financial statements included in this report for additional information regarding these expenses.
Operating income for Standard Semiconductor Products decreased in fiscal year 2009 by 8%. This decrease is primarily attributable to the $6.5 million insurance recovery recognized in fiscal year 2008. Excluding this recovery, operating income for Standard Semiconductor Products for fiscal year 2009 would . . .
|
|