This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements" that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include any expectations relating to earnings,

revenues or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; factors that may affect our operating results; statements concerning new products or services; statements related to future capital expenditures; statements related to future economic conditions or performance; statements as to industry trends and other matters that do not relate strictly to historical facts or statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. These statements are often identified by the use of words such as "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," or "will," and similar expressions or variations. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management based on information currently available to them. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the impact of current and future regulation affecting the telecommunications industry; technological developments; the effects of competition; natural or man-made disaster; the impact of current or future litigation; the ability to attract, develop and retain executives and other qualified employees; the ability to obtain and protect intellectual property rights; changes in general economic or market conditions; and other important factors, including those discussed in the section titled "Risk Factors" included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008. Furthermore, such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Overview

We provide tandem interconnection services principally to competitive carriers, including wireless, wireline, cable and broadband telephony providers. Competitive carriers use tandem switches to interconnect and exchange traffic between their networks without the need to establish direct switch-to-switch connections. Prior to the introduction of our service, the primary method for competitive carriers to exchange traffic was through the use of the incumbent local exchange carriers, or ILEC's, tandem switches. Under certain interpretations of the Telecommunications Act, ILECs are required to provide tandem switching to competitive carriers. For tandem transit services, ILECs generally set per minute rates and other charges according to mandated rate schedules (including varying rates) set by state public utility commissions. Our solution enables competitive carriers to exchange traffic between their networks without using an ILEC tandem.

The proliferation of competitive carriers over the past decade and their capture of an increasing share of subscribers shifted a greater amount of intercarrier traffic to ILEC tandem switches and amplified the complexity of carrier interconnections. This resulted in additional traffic loading of ILEC tandems, lower service quality and substantial costs incurred by competitive carriers for interconnection. A loss of ILEC market share to competitive carriers escalated competitive tensions and resulted in an increased demand for tandem switching.

We founded our company to solve these interconnection problems and better facilitate the exchange of traffic among competitive carriers and non-carriers. By utilizing our managed tandem solution, our customers benefit from a simplified interconnection network solution which reduces costs, increases network reliability, decreases competitive tension and adds network diversity and redundancy.

We have signed agreements with major competitive carriers and non-carriers and we operate in 91 markets as of September 30, 2008. During the third quarter of 2008, our network carried 15.9 billion minutes of traffic. As of September 30, 2008, our network was capable of connecting calls to an estimated 372 million telephone numbers assigned to carriers. As the telecommunications market share continues to shift from traditional ILEC access lines to competitive carriers, we believe we will have access to an expanding market. We believe that our neutral tandem network and its size and scale will provide us with opportunities to enter new markets, increase market share with current customers and attract new customers.

For the three month period ended September 30, 2008, we increased revenue to $31.2 million; an increase of 38.1%, compared to $22.6 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2007. The increase in revenue was primarily due to an increase of minutes of use to 15.9 billion minutes processed in the three months ended September 30, 2008 from 10.7 billion minutes processed in the three months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of 48.6%. For the three month period ended September 30, 2008, our income from operations was $8.8 million compared to $4.4 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2007. For the three month period ended September 30, 2008, our net income was $6.2 million compared to $2.0 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2007.

For the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, we increased revenue to $86.0 million; an increase of 41.7%, compared to $60.7 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2007. The increase in revenue was primarily due to an increase of minutes of use to 42.9 billion minutes processed in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from 29.2 billion minutes processed in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of 46.9%. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, our income

from operations was $23.4 million compared to $11.4 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2007. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, our net income was $15.8 million compared to $4.5 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2007.

Financial Operation Overview

Revenue

We generate revenue from the sale of our tandem interconnection services. Revenue is recorded each month on an accrual basis based upon minutes of traffic switched by our network by each customer, which we refer to as minutes of use. The rates charged per minute are determined by contract between us and our customers or our tariff. The following table sets forth our revenue, minutes of use and the average rate we charged per minute for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

                                            Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                              September 30,            September 30,
                                             2008         2007        2008        2007
    Revenue (in thousands)                $    31,154   $ 22,617   $   85,958   $ 60,740
    Minutes of use billed (in millions)        15,855     10,745       42,936     29,208
    Average fee per billed minute         $    0.0020   $ 0.0021   $   0.0020   $ 0.0021

Minutes of use increase as we increase our number of customers, enter new markets and increase the penetration of existing markets, either with new customers or with existing customers. The minutes of use decrease due to direct connection between existing customers and consolidation between customers, or a customer using a different interconnection provider.

The average fee per minute varies depending on market forces and type of service. The market rate in each market is based upon competitive conditions along with the local transit rates offered by the ILECs. Depending on the markets we enter, we may enter into contracts with our customers with either a higher or lower fee per minute than our current average. For example, although we regard the 27 additional markets we added during the first nine months of 2008 and the 30 additional markets added in 2007 as financially attractive, the rates we charge in those markets are generally lower than the rates we charge in the markets we initially opened in 2004. We expect the average fee per billed minute to continue to decrease as we add new markets with lower fees per minute than our current average. Although we expect that the total number of minutes switched by our network will increase as we enter new markets, our revenues would decrease if our average fee per minute were to continue to decline and we were unable to increase the total number of minutes switched by our network.

Our service solution incorporates other components beyond switching. In addition to switching, we often provision trunk circuits between our customers' switches and our network locations at our own expense and at no direct cost to our customers. We also provide quality of service monitoring, call records and traffic reporting and other services to our customers as part of our service solution. Our per minute fees are intended to incorporate all of these services.

While generally not seasonal in nature, our revenues are affected by certain events such as holidays, the unpredictable timing of direct connects between our customers or the loss of a customer, and installation and implementation delays. These factors can cause our revenue to both increase or decrease unexpectedly.

Operating Expense

Operating expenses consists of network and facilities expense, operations expenses, sales and marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, impairment of fixed assets and the gain or loss on the disposal of fixed assets. Personnel related costs are the most significant component as we grew to 134 employees at September 30, 2008 from 124 employees at September 30, 2007.

Network and Facilities Expense. Our network and facilities expense include transport and signaling network costs, facility rents and utilities, together with other costs that directly support the switch locations. We do not defer any costs associated with the start-up of new switch locations and we do not capitalize any costs. The start-up of an additional switch location can take between three months to six months. During this time we typically incur facility rent, utilities, payroll and related benefit costs along with initial non-recurring circuit installation costs. Revenues generally follow sometime after the sixth month.

Network transport costs typically occur on a repeating monthly basis, which we refer to as recurring costs, or on a one-time basis, which we refer to as non-recurring costs. Recurring costs primarily include monthly usage charges from telecommunication carriers, related to the circuits utilized by us to interconnect our customers. As our traffic increases, we must utilize additional circuits.

Non-recurring costs primarily include the initial installation of such circuits. Facility rents include the leases on our switch facilities, which expire through May 2018. Additionally, we pay the cost of all the utilities for all of our switch locations.

The largest component of our other costs included within Network and Facilities Expense relates to charges we pay to utilize ILEC services. We incur some monthly charges from the ILECs as we diversify our network and provide alternative routes to complete our customers' traffic. In some cases, we may not have sufficient capacity, or network transport lines, installed, or available, in our own network to handle the volume of traffic destined for a particular customer. In this case, we will incur these charges, generally temporarily, in order to maintain a high quality of service. We attempt to minimize these charges by managing our network, recognizing when additional capacity is required and working with our customers to augment the transport capacity required between our network and theirs.

Operations Expenses. Operations expenses include payroll and benefits for both our switch location personnel as well as individuals located at our corporate office who are directly responsible for maintaining and expanding our switch network. Other primary components of operations expenses include switch repair and maintenance, property taxes, property insurance and supplies. We expect to hire new employees to support our planned future growth.

Sales and Marketing Expense. Sales and marketing expenses represent the smallest component of our operating expenses and primarily include personnel costs, sales bonuses, marketing programs and other costs related to travel and customer meetings.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs for personnel and facilities associated with our executive, finance, human resource and legal departments and fees for professional services. Professional services principally consist of outside legal, audit and other accounting costs. The other accounting costs relate to work surrounding compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense is applied using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets after they are placed in service, which are five years for switch equipment and test equipment, three years for computer equipment, computer software and furniture and fixtures. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of five years or the life of the respective leases, whichever is shorter.

Impairment of Fixed Assets. The carrying value of long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, is evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment has occurred. A potential impairment has occurred if projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets. The estimated cash flows include management's assumptions of cash inflows and outflows directly resulting from the use of that asset in operation. The impairment test is a two-step process. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds the expected future cash flows from the asset, impairment is indicated. The impairment loss recognized is the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value. Typically, the fair value of the asset is determined by discounting the estimated future cash flows associated with the asset.

Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets. We have disposed of switch equipment in connection with converting to new technology and computer equipment to replace old or damaged units. When there is a carrying value of these assets, we record the write-off of these amounts to loss on disposal. In some cases, this equipment is sold to a third party. When the proceeds from the sale of equipment identified for disposal exceeds the asset's carrying value, we record a gain on disposal.

Change in fair value of warrants. Freestanding warrants related to preferred shares that were conditionally redeemable were classified as liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The warrants were subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date and any change in fair value was recognized as a component of other income (expense), net. Upon the closing of our IPO in November 2007, warrants to purchase shares of our convertible preferred stock became warrants to purchase shares of our common stock and, as a result, are no longer subject to Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position (FSP) No. 150-5, Issuers Accounting under Statement No. 150 for Freestanding Warrants and Other Similar Instruments on Shares that are Redeemable (FSP 150-5). At that time, the then-current aggregate fair value of these warrants of $6.9 million was reclassified from current liabilities to warrants, a component of shareholders' equity, and we ceased to record any further periodic fair value adjustments. On February 21, 2008 all outstanding warrants were exercised. Pursuant to the terms of the warrants Venture Lending and Leasing IV, Inc., the holder of the warrants, elected to exercise the warrants on a net basis based upon the average closing price of our common stock during the three days prior to such exercise. Based upon the closing prices of our common stock on February 20, 2008, February 19, 2008 and February 15, 2008 we issued a total of 356,921 shares of common stock on February 25, 2008 in full satisfaction of all outstanding warrants.

Interest Income (Expense). Interest expense consists of interest paid each month related to our outstanding equipment loans associated with our security agreement with an affiliate of Western Technology Investment. We record accrued interest each month

associated with a final payment for each loan equal to a range of 8.1% to 9.6% of the original principal loan amount. Interest expense also includes an amount related to the amortization of the value of debt discount associated with warrants issued to Venture Lending and Leasing IV, Inc., an affiliate of Western Technology Investment, in accordance with the terms of our agreement. Interest income is earned primarily on our cash, cash equivalents or non-current investments.

Other Expense. Other expense consists of expenses incurred in connection with the secondary offering by certain of our shareholders completed in April 2008.

Income Taxes. Income tax provision includes U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes and is based on pre-tax income or loss. The interim period provision for income taxes is based upon our estimated annual effective income tax rate. In determining the estimated annual effective income tax rate, we analyze various factors, including projections of our annual earnings and taxing jurisdictions in which earnings will be generated, the impact of state and local income taxes and our ability to use tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to utilize accounting policies and make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingencies as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during a fiscal period. The SEC considers an accounting policy to be critical if it is important to a company's financial condition and results of operations, and if it requires significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in its application. Although we believe that our judgments and estimates are appropriate and correct, actual results may differ from those estimates.

We believe the following to be our critical accounting policies because they are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and they require critical management judgments and estimates about matters that are uncertain. If actual results or events differ materially from those contemplated by us in making these estimates, our reported financial condition and results of operation for future periods could be materially affected.

Revenue Recognition

We generate revenue from sales of our tandem interconnection services. We maintain tariffs and executed service agreements with each of our customers in which specific fees and rates are determined. Revenue is recorded each month on an accrual basis based upon documented minutes of traffic switched for which service is provided, when collection is probable. We provide service primarily to large, well-established competitive carriers, including wireless, wireline, cable and broadband telephony providers.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We make judgments as to our ability to collect outstanding receivables and provide allowances for the portion of receivables when collection becomes doubtful. Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices. For those invoices not specifically reviewed, provisions are recorded at differing rates, based upon the age of the receivable. In determining these percentages, we analyze our historical collection experience and current economic trends. If the historical data we use to calculate the allowance for doubtful accounts does not reflect our future ability to collect outstanding receivables, additional provisions for doubtful accounts may be needed and future results of operations could be materially affected. At September 30, 2008, we do not have any allowance for doubtful accounts. We wrote-off less than $0.1 million of customer receivables during the first nine months of 2008 related to a customer that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Accrued Liabilities

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amount of accrued liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of expenses during the period.

Significant estimates may be required to determine the amount, if any, of charges for transport, signaling and other facility related expenses that may have been incurred but not yet invoiced. We have cutoff processes and controls in place to identify accrual amounts where invoices have been received after the period end. Where we believe products or services have been received, but no invoice has been received, we develop accrual estimates.

We may also develop, and report, significant estimates when our transport vendors invoice us for amounts that we dispute where (i) it is probable that the dispute will ultimately result in a payment by us and (ii) an amount can be reasonably estimated. At September 30, 2008, our disputed charges accrual was approximately $1.2 million. Of this amount, $0.4 million is related to one dispute. In addition, we anticipate this disputed charges accrual could materially increase over time in connection with other disputes.

Accounting for Income Taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future income tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective income tax bases and for net operating loss carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in income tax rates is recorded in earnings in the period of enactment. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred income tax assets whenever it is more likely than not that future tax benefits will not be realized. Deferred income tax assets are reviewed on a quarterly basis to determine if a valuation allowance is necessary based on current and historical performance, along with other relevant factors.

Income tax provision includes U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes and is based on pre-tax income or loss. The interim period provision or benefit for income taxes is based upon our estimated annual effective income tax rate. In determining the estimated annual effective income tax rate, we analyze various factors, including projections of our annual earnings and taxing jurisdictions in which earnings will be generated, the impact of state and local income taxes and our ability to use tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and was adopted by us on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 requires that a position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not (i.e. a likelihood of more than fifty percent) that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount of the benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Our policy is to recognize interest and penalty expense associated with uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense in the consolidated statement of operations. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have an effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company did not recognize any adjustments for unrecognized income tax benefits or expense.

Stock-Based Compensation

We currently record stock-based compensation expense in connection with any grant of options to our employees and independent contractors. We record stock-based compensation expense associated with our stock options in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which requires us to calculate the expense associated with our stock options by determining the fair value of the options.

The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which takes into account the exercise price of the stock option, the fair value of the common stock underlying the stock option as measured on the date of grant and an estimation of the volatility of the common stock underlying the stock option. Such value is recognized as expense over the service period, net of estimated forfeitures, using the accelerated method under SFAS 123(R). The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. We consider many factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including types of awards, employee class, and historical experience. Actual results, and future changes in estimates, may differ substantially from current estimates.

As of January 1, 2005, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified retrospective method. The modified retrospective method requires the prior period financial statements to be restated to recognize compensation cost in the amounts previously reported in the pro forma footnotes. We follow the fair-value method of accounting for stock options under SFAS No. 123(R) to account for the Plan. Stock-based employee compensation is reflected in the statement of operations. All options granted under the Plan have an exercise price equal to . . .