|
Quotes & Info
|
| VSEC > SEC Filings for VSEC > Form 10-K on 3-Mar-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
3-Mar-2009
Annual Report
Executive Overview
Organization
Our business operations consist primarily of diversified program management, logistics, engineering, IT, construction program and consulting services performed on a contract basis. Substantially all of our contracts are with government agencies and other government prime contractors.
Our business operations are managed under groups that consist of one or more divisions or wholly owned VSE subsidiaries that perform our work. Our Federal Group consists of our Communications and Engineering Division ("CED"), Engineering and Logistics Division ("ELD"), Field Support Services Division ("FSS"), Management Sciences Division ("MSD"), and Systems Engineering Division ("SED"). Our International Group consists of our BAV Division ("BAV"), Coast Guard Division ("VCG"), and Fleet Maintenance Division ("FMD"). Our IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group consists of our wholly owned subsidiaries Energetics Incorporated ("Energetics") and G&B Solutions, Inc. ("G&B"). Our Infrastructure Group consists of our wholly owned subsidiary Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation ("ICRC").
Customers and Services
We provide program management, logistics, engineering, IT, construction program, and consulting services to the government, other government prime contractors, and commercial entities. Our largest customer is the U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD"), including agencies of the U.S. Navy, Army and Air Force. We also provide services to various Federal Civil customers.
Revenues by Customer
(dollars in thousands)
2008 2007 2006
Customer Revenues % Revenues % Revenues %
-------- -------- - -------- - -------- -
U.S. Army/Army Reserve $ 625,237 9.9 $344,296 52.7 $174,473 48.0
U.S. Navy 195,792 18.8 189,534 29.0 164,788 45.3
U.S. Air Force 10,720 1.0 4,628 0.7 4,579 1.2
---------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Total - DoD 831,749 79.7 538,458 82.4 343,840 94.5
Department of
Transportation 89,873 8.6 30,977 4.7 - 0.0
Department of
U.S. Treasury 57,021 5.5 55,020 8.4 2,392 0.7
Department of Interior 19,156 1.8 1,053 0.2 - 0.0
Department of Energy 12,812 1.2 10,537 1.6 9,420 2.5
Other government 29,748 2.9 11,427 1.8 5,683 1.6
---------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Total - Federal Civil
Agencies 208,610 20.0 109,014 16.7 17,495 4.8
Commercial 3,376 0.3 5,692 0.9 2,399 0.7
---------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Total $1,043,735 100.0 $653,164 100.0 $363,734 100.0
========== ===== ======== ===== ======== =====
19
Segments
|
Our operations are conducted within four reportable segments aligned with our management groups: 1) Federal; 2) International; 3) IT, Energy and Management Consulting; and 4) Infrastructure.
Federal Group - Our Federal Group provides engineering, technical, management and integrated logistics support services to U.S. military branches and other government agencies. The divisions in this group include CED, ELD, FSS, MSD and SED.
CED - CED is dedicated to supporting the Army's Communications and Electronics Command ("CECOM") in the management and execution of the Rapid Response ("R2") Program, which supports clients across DoD and the government. CED manages execution of tasks involving research and development, technology insertion, systems integration and engineering, hardware/software fabrication and installation, testing and evaluation, studies and analysis, technical data management, logistics support, training and acquisition support. A large portion of our current work on this program is related to the U.S. military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. The contract supporting the R2 Program is scheduled to expire in January 2011.
CED Army Equipment Support Program - Our CED division has a program on its Rapid Response support contract to provide maintenance and logistics services in support of U.S. Army equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan. Our revenues on this program were approximately $320 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and approximately $219 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Most of the services on this program are provided by our subcontractor. Profit margins on subcontract work such as this are lower as compared to other programs where work is performed by our own personnel. We provide certain program management services and we are accountable for contract performance and compliance as the prime contractor. Program work on current task orders is scheduled to expire in February 2009.
CED Assured Mobility Systems Program - Our CED division has a program on its Rapid Response support contract to provide technical support services in support of U.S. Army PM Assured Mobility Systems and U.S. Army Tank-automotive and Armaments Command ("TACOM"). Our revenues on this program were approximately $93 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and approximately $28 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. In January 2009, we were awarded a $389 million follow-on task order on this program for work that will run through January 2011.
RCV Modernization Program - We were awarded a task order on our Rapid Response support contract for a program to provide maintenance work on U.S. Army Route Clearance Vehicles in Kuwait (the "RCV Modernization Program") in September 2008. We expect the initial phase of this program to run for two years under contractual coverage of approximately $194 million.
ELD - ELD provides full life cycle engineering, logistics, maintenance and refurbishment services to extend and enhance the life of existing equipment. ELD principally supports the U.S. Army, Army Reserve and Army National Guard with core competencies in combat and combat service support system conversions, technical research, sustainment and re-engineering, system integration and configuration management.
FSS - We formed FSS in June 2007 to provide worldwide field maintenance and logistics support services for a wide variety of military vehicles and equipment, including performance of organizational, intermediate and specialized depot-level maintenance. FSS principally supports the U.S. Army and Marine Corps by providing specialized Field Service Representatives and Field Support Teams in areas of combat operations and austere environments.
MSD - MSD provides services for product and process improvement, supporting a variety of Government and commercial clients. MSD provides training, consulting, and implementation support in the areas of: Enterprise Excellence, Lean Six Sigma, process and product optimization, project
management, leadership quality engineering, Integrated Product and Process
Development, and reliability engineering. MSD's services range from individual
improvement projects to global organizational change programs.
SED - SED provides comprehensive systems and software engineering, logistics, and prototyping services to DoD. Our services offered through SED principally support U.S. Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps combat and combat support systems. SED's core competencies include: systems technical support, configuration management and life cycle support for wheeled and tracked vehicles and ground support equipment; obsolescence management, service life extension, and technology insertion programs; and technical documentation and data packages.
International Group - Our International Group provides engineering, industrial, logistics and foreign military sales services to the U.S. military and other government agencies. The divisions in this Group include BAV, FMD and VCG.
BAV - Through BAV, we provide assistance to the U.S. Navy in executing its Foreign Military Sales ("FMS") Program for surface ships sold, leased or granted to foreign countries by providing program management, engineering, technical support, logistics services for ship reactivations and transfers and follow-on support. Our expertise includes: ship reactivation/transfer, overhaul and maintenance, follow-on technical support, FMS integrated logistics support, engineering and industrial services, training and spare and repair parts support. The level of revenues and associated profits resulting from fee income generated by this program varies depending on a number of factors, including the timing of ship transfers and associated support services ordered by foreign governments and economic conditions of potential customers worldwide. Changes in the level of activity associated with the Navy's ship transfer program have caused quarterly and annual revenue fluctuations.
FMD - FMD provides global field engineering, logistics, maintenance and information technology services to the U.S. Navy and Air Force, including fleet-wide ship and aircraft support programs. FMD's expertise includes ship repair and modernization, ship systems installations, ordnance engineering and logistics, facility operations, war reserve materials management, aircraft sustainment and maintenance automation and IT systems integration. FMD also provides management, maintenance, storage and disposal support for the U.S. Department of Treasury's seized and forfeited general property program.
Contract Field Teams Program - In July 2008, our FMD division was awarded one of several prime contracts to support the United States Air Force Contract Field Teams ("CFT") Program. The CFT Program awards have a maximum ceiling of approximately $10.12 billion. Under the program, we are providing rapid deployment and long-term support services for a variety of Air Force requirements to maintain, repair and modernize equipment and systems. While our revenues under the contract cannot be predicted; however, the award provides us with the opportunity to compete for and expand our work performed for the Air Force.
VCG - VCG provides the U.S. Coast Guard with FMS support and life cycle support for vessels transferred to foreign governments. VCG's core competencies include pre-transfer joint vessel inspections, reactivations, crew training, transit assistance, heavy-lift contracting, logistics support, technical support and overseas husbandry.
IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group - Our IT, Energy and Management Consulting Group provides technical and consulting services primarily to various civilian government agencies. This group includes Energetics and, as of April 2008, G&B.
Energetics - Energetics provides technical and management support in areas of nuclear energy, technology research, development, demonstration, and consulting services in the field of energy and environmental management. Energetics' expertise lies in state-of-the-art and advanced technology
assessment, technical and economic feasibility analysis, technology transfer,
R&D program planning, engineering studies, market assessment, strategic
resource management, regulatory analysis, environmental compliance and risk
management. Customers include the U.S. Department of Energy, including the
Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology; the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security; and other government agencies and commercial clients.
G&B - G&B is an established information technology provider to many government agencies, including the Departments of Homeland Security, Interior, Labor, Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, the Social Security Administration, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, and the National Institutes of Health. G&B's core expertise lies in enterprise architecture development, information assurance/business continuity, program and portfolio management, network IT services and systems design and integration. We acquired G&B in April 2008 for an initial cash purchase price of approximately $19.5 million plus potential additional payments in future years if specified financial targets are achieved. See Note 5 of "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" for further discussion of this acquisition.
Infrastructure Group - We formed our Infrastructure Group in the second quarter of 2007, upon acquiring ICRC. We acquired ICRC in June 2007 for an initial cash purchase price of approximately $11.8 million plus potential additional payments in future years if specified financial targets are achieved. See Note 5 of "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" for further discussion of this acquisition. ICRC is engaged principally in providing engineering and transportation infrastructure services.
Port of Anchorage Contract - A significant amount of ICRC's revenues and income comes from services performed for the Port of Anchorage in Alaska (the "POA Project"). This intermodal expansion program to provide infrastructure services to the port will significantly expand the size of the port's facilities and allow for larger ships, more dock space, improved cargo flow, improved traffic flow next to the port, more environmentally friendly port operations and other modernization enhancements. Some of the infrastructure services on this project typically cannot be performed during the winter months. The seasonal nature of this work will cause fluctuations in our revenues on this project, with higher revenue levels in summer months and lower revenue levels in winter months. In July 2008, ICRC was awarded a new unrestricted contract to continue work on this program. The contract has an estimated ceiling amount of $704 million, a three-year base period of performance, and four one-year option periods.
Concentration of Revenues
(in thousands)
2008 2007 2006
Source of Revenue Revenues % Revenues % Revenues %
----------------- -------- - -------- - -------- -
CED Army Equipment Support $ 319,933 30.7 $218,615 33.5 $106,209 29.2
CED Assured Mobility
Systems 92,669 8.9 27,547 4.2 - -
CED Other 174,442 16.7 47,482 7.3 22,449 6.2
---------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Total CED 587,044 56.3 293,644 45.0 128,658 35.4
POA Project 89,720 8.6 30,674 4.7 - -
BAV Egypt 49,926 4.8 51,295 7.9 51,446 14.1
BAV Taiwan 12,842 1.2 6,348 1.0 45,729 12.6
BAV Greece 999 0.1 11,312 1.7 5 -
BAV India 55 0.0 38,337 5.9 971 0.3
BAV Other 17,909 1.7 6,432 1.0 8,673 2.4
---------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Total BAV 81,731 7.8 113,724 17.5 106,824 29.4
Treasury Seized Asset
Program 55,580 5.3 53,690 8.2 1,345 0.4
Other 229,660 22.0 161,432 24.6 126,907 34.8
---------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Total Revenues $1,043,735 100.0 $653,164 100.0 $363,734 100.0
========== ===== ======== ===== ======== =====
|
Management Outlook
The growth in our revenues and profits during 2008 and 2007 presents us with both challenges and opportunities. Our work in the DoD market increased significantly in 2008 and several efforts within that market remain strong. Our ELD division has expanded its workforce, facilities, capacity to provide services, contractual coverage and funding since its inception, resulting in increases in revenues from these services in 2008 and 2007. Our investment in facilities and personnel to support this work leaves us well positioned to serve DoD's growing need for our equipment refurbishment and sustainment services. We expect further increases in this division's work going forward. Based on congressional approval of certain ship transfers, we expect our BAV division to show increases in ship transfer revenues in 2009 and potentially future years. Our CED Assured Mobility Systems Program is expected to continue to contribute significant revenues through its scheduled expiration in January 2011.
In addition to the growth in some of our current DoD programs, we expect recent new awards to contribute to our revenues and profits going forward. The award of the RCV Maintenance Program gives us a major new source of work over the next two years and a key presence in Kuwait that presents us with the potential for additional work there after. The award of the CFT Program contract gives us the opportunity to increase our services performed for the Air Force.
We also have three other multiyear, multiple award, indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity ("omnibus") contracts that have large nominal ceiling amounts with no funding committed at the time of award. These are the SeaPort Enhanced contract with the U.S. Navy, the Field and Installation Readiness Support Team ("FIRST") Contract with the U.S. Army, and the U.S. Army PEO CS & CSS Omnibus III contract. We are one of several awardees on each contract. While our future revenues from these contracts cannot be predicted with certainty, these contracts provide us with the opportunity to compete for work that could contribute to revenues.
The expansion of current work in our ELD and BAV divisions and the new
work arising from the RCV Maintenance and CFT Programs help us to replace
certain work efforts that have supported our growth in recent years and have
expired or are due to expire. In November 2008, we successfully completed a
four-year, $96 million program to provide a protection system, the Tanker
Ballistic Protection System ("TBPS"), for vehicles deployed by the U.S. Army
in Iraq. The CED Army Equipment Support Program will expire in February 2009,
as scheduled.
Additionally, the U.S. Army informed us in January 2009 that they would not consider our proposal for a new contract to succeed our current R2 Program contract. We protested this decision. In February 2009, we were informed that our protest was dismissed by the Department of the Army, Office of Command Counsel, based on the protest being premature. The notice of dismissal states the U.S. Army was entitled to delay debriefing us and the other excluded bidders until after the award of the successor contract is granted. The Command Counsel decision also encouraged the U.S. Army to provide us a comprehensive post-award debriefing in accordance with applicable regulations. We are evaluating our options regarding this matter, including the filing of a protest after the award of the successor contract.
Our challenge over the next two years, should we be unsuccessful in our efforts in challenging our exclusion from this award, will be to replace the R2 Program revenues with other new revenues or to move the work performed through the R2 contract to one of our other contracts. Our other omnibus contracts can be used to accommodate work performed by our employees and subcontractors. A large majority of our revenues on our R2 contract is "pass- through" work performed by subcontractors. Pass-through work included the work on the CED Army Equipment Support Program and the CED Assured Mobility Systems Program. Pass-through revenues generally have lower profit margins than work performed by our own personnel. We expect to continue our work on existing task orders on our current R2 contract through the scheduled contract expiration in January 2011.
We are augmenting our core base of DoD work by emphasizing growth in our non-DoD services. These efforts have included: 1) a renewed emphasis on marketing our Energetics services that has shown favorable results in 2008, 2) work on the Treasury Seized Property Management program, and 3) the acquisitions of ICRC in 2007 and G&B in 2008. We expect these efforts that are directed toward the growth of our work in the Federal Civil marketplace to contribute to overall future revenues growth and financial performance.
We also know there are other risks and uncertainties related to our business. We recognize that 2009 is a government transition year and government spending priorities may change in ways that we cannot predict at this time.
To summarize our outlook, we believe our business prospects are both bright and challenging. The momentum in revenues growth over the last two years and our current backlog is expected to sustain us in 2009. We are confident that the above-mentioned expansion of work in certain service offerings and the newly awarded work in the DoD market; our growing level of work in the Federal Civil marketplace; our increased emphasis on bolstering our marketing efforts in both our DoD and Federal Civil markets; and our continued commitment to grow through acquisitions positions us well to meet the challenge of replacing expiring work beyond 2009 and other risks and uncertainties related to our business.
Bookings and Funded Backlog
Revenues in government contracting businesses are dependent upon
contract funding ("Bookings") and funded contract backlog is an indicator of
potential future revenues. A summary of our bookings and revenues for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and funded contract backlog as
of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is as follows.
(in millions)
2008 2007 2006
---- ---- ----
Bookings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,189 $736 $388
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,044 $653 $364
Funded Backlog . . . . . . . . . . . . . $567 $408 $299
|
VSE Stock in Employee 401(k) Plan and ESOP Accounts
We have decided that employees should have an opportunity to diversify their 401(k) accounts in the VSE Employee ESOP/401(k) Plan (the "Plan") beginning with our 2008 Plan year. In January 2008, employees were notified that they may elect to transfer any portion of their 401(k) accounts that is invested in VSE common stock into another investment alternative under the Plan. This right extends to all of VSE common stock held under the 401(k) portion of the Plan. In addition, we have decided to terminate and liquidate the ESOP portion of the VSE Corporation Employee ESOP/401(k) Plan, and as elected by the employees, either distribute VSE common stock held in the ESOP accounts to the employees or rollover such VSE common stock into an Individual Retirement Account or employee plan selected by the employee. ESOP VSE common stock was distributed to employees in the third quarter of 2008.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 141(R), "Business Combinations; a replacement of FASB Statement No. 141," which became effective January 1, 2009. The new standard will replace existing guidance and significantly change accounting and reporting relative to business combinations in consolidated financial statements, including requirements to recognize acquisition-related transaction and post acquisition restructuring costs in results of operations as incurred. SFAS No. 141(R) will be effective for businesses acquired after the effective date.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," which became effective January 1, 2008 for all financial assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a market-based framework or hierarchy for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The new standard generally is applicable whenever another accounting pronouncement requires or permits assets and liabilities to be measured at fair value. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157," to delay the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually). For items within its scope, the FSP defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require us to make estimates and assumptions. We believe the following critical accounting polices affect the more significant accounts, particularly those that involve
judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Substantially all of our services are performed for our customers on a contract basis. The three primary types of contracts used are time and materials, cost-type, and fixed-price. Revenues result from work performed on these contracts by our employees and our subcontractors and from costs for materials and other work related costs allowed under our contracts.
Revenues for time and materials contracts are recorded on the basis of contract allowable labor hours worked multiplied by the contract defined billing rates, plus the direct costs and indirect cost burdens associated with materials and subcontract work used in performance on the contract. Generally, profits on time and material contracts result from the difference between the cost of services performed and the contract defined billing rates for these services.
Revenues on cost-type contracts are recorded as contract allowable costs are incurred and fees earned. Our BAV contract and our POA Project contract are cost plus award fee contracts. Both of these contracts have terms that specify award fee payments that are determined by performance and level of contract activity. Award fees are made during the year a contract modification authorizing the award fee payment is issued subsequent to the period in which the work is performed. We do not recognize award fee income until the fees are certain, generally upon contract notification confirming the award fee. Due to such timing, and to fluctuations in the level of revenues, profits as a percentage of revenues on these contracts will fluctuate from period to period.
Our contract with the Department of Treasury to support the Treasury Seized Property Management Program, is a cost plus incentive fee contract that contains certain conditions under which the incentive fee is earned. The amount of incentive fee earned depends on our costs incurred on the contract compared to certain target cost levels specified in the contract. Per the contract, an assessment of actual costs compared to target costs is made once annually. The target cost levels in this contract may be subject to negotiation and change if the customer's scope of work required varies from the scope of work originally contained in the contract. We recognize incentive fee when the amount is fixed or determinable and the collectability is reasonably assured. Due to the conditions under which the incentive fee for this contract is awarded, and to the potential for changes in the cost targets . . .
|
|