|
Quotes & Info
|
| COKE > SEC Filings for COKE > Form 10-Q on 7-Nov-2008 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-Nov-2008
Quarterly Report
Areas of Emphasis - a summary of the Company's key priorities.
Overview of Operations and Financial Condition - a summary of key information and trends concerning the financial results for the third quarter of 2008 ("Q3 2008") and the first nine months of 2008 ("YTD 2008") and changes from the third quarter of 2007 ("Q3 2007") and the first nine months of 2007 ("YTD 2007").
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements - a discussion of accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of the Company's financial condition and results of operations and that require critical judgments and estimates and the expected impact of new accounting pronouncements.
Results of Operations - an analysis of the Company's results of operations for Q3 2008 and YTD 2008 compared to Q3 2007 and YTD 2007.
Financial Condition - an analysis of the Company's financial condition as of the end of Q3 2008 compared to year-end 2007 and the end of Q3 2007 as presented in the consolidated financial statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources - an analysis of capital resources, cash sources and uses, investing activities, financing activities, off-balance sheet arrangements, aggregate contractual obligations and hedging activities.
Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
The consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of the
Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries including Piedmont Coca-Cola
Bottling Partnership ("Piedmont"). Minority interest consists of The Coca-Cola
Company's interest in Piedmont, which was 22.7% for all periods presented.
Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry
The Company produces, markets and distributes nonalcoholic beverages, primarily
products of The Coca-Cola Company, which include some of the most recognized and
popular beverage brands in the world. The Company is the second largest bottler
of products of The Coca-Cola Company in the United States, distributing these
products in eleven states primarily in the Southeast. The Company also
distributes several other beverage brands. These product offerings include both
sparkling and still beverages. Sparkling beverages are primarily carbonated
beverages including energy products. Still beverages are primarily noncarbonated
beverages such as bottled water, tea, ready to drink coffee, enhanced water,
juices and sports drinks. The Company had net sales of approximately
$1.4 billion in 2007.
The nonalcoholic beverage market is highly competitive. The Company's
competitors include bottlers and distributors of nationally and regionally
advertised and marketed products and private label products. In each region in
which the Company operates, between 75% and 95% of sparkling beverage sales in
bottles, cans and other containers are accounted for by the Company and its
principal competitors, which in each region includes
the local bottler of Pepsi-Cola and, in some regions, the local bottler of Dr
Pepper, Royal Crown and/or 7-Up products. During the last several years,
industry sales of sugar sparkling beverages, other than energy products, have
declined. The decline in sugar sparkling beverages has generally been offset by
volume growth in other nonalcoholic product categories. The sparkling beverage
category (including energy products) represents 80% of the Company's YTD 2008
bottle/can net sales.
The principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry are
point-of-sale merchandising, new product introductions, new vending and
dispensing equipment, packaging changes, pricing, price promotions, product
quality, retail space management, customer service, frequency of distribution
and advertising. The Company believes it is competitive in its territories with
respect to each of these methods.
Historically, operating results for the third quarter and first nine months of
the fiscal year have not been representative of results for the entire fiscal
year. Business seasonality results primarily from higher unit sales of the
Company's products in the second and third quarters versus the first and fourth
quarters of the fiscal year. Fixed costs, such as depreciation expense, are not
significantly impacted by business seasonality.
The Company performs its annual impairment test of franchise rights and goodwill
as of the first day of the fourth quarter. During Q3 2008, the Company believes
it did not experience any events or changes in circumstances that indicated the
carrying amounts of the Company's franchise rights or goodwill exceeded fair
values. As such, the Company did not perform an interim impairment test during
Q3 2008 and did not record any impairments of franchise rights or goodwill.
Net sales by product category were as follows:
Third Quarter First Nine Months
In Thousands 2008 2007 2008 2007
Bottle/can sales:
Sparkling beverages (including energy
products) $ 258,200 $ 255,804 $ 762,741 $ 760,359
Still beverages 66,160 58,897 186,020 158,280
Total bottle/can sales 324,360 314,701 948,761 918,639
Other sales:
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers 31,231 27,804 94,356 101,774
Post-mix and other 25,972 24,855 72,123 74,946
Total other sales 57,203 52,659 166,479 176,720
Total net sales $ 381,563 $ 367,360 $ 1,115,240 $ 1,095,359
|
Areas of Emphasis
Key priorities for the Company include revenue management, product innovation
and beverage portfolio expansion, distribution cost management and productivity.
Revenue Management
Revenue management requires a strategy which reflects consideration for pricing
of brands and packages within product categories and channels, highly effective
working relationships with customers and disciplined fact-based decision-making.
Revenue management has been and continues to be a key performance driver which
has significant impact on the Company's results of operations.
Product Innovation and Beverage Portfolio Expansion
Sparkling beverages volume, other than energy products, has declined over the
past several years. Innovation of both new brands and packages has been and will
continue to be critical to the Company's overall revenue. The Company introduced
the following new products during 2007: smartwater, vitaminwater, vitaminenergy,
Gold Peak and Country Breeze tea products, Diet Coke Plus, Dasani Plus, juice
products from FUZE (a subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company) and V8 juice products
from Campbell's. The Company also modified its energy product portfolio in 2007
with the addition of NOS© products from FUZE.
In August 2007, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Energy
Brands Inc. ("Energy Brands"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Coca-Cola
Company. Energy Brands, also known as glacιau, is a producer and distributor of
branded enhanced beverages including vitaminwater, smartwater and vitaminenergy.
The distribution agreement was effective November 1, 2007 for a period of ten
years and, unless earlier terminated, will be automatically renewed for
succeeding ten-year terms, subject to a one year non-renewal notification by the
Company. In conjunction with the execution of the distribution agreement, the
Company entered into an agreement with The Coca-Cola Company whereby the Company
agreed not to introduce new third party brands or certain third party brand
extensions in the United States through August 31, 2010 unless mutually agreed
to by the Company and The Coca-Cola Company.
The Company has invested in its own brand portfolio with products such as
Respect, a vitamin and mineral enhanced beverage, Tum-E Yummies, a vitamin C
enhanced flavored drink, Country Breeze and diet Country Breeze tea and its own
energy drink. The Company is also the exclusive licensee of Cinnabon Premium
Coffee Lattes in North America. These brands enable the Company to participate
in strong growth categories and capitalize on distribution channels that may
include the Company's traditional Coca-Cola franchise territory as well as third
party distributors outside the Company's traditional Coca-Cola franchise
territory. While the growth prospects of Company-owned or exclusive licensed
brands appear promising, the cost of developing, marketing and distributing
these brands is anticipated to be significant.
The Company entered into a distribution agreement in October 2008 with
subsidiaries of Hansen Natural Corporation, the developer, marketer, seller and
distributor of Monster Energy drinks, the leading volume brand in the U.S.
energy drink category. Under this agreement, the Company has the right to
distribute Monster Energy drinks in certain of the Company's territories
beginning in November 2008.
Distribution Cost Management
Distribution costs represent the costs of transporting finished goods from
Company locations to customer outlets. Total distribution costs amounted to
$152.5 million and $144.1 million in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007, respectively. Over
the past several years, the Company has focused on converting its distribution
system from a conventional routing system to a predictive system. This
conversion to a predictive system has allowed the Company to more efficiently
handle increasing numbers of products. In addition, the Company has closed a
number of smaller sales distribution centers over the past several years
reducing its fixed warehouse-related costs.
The Company has three primary delivery systems for its current business:
bulk delivery for large supermarkets, mass merchandisers and club stores;
advanced sales delivery for convenience stores, drug stores, small supermarkets and certain on-premise accounts; and
full service delivery for its full service vending customers.
Distribution cost management will continue to be a key area of emphasis for the
Company.
Productivity
A key driver in the Company's selling, delivery and administrative ("S,D&A")
expense management relates to ongoing improvements in labor productivity and
asset productivity. The Company initiated plans to reorganize the structure in
its operating units and support services in July 2008. The reorganization
resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions, or approximately 5%,
of the Company's workforce. The Company implemented these changes in order to
improve its efficiency and to help offset significant increases in the cost of
raw materials and operating expenses. The Company anticipates annual savings of
$25 million to $30 million from this reorganization plan. The plan was
substantially completed in Q3 2008. The Company continues to focus on its supply
chain and distribution functions for ongoing opportunities to improve
productivity.
Overview of Operations and Financial Condition
The following overview provides a summary of key information concerning the
Company's financial results for Q3 2008 and YTD 2008 compared to Q3 2007 and YTD
2007.
The following items affect the comparability of the financial results presented
below:
Q3 2008 and YTD 2008
a $13.8 million ($7.2 million after-tax, or basic net loss per share of
$.78) charge to freeze the Company's liability to the Central States,
Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund ("Central States"), a
multi-employer pension fund, while preserving the pension benefits
previously earned by Company employees covered by this plan; and
a $4.0 million ($2.1 million after-tax, or basic net loss per share of $.23) charge for restructuring expense related to the Company's plan initiated in Q3 2008 to reorganize the structure of its operating units and support services, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions.
YTD 2007
a $2.6 million ($1.6 million after-tax, or basic net loss per share of
$.18) charge related to a simplification of the Company's operating
management structure and reduction in workforce.
Third Quarter %
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) 2008 2007 Change Change
Net sales $ 381,563 $ 367,360 $ 14,203 3.9
Gross margin 155,827 155,212 615 0.4
S,D&A expenses 149,384 134,972 14,412 10.7
Income from operations 6,443 20,240 (13,797 ) (68.2 )
Interest expense 9,406 12,135 (2,729 ) (22.5 )
Income (loss) before income taxes (3,668 ) 7,995 (11,663 ) NM *
Income tax provision (benefit) (523 ) 2,722 (3,245 ) NM *
Net income (loss) (3,145 ) 5,273 (8,418 ) NM *
Basic net income (loss) per share:
Common Stock $ (.34 ) $ .58 $ (.92 ) NM *
Class B Common Stock $ (.34 ) $ .58 $ (.92 ) NM *
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
Common Stock $ (.34 ) $ .58 $ (.92 ) NM *
Class B Common Stock $ (.34 ) $ .58 $ (.92 ) NM *
* Not meaningful
First Nine Months %
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) 2008 2007 Change Change
Net sales $ 1,115,240 $ 1,095,359 $ 19,881 1.8
Gross margin 467,625 475,993 (8,368 ) (1.8 )
S,D&A expenses 421,300 402,710 18,590 4.6
Income from operations 46,325 73,283 (26,958 ) (36.8 )
Interest expense 29,789 36,647 (6,858 ) (18.7 )
Income before income taxes 14,810 34,676 (19,866 ) (57.3 )
Income tax provision 7,135 13,061 (5,926 ) (45.4 )
Net income 7,675 21,615 (13,940 ) (64.5 )
Basic net income per share:
Common Stock $ 0.84 $ 2.37 $ (1.53 ) (64.6 )
Class B Common Stock $ 0.84 $ 2.37 $ (1.53 ) (64.6 )
Diluted net income per share:
Common Stock $ 0.84 $ 2.36 $ (1.52 ) (64.4 )
Class B Common Stock $ 0.83 $ 2.36 $ (1.53 ) (64.8 )
|
The Company's net sales grew 3.9% and 1.8% in Q3 2008 and YTD 2008, respectively, from the same periods in 2007. The net sales increase in Q3 2008 was primarily due to a 5.3% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit and a 9.5% increase in sales price per unit of other Coca-Cola bottlers sales ("bottler sales") offset by a 10% decrease in post-mix volume. These increases were recognized primarily to help offset increases in product costs. Bottle/can volume decreased by 1.5% in Q3 2008 compared to Q3 2007. The increases in sales price per unit were primarily due to a per unit price increase in all product categories except energy products and bottled water and increased sales of enhanced water which have a higher per unit price offset by decreases in higher price packages in higher margin channels. The net sales increase in YTD 2008 was
primarily due to a 2.6% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit and a .6%
increase in bottle/can volume offset by a 7.3%, or $7.4 million, decrease in
bottler sales. The increase in bottle/can sales price per unit was primarily due
to an increase in per unit price of sparkling products (other than energy
products) and increases in sales of enhanced water which has a higher per unit
sales price, offset by decreases in sales of higher price packages in higher
margin channels (primarily convenience) and lower sales price per unit for
bottled water. The increase in bottle/can volume was primarily due to increases
in enhanced water volume offset by a decrease in bottled water volume. The
decreases in bottler sales were primarily the result of decreased volume in
energy and tea products.
Gross margin dollars increased .4% in Q3 2008 compared to Q3 2007 and decreased
1.8% in YTD 2008 compared to YTD 2007. The Company's gross margin percentage
decreased from 42.3% for Q3 2007 to 40.8% for Q3 2008 and from 43.5% in YTD 2007
to 41.9% in YTD 2008. The decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net sales
in Q3 2008 compared to Q3 2007 was primarily due to increased raw material costs
and increased sales of purchased products (which have lower margin percentages)
partially offset by higher sales prices per unit. The decrease in gross margin
as a percentage of net sales in YTD 2008 compared to YTD 2007 was primarily due
to increased raw material costs, increased sales of purchased products (which
have lower margin percentages), a shift in product and package mix to lower
margin items and lower sales price per unit for bottled water partially offset
by higher sales prices per unit for other products. Purchased products include
FUZE, Campbell's products, smartwater, vitaminwater and NOS© energy products.
S,D&A expenses increased 10.7% in Q3 2008 from Q3 2007 and increased 4.6% in YTD
2008 from YTD 2007. The increases in S,D&A expenses in Q3 2008 and YTD 2008 were
primarily attributable to the $13.8 million charge that resulted from the new
collective bargaining agreement that allowed the Company to freeze its liability
for the union pension plan, restructuring expenses and increased fuel costs.
Net interest expense decreased 22.5% and 18.7% in Q3 2008 and YTD 2008 compared
to Q3 2007 and YTD 2007, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to lower
effective interest rates and lower borrowing levels offset by a $.9 million and
$2.3 million decrease in interest earned on short-term cash investments in Q3
2008 and YTD 2008 as compared to Q3 2007 and YTD 2007, respectively. The
Company's overall weighted average interest rate decreased to 5.7% during YTD
2008 from 6.7% during YTD 2007.
Net debt and capital lease obligations were summarized as follows:
Sept. 28, December 30, Sept. 30,
In Thousands 2008 2007 2007
Debt $ 591,450 $ 598,850 $ 691,450
Capital lease obligations 78,280 80,215 80,839
Total debt and capital lease obligations 669,730 679,065 772,289
Less: Cash and cash equivalents 20,583 9,871 88,400
Total net debt and capital lease obligations (1) $ 649,147 $ 669,194 $ 683,889
|
(1) The non-GAAP measure "Total net debt and capital lease obligations" is used to provide readers with additional information to more clearly evaluate the Company's capital structure and financial leverage.
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting
Pronouncements
Critical Accounting Policies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates
and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial
position in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under
different assumptions and conditions. The Company included in its Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2007 a discussion of the Company's
most critical accounting policies, which are those most important to the
portrayal of the Company's financial condition and results of operations and
require management's most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as
a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain.
The Company did not make changes in any critical accounting policies during YTD
2008. Any changes in critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed
with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company during the
quarter in which a change is made.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 158, "Employers'
Accounting for Defined Pension and Other Postretirement Plans," which was
effective for the year ending December 31, 2006 except for the requirement that
benefit plan assets and obligations be measured as of the date of the employer's
statement of financial position, which was effective for the year ending
December 28, 2008. The impact of the adoption of the change in measurement dates
was not material to the consolidated financial statements. See Note 16 and Note
18 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurement." This
Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. The Statement does not require any new fair value
measurements but could change the current practices in measuring current fair
value measurements. The Statement was effective at the beginning of the first
quarter of 2008 ("Q1 2008") for all financial assets and liabilities and for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a
recurring basis. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact
on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 12 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information. In February 2008, FASB issued
FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,"
which defers the application date of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and liabilities until the first quarter of 2009 except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements
on a recurring basis. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact
related to the Company's nonfinancial assets and liabilities not valued on a
recurring basis.
In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities." This Statement permits entities to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This
Statement was effective at the beginning of Q1 2008. The Company has not applied
the fair value option to any of its outstanding instruments; therefore, the
Statement did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interest in
Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of ARB No. 51." This Statement
amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (commonly referred to
as minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The Statement
is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The
Company anticipates that the adoption of this Statement will not have a material
impact on the consolidated financial statements, although changes in financial
statement presentation will be required.
In December 2007, FASB revised SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" (SFAS
No. 141(R)). This Statement established principles and requirements for
recognizing and measuring identifiable assets and goodwill acquired, liabilities
assumed and any noncontrolling interest in an acquisition, at their fair values
as of the acquisition date. The Statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The impact on the Company of adopting
SFAS No. 141(R) will depend on the nature, terms and size of business
combinations completed after the effective date.
In March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133"
("SFAS No. 161"). This Statement amends and expands the disclosure requirements
of Statement No. 133 to provide an enhanced understanding of why an entity uses
derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for and how they affect an entity's financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. The Statement is effective for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning on or after November 15, 2008. The adoption of this
Statement will not impact the consolidated financial statements other than
expanded footnote disclosures related to derivative instruments and related
hedged items.
In April 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, "Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets" ("FSP 142-3"). FSP 142-3 amends the factors to
be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine
the useful life of intangible assets under SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets." The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the consistency
between the useful life of an intangible asset and the period of expected cash
flows used to measure its fair value. FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is in the process of evaluating
the impact of FSP 142-3, but does not expect it to have a material impact on the
Company's consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles." This Statement identifies the sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the
preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. This Statement is
. . .
|
|