|
Quotes & Info
|
| IMGN > SEC Filings for IMGN > Form 10-Q on 6-Feb-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
6-Feb-2009
Quarterly Report
OVERVIEW
Since our inception, we have been principally engaged in the development of novel, targeted therapeutics for the treatment of cancer using our expertise in cancer biology, monoclonal antibodies, and small-molecule cytotoxic, or cell-killing, agents. Our Tumor-Activated Prodrug, or TAP, technology uses antibodies to deliver a potent cytotoxic agent specifically to cancer targets, and consists of a monoclonal antibody that binds to a cancer target with one of our proprietary cell-killing agents attached. The antibody component enables a TAP compound to bind specifically to cancer cells that express a particular target antigen and the cytotoxic agent serves to kill the cancer cell. Our TAP technology is designed to enable the creation of highly effective, well-tolerated anticancer products. All of our and our collaborative partners' TAP compounds currently in preclinical and clinical testing contain either DM1 or DM4 as the cytotoxic agent. Both DM1 and DM4 are our proprietary derivatives of a naturally occurring substance called maytansine. We also use our expertise in antibodies and cancer biology to develop "naked," or unconjugated, antibody anticancer product candidates.
We have entered into collaborative agreements that enable companies to use our TAP technology to develop commercial product candidates to specified targets. We have also used our proprietary TAP technology in conjunction with our in-house antibody expertise to develop our own anticancer product candidates. Under the terms of our collaborative agreements, we are generally entitled to upfront fees, milestone payments and royalties on any commercial product sales. In addition, under certain agreements we are entitled to research and development funding based on activities performed at our collaborative partner's request. We are reimbursed our direct and overhead costs to manufacture preclinical and clinical materials and, under certain collaborative agreements, the reimbursement includes a profit margin. Currently, our collaborative partners include Amgen, Inc., Bayer HealthCare AG, Biogen Idec Inc., Biotest AG, Genentech, Inc., and sanofi-aventis. We expect that substantially all of our revenue for the foreseeable future will result from payments under our collaborative arrangements.
sanofi-aventis-In July 2003, we entered into a discovery, development and commercialization collaboration with sanofi-aventis. Under the terms of this agreement, in consideration of an upfront payment of $12 million, sanofi-aventis gained commercialization rights to new anticancer therapeutics developed to targets included in the collaboration, including the right to use our TAP technology and our humanization technology in the creation of therapeutics to these targets. The agreement included a
research support funding commitment by sanofi-aventis for $50.7 million over the first three years of the agreement, and then for an additional $18.2 million when the agreement was extended for a fourth year, and then for an additional $10.4 million when the agreement was extended for a fifth year. The two companies subsequently agreed to extend the date of payment through October 31, 2008 to enable completion of previously agreed upon research. We have earned $81.5 million of committed research funding for activities performed under the completed research term of this agreement. As with all of its collaborative partners, we now perform research for sanofi-aventis and receive financial compensation from them on a mutually-agreed upon basis..
The collaboration agreement also provides for certain other payments based on the achievement of product candidate milestones and royalties on sales of any resulting products, if and when such sales commence. Assuming all benchmarks are met, we will receive payments of between $21.5 million and $30 million per antigen target for each product candidate developed under this agreement. Through December 31, 2008, we have received and earned $10.5 million with the achievement of various milestones related to five of the targets in this collaboration that have been disclosed.
Additionally, in October 2006, sanofi-aventis licensed non-exclusive rights to use our proprietary humanization technology, which enables antibodies of murine origin to avoid detection by the human immune system. This license provides sanofi-aventis with the non-exclusive right to use our proprietary humanization technology through August 31, 2011 with the right to extend for one or more additional periods of three years each by providing us with written notice prior to expiration of the then-current license term and payment of a specified renewal fee. Under the terms of the license, we received a $1 million license fee, half of which was paid upon contract signing and the second half was paid in August 2008, and in addition, we are entitled to receive milestone payments potentially totaling $4.5 million plus royalties on sales for each licensed product under this agreement. We have deferred the $1 million upfront payment and are recognizing this amount as revenue over the five-year term of the agreement.
In August 2008, sanofi-aventis exercised its option under a 2006 agreement for expanded access to our TAP technology. The exercise of this option enables sanofi-aventis to evaluate, with certain restrictions, our maytansinoid TAP technology with antibodies to targets not licensed as part of the research collaboration between the companies and to take licenses for the exclusive right to use the technology to develop products to specific targets on the terms in the 2006 agreement. We are entitled to earn upfront and milestone payments potentially totaling $32 million per target for each compound developed under the 2006 agreement, as well as royalties on commercial sales. We are also entitled to manufacturing payments for any materials made on behalf of sanofi-aventis. We received $3.5 million with the exercise of this option in August 2008, in addition to the $500,000 we received in December 2006 with the signing of the option agreement. The agreement has a three-year term from the date of the exercise of the option and can be renewed by sanofi-aventis for one additional three-year term by payment of a $2 million fee. We have deferred the $3.5 million exercise fee and are recognizing this amount as revenue over the initial three-year option term.
In October 2008, sanofi-aventis began Phase II evaluation of AVE1642, triggering a $4 million milestone payment to us. This milestone is included in license and milestone fee revenue for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008.
Genentech-In May 2000, we entered into a license agreement with Genentech that granted Genentech exclusive rights to use our maytansinoid TAP technology with antibodies that target HER2. We received a $2 million upfront payment upon execution of the agreement. In addition to royalties on net sales of any HER2-targeting TAP compounds developed under this agreement if and when they occur, the terms of the agreement include other payments based upon Genentech's achievement of milestones. In May 2006, we amended this agreement which increased the potential milestone payments and certain royalties. Assuming all requirements are met under this agreement, we are to receive $44 million in milestone payments under this agreement in addition to royalties on sales, if any. Through December 31, 2008, we have received $7 million in milestone payments.
In December 2008, Genentech licensed the exclusive right to use our maytansinoid TAP technology with its therapeutic antibodies to an undisclosed target. This license was taken under an agreement entered into by the companies in 2000 that provided Genentech with the right to take exclusive licenses to use our maytansinoid TAP technology to develop products for individual targets on agreed upon terms. Under the terms of the license, we received a $1 million upfront payment and are entitled to receive milestone payments plus royalties on the sales of any resulting products. Genentech is responsible for the development, manufacturing, and marketing of any products resulting from this license. We have deferred the $1 million upfront payment and are recognizing this amount as revenue over the estimated period of substantial involvement.
Biotest AG-In September 2008, Biotest began Phase I evaluation of BT-062 which triggered a $500,000 milestone payment to us. This milestone is included in license and milestone fee revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2008.
Bayer HealthCare AG-In October 2008, we entered into a development and license agreement with Bayer HealthCare AG. The agreement grants Bayer exclusive rights to use our TAP technology to develop therapeutic compounds to a target found on solid tumors. We received a $4 million upfront payment upon execution of the agreement, and - for each compound developed and marketed by Bayer under this collaboration - we could potentially receive up to $170.5 million in milestone payments; additionally, we receive royalties on the sales of any resulting products. We will be compensated by Bayer at a stipulated rate for work performed on behalf of Bayer under a mutually agreed upon research plan and budget which may be amended from time to time during the term of the agreement. We also will receive payments for manufacturing any preclinical and clinical materials made at the request of Bayer as well as for any related process development activities. We have deferred the $4 million upfront payment and are recognizing this
amount as revenue over the estimated period of substantial involvement.
To date, we have not generated revenues from commercial product sales and we expect to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2008, we had approximately $45.9 million in cash and marketable securities compared to $47.9 million in cash and marketable securities as of June 30, 2008.
We anticipate that future cash expenditures will be partially offset by collaboration-derived proceeds, including milestone payments, clinical material reimbursements and upfront fees. Accordingly, period-to-period operational results may fluctuate dramatically based upon the timing of receipt of the proceeds. We believe that our established collaborative agreements, while subject to specified milestone achievements, will provide funding to assist us in meeting obligations under our collaborative agreements while also assisting in providing funding for the development of internal product candidates and technologies. However, we can give no assurances that such collaborative agreement funding will, in fact, be realized in the time frames we expect, or at all. Should we or our partners not meet some or all of the terms and conditions of our various collaboration agreements, we may be required to pursue additional strategic partners, secure alternative financing arrangements, and/or defer or limit some or all of our research, development and/or clinical projects. However, we cannot provide assurance that any such opportunities presented by additional strategic partners or alternative financing arrangements will be entirely available to us, if at all.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to our collaborative agreements and inventory. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We enter into licensing and development agreements with collaborative partners for the development of monoclonal antibody-based anticancer therapeutics. We follow the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, or SAB 104, and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21, Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Elements, or EITF 00-21. In accordance with SAB 104 and EITF 00-21, we recognize revenue related to research activities as they are performed, as long as there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection of the related receivable is probable. The terms of our agreements contain multiple elements which typically include non-refundable license fees, payments based upon the achievement of certain milestones and royalties on product sales. We evaluate such arrangements to determine if the deliverables are separable into units of accounting and then apply applicable revenue recognition criteria to each unit of accounting.
At December 31, 2008, we had the following three types of collaborative contracts with the parties identified below:
† License to use our TAP technology and/or certain other intellectual property to develop compounds to a single target antigen:
Biogen Idec Inc. (single-target license)
Biotest AG (single-target license)
Genentech, Inc. (multiple single-target licenses)
sanofi-aventis (license to multiple individual targets)
Bayer Healthcare AG (single-target license)
† Option agreement for a defined period of time to secure licenses to use our TAP technology to develop anticancer compounds to a limited number of targets on established terms (broad option agreement):
Amgen, Inc.
Genentech, Inc.
sanofi-aventis
† Non-exclusive license to our humanization technology:
sanofi-aventis
Generally, the foregoing collaboration agreements provide that we will (i) at the collaborator's request, manufacture preclinical and clinical materials at our cost, or, in some cases, cost plus a margin, (ii) earn payments upon the collaborators' achievements of certain milestones and (iii) earn royalty payments, generally until the later of the last applicable patent expiration or twelve years after product launch. Royalty rates may vary over the royalty term depending on certain intellectual property rights. We are required to
provide technical training and to share any process improvements and know-how with its collaborators during the research term of the collaboration agreements.
Generally, upfront payments on single-target licenses are deferred over the period of our substantial involvement during development. The determination of the length of this period is subject to judgment and estimation and can have an impact on the amount of revenue recognized in a given period. Our employees are available to assist the Company's collaborators during the development of their products. We estimate this development phase to begin at the inception of the collaboration agreement and conclude at the end of non-pivotal Phase II testing. We believe this period of involvement is, depending on the nature of the license, on average six and one-half years. Quarterly, we reassess our periods of substantial involvement over which we amortize our upfront license fees. In the event that a single-target license were to be terminated, we would recognize as revenue any portion of the upfront fee that had not previously been recorded as revenue, but was classified as deferred revenue at the date of such termination.
We defer upfront payments received from our broad option agreements over the period during which the collaborator may elect to receive a license. These periods are specific to each collaboration agreement, but are between seven and 12 years. If a collaborator selects an option to acquire a license under these agreements, any option fee is deferred and recorded over the life of the option, generally 12 to 18 months. If a collaborator exercises an option and we grant a single-target license to the collaborator, we defer the license fee and account for the fee as we would an upfront payment on a single-target license, as discussed above. Upon exercise of an option to acquire a license, we would recognize any remaining deferred option fee over the period of our substantial involvement under the license acquired. In the event a broad option agreement were to be terminated, we would recognize as revenue any portion of the upfront fee that had not previously been recorded as revenue, but was classified as deferred revenue at the date of such termination. In the event a collaborator elects to discontinue development of a specific product candidate under a single-target license, but retains its right to use our technology to develop an alternative product candidate to the same target or a target substitute, we would cease amortization of any remaining portion of the upfront fee until there is substantial preclinical activity on another product candidate and our remaining period of substantial involvement can be estimated.
When milestone fees are specifically tied to a separate earnings process and are deemed to be substantive and at risk, revenue is recognized when such milestones are achieved. In addition, we recognize research and development support revenue from certain collaboration and development agreements based upon the level of research services performed during the period of the research agreement. Deferred revenue substantially represents amounts received under collaborative agreements and not yet earned pursuant to these policies. Where we have no continuing involvement, we will record non-refundable license fees as revenue upon receipt and will record revenue upon achievement of milestones by its collaborative partners.
We produce preclinical and clinical materials for our collaborators. We are reimbursed for certain of our direct and overhead costs to produce clinical materials. We recognize revenue on preclinical and clinical materials when the materials have passed all quality testing required for collaborator acceptance and title and risk of loss have transferred to the collaborator.
We also produce research material for potential collaborators under material transfer agreements. Additionally, we perform research activities, including developing antibody-specific conjugation processes, on behalf of our collaborators and potential collaborators during the early evaluation and preclinical testing stages of drug development. Generally, we are reimbursed for certain of our direct and overhead costs of producing these materials or providing these services. We record the amounts received for the materials produced or services performed as a component of research and development support. We also develop conjugation processes for materials for later stage testing and commercialization for certain collaborators. We are reimbursed for certain of our direct and overhead costs and may receive milestone payments for developing these processes and these are recorded as a component of research and development support.
Inventory
We review our estimates of the net realizable value of our inventory at each reporting period. Our estimate of the net realizable value of our inventory is subject to judgment and estimation. The actual net realizable value of our inventory could vary significantly from our estimates. We consider quantities of raw materials in excess of twelve-month projected usage that is not supported by firm, fixed collaborator orders and projections at the time of the assessment to be excess. To date, we have fully reserved any such material identified as excess with a corresponding charge to research and development expense. Our collaborators' estimates of their clinical material requirements are based upon expectations of their clinical trials, including the timing, size, dosing schedule and the maximum tolerated dose likely to be reached for the compound being evaluated. Our collaborators' actual requirements for clinical materials may vary significantly from their projections. Significant differences between our collaborators' actual manufacturing orders and their projections could result in our actual twelve-month usage of raw materials varying significantly from our estimated usage at an earlier reporting period. Reductions in collaborators' projections could indicate that we have additional excess raw material inventory and we would then evaluate the need to record further write-downs, which would be included as charges to research and development expense.
Stock Based Compensation
As of December 31, 2008, the Company is authorized to grant future awards under one share-based compensation plan, which is the ImmunoGen, Inc. 2006 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan. Effective July 1, 2005, we adopted the fair
value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, or Statement 123(R), using the
modified-prospective-transition method. Under that transition method,
compensation cost includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments
granted, but not yet vested as of July 1, 2005, based on the grant-date fair
value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FASB Statement
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, or Statement 123, and
(b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to July 1,
2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of Statement 123(R). Such amounts have been reduced by our estimate
of forfeitures of all unvested awards.
The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility is based exclusively on historical volatility data of our stock. The expected term of stock options granted is based exclusively on historical data and represents the period of time that stock options granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected term is calculated for and applied to one group of stock options as we do not expect substantially different exercise or post-vesting termination behavior amongst our employee population. The risk-free rate of the stock options is based on the U.S. Treasury rate in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the stock options. Estimated forfeitures are based on historical data as well as current trend. Compensation cost incurred during the three and six months ended December 31, 2008 was $838,000 and $2.1 million respectively. Compensation cost incurred during the three and six months ended December 31, 2007 was $546,000 and $1.1 million respectively. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2008 we recorded approximately $35,000 and $747,000, respectively, of compensation expense, which is included in the amounts above, related to the modification of the terms certain of options previously granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company in accordance with the succession plan approved by our Board of Directors in September 2008.
As of December 31, 2008, the estimated fair value of unvested employee awards was $3.7 million, net of estimated forfeitures. The weighted-average remaining vesting period for these awards is approximately two and a half years.
Investment in Marketable Securities
We invest in marketable securities of highly rated financial institutions and investment-grade debt instruments and limit the amount of credit exposure with any one entity. These investments are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, or Statement 115. We have classified our marketable securities as "available-for-sale" and, accordingly, carry such securities at aggregate fair value. In accounting for investments, we evaluate if a decline in the fair value of a marketable security below our cost basis is other-than-temporary, and if so, we record an impairment charge in our consolidated statement of operations. The factors that we consider in our evaluation include the fair market value of the security, the duration and magnitude of the security's decline, and our intent and ability to hold the security to recovery. The determination of whether a loss is other than temporary is highly judgmental and can have a material impact on our results. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, we recorded approximately $266,000 and $402,000, respectively, in other-than-temporary impairment charges. No similar charges were recorded in the six months ended December 31, 2007.
Derivatives
Derivative instruments include a portfolio of short duration foreign currency forward contracts intended to mitigate the risk of exchange fluctuations for existing or anticipated receivable and payable balances denominated in foreign currency. Derivatives are estimated at fair value and classified as other current assets or liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of these instruments represents the present value of estimated future cash flows under the contracts, which are a function of underlying interest rates, currency rates, related volatility, counterparty creditworthiness and duration of the contracts. Changes in these factors or a combination thereof may affect the fair value of these instruments.
We do not designate foreign currency forward contracts as hedges for accounting purposes, and changes in the fair value of these instruments are recognized in earnings during the period of change. Because we enter into forward contracts only as an economic hedge, any gain or loss on the underlying foreign-denominated existing or anticipated receivable or payable balance would be offset by the loss or gain on the forward contract. For the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, net losses recognized on forward contracts were $79,000 and $182,000, respectively, and are included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations as other (loss) income, net. As of December 31, 2008, we had outstanding forward contracts with amounts equivalent to approximately $3.4 million (2.6 million in Euros), all maturing on or before February 27, 2009. As of June 30, 2008, we had outstanding forward contracts with amounts equivalent to approximately $1.4 million (924,000 in Euros). For the three and six months ended December 31, 2007, net gains recognized on forward contracts were $49,000 and $242,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2007, we had outstanding forward contracts with amounts equivalent to approximately $7.4 million (5.1 million in Euros). We do not anticipate using derivative instruments for any purpose other than hedging our exchange rate exposure.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of Three Months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
Revenues
Our total revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $9.3 million and $9.8 million, respectively. The $416,000 decrease in revenues in the three months ended December 31, 2008 from the same period in the prior year is attributable to a decrease in research and development support revenue and clinical materials reimbursement revenue, partially offset by an increase in license and milestone fees, all of which are discussed below.
Research and development support was $2.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008 compared with $3.7 million for the three months ended . . .
|
|