|
Quotes & Info
|
| FRBK > SEC Filings for FRBK > Form 10-K on 16-Mar-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
16-Mar-2009
Annual Report
The following is management's discussion and analysis of the Company's financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations, liquidity and capital resources presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.
In connection with management's assessment of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2008, management identified certain material weaknesses related to other than temporarily impaired investment securities and the financial statement reporting process. You should see Item 9A of this report and "Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting," for additional information.
Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates
Discontinued Operations - In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the Company has presented the operations of First Bank of Delaware as discontinued operations starting with the first quarter 2005. On January 31, 2005 the First Bank of Delaware was spun off, effective January 1, 2005. All assets, liabilities and equity of First Bank of Delaware were spun off as an independent company, trading on the OTC market under the stock symbol "FBOD". Shareholders received one share of stock in First Bank of Delaware, for every share owned of the Company. The short-term loan and tax refund lines of business were accordingly transferred after that date. Republic continued to purchase tax refund anticipation loans from the First Bank of Delaware through 2006. However, First Bank of Delaware decided not to continue with this program in 2007.
In reviewing and understanding financial information for the Company you are encouraged to read and understand the significant accounting policies used in preparing our consolidated financial statements. These policies are described in Note 3 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements. The accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to general practices within the banking industry. The preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis including those related to the allowance for loan losses, other-than-temporary impairment of securities and deferred income taxes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These form the bases for making judgments on the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Allowance for Loan Losses-The allowance for loan losses is increased by charges to income through the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries). The allowance is maintained at a level that management, based upon its evaluation, considers adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management's periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on the Company's past loan loss experience, the volume and composition of lending conducted by the Company, adverse situations that may affect a borrower's ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, current economic conditions and other factors affecting the known and inherent risk in the portfolio. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates including, among others, the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impacted loans, exposure at default, value of collateral, and estimated losses on our commercial and residential loan portfolios. All of these estimates may be susceptible to significant change.
The allowance consists of specific allowances for both impaired loans and all classified loans which are not impaired, and a general allowance on the remainder of the portfolio. Although we determine the amount of each element of the allowance separately, the entire allowance for loan losses is available for the entire portfolio.
We establish an allowance on certain impaired loans for the amount by which the discounted cash flows, observable market price, or fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, is lower than the carrying value of the loan. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. A delay or shortfall in amount of payments does not necessarily result in the loan being identified as impaired.
We also establish a specific valuation allowance on classified loans which are not impaired. We segregate these loans by category and assign allowances to each loan based on inherent losses associated with each type of lending and consideration that these loans, in the aggregate, represent an above-average credit risk and that more of these loans will prove to be uncollectible compared to loans in the general portfolio. Classification of a loan within this category is based on identified weaknesses that increase the credit risk of the loan.
We establish a general allowance on non-classified loans to recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular loans. This general valuation allowance is determined by segregating the loans by loan category and assigning allowance percentages based on our historical loss experience, delinquency trends, and management's evaluation of the collectibility of the loan portfolio.
The allowance is adjusted for significant factors that, in management's judgment, affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle, and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated each reporting period to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment.
While management uses the best information known to it in order to make loan loss allowance valuations, adjustments to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic and other conditions, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, or changes in accounting guidance. In times of economic slowdown, either regional or national, the risk inherent in the loan portfolio could increase resulting in the need for additional provisions to the allowance for loan losses in future periods. An increase could also be necessitated by an increase in the size of the loan portfolio or in any of its components even though the credit quality of the overall portfolio may be improving. Historically, our estimates of the allowance for loan loss have approximated actual losses incurred. In addition, the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the FDIC, as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. The Pennsylvania Department of Banking or the FDIC may require the recognition of adjustment to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examinations. To the extent that actual outcomes differ from management's estimates, additional provisions to the allowance for loan losses may be required that would adversely impact earnings in future periods.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Securities-Securities are evaluated on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. To determine whether a loss in value is other-than-temporary, management utilizes criteria such as the reasons underlying the decline, the magnitude and duration of the decline and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in the fair value. The term "other-than-temporary" is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized. In connection with management's assessment of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2008, management identified certain material weaknesses related to other than temporarily impaired investment securities and the financial statement reporting process. See Item 9A of this report and "Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting," for additional information.
Income Taxes-Management makes estimates and judgments to calculate various tax liabilities and determine the recoverability of various deferred tax assets, which arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of revenues and expenses. Management also estimates a reserve for deferred tax assets if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods. These estimates and judgments are inherently subjective. Historically, our estimates and judgments to calculate our deferred tax accounts have not required significant revision.
In evaluating our ability to recover deferred tax assets, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including our past operating results and our forecast of future taxable income. In determining future taxable income, management makes assumptions for the amount of taxable income, the reversal of temporary differences and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require us to make judgments about our future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimates we use to manage our business. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. An increase in the valuation allowance would result in additional income tax expense in the period and could have a significant impact on our future earnings.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, ''Fair Value Measurements'', which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. FASB Statement No. 157 does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an asset or liability is carried at fair value. The new standard provides a consistent definition of fair value which focuses on exit price and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. The standard also establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The standard eliminates large position discounts for financial instruments quoted in active markets, requires costs related to acquiring financial instruments carried at fair value to be included in earnings as incurred and requires that an issuer's credit standing be considered when measuring liabilities at fair value. The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (R), Business Combinations. This statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The guidance will become effective as of the beginning of a company's fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. This new pronouncement will impact the Company's accounting for business combinations completed after January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The guidance will become effective as of the beginning of a company's fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. The implementation of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) APB 14-1, "Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)" which clarifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash (including partial cash settlement) upon conversion. The FSP requires issuers to account separately for the liability and equity components of certain convertible debt instruments in a manner that reflects the issuer's nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized. The FSP requires bifurcation of a component of the debt, classification of that component in equity and the accretion of the resulting discount on the debt to be recognized as part of interest expense. The FSP requires retrospective application to the terms of instruments as they existed for all periods presented. The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the new pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities." This FSP clarifies that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common shareholders. Awards of this nature are considered participating securities and the two-class method of computing basic and diluted earnings per share must be applied. This FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The implementation of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4, "Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161" (FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4). FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4 amends and enhances disclosure
requirements for sellers of credit derivatives and financial guarantees. It also clarifies that the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 161 are effective for quarterly periods beginning after November 15, 2008, and fiscal years that include those periods. FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4 is effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after November 15, 2008. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 140-4 and FASB Interpretation (FIN)
46(R)-8, "Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of
Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities" (FSP SFAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8). FSP SFAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 amends FASB SFAS 140
"Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities", to require public entities to provide additional disclosures
about transfers of financial assets. It also amends FIN 46(R), "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities", to require public enterprises, including sponsors
that have a variable interest in a variable interest entity, to provide
additional disclosures about their involvement with variable interest entities.
Additionally, this FSP requires certain disclosures to be provided by a public
enterprise that is (a) a sponsor of a qualifying special purpose entity (SPE)
that holds a variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor
of financial assets to the qualifying SPE and (b) a servicer of a qualifying SPE
that holds a significant variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the
transferor of financial assets to the qualifying SPE. The disclosures required
by FSP SFAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 are intended to provide greater transparency
to financial statement users about a transferor's continuing involvement with
transferred financial assets and an enterprise's involvement with variable
interest entities and qualifying SPEs. FSP SFAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R) is effective
for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after December 15, 2008. The
implementation of this standard did not have an impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, "Employers' Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets". This FSP amends SFAS 132(R), "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits", to provide guidance on an employer's disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The disclosures about plan assets required by this FSP shall be provided for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Company is currently reviewing the effect this new pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
Overview
The Company's net income decreased $7.4 million, or 106.9%, to a loss of $472,000` or $ (.04) per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to $6.9 million, or $0.65 per diluted share for the prior year. There was a $14.4 million, or 21.0%, decrease in total interest income, reflecting a 3.8% decrease in average loans outstanding while interest expense decreased $13.2 million reflecting a 1.9% decrease in average interest bearing deposits. Accordingly, net interest income decreased $1.1 million. The provision for loan losses in 2008 increased $5.9 million to $7.5 million, compared to $1.6 million in 2007, reflecting the impact of an economic downturn in real estate markets. Non-interest income decreased $1.8 million to $1.2 million in 2008 compared to $3.1 million in 2007. The decrease reflected a $1.4 million impairment charge on a bank pooled trust preferred security. Non-interest expenses increased $2.5 million to $23.9 million compared to $21.4 million in 2007. The increase reflected $1.6 million of write downs and losses on the sale of other real estate which also reflected the impact of the economic downturn. Return on average assets and average equity of (0.05)% and (0.60)% respectively in 2008 compared to 0.71% and 8.86% respectively in 2007.
Analysis of Net Interest Income
Historically, the Company's earnings have depended primarily upon Republic's net
interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on
interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net
interest income is affected by changes in the mix of the volume and rates of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table
provides an analysis of net interest income on an annualized basis, setting
forth for the periods (i) average assets, liabilities, and shareholders' equity,
(ii) interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense on
interest-bearing liabilities, (iii) average yields earned on interest-earning
assets and average rates on interest-bearing liabilities, and (iv) Republic's
net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average total
interest-earning assets). Averages are computed based on daily balances.
Non-accrual loans are included in average loans receivable. Yields are adjusted
for tax equivalency in 2008, 2007 and 2006, as Republic had tax-exempt income in
those years.
Interest Interest Interest
Average Income/ Yield/ Average Income/ Yield/ Average Income/ Yield/
Balance Expense Rate (1) Balance Expense Rate (1) Balance Expense Rate (1)
For the Year For the Year For the Year
Ended Ended Ended
(Dollars in thousands) December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007 December 31, 2006
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold and other
interest-earning assets $ 9,821 $ 218 2.22 % $ 13,923 $ 686 4.93 % $ 25,884 $ 1,291 4.99 %
Investment securities and restricted
stock 89,365 5,135 5.75 % 95,715 5,752 6.01 % 57,163 3,282 5.74 %
Loans receivable 789,446 48,846 6.19 % 820,380 62,184 7.58 % 728,754 58,254 7.99 %
Total interest-earning
assets 888,632 54,199 6.10 % 930,018 68,622 7.38 % 811,801 62,827 7.74 %
Other assets 51,349 39,889 36,985
Total assets $ 939,981 $ 969,907 $ 848,786
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand - non-interest bearing $ 76,671 $ - N/A $ 78,641 $ - N/A $ 82,233 $ - N/A
Demand -
interest-bearing 33,976 327 0.96 % 38,850 428 1.10 % 53,073 565 1.06 %
Money market & savings 222,590 6,150 2.76 % 266,706 11,936 4.48 % 240,189 9,109 3.79 %
Time deposits 397,740 14,844 3.73 % 361,120 18,822 5.21 % 304,375 14,109 4.64 %
Total deposits 730,977 21,321 2.92 % 745,317 31,186 4.18 % 679,870 23,783 3.50 %
Total interest-
bearing deposits 654,306 21,321 3.26 % 666,676 31,186 4.68 % 597,637 23,783 3.98 %
Other borrowings 121,236 3,760 3.10 % 133,122 7,121 5.35 % 88,609 4,896 5.53 %
Total interest-bearing
liabilities 775,542 25,081 3.23 % 799,798 38,307 4.79 % 686,246 28,679 4.18 %
Total deposits and
other borrowings 852,213 25,081 2.94 % 878,439 38,307 4.36 % 768,479 28,679 3.73 %
Non-interest-bearing
Other liabilities 8,459 13,734 10,981
Shareholders' equity 79,309 77,734 69,326
Total liabilities and
Shareholders' equity $ 939,981 $ 969,907 $ 848,786
Net interest income
(2) $ 29,118 $ 30,315 $ 34,148
Net interest spread 2.87 % 2.59 % 3.56 %
Net interest margin
(2) 3.28 % 3.26 % 4.20 %
|
Rate/Volume Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income
Net interest income may also be analyzed by segregating the volume and rate
components of interest income and interest expense. The following table sets
forth an analysis of volume and rate changes in net interest income for the
periods indicated. For purposes of this table, changes in interest income and
expense are allocated to volume and rate categories based upon the respective
changes in average balances and average rates.
Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31,
2008 vs. 2007 2007 vs. 2006
Change due to Change due to
(Dollars in Average Average Average Average
thousands) Volume Rate Total Volume Rate Total
Interest earned on:
Federal funds sold
and other
interest-earning
assets $ (91 ) $ (377 ) $ (468 ) $ (589 ) $ (16 ) $ (605 )
Securities (366 ) (251 ) (617 ) 2,317 153 2,470
Loans (1,919 ) (11,419 ) (13,338 ) 6,945 (3,015 ) 3,930
. . .
|
|
|