|
Quotes & Info
|
| CVGW > SEC Filings for CVGW > Form 10-K on 14-Jan-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
14-Jan-2009
Annual Report
Net sales of frozen products represented approximately 64% and 63% of total
processed segment sales for the years ended October 31, 2008 and 2007. Net sales
of our ultra high pressure products represented approximately 36 % and 37% of
total processed segment sales for the years ended October 31, 2008 and 2007.
Our Fresh Products business is highly seasonal and is characterized by crop
volume and price changes. Furthermore, the operating results of all of our
businesses, including our processed products business, have been, and will
continue to be, affected by substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations and
market downturns due to a number of factors, such as pests and disease, weather
patterns, changes in demand by consumers, the timing of the receipt, reduction,
or cancellation of significant customer orders, the gain or loss of significant
customers, market acceptance of our products, our ability to develop, introduce,
and market new products on a timely basis, availability and cost of avocados and
supplies from growers and vendors, new product introductions by our competitors,
change in the mix of avocados and processed products we sell, and general
economic conditions. We believe, however, that we are currently positioned to
address these risks and deliver favorable operating results for the foreseeable
future.
Recent Developments
Dividend Payment
On December 23, 2008, we paid a $0.35 per share dividend in the aggregate
amount of $5.0 million to shareholders of record on December 9, 2008.
Fresh Packinghouse acquisition
Effective July 2008, we purchased our previously leased fresh avocado
packinghouse located in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico for $4.0 million, plus
acquisition costs. We recorded approximately $0.9 million and $3.1 million in
land and buildings and improvements related to this transaction. The building is
currently being depreciated over a 40-year period.
Capital Lease
In April 2008, we entered into a capital lease for various fixed assets
related to our Swedesboro, New Jersey facility. Such fixed assets are included
in buildings and improvements and equipment at October 31, 2008, totaling
$0.6 million and $0.5 million. Depreciation expense was $2.1 million,
$2.0 million and $1.9 million for fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006, of which
$0.1 million was related to depreciation on capital leases. We did not have any
significant capital leases as of October 31, 2007.
Contingencies
Hacienda Suit - We are currently under examination by the Mexican tax
authorities (Hacienda) for the tax year ended December 31, 2000 and December 31,
2004. We have received assessments totaling approximately $2.0 million and
$4.5 million from Hacienda related to the amount of income at our Mexican
subsidiary. Subsequent to that initial assessment, the Hacienda offered a
settlement of approximately $400,000 related to the tax year 2000 assessment,
which we declined. Based primarily on discussions with legal counsel and the
evaluation of our claim, we maintain our belief that the Hacienda's position has
no merit and that we will prevail. Accordingly, no amounts have been provided
for in the financial statements as of October 31, 2008. We pledged our processed
products building located in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico as collateral to
Hacienda in regards to this assessment.
IRS examination - We are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue
Service for the year ended October 31, 2005. We do not believe that the
settlement of such examination will have a material adverse impact on our
financial statements.
From time to time, we are also involved in litigation arising in the ordinary
course of our business that we do not believe will have a material adverse
impact on our financial statements.
Term Revolving Credit Agreement
In May 2008, we entered into a Term Revolving Credit Agreement (the
"Agreement") with Farm Credit West, PCA. Under the terms of the Agreement, we
are advanced funds for the purchase and installation of capital items and other
corporate needs of the Company. Total credit available under the Agreement,
which expires in February 2012, is now $30 million, up from $20 million. The
credit facility contains various financial covenants, the most significant
relating to working capital, tangible net worth (as defined), and Earnings
Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined). We
were in compliance with all such covenants at October 31, 2008.
Business Acquisitions
Calavo and Lecil E. Cole, Suzanne Cole-Savard, Guy Cole, Eric Weinert, and
Lecil E. Cole and Mary Jeanette Cole, as trustees of the Lecil E. and Mary
Jeanette Cole Revocable Trust dated October 19, 1993 (the "Cole Trust")
(collectively, the "Sellers"), have entered into an Acquisition Agreement, dated
May 19, 2008 (the "Acquisition Agreement"), which sets forth the terms and
conditions pursuant to which Calavo purchased all of the outstanding shares of
Hawaiian Sweet, Inc. ("HS") and all ownership interests of Hawaiian Pride, LLC
("HP"). HS and HP engage in tropical-product packing and processing operations
in Hawaii. The Acquisition Agreement provides, among other things, that as a
result of the Acquisition Agreement, Calavo shall make an initial purchase price
payment in the aggregate amount of $3,500,000 for both entities. Calavo made the
initial payment on May 20, 2008. Calavo shall also make two additional annual
payments, ranging from $2,500,000 to $4,500,000, based on certain operating
results (the "Earn-Out Payment(s)"), as defined. Mr. Cole is President, Chief
Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Calavo. Pursuant to
SFAS 141, Business Combinations, we recorded approximately $7.1 million as a
liability related to deferred and contingent consideration to the Sellers, of
which $3.6 million was recorded in accrued expenses, $3.5 million is recorded in
long-term obligations, less current portion, and $0.6 million as deferred tax
liabilities. Total liabilities recorded as a result of the acquisition was
$7.7 million.
The first Earn-Out Payment to be made by Calavo will be adjusted if the
aggregate working capital ("WC") of HS and HP does not equal $700,000 as of the
closing date. In the event that WC is less than $700,000, Calavo shall reduce
its first Earn-Out payment by an amount equal to the difference between $700,000
and the closing date aggregate working capital of HS and HP. In the event that
WC is greater than $700,000, Calavo shall increase its first Earn-Out payment by
an amount equal to the difference between $700,000 and the closing date
aggregate working capital of HS and HP.
Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, the transaction closed on May 30,
2008.
Concurrently with the execution of the Acquisition Agreement, Calavo and the
Cole Trust have entered into an Agreement and Escrow Instructions for Purchase
and Sale of Real Property (the "Real Estate Contract"), dated the same date as
the acquisition agreement, pursuant to which Calavo purchased from the Cole
Trust approximately 727 acres of agricultural land located in Pahoa, Hawaii for
a purchase price of $1,500,000, which Calavo delivered on May 19, 2008. The Real
Estate Contract also closed on May 30, 2008.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in thousands). We
obtained third-party valuations for the long-term assets acquired and incurred
approximately $0.2 million in acquisition costs.
At May 30, 2008
Current assets $ 1,498
Property, plant, and equipment 10,947
Intangible assets 1,310
Total assets acquired 13,755
Current liabilities (809 )
Deferred tax liabilities (654 )
Net assets acquired 12,292
Deferred consideration (4,709 )
Contingent consideration (2,358 )
Net cash paid as of May 30, 2008 $ 5,225
|
Of the $1,310,000 of intangible assets, $1,140,000 was assigned to customer
contract/relationships with a weighted average life of 8 years, $100,000 to
trade names with an average life of 8 years and $70,000 to non-competition
agreements with an average life of 3 years.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires
us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we re-evaluate all of
our estimates, including those related to the areas of customer and grower
receivables, inventories, useful lives of property, plant and equipment,
promotional allowances, income taxes,
retirement benefits, and commitments and contingencies. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are
not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may materially differ
from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions as additional
information becomes available in future periods.
Management has discussed the development and selection of critical accounting
estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Audit
Committee has reviewed our disclosure relating to critical accounting estimates
in this Annual Report.
We believe the following are the more significant judgments and estimates
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Promotional allowances. We provide for promotional allowances at the time of
sale, based on our historical experience. Our estimates are generally based on
evaluating the relationship between promotional allowances and gross sales. The
derived percentage is then applied to the current period's sales revenues in
order to arrive at the appropriate debit to sales allowances for the period. The
offsetting credit is made to accrued liabilities. When certain amounts of
specific customer accounts are subsequently identified as promotional, they are
written off against this allowance. Actual amounts may differ from these
estimates and such differences are recognized as an adjustment to net sales in
the period they are identified. A 1% change in the derived percentage would
impact results of operations by approximately $0.1 million.
Income Taxes. We account for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This statement requires the recognition of
deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future consequences of events that
have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax returns.
Measurement of the deferred items is based on enacted tax laws. In the event the
future consequences of differences between financial reporting bases and tax
bases of our assets and liabilities result in a deferred tax asset, SFAS No. 109
requires an evaluation of the probability of being able to realize the future
benefits indicated by such asset. A valuation allowance related to a deferred
tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
In November 2008, we adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which
provides a financial statement recognition threshold and measurement attribute
for a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Under FIN 48,
a company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if
it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on
examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the
position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a
position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than
50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
As a multinational corporation, we are subject to taxation in many
jurisdictions, and the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in various
taxing jurisdictions. If we ultimately determine that the payment of these
liabilities will be unnecessary, the liability will be reversed and we will
recognize a tax benefit during the period in which it is determined the
liability no longer applies. Conversely, we record additional tax charges in a
period in which it is determined that a recorded tax liability is less than the
ultimate assessment is expected to be.
The application of tax laws and regulations is subject to legal and factual
interpretation, judgment and uncertainty. Tax laws and regulations themselves
are subject to change as a result of changes in fiscal policy, changes in
legislation, the evolution of regulations and court rulings. Therefore, the
actual liability for U.S. or foreign taxes may be materially different from
management's estimates, which could result in the need to record additional tax
liabilities or potentially reverse previously recorded tax liabilities.
FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition of income tax assets and
liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and
liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax
positions, and income tax disclosures. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a
material impact on our financial position and results of operations. See Note
10. Prior to fiscal 2008, we recorded estimated income tax liabilities to the
extent they were probable and could be reasonably estimated.
Goodwill and acquired intangible assets. Goodwill is tested for impairment on
an annual basis and between annual tests whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, in
accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under SFAS
No. 142, goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an
operating segment or one level below the operating segment. Goodwill impairment
testing is a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test,
used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting
unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a
reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is
considered not impaired, and the second step of the impairment test would be
unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair
value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed to
measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill
impairment test, used to measure the amount of impairment loss, compares the
implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that
goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss must be recognized in an amount
equal to that excess. Goodwill impairment testing requires significant judgment
and management estimates, including, but not limited to, the determination of
(i) the number of reporting units, (ii) the goodwill and other assets and
liabilities to be allocated to the reporting units and (iii) the fair values of
the reporting units. The estimates and assumptions described above, along with
other factors such as discount rates, will significantly affect the outcome of
the impairment tests and the amounts of any resulting impairment losses. We
performed our annual assessment of goodwill and determined that no impairment
existed as of October 31, 2008.
Allowance for accounts receivable. We provide an allowance for estimated
uncollectible accounts receivable balances based on historical experience and
the aging of the related accounts receivable. If the financial condition of our
customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to
make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain items from our consolidated statements
of income, expressed as percentages of our total net sales, for the periods
indicated:
Year ended October 31,
2008 2007 2006
Net sales 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
Gross margins 9.2 % 10.5 % 10.6 %
Selling, general and administrative 5.8 % 6.5 % 7.2 %
Operating income 3.4 % 4.0 % 3.4 %
Interest Income 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.1 %
Interest Expense (0.4 )% (0.4 )% (0.3 )%
Other income, net 0.2 % 0.2 % 0.2 %
Net income 2.1 % 2.4 % 2.1 %
|
Net Sales
We believe that the fundamentals for our products continue to be favorable.
Firstly, Americans are eating more avocados. Over the last 10 years, United
States (U.S.) consumption of avocados has expanded at a 9% compound annual
growth rate and we do not anticipate this growth significantly changing. We
believe that the healthy eating trend that has been developing in the United
States contributes to such growth, as avocados, which are cholesterol and sodium
free, are dense in fiber, vitamin B6, antioxidants, potassium, folate, and
contain unsaturated fat, which help lower cholesterol. Also, a growing number of
research studies seem to suggest that phytonutrients, which avocados are rich
in, help fight chronic illnesses, such as heart disease and cancer.
Additionally, we believe that the demographic changes in the U.S. will
greatly impact the consumption of avocados and avocado-based products. The
Hispanic community currently accounts for approximately 15% of the U.S.
population, and the total number of Hispanics is estimated to triple by the year
2050. Avocados are considered a staple item purchased by Hispanic consumers, as
the per-capita avocado consumption in Mexico is estimated to be more than
seven-fold that of the U.S.
We anticipate avocado products will further penetrate the United States
marketplace driven by growth in the Hispanic community and general acceptance in
American cuisine. As the largest marketer of avocado products in the United
States, we believe that we are well positioned to leverage this trend and to
grow all segments of our business. Additionally, we also believe that avocados
and avocado based products will further penetrate other marketplaces that we
currently operate in, as interest in avocados continues to expand.
In October 2002, the USDA announced the creation of a Hass Avocado Board to
promote the sale of Hass variety avocados in the U.S. marketplace. This board
provides a basis for a unified funding of promotional activities based on an
assessment on all avocados sold in the U.S. marketplace, including imported and
California grown fruit. The California Avocado Commission, which receives its
funding from California avocado growers, has historically shouldered the
promotional and advertising costs supporting avocado sales. We believe that the
incremental funding of promotional and advertising programs in the U.S. will, in
the long term, positively impact average selling prices and will favorably
impact our California avocado and international avocado businesses. During
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, on behalf of avocado growers, we remitted
approximately $2.2 million, $1.7 million and $1.7 million to the California
Avocado Commission. During fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, we remitted approximately
$2.2 million, $2.2 million and $4.7 million to the Hass Avocado Board related to
California avocados.
Sales of products and related costs of products sold are recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price
is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Service
revenue, including freight, ripening, storage, bagging and palletization
charges, is recorded when services are performed and sales of the related
products are delivered. We provide for sales returns and promotional allowances
at the time of shipment, based on our experience. The following table summarizes
our net sales by business segment:
2008 Change 2007 Change 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
Net sales:
Fresh products $ 315,667 20.8 % $ 261,325 10.3 % $ 236,889
Processed products 45,807 10.0 % 41,659 13.1 % 36,834
Total net sales $ 361,474 19.3 % $ 302,984 10.7 % $ 273,723
As a percentage of net sales:
Fresh products 87.3 % 86.3 % 86.5 %
Processed products 12.7 % 13.7 % 13.5 %
100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
|
Net sales for the year ended October 31, 2008, when compared to 2007, . . .
|
|