|
Quotes & Info
|
| NVD > SEC Filings for NVD > Form 10-Q on 12-Nov-2008 | All Recent SEC Filings |
12-Nov-2008
Quarterly Report
The following discussion of our financial condition and result of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The discussion includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth in Part II, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" of this Quarterly Report, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
GENERAL
NovaDel Pharma Inc. is a specialty pharmaceutical company developing oral spray
formulations for a broad range of marketed drugs. Our proprietary technology
offers, in comparison to conventional oral dosage forms, the potential for
faster absorption of drugs into the bloodstream leading to quicker onset of
therapeutic effects and possibly lower doses. Oral sprays eliminate the
requirement for water or the need to swallow, potentially improving patient
convenience and compliance. Our oral spray technology is focused on addressing
unmet medical needs for a broad array of existing and future pharmaceutical
products. Our most advanced oral spray candidates target angina, nausea,
insomnia, migraine headaches and disorders of the central nervous system. We
plan to develop these and other products independently and through collaborative
arrangements with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Currently, we have
eight patents which have been issued in the U.S. and 71 patents which have been
issued outside of the U.S. Additionally, we have over 90 patents pending around
the world. We look for drug compounds that are off patent or are coming off
patent in the near future, and we formulate these compounds in conjunction with
our proprietary drug delivery method. Once formulated, we file for new patent
applications on these formulated compounds that comprise our product candidates.
Our patent portfolio includes patents and patent applications with claims
directed to the pharmaceutical formulations, methods of use and methods of
manufacturing for our product candidates.
We have had a history of recurring losses, giving rise to an accumulated deficit as of September 30, 2008 of $72,920,000, as compared to $65,243,000 as of December 31, 2007. We have had negative cash flow from operating activities of $5,126,000 and $12,051,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, respectively. As of September 30, 2008, we had working capital of $1,020,000, as compared to $3,811,000 as of December 31, 2007, representing a net decrease in working capital of approximately $2,791,000.
Given the current level of spending, and assuming that ProQuest does not convert its notes into common stock, but demands payment under the notes issued in the Initial Closing and the Subsequent Closing, we estimate that we will have sufficient cash on hand to fund operations through December 2008. In the event, however, that ProQuest converts its notes into shares of common stock, then we estimate that we will have sufficient cash on hand to fund operations through the second quarter of 2009. We may also determine that it is appropriate to increase development activities on our product candidate pipeline, which activities have been significantly reduced since the fourth quarter of 2007. An increase in development activities would significantly increase cash outflows and thereby require additional funding in order to sustain operations through the second quarter of 2009. We may choose to raise additional capital before December 31, 2008, or in early 2009, to fund future development activities or to take advantage of other strategic opportunities. This could include the securing of funds through new strategic partnerships and/or the sale of common stock or other securities.
Given the recent downturn in the economy, there can be no assurance that public or private capital will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. There are a number of risks and uncertainties related to our attempt to complete a financing or strategic partnering arrangement that are outside our control. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we are unsuccessful at obtaining additional financing as needed, we may be required to significantly curtail or cease operations. We will need additional financing thereafter until we achieve profitability, if ever.
Our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, were prepared under the assumption that we will continue our operations as a going concern. We were incorporated in 1982, and have a history of losses. As a result, our independent registered public accounting firm in their audit report has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We believe that the cash inflows that have been generated from the 2008 Financing, along with the $3,000,000 non-refundable license fee received from BioAlliance and any additional potential cash inflows that may be received during the remainder of 2008 and early 2009, will improve our ability to continue our operations as a going concern. Continued operations are dependent on our ability to complete equity or debt formation activities or to generate profitable operations. Such capital formation activities may not be available or may not be available on reasonable terms. Our condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
On May 14, 2008, we received notice from the NYSE Alternext indicating that we were not in compliance with certain of the NYSE Alternext continued listing standards. Specifically, the NYSE Alternext has notified us that we are not in compliance with Section 1003(a)(iii) of the NYSE Alternext Company Guide with stockholders' equity of less than $6,000,000 and losses from continuing operations and net losses in its five most recent fiscal years, and Section 1003(a)(iv) of the NYSE Alternext Company Guide in that we have sustained losses which are so substantial in relation to our overall operations or our existing financial resources, or our financial condition has become so impaired that it appears questionable, in the opinion of the NYSE Alternext, as to whether we will be able to continue operations and/or meet our obligations as they mature.
In order for us to maintain our NYSE Alternext listing, we were required to submit a plan by June 13, 2008, advising the NYSE Alternext of the actions we have taken, or will take, that will bring us into compliance with Section 1003(a)(iv) by November 14, 2008, and Section 1003(a)(iii) by November 16, 2009. We informed the NYSE Alternext that we intended to submit such a plan, and did so on June 12, 2008.
In addition, as of September 30, 2008, we are no longer in compliance with
Section 1003(a)(ii) of the NYSE Alternext Company Guide with stockholders'
equity of less than $4,000,000 and losses from continuing operations and net
losses in three of its four most recent fiscal years; and Section 1003(a)(i) of
the NYSE Alternext Company Guide with stockholders' equity of less than
$2,000,000 and losses from continuing operations and net losses in two of its
three most recent fiscal years. However, as previously noted, the plan that we
submitted to the NYSE Alternext on June 13, 2008 reasonably demonstrates our
ability to attain a stockholders' equity of $6,000,000 or above by no later than
November 16, 2009, which will also address the deficiencies noted in Section
1003(a)(ii) and Section 1003(a)(i).
We will be subject to periodic review by the NYSE Alternext during the plan periods and must continue to provide the NYSE Alternext with updates in conjunction with the initiatives of the plan as appropriate or upon request, and failure to make progress consistent with the plan or to regain compliance with the continued listing standards by the end of the plan period could result in delisting from the NYSE Alternext.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to make progress consistent with our plan to regain compliance with NYSE Alternext's continued listing standards in a timely manner, or at all. We may appeal a staff determination to initiate delisting proceedings in accordance with Section 1010 and Part 12 of the NYSE Alternext Company Guide.
Since inception, substantially all of our revenues have been derived from consulting activities, primarily in connection with product development for various pharmaceutical companies. More recently, we have begun to derive revenues from license fees and milestone payments stemming from our partnership agreements. Our future growth and profitability will be principally dependent upon our ability to successfully develop our products and to market and distribute the final products either internally or with the assistance of a strategic partner.
Highlights for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and additionally through the date of filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, include the following:
Product Pipeline
† Announced that our New Drug Application for Zolpimist™ to treat insomnia was accepted for filing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
† Announced the results of a clinical study comparing our tizanidine oral spray with tizanidine tablets, where our oral spray met primary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic and safety objectives.
† Announced the results of a pilot efficacy study comparing our NVD-201 with Imitrex® tablets, where our oral spray was safe and effective in relieving migraine headaches at a lower dosage than that for the Imitrex® tablets.
† Announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had requested an extension of up to three months on our New Drug Application for Zolpimist™ in order to complete their review.
† Updated our website and corporate presentation for our new product pipeline, as discussed further below.
† Announced that Par Pharmaceuticals had recently completed bioequivalence studies on Zensana™ with mixed results, and that Par would be working with us to carefully review and understand the results of the studies before determining the next steps for Zensana™.
† Announced that we had entered into definitive agreements for the private placement with ProQuest Investments II, L.P., ProQuest Investments II Advisors Fund, L.P., and ProQuest Investments III, L.P. for an aggregate of up to $4,000,000 in gross proceeds, in the form of secured convertible promissory notes with an interest rate of 10%, and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.
† Announced that we had entered into a European partnership with BioAlliance Pharma SA for the development and commercialization of our ondansetron oral spray (or OS) for Europe.
† Announced that we had entered into amendment no. 1 to the securities purchase agreement in connection with the 2008 Financing to clarify certain terms of the securities purchase agreement.
† Announced that we had closed the initial portion of the 2008 Financing (the Initial Closing) for an aggregate gross proceeds of $1,475,000, in the form of secured convertible promissory notes and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.
† Announced that we received a notification from NYSE Alternext that we were not in compliance with certain of the NYSE Alternext continued listing standards. On June 12, 2008, we submitted a plan of compliance to the NYSE Alternext for review. On July 30, 2008, NYSE Alternext notified us that it had completed its review of our proposed plan of compliance and has determined that we have made a reasonable demonstration of our ability to regain compliance with the continued listing standards by the end of the plan periods. The NYSE Alternext is continuing our listing pursuant to an extension, subject to certain conditions.
† Announced that we had closed on the subsequent portion of the 2008 Financing (the Subsequent Closing) for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,525,000 in the form of secured convertible promissory notes and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.
Drug development in the U.S. and most countries throughout the world is a process that includes several steps defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, or comparable regulatory authorities in foreign countries. The FDA approval processes relating to new drugs differ, depending on the nature of the particular drug for which approval is sought. With respect to any drug product with active ingredients not previously approved by the FDA, a prospective drug manufacturer is required to submit a New Drug Application, or NDA, which includes complete reports of pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies to prove such product's safety and efficacy. Prior to submission of the NDA, it is necessary to submit an Investigational New Drug, or IND, to obtain permission to begin clinical testing of the new drug. Given that our current product candidates are based on a new technology for formulation and delivery of active pharmaceutical ingredients that have been previously approved and that have been shown to be safe and effective in previous clinical trials, we believe that we will be eligible to submit what is known as a 505(b)(2) NDA. We estimate that the development of new formulations of our pharmaceutical product candidates, including formulation, testing and submission of an NDA, will require significantly less time and lower investments in direct research and development expenditures than is the case for the discovery and development of new chemical entities. However, our estimates may prove to be inaccurate; or pre-marketing approval relating to our proposed products may not be obtained on a timely basis, if at all, and research and development expenditures may significantly exceed management's expectations.
It is not anticipated that we will generate any revenues from royalties or sales of our product candidates until regulatory approvals are obtained and marketing activities begin. Any one or more of our product candidates may not prove to be commercially viable, or if viable, may not reach the marketplace on a basis consistent with our desired timetables, if at all. The failure or the delay of any one or more of our proposed products to achieve commercial viability would have a material adverse effect on us.
• the scope, rate of progress and expense of our clinical trials and other research and development activities;
• results of future clinical trials;
• the expense of clinical trials for additional indications;
• the terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing and other arrangements that we may establish;
• the expense and timing of regulatory approvals or changes in the regulatory approval process;
• the expense of establishing clinical and commercial supplies of our product candidates and any products that we may develop;
• the effect of competing technologies and market developments; and
• the expense of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights.
We expect to continue to spend significant amounts on the development of our product candidates and we expect our costs to increase as we continue to develop and ultimately commercialize our product candidates. The following table summarizes our product candidates:
Active
Ingredient or
Class of
Molecule Indications Stage of Development Partner
Approved Product
NitroMist™ nitroglycerin Angina Pectoris FDA Approved -
Product Candidates
NDA submitted - FDA
acceptance January
Zolpimist™ zolpidem Insomnia 23, 2008 -
Hana
Biosciences/Par
Pharmaceutical,
Inc./BioAlliance
Zensana™ ondansetron Nausea/Vomiting Clinical development Pharma S.A.
Pilot Efficacy study
NVD-201 sumatriptan Migraines complete -
Middle-of-the-Night
Zolpimist™ zolpidem Awakening Clinical development -
Pre-Procedure Preclinical
NVD-301 midazolam Anxiety development -
Erectile Preclinical
NVD-401 sildenafil Dysfunction development -
Preclinical
NVD-501 fentanyl Breakthrough Pain development -
|
NitroMist™ (nitroglycerin lingual aerosol). This product is indicated for acute relief of an attack or acute prophylaxis of angina pectoris due to coronary artery disease, and was approved by the FDA in November 2006. Previously, this product was partnered with Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., or Par; however, on August 1, 2007, we announced that Par returned the rights to NitroMist™ to us as part of Par's strategy to concentrate its resources on supportive care in AIDS and oncology markets. We are currently investigating strategic partners for this product.
Zensana™ (ondansetron oral spray). Ondansetron is the active ingredient in Zofran®, the leading anti-emetic marketed by GSK. Through July 31, 2007, this product candidate was licensed to Hana Biosciences, who was overseeing all clinical development and regulatory approval activities for this product in the U.S. and Canada. On July 31, 2007, we entered into a Product Development and Commercialization Sublicense Agreement with Hana Biosciences and Par, pursuant to which Hana Biosciences granted a sublicense to Par to develop and commercialize Zensana™. Par is responsible for all development, regulatory, manufacturing and commercialization activities of Zensana™ in the United States and Canada, including the development and re-filing of the NDA in the United States. In addition, we entered into an Amended and Restated License Agreement with Hana Biosciences, pursuant to which Hana Biosciences relinquished its right to pay reduced royalty rates to us until such time as Hana Biosciences had recovered one-half of its costs and expenses incurred in developing Zensana™ from sales of Zensana™ and we agreed to surrender for cancellation all 73,121 shares of the Hana Biosciences common stock we acquired in connection with execution of the original license agreement with Hana Biosciences. Par has previously announced that it expects to complete clinical development on the revised formulation of Zensana™ during 2008, and expects to submit a new NDA for Zensana™ by the end of 2008. However, Par recently announced that it had completed bioequivalency studies on Zensana™ with mixed results, with bioequivalence to reference drug (Zofran® tablets) achieved in some of the studies and not achieved in others. The Company is working with Par to carefully review and better understand the results from these studies before determining the next steps for Zensana™. Scale-up and stability studies for Zensana™ to date are sufficient for NDA submission.
In January 2006, Hana Biosciences announced positive study results of a pivotal clinical trial for Zensana™. Hana Biosciences submitted its NDA on June 30, 2006 and such NDA was accepted for review by the FDA in August 2006. Previously, Hana Biosciences targeted final approval from the FDA and commercial launch in calendar 2007. However, on February 20, 2007, we announced that Hana Biosciences notified us that ongoing scale-up and stability experiments indicate that there is a need to make adjustments to the formulation and/or manufacturing process, and that there is likely to be a delay in the FDA approval and commercial launch of Zensana™ as a result thereof. On March 23, 2007, Hana Biosciences announced its plan to withdraw, without prejudice, its pending NDA for Zensana™ with the FDA.
We will receive a milestone payment from Hana Biosciences upon final approval from the FDA. In addition, we will receive double-digit royalty payments based upon a percentage of net sales. We retain the rights to our ondansetron oral spray outside of the U.S. and Canada.
While Imitrex® nasal spray was not included in this clinical study, the following represents a discussion of the results of our clinical study as compared to published data for Imitrex® nasal spray. Time to the first peak plasma concentration of sumatriptan -- which represents drug absorbed directly across the oral mucosa -- was approximately 70% faster with the 20mg NVD-201 than what has been reported in the literature for the same dose of the Imitrex® nasal spray (6 min. vs. 20 min.). The mean concentration level achieved during this critical first phase of absorption is approximately 30% greater for the NVD-201 than what was observed in published studies of the nasal spray (10.9 ng/mL vs. 8.5 ng/mL). Relative bioavailability after administration of 20mg . . .
|
|