|
Quotes & Info
|
| COIN > SEC Filings for COIN > Form 10-Q on 19-Nov-2008 | All Recent SEC Filings |
19-Nov-2008
Quarterly Report
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes to the consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements that relate to future events or our future financial performance.
These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of
activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based largely
on our current expectations and are subject to a number of uncertainties and
risks including the Risk Factors identified in our Annual Report on Form
10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007. Actual results could differ
materially from these forward-looking statements. Converted Organics Inc. is
sometimes referred to herein as "we", "us", "our" and the "Company".
Introduction
Our operating structure is composed of our parent company, Converted Organics
Inc., and three operating subsidiaries. The first is Converted Organics of
Woodbridge, LLC, which includes the start up operation of our Woodbridge, NJ
facility, second, Converted Organics of California, LLC, which includes the
operating activity of our Gonzales, CA facility and third, Converted Organics of
Rhode Island, LLC which was formed in July 2008 for the purpose of designing,
financing and building a Rhode Island facility. Converted Organics Inc.
transitioned from a development stage company in the second quarter of 2008 (as
operations have commenced and we recorded revenues of approximately $1,200,000
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008) to an operating company that
constructs and operates processing facilities that will use food waste as raw
material to manufacture all-natural soil amendment products combining
nutritional and disease suppression characteristics. In addition to our current
sales in the agribusiness market, we plan to sell and distribute our products in
the turf management and retail markets. We have hired experienced sales
personnel in these markets and have begun to introduce the product to the
marketplace.
Woodbridge Facility
We obtained a long-term lease for a site in a portion of an industrial
building in Woodbridge, New Jersey that was modified and equipped as our first
internally constructed organic waste conversion facility. Operations began in
late June of 2008 at the Woodbridge facility and currently we are processing
both liquid and solid waste and we are producing a liquid fertilizer and soil
enhancement product. Construction is still in process on certain aspects of the
facility and as of the filing of this report we are not producing any solid
product. We expect to produce solid product by the end of December 2008, and our
plan is to produce and store the solid product for sale into the retail market
in the spring of 2009. We feel that this strategy will produce a favorable
selling price for the dry product. When fully operational, the Woodbridge
facility is expected to process approximately 78,000 tons of organic food waste
and produce approximately 7,500 tons of dry product and 6,700 tons of liquid
product annually. During the first four to six months of operations at our
Woodbridge facility, we expect to incur operating losses and we may not generate
sufficient cash to pay for the anticipated operating expenses. We plan to use
funds we have already received from the exercise of Class A warrants to fund the
working capital requirements at that facility until it becomes cash flow
positive. We feel that there will be sufficient production of liquid product
that, when sold, will allow the plant to be cash flow positive even though we
plan to inventory the dry product until spring 2009.
UOP Acquisition; Gonzales Facility
On January 24, 2008, we acquired the net assets of United Organic Products,
LLC ("UOP"), which was under common ownership with Waste Recovery Industries,
LLC ("WRI"). With this acquisition, we acquired a leading liquid fertilizer
product line, as well as the Gonzales facility, which is a state-of-the-art
production facility that services a strong West Coast agribusiness customer base
through established distribution channels. This facility is operational and
began to generate revenues for us in February 2008. The purchase price of
$2,500,000 was paid in cash of $1,500,000 and notes payable of $1,000,000. The
note matures on February 1, 2011, has an interest rate of 7% per annum, is
payable monthly in arrears, and is convertible into our common stock six months
after the acquisition date for a price equal to the average closing price of our
common stock on NASDAQ for the five days preceding conversion.
The Gonzales facility generated revenue during the first nine months of 2008
of approximately $1,169,000. These sales, however, resulted in a negative
operating margin of approximately $88,000. This negative margin is due primarily
to low sales in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 due to the seasonality of
agricultural sales in California during the summer months. Our plan to improve
operating margins consists of channeling sales into the profitable turf and
retail markets and by generating tip fees from receiving additional quantities
of food waste. In addition, we plan to add capacity to the Gonzales plant during
2008 and 2009, whereby the plant will produce approximately three times its
current production and will be capable of producing both liquid and solid
products. Completion of the plant expansion is dependent on our ability to raise
additional capital which is further discussed in the liquidity and capital
resources section. We expect that the cash flow generated from the Gonzales
facility will be sufficient to sustain its operation regardless of whether we
are able to increase capacity. If capacity is increased, we expect the cash flow
from the Gonzales facility to offset some of the losses we expect to incur in
connection with the start-up and ramp-up of the production capacity at the
Woodbridge facility and remainder of the Company's operations. However, the cash
flow will not be sufficient to offset all of the anticipated losses.
WRI Acquisition
On January 24, 2008, we acquired the assets, including the intellectual
property, of WRI. This acquisition makes us the exclusive owner of the
proprietary technology and process known as the High Temperature Liquid
Composting ("HTLC") system, which processes various biodegradable waste products
into liquid and solid organic-based fertilizer and feed products. The purchase
price of $500,000 was paid with a 7% short-term note that matured and was repaid
on May 1, 2008. Interest on that note was paid monthly. In addition, the
purchase agreement provides for a technology fee payment of $5,500 per ton of
waste-processing capacity that is added to plants that were not planned at the
time of this acquisition and that use this new technology. The per-ton fee is
not payable on the Woodbridge facility, the facility that is being planned in
Rhode Island, or the Gonzales facility acquired in the acquisition or the
currently planned addition thereto, except to the extent that capacity (in
excess of the currently planned addition) is added to the Gonzales facility in
the future. Also, the purchase agreement provides that if we decide to exercise
our right, obtained in the WRI acquisition, to enter into a joint venture with
Pacific Seafood Inc. for the development of a fish waste-processing product (the
"Eureka product"), we will pay 50% of our net profits earned from this Eureka
product to the seller of WRI. Combined payments of both the $5,500 per ton
technology fee and the profits paid from the Eureka product, if any, is capped
at $7.0 million with no minimum payment required. In April 2008, we entered into
an agreement with Pacific Seafoods Inc. whereby we will pay Pacific Seafoods
Inc. 50% of the net profits from the Eureka product. As of the filing date of
this report no profits have been earned from the Eureka product. It is our
intention to expense the payments, if any, that are paid on either the profits
from the Eureka product or the $5,500 per ton technology fee, as they are paid
or become due.
Rhode Island Facility
As of the filing of this report, the Rhode Island Industrial Facilities
Corporation has provided initial approval to the Company's Revenue Bond
Financing Application for up to $15 million for the construction of the new
facility. In addition, the Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation ("RIRRC")
gave us final approval to lease nine acres of land in the newly created Lakeside
Commerce Industrial Park in Johnston, RI. We previously filed an application
with the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management for the operation
of a Putrescible Waste Recycling Center at that site. On September 1, 2008, we
entered into a twenty year ground lease with the RIRRC under which we are
obligated to pay $9,167 per month, plus $8 per ton of fertilizer (liquid or
solid) sold from the facility.
January 2008 Financing
Also, on January 24, 2008, we entered into a private financing with three
investors (the "Investors") for a total amount of $4,500,000 (the "Financing").
The Financing was offered at an original issue discount of 10%. We used the
proceeds to fund the acquisitions described above, to fund further development
activities and to provide working capital. As consideration for the Financing,
the Investors received a note issued by the Company in the amount of $4,500,000,
with interest accruing at 10% per annum to be paid monthly and with the
principal balance to be paid by January 24, 2009 (the "Note"). In addition, we
issued to the Investors 750,000 Class A Warrants and 750,000 Class B Warrants,
which may be exercised at $8.25 and $11.00 per warrant share, respectively (the
"Warrants"). A placement fee of $225,000 was paid from the proceeds of this
loan.
In connection with the Financing, we agreed to have a shareholder vote to
seek approval to issue a convertible debenture in exchange for the Note with an
interest rate of 10% per annum, which would be convertible into common stock
(the "Convertible Debenture"). In April 2008, we received shareholder approval
and the Note was replaced by the Convertible Debenture and one half of each of
the Class A Warrants and of the Class B Warrants issued to the Investors were
returned to the Company.
The Convertible Debenture provides the Investors the option, at any time on
or before the maturity date of January 24, 2009, to convert the outstanding
principal of this Convertible Debenture into our common stock at the conversion
price equal to the lowest of (i) the fixed conversion price of $6.00 per share,
(ii) the lowest price, conversion price or exercise price set by the Company in
any equity financing transaction, convertible security, or derivative instrument
issued after January 24, 2008, or (iii) the default conversion price, which is,
if and so long as there exists an event of default, then 70% of the average of
the three lowest closing prices of common stock during the twenty day trading
period immediately prior to the notice of conversion.
In connection with the financing, we entered into a registration rights
agreement with the Investors, which called for the Company to register the
securities within certain time periods. We have filed the required registration
statements and such registration statements have been declared effective.
However, the registration statement filed for the convertible debt and the date
the warrant registration statement was declared effective by the SEC did not
occur within the timelines agreed to in the registration rights agreement. The
registration rights agreement called for $90,000 per month in liquidated
damages, payable in cash, if we did not file the registration statement for the
Convertible Debenture and liquidated
damages equal to the average closing price of 375,000 Class A warrants and
375,000 Class B warrants for each 30 day period, commencing May 13, 2008, and
multiplying that average by 2% for every month that the registration statement
was not declared effective.
Therefore, on April 24, 2008, we began to incur liquidated damages in
connection with the Convertible Debenture of $90,000 per month and as of May 13,
2008, we began to incur liquidated damage obligations in connection with the
Warrants according to the formula described above. We paid a total of
approximately $102,000 in liquidated damages related to the Convertible
Debentures. On June 7, 2008 the warrant registration statement was declared
effective and we paid an additional $56,000 in liquidated damages as a result of
the effective date going past the date agreed to in the registration rights
agreement. At this time, we are not subject to further liquidated damages.
Also in connection with this financing, we entered into a Security Agreement
with the Investors, whereby we granted the Investors a security interest in
Converted Organics of California, LLC and any and all assets that are acquired
by the use of funds from the Financing. In addition, we granted the Investors a
security interest in Converted Organics of Woodbridge, LLC and all assets
subordinate only to the current lien held by the holder of the bonds issued in
connection with the Woodbridge facility of approximately $17,500,000.
Pro Forma Financial Information
The unaudited supplemental pro forma information discloses the results of
operations for the current fiscal year up to the date of the most recent interim
period presented (and for the corresponding period in the preceding year) as
though the business combination had been completed as of the beginning of the
period reported on.
The pro forma condensed consolidated financial information is based upon
available information and certain assumptions that the Company believes are
reasonable. The unaudited supplemental pro forma information does not purport to
represent what the Company's financial condition or results of operations would
actually have been had these transactions in fact occurred as of the dates
indicated above or to project the Company's results of operations for the period
indicated or for any other period.
Nine months ending September 30,
2008 2007
Revenues (in thousands) $ 1,181 $ 1,067
Net loss (in thousands) (11,621 ) (3,647 )
Net loss per share - basic and diluted (2.21 ) (1.11 )
|
Construction and Start-up Period
We have commenced plant operations at our Woodbridge facility. Our process
engineer, Weston Solutions, Inc., has completed the design, mass balance, energy
balance, and process flow drawings for the Woodbridge facility. This work formed
the basis for soliciting bids for a guaranteed maximum price contract for the
construction of the Woodbridge facility. In addition, our management team has
been focused primarily on constructing the Woodbridge facility, conducting
start-up trials and bringing operations to full-scale production as quickly as
practicable. Operations began in late June of 2008 at the Woodbridge facility
and currently we are processing liquid and solid waste and we are producing a
liquid
fertilizer and soil enhancement product. Construction is still in process on
certain aspects of the facility and as of the filing of this report we are not
producing any solid product. We expect to produce solid product by the end of
December, 2008. We have budgeted approximately $14.6 million for the design,
building, and testing of our facility, including related non-recurring
engineering costs. The capital outlay of $14.6 million has and will come from
the $25.4 million raised by our initial public offering of stock and the
issuance of New Jersey Economic Development Bonds, both of which closed on
February 16, 2007 and does not include $4.6 million of lease financing provided
by the New Jersey landlord.
As of September 30, 2008, we have incurred approximately $10.6 million of the
$14.6 million in planned construction costs. The total cost is expected to
exceed the estimate of $14.6 million by approximately $1 million (which does not
include $4.6 million of lease financing) also, we currently plan to purchase
additional equipment, which would allow us to produce additional product, which
is in high demand by the retail market. The estimated cost of this additional
equipment would be approximately $1.5 million. Also, we have decided to
incorporate the HTLC technology acquired from WRI into the Woodbridge facility.
We estimate that these costs could be approximately $3.0 million dollars,
bringing the total plant cost to $20.1 million, not including lease financing.
Installation of the HTLC technology and additional equipment is dependent on our
ability to raise additional capital which is further discussed in the liquidity
and capital resources section. The purpose of adding the HTLC technology to the
Woodbridge facility is two fold: first it will significantly lower operating
costs, most notably utility costs as the need to evaporate significant amounts
of liquid byproduct would no longer be necessary, and two, the non evaporated
liquid by product can be used in the production process and sold as additional
product.
Full-scale Operations
Operations at the Woodbridge facility are expected to achieve the initial
design capacity of approximately 250 tons per day within four to six months
following commencement of operations. Upon commencement of operations, there
will be two revenue streams: (i) tip fees that in our potential markets range
from $50 to $100 per ton, and (ii) product sales. Tip fees are paid to us to
receive the organic waste stream from the waste hauler; the hauler pays us,
instead of a landfill, to take the waste. If the haulers source separate and pay
in advance, they will be charged tip fees that are up to 20% below market.
Operations are expected to be stabilized at design capacity within four to six
months of commencement.
Operations at the Gonzales facility began in February 2008, with the
production of approximately 25 tons per day of liquid fertilizer. This output is
presently being sold into the California agricultural market.
Future Development
Subject to the availability of development capital for which we have no
current commitments, we intend to commence development and construction of other
facilities while completing construction of our Woodbridge facility. Assuming
needed capital is available, the timing of our next facility is dependent on
many factors, including locating property suited for our use, negotiating
favorable terms for lease or purchase, obtaining regulatory approvals, and
procuring raw material at favorable prices.
We anticipate that our next facility will be located in Rhode Island. We have
signed a ground lease with the Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation for a
proposed facility in Johnston, Rhode Island. Other locations in Massachusetts
and New York, as well as other states, will be considered as determined by
management.
In each contemplated market, we have started development activity to secure a
facility location. We have also held preliminary discussions with state and
local regulatory officials and raw material suppliers. We believe that this
preliminary development work will allow us to develop and operate a third
facility by the end of 2009, subject to the availability of debt financing for
which we have no current commitments. We believe we will be able to use much of
the engineering and design work done for our Woodbridge facility for subsequent
facilities, thus reducing both the time and costs associated with these
activities. We expect to form a separate wholly owned subsidiary for each
facility to facilitate necessary bond financing and manage risk.
Trends and Uncertainties Affecting our Operations
We will be subject to a number of factors that may affect our operations and
financial performance. These factors include, but are not limited to, the
available supply and price of organic food waste, the market for liquid
concentrate and solid organic fertilizer, increasing energy costs, the
unpredictable cost of compliance with environmental and other government
regulation, and the time and cost of obtaining USDA, state or other product
labeling designations. Demand for organic fertilizer and the resulting prices
customers are willing to pay also may not be as high as our market studies
suggest. In addition, supply of organic fertilizer products from the use of
other technologies or other competitors may adversely affect our selling prices
and consequently our overall profitability.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2008, we had total current assets of approximately $4.2
million consisting primarily of cash, restricted cash, and prepaid assets, and
had current liabilities of approximately $8.8 million, consisting primarily of
accounts payable, accrued expenses and notes payable leaving us with negative
working capital of approximately $4.6 million. Non-current assets totaled $26.9
million and consisted primarily of restricted cash, construction in process and
property and equipment. Non-current liabilities consist primarily of notes
payable of $667,000 and bonds payable of $17,500,000 at September 30, 2008. We
have an accumulated deficit at September 30, 2008 of approximately $22 million.
Owners' equity at September 30, 2008 was approximately $4.2 million. For the
first nine months of 2008, we generated revenues from operations of
approximately $1.2 million. Prior to 2008, the Company had no revenues.
We issued 1,800,000 Class A warrants as part of our initial public offering.
We also issued an additional 293,629 Class A warrants and 375,000 Class A
warrants as part of the February 16, 2007 and January 24, 2008 financings,
respectively. The exercise price of each Class A warrant was $8.25 per share. In
the first nine months of 2008, 756,000 of the Class A warrants were voluntarily
exercised, providing us with approximately $6.1 million in cash. The remaining
Class A warrants (1,029,609 from the initial public offering, 293,629 from the
February 2007 financing, and 375,000 from the January 2008 financing) were
redeemable at the Company's option, at a redemption price of $0.25 per warrant.
We were required to provide 30 days' prior written notice to the Class A warrant
holders of our intention to redeem the warrants. On September 16, 2008, we
notified warrant holders that we were calling the Class A warrants for
redemption, and unless the warrants were exercised prior to the redemption date,
we would redeem them for $0.25 per warrant. We subsequently extended the
redemption date to November 14, 2008.
In connection with the redemption, we received proceeds of approximately $5.5 million upon the exercise of approximately 673,000 Class A warrants. The remaining Class A Warrants (approximately 1.0 million) will be redeemed by us for $0.25 each and will no longer be exercisable into shares of common stock. We also issued 1,800,000 Class B warrants as part of our initial public offering, and 293,629 Class B warrants and 375,000 Class B warrants as part of the February 16, 2007 and January 24, 2008 financings, respectively, all of which have the same expiration date as the Class A warrants, which is February 16, 2012. The Class B warrants are not redeemable by the Company and, as such, we . . .
|
|