|
Quotes & Info
|
| ABC > SEC Filings for ABC > Form 10-Q on 5-Feb-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
5-Feb-2009
Quarterly Report
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations (Continued)
Results of Operations
AmerisourceBergen Corporation
Summary Financial Information
Three Months Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands) 2008 2007 Change
Total revenue $ 17,338,377 $ 17,279,383 - %
Pharmaceutical Distribution gross profit $ 489,848 $ 482,631 1 %
Gain on antitrust litigation settlements - 1,585 N/M
Total gross profit $ 489,848 $ 484,216 1 %
Pharmaceutical Distribution operating income $ 198,913 $ 191,235 4 %
Facility consolidations, employee severance
and other (1,029 ) (177 ) N/M
Gain on antitrust litigation settlements - 1,585 N/M
Total operating income $ 197,884 $ 192,643 3 %
Percentages of total revenue:
Pharmaceutical Distribution
Gross profit 2.83 % 2.79 %
Operating expenses 1.68 % 1.69 %
Operating income 1.15 % 1.11 %
AmerisourceBergen Corporation
Gross profit 2.83 % 2.80 %
Operating expenses 1.68 % 1.69 %
Operating income 1.14 % 1.11 %
|
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations (Continued)
Operating Results
Total revenue, including bulk deliveries, was $17.3 billion in the quarters
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. Total revenue growth was 0.3% from the prior
year quarter as ABSG's total revenue growth of 5% was substantially offset by a
0.5% decline in ABDC's total revenue. During the quarter ended December 31,
2008, 69% of total revenue was from sales to institutional customers and 31% was
from sales to retail customers; this compared to a customer mix in the prior
year quarter of 64% institutional and 36% retail. In comparison with the prior
year quarter results, sales to institutional customers increased 8% primarily
due to the strong growth of our largest customer. Sales to retail customers
decreased 13% primarily due to the July 1, 2008 loss of certain business
(approximately $3.0 billion on an annualized basis) with a national retail drug
chain customer. Excluding the loss of this business, total revenue in the
quarter ended December 31, 2008 would have increased by 4.8% from the prior year
quarter.
Bulk deliveries of $457.3 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2008
decreased from $1.1 billion in the prior year quarter primarily due to the prior
fiscal year transition of a significant amount of business previously conducted
on a bulk delivery basis with our largest customer to an operating revenue
basis. Due to the insignificant service fees generated from bulk deliveries,
fluctuations in volume have no significant impact on operating margins. However,
revenue from bulk deliveries has a positive impact on our cash flows due to
favorable timing between the customer payments to us and payments by us to our
suppliers.
ABDC's total revenue decreased by 0.5% from the prior year quarter primarily due
to the loss of certain business with a large retail drug chain customer, as
mentioned above, offset, in part, by an increase in sales to certain of its
large institutional customers.
ABSG's total revenue of $3.8 billion in the quarter ended December 31, 2008
increased 5% from the prior year quarter primarily due to the good growth
broadly across its distribution and services businesses, offset, in part, by
declining anemia drug sales (see paragraph below). Additionally, the prior year
quarter benefited from one month of sales to a large oncology drug customer,
which was acquired by a competitor in October 2007. The majority of ABSG's
revenue is generated from the distribution of pharmaceuticals to physicians who
specialize in a variety of disease states, especially oncology. ABSG also
distributes vaccines, plasma, and other blood products. ABSG's business may be
adversely impacted in the future by changes in medical guidelines and the
Medicare reimbursement rates for certain pharmaceuticals, including oncology
drugs administered by physicians and anemia drugs. Since ABSG provides a number
of services to or through physicians, any changes to this service channel could
result in slower or reduced growth in revenues.
Revenue related to the distribution of anemia-related products, which
represented approximately 5.5% of total revenue in the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, decreased approximately 11% from the prior year quarter. The
decline in sales of anemia-related products has been most pronounced in the use
of these products for cancer treatment. Sales of oncology anemia-related
products represented approximately 2% of total revenue in the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 and decreased approximately 27% from the prior year quarter.
Several developments have contributed to the decline in sales of anemia drugs,
including expanded warning and other product safety labeling requirements, more
restrictive federal policies governing Medicare reimbursement for the use of
these drugs to treat oncology patients with kidney failure and dialysis, and
changes in regulatory and clinical medical guidelines for recommended dosage and
use. As a result, we expect oncology-related anemia drug sales to continue to
decline further in fiscal 2009 from our fiscal 2008 total. In addition, the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") is continuing to review clinical study data
concerning the possible risks associated with erythropoiesis stimulating agents.
Also, on July 30, 2008, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS")
announced it is considering a review of national Medicare coverage policy for
these drugs for patients who have cancer or pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease.
The FDA or CMS may take additional action regarding the use, safety labeling
and/or Medicare coverage of these drugs in the future. Further changes in
medical guidelines for anemia drugs may impact the availability and extent of
reimbursement for these drugs from third party payors, including federal and
state governments and private insurance plans. Our future revenue growth rate
and/or profitability may continue to be impacted by any future reductions in
reimbursement for anemia drugs or changes that limit the dosage and or use of
anemia drugs.
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations (Continued)
We continue to expect that our total revenue growth in fiscal 2009 will be
between 1% and 3%. This expected range reflects market growth between 1% and 2%
as estimated by industry data firm IMS Healthcare, Inc. ("IMS"), the expected
strong growth of certain of our large institutional customers, primarily within
ABDC, offset in part by the loss of certain business with a national retail
chain customer to a competitor, effective July 1, 2008. Sales to this chain
customer approximated $3.0 billion on an annualized basis. Our expected growth
largely reflects U.S. pharmaceutical industry conditions, including increases in
prescription drug utilization, the introduction of new products, and higher
pharmaceutical prices, offset, in part, by the increased use of lower-priced
generics. Our growth has also been impacted by industry competition and changes
in customer mix. Industry sales in the United States, as estimated by IMS, are
expected to grow between 1% and 2% in 2009 and between 3% and 6% per year during
the five-year period ending 2012. IMS also indicated that certain sectors of the
market, such as biotechnology and other specialty and generic pharmaceuticals
would grow faster than the overall market. Our future revenue growth will
continue to be affected by various factors such as: competition within the
industry, customer consolidation, changes in pharmaceutical manufacturer pricing
and distribution policies and practices, increased downward pressure on
reimbursement rates, changes in Federal government rules and regulations,
industry growth trends, such as the likely increase in the number of generic
drugs that will be available over the next few years as a result of the
expiration of certain drug patents held by brand manufacturers, and general
economic conditions.
Gross profit of $489.8 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 increased
1% from the prior year quarter. As a percentage of total revenue, gross profit
in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was 2.83%, an increase of 3 basis points
from the prior year quarter. These increases were primarily due the strong
growth and increased profitability of our generic programs; increased
contributions from our fee-for-service agreements, including $10.2 million of
fees relating to prior period sales due to the execution of new agreements in
the current quarter; strong manufacturer price increases; and good growth from
certain of ABSG's service businesses; all of which were partially offset by
ABSG's $12.7 million loss on its influenza vaccine program, which included a
$15.5 million write-down of excess influenza vaccine inventory. Prior year's
gross profit also benefited from a gain of $10.0 million relating to a favorable
litigation settlement with a major competitor. Additionally, in the prior year
quarter, we recognized a gain of $1.6 million from antitrust litigation
settlements with pharmaceutical manufacturers. This gain, which was excluded
from the determination of Pharmaceutical Distribution segment's gross profit,
was recorded as reduction to cost of goods sold.
Our cost of goods sold for interim periods includes a last-in, first-out
("LIFO") provision that is based on our estimated annual LIFO provision. We
recorded a LIFO charge of $5.0 million and $3.1 million in the quarters ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The annual LIFO provision is affected
by changes in inventory quantities, product mix, and manufacturer pricing
practices, which may be impacted by market and other external influences.
Operating expenses of $292.0 million, which include the below facility
consolidations, employee severance and other charges of $1.0 million, in the
quarter ended December 31, 2008 increased $0.4 million from the prior year
quarter. As a percentage of total revenue, operating expenses declined to 1.68%
from 1.69% in the prior year quarter, which was primarily due to reduced ABDC
warehouse operating costs from continuing productivity improvements and due to
our streamlined organizational structure within ABDC and ABSG, as a result of
our cE2 initiative described below.
The following table illustrates the charges incurred relating to facility
consolidations, employee severance and other, (which are excluded from operating
expenses of the Pharmaceutical Distribution segment), for the quarters ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
Quarter ended
December 31,
2008 2007
Facility consolidations and employee severance $ 1,029 $ (758 )
Costs related to business divestitures - 935
Total facility consolidations, employee severance and other $ 1,029 $ 177
|
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations (Continued)
In fiscal 2008, we announced a more streamlined organizational structure and
introduced an initiative ("cE2") designed to drive increased customer efficiency
and cost effectiveness. In connection with these efforts, we have reduced
various operating costs and terminated certain positions. We have incurred the
majority of our employee severance costs related to cE2 through December 31,
2008. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we terminated 122 employees
and incurred $1.0 million of employee severance costs. During the prior year
quarter, we reversed $0.9 million of employee severance charges previously
estimated and recorded. Costs related to business divestitures in the prior year
quarter related to the sale of PMSI.
We paid a total of $3.6 million and $0.4 million for employee severance, lease
cancellation and other costs during the quarters ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Most employees receive their severance benefits over a
period, generally not in excess of 12 months, while others may receive a
lump-sum payment.
Operating income of $197.9 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2008
increased 3% from the prior year quarter. As a percentage of total revenue,
operating income in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 increased 3 basis points
from the prior year quarter. These increases were due to the improvement in our
gross profit as operating expenses were relatively flat in comparison to the
prior year quarter. The costs of facility consolidations, employee severance and
other decreased operating income by $1.0 million in the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 and lowered operating income as a percentage of total revenue
by 1 basis point. The gain on antitrust litigation settlements, less the costs
of facility consolidations, employee severance and other, contributed
$1.4 million to operating income in the prior year quarter and contributed 1
basis point to operating income as a percentage of total revenue.
Interest expense, interest income, and their respective weighted-average
interest rates in the quarters ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were as follows
(in thousands):
2008 2007
Weighted-Average Weighted-Average
Amount Interest Rate Amount Interest Rate
Interest expense $ 16,363 5.30 % $ 20,235 5.73 %
Interest income (2,180 ) 2.27 % (3,821 ) 4.45 %
Interest expense, net $ 14,183 $ 16,414
|
Interest expense decreased from the prior year quarter due to a decrease of
$82.8 million in average borrowings and a decrease in the weighted-average
variable interest rate to 3.73% from 5.63% in the prior year quarter. Interest
income decreased from the prior year quarter primarily due to a decline in the
weighted-average interest rate. Our net interest expense in future periods may
vary significantly depending upon changes in net borrowings, interest rates and
strategic decisions made by us to deploy our invested cash and short-term
investments.
Income tax expense reflects an effective income tax rate of 38.6%, versus 38.2%
in the prior year quarter. We expect that our effective tax rate in fiscal 2009
will approximate our prior fiscal year tax rate of 38.4%.
Income from continuing operations of $112.5 million in the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 increased 4% from the prior year quarter due to the increase
in operating income and the decrease in interest expense. Diluted earnings per
share from continuing operations of $0.73 in the quarter ended December 31, 2008
increased 12% from $0.65 per share in the prior year quarter. The difference
between diluted earnings per share growth and the increase in income from
continuing operations was primarily due to the 7% reduction in weighted average
common shares outstanding resulting from purchases of our common stock in
connection with our stock repurchase program (see Liquidity and Capital
Resources), net of the impact of stock option exercises.
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, for the
quarters ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 related to the PMSI business, which
was sold in October 2008. Accordingly, PMSI's results of operations have been
classified as discontinued for the current and prior periods presented.
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations (Continued)
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table illustrates the Company's debt structure at December 31,
2008, including availability under revolving credit facilities and the
receivables securitization facility (in thousands):
Outstanding Additional
Balance Availability
Fixed-Rate Debt:
$400,000, 5 5/8% senior notes due 2012 $ 398,841 $ -
$500,000, 5 7/8% senior notes due 2015 498,166 -
Other 1,677 -
Total fixed-rate debt 898,684 -
Variable-Rate Debt:
Blanco revolving credit facility due 2009 55,000 -
Multi-currency revolving credit facility due 2011 232,385 450,505
Receivables securitization facility due 2009 - 975,000
Other 580 920
Total variable-rate debt 287,965 1,426,425
Total debt, including current portion $ 1,186,649 $ 1,426,425
|
The Company's aggregate availability under its revolving credit facilities and
its receivables securitization facility provides sufficient sources of capital
to fund the Company's working capital requirements.
The Company has a $695 million five-year multi-currency senior unsecured
revolving credit facility (the "Multi-Currency Revolving Credit Facility") with
a syndicate of lenders. (This amount reflects the reduction of $55 million in
availability under the facility as a result of the bankruptcy of Lehman
Commercial Paper, Inc. in September 2008.) Interest on borrowings under the
Multi-Currency Revolving Credit Facility accrues at specified rates based on the
Company's debt rating and ranges from 19 basis points to 60 basis points over
LIBOR/EURIBOR/Bankers Acceptance Stamping Fee, as applicable (40 basis points
over LIBOR/EURIBOR/Bankers Acceptance Stamping Fee at December 31, 2008).
Additionally, interest on borrowings denominated in Canadian dollars may accrue
at the greater of the Canadian prime rate or the CDOR rate. The Company pays
quarterly facility fees to maintain the availability under the Multi-Currency
Revolving Credit Facility at specified rates based on the Company's debt rating,
ranging from 6 basis points to 15 basis points of the total commitment (10 basis
points at December 31, 2008). The Company may choose to repay or reduce its
commitments under the Multi-Currency Revolving Credit Facility at any time. The
Multi-Currency Revolving Credit Facility contains covenants, including
compliance with a financial leverage ratio test, as well as others that impose
limitations on, among other things, indebtedness of excluded subsidiaries and
asset sales.
The Company has a $975 million receivables securitization facility ("Receivables
Securitization Facility"), of which $181.2 million expires in June 2009 and
$793.8 million expires in November 2009. The Company has available to it an
accordion feature whereby the commitment may be increased, subject to lender
approval, for seasonal needs during the December and March quarters. Effective
January 2, 2009, the Company increased its availability by $152 million under
the accordion feature. Interest rates are based on prevailing market rates for
short-term commercial paper plus a program fee, and vary based on the Company's
debt ratings. The program fee and the commitment fee, on average, were 53 basis
points and 20 basis points, respectively, at December 31, 2008. At December 31,
2008, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Receivables Securitization
Facility.
The Blanco revolving credit facility (the "Blanco Credit Facility") is not
classified in the current portion of long-term debt on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2008 because the Company has the
ability and intent to refinance it on a long-term basis. Borrowings under the
Blanco Credit Facility are guaranteed by the Company. Interest on borrowings
under the Blanco Credit Facility accrues at specific rates based on the
Company's debt rating (55 basis points over LIBOR at December 31, 2008).
Additionally, the Company pays quarterly facility fees on the full amount of the
facility to maintain the availability under the Blanco Credit Facility at
specific rates based on the Company's debt rating (10 basis points at
December 31, 2008).
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations (Continued)
The Company's operating results have generated cash flow, which, together with
availability under its debt agreements and credit terms from suppliers, has
provided sufficient capital resources to finance working capital and cash
operating requirements, and to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions,
repayment of debt, the payment of interest on outstanding debt, dividends, and
repurchases of shares of the Company's common stock.
Recent deterioration in general economic conditions could adversely affect the
amount of prescriptions that are filled and the amount of pharmaceutical
products purchased by consumers and, therefore, reduce purchases by our
customers. In addition, volatility in financial markets may also negatively
impact our customers' ability to obtain credit to finance their businesses on
acceptable terms. Reduced purchases by our customers or changes in the ability
of our customers to remit payments to us as required could adversely affect our
revenue growth, our profitablity, and our cash flow from operations.
. . .
|
|