|
Quotes & Info
|
| HNI > SEC Filings for HNI > Form 10-K on 27-Feb-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
27-Feb-2009
Annual Report
The following discussion of the Corporation's historical results of operations and of its liquidity and capital resources should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation and related notes. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and involve risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under the heading "Item 1A Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this report.
Overview
The Corporation has two reportable segments: office furniture and hearth products. The Corporation is the second largest office furniture manufacturer in the world and the nation's leading manufacturer and marketer of gas and wood burning fireplaces. The Corporation utilizes its split and focus, decentralized business model to deliver value to its customers with various brands and selling models. The Corporation is focused on growing its existing businesses while seeking out and developing new opportunities for growth.
The Corporation's results were negatively impacted by macroeconomic pressures during 2008. Small business confidence, corporate profits and employment all decreased. Instability in the global financial markets caused credit to become scarce and, when available, generally more expensive. New housing starts continued to decline, reaching historic lows. Steel and fuel costs experienced rapid, steep inflation before abating due to widespread economic weakness toward the end of the year. These factors impacted the supplies-driven channel of the Corporation's office furniture segment and the hearth segment dramatically during 2008. The contract channel of the office furniture segment began to experience the impact in order trends at the end of 2008. As a result the Corporation implemented actions to adjust to lower demand levels. These included reductions in staffing, short work weeks and other actions to reduce labor costs. The Corporation completed the complicated task of consolidating a manufacturing facility, closing two distribution centers and starting up a new distribution center in its office furniture segment in 2008.
Net sales during 2008 were $2.5 billion, a decrease of 3.6 percent, compared to net sales of $2.6 billion in 2007. The sales decline was driven by lower volume in the supplies-driven channel of the office furniture segment and the new construction channel of the hearth products segment.
The Corporation completed the acquisition of HBF a leading provider of premium upholstered seating, textiles, wood tables and wood case goods for the office environment during 2008. The Corporation recorded $21.8 million of goodwill and intangible impairment charges during 2008 related to reporting units acquired over the past five years in its office furniture segment due to current and projected market and economic conditions.
Management believes the volatile and uncertain economic outlook will negatively impact both segments of its business in 2009. The Corporation is working to mitigate substantial economic and market weakness by eliminating waste, attacking structural cost and streamlining its business.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
General
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon the Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of the Corporation's Board of Directors (the "Board"). Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fiscal year end - The Corporation follows a 52/53-week fiscal year which ends on the Saturday nearest December 31. Fiscal year 2008 ended on January 3, 2009; 2007 ended on December 29, 2007; and fiscal 2006 ended on December 30, 2006. The financial statements for fiscal year 2008 are on a 53-week basis; 2007 and 2006 are on a 52-week basis. A 53-week year occurs approximately every sixth year.
Revenue recognition - The Corporation normally recognizes revenue upon shipment of goods to customers. In certain circumstances, the Corporation does not recognize revenue until the goods are received by the customer or upon installation or customer acceptance based on the terms of the sale agreement. Revenue includes freight charged to customers; related costs are included in selling and administrative expense. Rebates, discounts and other marketing program expenses directly related to the sale are recorded as a reduction to sales. Marketing program accruals require the use of management estimates and the consideration of contractual arrangements subject to interpretation. Customer sales that achieve or do not achieve certain award levels can affect the amount of such estimates, and actual results could differ from these estimates. Future market conditions may require increased incentive offerings, possibly resulting in an incremental reduction in net sales at the time the incentive is offered.
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable - The allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is based on several factors, including overall customer credit quality, historical write-off experience, the length of time a receivable has been outstanding and specific account analysis that projects the ultimate collectability of the account. As such, these factors may change over time causing the Corporation to adjust the reserve level accordingly.
When the Corporation determines a customer is unlikely to pay, a charge is recorded to bad debt expense in the income statement and the allowance for doubtful accounts is increased. When the Corporation is reasonably certain the customer cannot pay, the receivable is written off by removing the accounts receivable amount and reducing the allowance for doubtful accounts accordingly.
As of January 3, 2009, there was approximately $247 million in outstanding accounts receivable and $9 million recorded in the allowance for doubtful accounts to cover potential future customer non-payments. However, if economic conditions were to deteriorate significantly or one of the Corporation's large customers declares bankruptcy, a larger allowance for doubtful accounts might be necessary. The allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $11 million at year end 2007 and $13 million at year end 2006.
Inventory valuation - The Corporation valued 83% of its inventory by the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method at January 3, 2009. Additionally, the Corporation evaluates inventory reserves in terms of excess and obsolete exposure. This evaluation includes such factors as anticipated usage, inventory turnover, inventory levels and ultimate product sales value. As such, these factors may change over time causing the Corporation to adjust the reserve level accordingly. The Corporation's reserves for excess and obsolete inventory were approximately $8 million at year end 2008, $9 million at year-end 2007 and $8 million at year-end 2006.
Long-lived assets - The Corporation reviews long-lived assets for impairment as events or changes in circumstances occur indicating the amount of the asset reflected in the Corporation's balance sheet may not be recoverable. The Corporation compares an estimate of undiscounted cash flows produced by the asset, or the appropriate group of assets, to the carrying value to determine whether impairment exists. The estimates of future cash flows involve considerable management judgment and are based upon the Corporation's assumptions about future operating performance. The actual cash flows could differ from management's estimates due to changes in business conditions, operating performance and economic conditions. Asset impairment charges associated with the Corporation's restructuring activities are discussed in Restructuring Related and Impairment Charges in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Corporation's continuous focus on improving the manufacturing process tends to increase the likelihood of assets being replaced; therefore, the Corporation is regularly evaluating the expected useful lives of its equipment which can result in accelerated depreciation.
Goodwill and other intangibles - In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" the Corporation evaluates its goodwill for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter or whenever indicators of impairment exist. The Corporation estimates the fair value of its reporting units using various valuation techniques, with the primary technique being a discounted cash flow analysis. The Corporation has eleven reporting units within its office furniture and hearth products operating segments, of which ten contained goodwill. These reporting units constitute components for which discrete financial information is available and regularly reviewed by segment management. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. The estimate of fair value of each reporting unit is based on management's projection of revenues, gross margin, operating costs and cash flows considering historical and estimated future results, general economic and market conditions as well as the impact of planned business and operational strategies. The valuations employ present value techniques to measure fair value and consider market factors. Management believes the assumptions used for the impairment test are consistent with those utilized by a market participant in performing similar valuations of its reporting units. A separate discount rate was utilized for each reporting unit with rates ranging from 10.5% to 12.0%. Management bases its fair value estimates on assumptions they believe to be reasonable at the time, but such assumptions are subject to inherent uncertainty. Actual results may differ from those estimates. In addition, for reasonableness, the summation of all reporting units' fair values is compared to the Corporation's market capitalization. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an additional step is required to determine the implied fair value of goodwill associated with that reporting unit. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by first allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities and then computing the excess of the reporting unit's fair value over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, such excess represents the amount of goodwill impairment, and, accordingly such impairment is recognized.
As a result of the review performed in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Corporation determined the carrying amount of certain reporting units acquired over the past few years in the office furniture segment exceeded their fair value. Management then compared the carrying value of goodwill to the implied fair value of the goodwill in each of these reporting units, and concluded that $17 million of impairment charges needed to be recognized. The impacted reporting units included an office furniture services unit, dealer distribution unit, and a recent acquisition with goodwill charges of approximately $10 million, $5 million and $2 million, respectively.
The changes to fair value in the reporting units that triggered impairment charges in the fourth quarter were primarily attributable to the deterioration in market conditions experienced in late 2008 which also caused management to change its estimates of future results. The Corporation factored these current market conditions and estimates into its projected forecasts of sales, operating income and cash flows of each reporting unit through the course of its strategic planning process completed in the fourth quarter.
The significant estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows of its reporting units are based on management's view of longer-term broad market trends. Management combines this trend data with estimates of current economic conditions in the U.S., competitor behavior, the mix of product sales, commodity costs, wage rates, the level of manufacturing capacity, and the pricing environment. In addition, estimates of fair value are impacted by estimates of the market participant derived weighted average cost of capital. The Corporation's cash flow projections in all of its reporting units assumed declining revenue and cash flows in 2009 and that significant recovery would not begin until after 2010. As a reasonableness test, management also compared the market capitalization of the Corporation at January 3, 2009 to the aggregate fair value of the reporting units, resulting in an implied control premium of approximately 30 percent. Management believes this implied control premium is reasonable, in light of the synergies across its operating units, lean manufacturing environment and strong position in the markets it serves.
Goodwill of approximately $268 million remains on the consolidated balance sheet as of the end of fiscal 2008.
The Corporation also determines the fair value of indefinite lived trade names on an annual basis during the fourth quarter or whenever indication of impairment exists. The Corporation performed its fiscal 2008 assessment of indefinite lived trade names during the fourth quarter. The estimate of the fair value of the trade names was based on a discounted cash flow model using inputs which included: projected revenues from management's long term plan, assumed royalty rates that could be payable if the trade names were not owned and a discount rate. As a result of the review the Corporation determined the carrying value of certain trade names acquired over the past few years in the office furniture segment exceeded their fair value and concluded that a $4.8 million impairment charge needed to be recognized. A carrying value of trade names of approximately $61 million remains on the consolidated balance sheet at the end of fiscal 2008.
The Corporation has definite lived intangibles that are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible, subject to amortization, is not recoverable from expected future cash flows and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value. No impairment losses related to definite lived intangibles were recorded. Intangibles, net of amortization, of approximately $79 million are included on the consolidated balance sheet as of the end of fiscal 2008.
Key to recoverability of goodwill, indefinite-lived intangibles and long-lived assets is the forecast of the depth and duration of the economic downturn and its impact on future revenues, operating margins, and cash flows. Management's projection for the U.S. office furniture and domestic hearth markets and global economic conditions is inherently subject to a number of uncertain factors, such as the depth and duration of the global economic slowdown, U.S housing market, credit availability and borrowing rates, and overall consumer confidence. In the near term, as management monitors the above factors, it is possible they may change the revenue and cash flow projections of certain reporting units, which may require the recording of additional asset impairment charges. There are certain reporting units that have been recently acquired and therefore have a historical cost that is closer to the current fair value. For one of its reporting units within the office furniture segment, a minor downward modification in forecasted results would result in additional impairment charges. This reporting unit has approximately $9 million of goodwill at January 3, 2009. For all other reporting units, where impairment charges have not been recorded, the calculated fair value exceeds the carrying value of the reporting unit by at least 15%.
Self-insured reserves - The Corporation is partially self-insured or carries high deductibles for general, auto, and product liability; workers' compensation; and certain employee health benefits. The general, auto, product, and workers' compensation liabilities are managed via a wholly-owned insurance captive; the related liabilities are included in the accompanying financial statements. As of January 3, 2009, those liabilities totaled $29 million. The Corporation's policy is to accrue amounts in accordance with the actuarially determined liabilities. The actuarial valuations are based on historical information along with certain assumptions about future events. Changes in assumptions for such matters as the number or severity of claims, medical cost inflation, and magnitude of change in actual experience development could cause these estimates to change in the near term.
Stock-based compensation - The Corporation adopted the provisions of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS
123(R)"), beginning January 1, 2006. This statement requires the Corporation to
measure the cost of employee services in exchange for an award of equity
instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award and to recognize
cost over the requisite service period. This resulted in a cost of approximately
$1.6 million in 2008, $3.6 million in 2007 and $3.2 million in 2006. The
decrease in cost in 2008 was due to a true-up adjustment to estimated
forfeitures based on current year events.
Income taxes - Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Corporation's assets and liabilities. The Corporation provides for taxes that may be payable if undistributed earnings of overseas subsidiaries were to be remitted to the United States, except for those earnings that it considers to be permanently reinvested.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Corporation adopted the provision of FIN 48 on December 31, 2006, the beginning of fiscal 2007. See Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS 157") which provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard also expands the amount of disclosure regarding the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. The standard applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. The Corporation partially adopted SFAS 157 on December 30, 2007, the beginning of its 2008 fiscal year. The Corporation has not applied the provisions of SFAS 157 to goodwill and intangibles in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position 157-2. The Corporation will adopt the new standard on January 4, 2009, the beginning of its 2009 fiscal year. The Corporation is still evaluating the impact but does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its financial statements.
In February, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities" ("SFAS 159") which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The Corporation adopted SFAS 159 on December 30, 2007, the beginning of fiscal 2008. As the Corporation did not elect to fair value any additional assets or liabilities it did not have a material impact on its financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised), "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141(R)"), replacing SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141"), and SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - An Amendment of ARB No. 51" ("SFAS 160"). SFAS 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements of SFAS 141, broadens its scope by applying the acquisition method to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses, and requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be measured at fair value as of the acquisition date, that liabilities related to contingent considerations be recognized at the acquisition date and remeasured at fair value in each subsequent reporting period, that acquisition-related costs be expensed as incurred and that income be recognized if the fair value of the net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests (i.e., minority interests) in a subsidiary, including changes in a parent's ownership interest in a subsidiary and requires, among other things, that noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries be classified as a separate component of equity. Except for the presentation and disclosure requirements of SFAS 160, which are to be applied retrospectively for all periods presented, SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160 are to be applied prospectively in financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Corporation is not able to predict the impact this guidance will have on the accounting for acquisitions it may complete in future periods. For acquisitions completed prior to January 3, 2009, the new standard requires that changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the measurement period must be recognized in earnings rather than as an adjustment to the cost of the acquisition. The Corporation does not expect this new guidance or the adoption of FAS160 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 ("SFAS 161"). SFAS 161 expends disclosures for derivative instruments by requiring entities to disclose the fair value of derivative instruments and their gains or losses in tabular format. SFAS 161 also requires disclosures of information about credit risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements, counterparty credit risk and strategies and objectives for using derivative instruments. SFAS 161 will become effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Corporation will adopt this new accounting standard on January 4, 2009, the beginning of its fiscal year. The Corporation does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its financial statements.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the percentage of consolidated net sales represented by certain items reflected in the Corporation's statements of income for the periods indicated.
Fiscal 2008 2007 2006 Net Sales 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % Cost of products sold 66.6 64.8 65.4 Gross profit 33.4 35.2 34.6 Selling and administrative expenses 29.0 27.3 26.8 Restructuring related charges 1.0 0.4 0.1 Operating income 3.4 7.5 7.7 Interest income (expense) net (0.6 ) (0.7 ) (0.5 ) Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest 2.8 6.9 7.2 Income taxes 1.0 2.2 2.4 Minority interest in earnings of subsidiary 0.0 0.0 0.0 Income from continuing operations 1.8 % 4.7 % 4.8 % |
Net Sales
Net sales during 2008 were $2.5 billion, a decrease of 3.6 percent, compared to net sales of $2.6 billion in 2007. Acquisitions contributed $118 million or 4.6 percentage points of sales. Higher price realization of $66 million was offset by continued softness in the supplies driven channel of the office furniture segment and lower volume in the hearth products segment driven by the continuing decline in the new construction channel. Net sales during 2007 were $2.6 billion, a decrease of 4.1 percent, compared to net sales of $2.7 billion in 2006. Acquisitions contributed $46 million or 1.7 percentage points of sales. Higher price realization of $84 million was offset by soft demand in the supplies driven channel of the office furniture segment and lower volume in the hearth products segment.
Gross Profit
Gross profit as a percent of net sales decreased 1.8 percentage points in 2008 as compared to 2007 due to lower volume, higher material costs and restructuring and transition costs offset partially by better price realization. Gross profit as a percent of net sales increased 0.6 percentage points in 2007 as compared to 2006 due to better price realization and increased cost control offset partially by lower volume.
|
|