|
Quotes & Info
|
| PTIX > SEC Filings for PTIX > Form 10-K on 5-Mar-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
5-Mar-2009
Annual Report
The Company's annual operating performance is subject to various risks and uncertainties. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes, included elsewhere herein, as well as the risk factors described in ITEM 1A of this Form 10-K. The Company's future operating results may be affected by various trends and factors, which are beyond the Company's control. These risks and uncertainties include, among other factors, business and economic conditions, rapid technological changes accompanied by frequent new product introductions, competitive pressures, dependence on key customers, inability to gauge order flows from customers, fluctuations in quarterly and annual results, the reliance on a limited number of third party suppliers, limitations of the Company's manufacturing capacity and arrangements, the protection of the Company's proprietary technology, the dependence on key personnel, changes in critical accounting estimates, potential impairments related to goodwill and investments, foreign regulations, and potential material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. In addition, during weak or uncertain economic periods, customers' visibility deteriorates causing delays in the placement of their orders. These factors often result in a substantial portion of the Company's revenue being derived from orders placed within a quarter and shipped in the final month of the same quarter.
Matters discussed in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company's actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.
Table of contents
Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
In preparing the financial statements in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), estimates and assumptions are required to be made that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information disclosures, including information about contingencies, risk and financial condition. The Company believes that given the current facts and circumstances, these estimates and assumptions are reasonable, adhere to GAAP, and are consistently applied. Inherent in the nature of an estimate or assumption is the fact that actual results may differ from estimates, and estimates may vary as new facts and circumstances arise. Management's judgment in making these estimates and relying on these assumptions may materially impact amounts reported for any period.
The critical accounting policies, judgments and estimates that we believe have the most significant effect on our financial statements are set forth below:
º Revenue Recognition
º Software Development Costs
º Valuation of Inventories
º Income Taxes
º Product Warranty
º Stock-Based Compensation
º Restructuring Costs
º Investments
º Carrying value of Goodwill
Revenue Recognition: Revenue is recognized from product sales in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, "Revenue Recognition." Product sales represent the majority of our revenue and include both hardware products and hardware products with embedded software. Revenue is recognized from these product sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been provided, the sale price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Additionally, products are sold on terms which transfer title and risk of loss at a specified location, typically the shipping point. Accordingly, revenue recognition from product sales occurs when all factors are met, including transfer of title and risk of loss, which typically occurs upon shipment. If these conditions are not met, revenue recognition is deferred until such time as these conditions have been satisfied.
Revenue earned from arrangements for software is accounted for under the provisions of Statement of Position 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition." For the sale of multiple-element arrangements whereby equipment is combined with other elements, such as software and maintenance, the Company allocates to, and recognizes revenue from, the various elements based on their fair value. Revenue from software requiring significant production, modification, or customization is recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting. Anticipated losses on contracts, if any, are charged to operations as soon as such losses are determined. If all conditions of revenue recognition are not met, revenue recognition is deferred and revenue will be recognized when all obligations under the arrangement are fulfilled. Revenue from software maintenance contracts is recognized ratably over the contractual period.
Revenue from consulting and other services is recognized at the time the services are rendered. Certain products are sold through distributors who are granted limited rights of return. Potential returns are accounted for at the time of sale.
Table of contents
The accounting estimate related to revenue recognition is considered a "critical accounting estimate" because terms of sale can vary, and judgment is exercised in determining whether to defer revenue recognition. Such judgments may materially affect net sales for any period. Judgment is exercised within the parameters of GAAP in determining when contractual obligations are met, title and risk of loss are transferred, sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Software Development Costs: All software development costs incurred in establishing the technological feasibility of computer software products to be sold are charged to expense as research and development costs. Software development costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility of a computer software product to be sold and prior to general release of that product are capitalized. Amounts capitalized are amortized commencing after general release of that product over the estimated remaining economic life of that product, generally three years, using the straight-line method or using the ratio of current revenues to current and anticipated revenues from such product, whichever provides greater amortization. If the technological feasibility for a particular project is judged not to have been met or recoverability of amounts capitalized is in doubt, project costs are expensed as research and development or charged to cost of goods sold, as applicable. The accounting estimate related to software development costs is considered a "critical accounting estimate" because judgment is exercised in determining whether project costs are expensed as research and development or capitalized as an asset. Such judgments may materially affect expense amounts for any period. Judgment is exercised within the parameters of GAAP in determining when technological feasibility has been met and recoverability of software development costs is reasonably assured.
Valuation of Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, using the first-in, first-out method. Inventory includes purchased parts and components, work in process and finished goods. Provisions for excess, obsolete or slow moving inventory are recorded after periodic evaluation of historical sales, current economic trends, forecasted sales, estimated product lifecycles and estimated inventory levels. Purchasing practices, electronic component obsolescence, accuracy of sales and production forecasts, introduction of new products, product lifecycles, product support and foreign regulations governing hazardous materials are the factors that contribute to inventory valuation risks. Exposure to inventory valuation risks is managed by maintaining safety stocks, minimum purchase lots, managing product end-of-life issues brought on by aging components or new product introductions, and by utilizing certain inventory minimization strategies such as vendor-managed inventories. The accounting estimate related to valuation of inventories is considered a "critical accounting estimate" because it is susceptible to changes from period-to-period due to the requirement for management to make estimates relative to each of the underlying factors, ranging from purchasing, to sales, to production, to after-sale support. If actual demand, market conditions or product lifecycles differ from estimates, inventory adjustments to lower market values would result in a reduction to the carrying value of inventory, an increase in inventory write-offs and a decrease to gross margins.
Income Taxes: The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No.
109. Accordingly, the Company provides deferred income tax assets and
liabilities based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the
financial and tax bases of assets and liabilities based on currently enacted tax
laws. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets in amounts
for which realization is not considered more likely than not to occur. The
accounting estimate related to income taxes is considered a "critical accounting
estimate" because judgment is exercised in estimating future taxable income,
including prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, and in assessing the
need for any valuation allowance. If it should be determined that all or part of
a net deferred tax asset is not able to be realized in the future, an adjustment
to the valuation allowance would be charged to income in the period such
determination was made. Likewise, in the event that it should be determined that
all or part of a deferred tax asset in the future is in excess of the net
recorded amount, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would increase income
to be recognized in the period such determination was made.
Table of contents
The Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions worldwide and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. These audits can involve complex issues, which may require an extended period of time for resolution. Although management believes that adequate provision has been made for such issues, there is the possibility that the ultimate resolution of such issues could have an adverse effect on the earnings of the Company. Conversely, if these issues are resolved favorably in the future, the related provisions would be reduced, thus having a positive impact on earnings.
In addition, the calculation of the Company's tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. As a result of the implementation of FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48), the Company recognizes liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on the two-step process prescribed within the interpretation. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires the Company to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this requires the Company to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. The Company re-evaluates these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision in the period.
Finally, the recorded value of the Company's deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company's ability to generate future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. These assets consist of research credit carry-forwards, capital and net operating loss carry-forwards, and the future tax effect of temporary differences between balances recorded for financial statement purposes and for tax return purposes. It will require future pre-tax earnings of in excess of $7 million in order to fully realize the value of the Company's deferred tax assets. Of this amount, approximately $650,000 of capital gains must be realized in 2009 or 2010 in order to fully realize the recorded balance of deferred tax assets relating to capital loss carryforwards. If the Company were to sustain future net losses, it may be necessary to record valuation allowances against such deferred tax assets in order to recognize impairments in their estimated future economic value.
Product Warranty: Warranty obligations are generally incurred in connection with the sale of the Company's products. The warranty period for these products is generally one year. The costs incurred to provide for these warranty obligations are estimated and recorded as an accrued liability at the time of sale. Future warranty costs are estimated based on historical performance rates and related costs to repair given products. The accounting estimate related to product warranty is considered a "critical accounting estimate" because judgment is exercised in determining future estimated warranty costs. Should actual performance rates or repair costs differ from estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.
Stock-Based Compensation: The Company's board of directors approves grants of stock options to employees to purchase our common stock. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) "Share-Based Payment," stock compensation expense is recorded based upon the estimated fair value of the stock option at the date of grant. The accounting estimate related to stock-based compensation is considered a "critical accounting estimate" because estimates are made in calculating compensation expense including expected option lives, forfeiture rates and expected volatility. Expected option lives are estimated using vesting terms and contractual lives. Expected forfeiture rates and volatility are calculated using historical information. Actual option lives and forfeiture rates may be different from estimates and may result in potential future adjustments which would impact the amount of stock-based compensation expense recorded in a particular period.
Table of contents
Restructuring Costs: Restructuring costs consist of employee-related severance costs, lease termination costs and other facility-related closing expenses. Employee-related severance benefits are recorded either at the time an employee is notified or, if there are extended service periods, is estimated and recorded pro-rata over the period of each planned restructuring activity. Lease termination costs are calculated based upon fair value considering the remaining lease obligation amounts and estimates for sublease receipts. The accounting estimate related to restructuring costs is considered a "critical accounting estimate" because estimates are made in calculating the amount of employee-related severance benefits that will ultimately be paid and the amount of sublease receipts that will ultimately be received in future periods. Actual amounts paid for employee-related severance benefits can vary from these estimates depending upon the number of employees actually receiving severance payments. Actual sublease receipts received may also vary from estimates.
Investments: We recognize realized losses when declines in the fair value of our investments, below their cost basis, are judged to be other-than-temporary. In determining when a decline in fair value is other than temporary, we consider various factors including market price (if available), investment ratings, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee and the underlying collateral, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than our cost basis, the extent to which the investment is guaranteed, the financial health of the guarantor (if any), and our ability and intent to hold the investment until maturity or for a sufficient period of time to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. We make significant judgments in considering these factors. If it were judged that a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, the investment is valued as the current fair value and a realized loss equal to the decline is reflected as an adjustment to net income. Such adjustments could materially adversely affect our operating results.
Carrying Value of Goodwill: Tests for impairments of goodwill are conducted annually, at year end, or more frequently if circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. SFAS No. 142 requires a two-step method for determining goodwill impairment where step one is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit with the unit's carrying amount, including goodwill. If this test indicates that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then step two is required to compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill. An impairment loss is then recognized to the extent that the goodwill's carrying amount exceeds its fair value. The Company is considered to consist of being only one reporting unit.
The quoted market capitalization of the Company was less than the Company's book value at December 31, 2008. The Company used a discounted cash flow valuation model applied to a five-year projection of future cash flows in its evaluation of goodwill. This cash flow valuation model necessarily involves considerable judgment in the estimation of inputs and assumptions used in this cash flow valuation model. The accounting estimate related to impairment of goodwill is considered a "critical accounting estimate" because these impairment tests include estimates of future cash flows that are dependent upon subjective assumptions regarding future operating results including revenue growth rates, expense levels, discount rates, capital requirements and other factors that impact estimated future cash flows and the estimated implied fair value of the Company.
Should actual results differ materially from those projected, it may become necessary to record an impairment against some or all of the carrying value of goodwill. The current economic downturn has negatively impacted many of these inputs and assumptions. If market and economic conditions deteriorate further, this would increase the likelihood of future non-cash impairment charges related to the carrying value of goodwill.
Table of contents
Key Performance Indicators
The Company believes that a key indicator for its business is the trend for the volume of orders received from customers. During weak economic periods, customers' ability to forecast their requirements deteriorates causing delays in the placement of orders. Forward-looking visibility on customer orders is at an all time low. Most of our embedded systems customers are placing orders for product only when they have orders in hand from their customers. Total shipments to customers in 2008 amounted to $40.5 million, compared to $40.3 million in 2007. This slight increase in revenue was attributable to higher shipments of products to the Company's two largest customers, Data Connection Limited and Alcatel-Lucent, and higher signaling shipments, offset primarily by lower shipments to our traditional OEM telecommunications customers. As a result of increased product demand from their customers in 2008, our shipments to Data Connection Limited increased by $2.4 million and our shipments to Alcatel-Lucent increased by $.4 million.
Overview
The Company is a global supplier of advanced network communications and control solutions to end users, application developers and original equipment manufacturers that serve mission critical telecommunications, aerospace and defense markets.
Performance Technologies is a Delaware corporation and since its founding in 1981 it has supplied standards-based products and solutions to its customers. The Company's product portfolio includes the SEGway suite of Signaling (SS7/SIP) Transfer Points, Signaling Gateways and Bridges, and its IPnexus family of COTS-based application ready systems, WAN gateways, and multi-protocol communications servers. The Company maximizes the value proposition of its products by leveraging its field proven systems, software and hardware technologies developed over a twenty-eight year record of demonstrated innovation. Management believes the tight integrated combination of these technologies results in measurable benefits to its customers.
The Company's business addresses one industry segment - Communications - and globally targets two primary vertical markets for its communications products, namely telecommunications and aerospace and defense. The telecommunications market, historically our largest vertical market, is fundamentally driven by investments in network infrastructure by carriers and service providers. Telecommunications market revenues derived from our OEM and application-ready systems products are primarily dependent on broad, multi-year deployments of next-generation telecommunications infrastructure. Telecommunications market revenues generated from end solutions, such as our signaling products, are governed by investments necessary to support existing and evolving service demands such as the ongoing worldwide explosive growth in text messaging. Sales into the aerospace and defense market are typically to prime contractors and system integrators that reflect investment levels by various government agencies and military branches in specific programs and projects requiring enhanced communications capabilities.
Compared to the traditional OEM telecommunications equipment market we serve, gross margins are higher and the sales cycles are shorter for both the aerospace and defense and signaling product markets.
Industry Overview
The telecommunications market is fundamentally driven by investments in network infrastructure by carriers and service providers. Telecommunications market revenues derived from our OEM and application-ready systems products are primarily dependent on broad, multi-year deployments of next-generation telecommunications infrastructure. While this market was very challenging throughout 2008, it began deteriorating rapidly during the third quarter as customers made decisions to preserve cash, rather than to invest in their network infrastructure.
Telecommunications market revenues generated from end solutions are governed by investments necessary to support existing and evolving service demands. SEGway Signaling product revenues grew in 2008 as the ongoing worldwide explosive growth in text messaging put pressure on carriers and service providers to build infrastructure to support the higher volumes and the cost attributes of IP networks became more enticing.
Sales into the aerospace and defense market are typically to prime contractors and system integrators that reflect investment levels by various government agencies and military branches in specific programs and projects requiring enhanced communications capabilities. Aerospace and defense shipments are subject to project deployment schedules and are not often consistent from quarter to quarter. While our aerospace and defense shipments declined somewhat in 2008, compared to 2007, we believe there are an increasing number of project opportunities for our products and management expects to add additional sales and marketing focus to this area in 2009.
There is little doubt that the economic climate in 2009 will be very challenging for the Company. Although market interest and activity related to our product portfolio remains strong, actual sales visibility is at an all time low. In light of these conditions, staffing reductions were initiated in January 2009 to further reduce our expense levels. This measure, which is expected to result in a $.45 million restructuring charge in the first quarter 2009, reduces the Company's annual expense level by approximately $1 million. Despite the necessity for these expense control measures, we remain dedicated to continuing our strategic programs, which are expected to generate long-term growth.
Please refer to PART 1, ITEM 1, under the caption "Business," for further discussion of the industry, markets and economic environment.
Strategy
The Company's strategy is to maximize the value proposition of its products by leveraging its field proven systems, software and hardware technologies. Management believes the tight integrated combination of these technologies results in measurable benefits to its customers through compelling development risk mitigation and substantially accelerated time-to-market metrics.
Management is proceeding with multi-faceted initiatives to construct a solid foundation for long-term profitable growth. These efforts are directed at niches within the communications market including signaling, aerospace and defense.
There are identifiable risks associated with the Company's strategy in the current economic climate. While management believes that the signaling, aerospace and defense are growing markets, the application developers and original equipment manufacturers markets for communications products are experiencing challenging economic conditions which are impacting business prospects. Management expects to realize measurable progress on its strategic initiatives for 2009. However, based on the current economic environment, management believes that realizing meaningful financial performance will be very difficult.
Please refer to PART 1, ITEM 1, under the caption "Business," for further information regarding the Company's "Strategy."
Table of contents
Financial Overview
Revenue:
Revenue for 2008 amounted to $40.5 million, compared to $40.3 million in 2007. This slight increase in revenue was attributable to higher shipments of products to the Company's two largest customers, Data Connection Limited and Alcatel-Lucent, and higher signaling shipments, offset primarily by lower shipments to our traditional OEM telecommunications customers. As a result of increased product demand from their customers in 2008, our shipments to Data Connection Limited increased by $2.4 million and our shipments to Alcatel-Lucent increased by $.4 million.
Shipments to customers outside of the United States represented 60% and 48% of sales in 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in shipments to customers outside of the United States was principally due to higher shipments to Data Connection Limited. Data Connections is an OEM and during 2008, they experienced greater customer demand for their products that incorporate our IPnexus systems. Shipments to the United Kingdom represented 18% and 13% of the Company's total sales in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Earnings:
Net income in 2008 amounted to $1.7 million, or $.14 per diluted share, based on 11.6 million shares outstanding and included:
º Stock compensation expense of $.6 million, or $.03 per share;
º Unsuccessful acquisition expenses of $.2 million, or $.02 per share;
º A discrete income tax benefit of $.4 million, or $.03 per share.
Net income in 2007 amounted to $1.8 million, or $.14 per diluted share, based on 12.6 million shares outstanding and included:
º Stock compensation expense of $.7 million, or $.04 per share;
º Write-offs of software development costs amounting to $.5 million, or $.03
per share;
º Restructuring charges of $.4 million, or $.02 per share, representing
adjustments to estimated lease costs pertaining to 2006 restructuring
activities;
º A gain on sale of an investment of $.3 million, or $.02 per share;
º A recovery on a note receivable of $.5 million, or $.03 per share; and
º Net discrete income tax provision items amounting to $.1 million, or $.01
per share.
The 2008 decrease in weighted average shares outstanding is attributable to the . . .
|
|