|
Quotes & Info
|
| KRC > SEC Filings for KRC > Form 10-Q on 29-Oct-2008 | All Recent SEC Filings |
29-Oct-2008
Quarterly Report
The following discussion relates to our consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. Statements contained in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" that are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Some of the information presented is forward-looking in nature, including information concerning projected future occupancy rates, rental rate increases, property development timing and investment amounts. Although the information is based on our current expectations, actual results could vary from expectations stated in this report. Numerous factors will affect our actual results, some of which are beyond our control. These include the timing and strength of regional and national economic growth, the strength of commercial and industrial real estate markets, market conditions affecting tenants, competitive market conditions, fluctuations in availability and cost of construction materials resulting from the effects of increased worldwide demand, increased labor costs, future interest rate levels, volatility in our stock price, availability of credit and other capital market conditions. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this information, which speaks only as of the date this report was filed. We assume no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent we are required to do so in connection with our ongoing requirements under federal securities laws to disclose material information. For a discussion of important risks related to our business, and related to investing in our securities, including risks that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from results and events referred to in the forward-looking information, see "Item 1A-Risk Factors" in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and the discussion under the captions "-Factors That May Influence Future Results of Operations" and "-Liquidity and Capital Resources-Factors That May Influence Future Sources of Capital and Liquidity" below. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the potential circumstances or events expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this report might not occur.
Overview and Background
We own, operate and develop office and industrial real estate in Southern California. We operate as a self-administered REIT. We own our interests in all of our properties through the Operating Partnership and the Finance Partnership, and we conduct substantially all of our operations through the Operating Partnership. We owned a 94.9%, 93.7% and 93.5% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of September 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively.
Factors That May Influence Future Results of Operations
Global Market and Economic Conditions. In the U.S., recent market and economic conditions have been unprecedented and challenging with tighter credit conditions and slower growth through the third quarter of 2008. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008, continued concerns about the systemic impact of inflation, energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit, the U.S. mortgage market and a declining real estate market in the U.S. have contributed to increased market volatility and diminished expectations for the U.S. economy. In the third quarter, added concerns fueled by the federal government conservatorship of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal National Mortgage Association, the declared bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., the U.S. government provided loan to American International Group Inc. and other federal government interventions in the U.S. credit markets lead to increased market uncertainty and instability in both U.S. and international capital and credit markets. These conditions, combined with volatile oil prices, declining business and consumer confidence and increased unemployment have in recent weeks subsequent to the end of the quarter contributed to volatility of unprecedented levels.
As a result of these market conditions, the cost and availability of credit has been and may continue to be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads. Concern about the stability of the markets generally and the strength of counterparties specifically has led many lenders and institutional investors to reduce, and in some cases, cease to provide funding to borrowers. Continued turbulence in the U.S. and international markets and economies may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, and the liquidity and financial condition of our tenants. If these market conditions continue, they may limit our ability, and the ability of our tenants, to timely refinance maturing liabilities and access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs, resulting in an adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations.
Rental rates. For leases that commenced during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the change in rental rate was an increase of 34.4% and 33.9%, respectively, on a GAAP basis and an increase of 12.0% and 11.7%, respectively, on a cash basis. The change in rental rate on a cash basis is calculated as the change between the initial stated rent for a new or renewed lease and the ending stated rent for the expiring lease for the same space, whereas the change in rental rate on a GAAP basis compares the average rents over the term of the lease for each lease. Both calculations exclude leases for which the space was vacant longer than one year. We believe that at September 30, 2008 the weighted average cash rental rates for our properties were approximately 10% below the current average quoted market rates, although individual properties within any particular submarket presently may be leased either above, below or at the current quoted market rates within that submarket, and the average rental rates for individual submarkets may be above, below or at the average cash rental rate of our overall portfolio. We cannot give any assurance that leases will be renewed or that available space will be re-leased at rental rates equal to or above the current quoted market rates. Our occupancy and rental rates are impacted by general economic conditions, including the pace of regional economic growth and access to capital. An extended economic slowdown and tightening of the credit markets could have an adverse affect on our tenants and, as a result, on our future occupancy and rental rates.
Real Estate Asset Valuation. General economic conditions and the resulting impact on market conditions or a downturn in tenants' businesses may adversely affect the value of our assets. Periods of economic slowdown or recession in the United States, declining demand for leased office or industrial properties and/or a decrease in market rental rates and/or market values of real estate assets in our submarkets could have a negative impact on the value of our assets, including the value of our properties and related tenant improvements. If we were required under GAAP to write down the carrying value of any of our properties to the lower of cost or market due to impairment, or if as a result of an early lease termination we were required to remove and dispose of material amounts of tenant improvements that are not reusable to another tenant, our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected.
Scheduled lease expirations. In addition to the 1.1 million rentable square feet, or 9.3%, of currently available space in our stabilized portfolio, leases representing approximately 1.3% and 12.7% of the occupied square footage of our stabilized portfolio are scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2008 and in 2009, respectively. The leases scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2008 and in 2009 represent approximately 0.8 million rentable square feet of office space, or 8.7% of our total annualized base rental revenue, and 0.7 million rentable square feet of industrial space, or 2.2% of our total annualized base rental revenue, respectively. We believe that the average cash rental rates for leases scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2008 and in 2009 are approximately 10% below the current average quoted market rates, although individual properties within any particular submarket presently may be leased either above, below or at the current quoted market rates within that submarket, and the average rental rates for individual submarkets may be above, below or at the average cash rental rate of our overall portfolio. Our ability to re-lease available space depends upon the market conditions in the specific regions in which our properties are located and general market conditions.
Sublease space. Of our leased space as of September 30, 2008, approximately 199,000 rentable square feet, or 1.6%, of the rentable square footage in our stabilized portfolio, was available for sublease, compared to approximately 608,100 rentable square feet, or 5.1%, as of December 31, 2007. Of the 1.6% of available sublease space in our stabilized portfolio as of September 30, 2008, approximately 1.5% was vacant space, and the
remaining 0.1% was occupied. Approximately 58%, 25% and 17% of the available sublease space as of September 30, 2008 is located in the San Diego, Orange County and Los Angeles regions, respectively. Of the approximately 199,000 rentable square feet available for sublease as of September 30, 2008, there are no scheduled 2008 lease expirations and approximately 52,300 rentable square feet representing five leases are scheduled to expire in 2009.
Negative trends or other unforeseeable events that impair our ability to renew or re-lease space and our ability to maintain or increase rental rates in our submarkets could have an adverse effect on our future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Development and Redevelopment Programs. Historically, a significant portion of our growth has come from our development and redevelopment efforts. We have a proactive planning process by which we continually evaluate the size, timing, costs and scope of our development and redevelopment programs and, as necessary, scale activity to reflect the economic conditions and the real estate fundamentals that exist in our strategic submarkets. We believe that a portion of our future potential growth will continue to come from our development pipeline. As of September 30, 2008, our development pipeline included 116.7 acres of land with an aggregate cost basis of approximately $238 million. We continue to seek and obtain development opportunities throughout Southern California and specifically in our core markets. However, we anticipate that the general economic conditions and the resulting impact on conditions in our core markets may delay timing and reduce the scope of our development program. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we did not capitalize interest and carry costs on certain development pipeline projects with an aggregate cost basis of approximately $38 million, as it was determined these projects did not qualify for interest and other carry cost capitalization during the third quarter of 2008 under GAAP. A delay in the timing and a change in the scope of our development activities could further impact the average development and redevelopment asset balances qualifying for interest and other carry cost capitalization. In addition, we may be unable to lease committed development or redevelopment properties at expected rental rates or within projected timeframes or complete development or redevelopment properties on schedule or within budgeted amounts, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We believe that other possible sources of potential future growth are redevelopment opportunities within our existing portfolio and/or targeted acquisitions. Redevelopment efforts can achieve similar returns to new development with reduced entitlement risk and shorter construction periods. Depending on market conditions, we will continue to pursue future redevelopment opportunities in our strategic submarkets where there is limited land for development.
See additional information regarding our development and redevelopment properties under the caption "-Stabilized and In-Process Development and Redevelopment Properties."
City of San Diego. Given the geographic concentration of our development
program in San Diego County, our operating results may be affected by (i) the
city of San Diego's current financial difficulties and ongoing investigations
with respect to the city's finances, (ii) the city of San Diego's General Plan
and Land Use update, (iii) the city of San Diego's zoning ordinance updates,
(iv) the city of San Diego and other state agencies' future adoption of
potential impact fees to address water supply infrastructure, climate change
legislation and mandatory energy and sustainable building code requirements, (v)
the potential new building permit moratorium due to state and regional water
agencies not issuing new water meters because of new water rationing guidelines,
and (vi) recent storm water runoff regulations and other pending ordinances
currently under consideration by the city, county and state water agencies and
other agencies. Any of these factors may affect the city of San Diego's ability
to finance capital projects and may impact real estate development,
entitlements, costs of development and market conditions in this important
submarket. As of the date this report was filed, we have not experienced any
material adverse effects arising from these factors.
Incentive Compensation. Our Executive Compensation Committee, which is comprised of three independent directors, determines compensation, including equity and cash incentive programs, for our executive
officers. The programs approved by the Executive Compensation Committee have historically provided for equity and cash compensation to be earned by our executive officers based on certain performance measures, including financial, operating and development targets.
In the first quarter of 2008, our Executive Compensation Committee approved the 2008 Annual Bonus Program and the 2008 Annual Long-Term Incentive Program for executive management that will allow for executive management to receive bonus compensation for achieving certain specified corporate performance measures. The provisions of the 2008 programs were reported on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2008. As a result of the structure of these programs and other such programs that the Executive Compensation Committee may adopt in the future, accrued incentive compensation and compensation expense will be affected by our operating and development performance, financial results, the performance of our common stock and market conditions. Consequently, we cannot predict with certainty the amounts that will be recorded in future periods related to compensation programs.
Share-Based Compensation. As of September 30, 2008, there was $12.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to incentive awards granted under share-based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years. The $12.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost does not reflect the potential future compensation cost for the 2008 Annual Long-Term Incentive Program or the DPP since share-based awards have not yet been granted under these programs as of September 30, 2008. The compensation cost that will be recorded in future periods related to these programs will be based on the amounts ultimately earned and granted under these programs. (See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included with this report for additional information).
Significant Tenants
The following table sets forth information about our fifteen largest tenants as
of September 30, 2008, based upon annualized rental revenues at September 30,
2008.
Percentage
of Total
Annualized Base Annualized
Rental Base Rental Initial Lease Lease Expiration
Tenant Name Revenues(1) Revenues(1) Date(2) Date
(in thousands)
Intuit $ 15,021 6.2 % November 1997 Various (3)
Scripps Health 12,336 5.1 July 2004 Various (4)
Cardinal Health, Inc. 9,256 3.8 July 2007 August 2017
AMN Healthcare 8,341 3.4 July 2003 July 2018
DIRECTV Group, Inc.(5) 8,037 3.3 November 1996 July 2014
The Boeing Company 6,593 2.7 August 1984 Various (6)
Fish & Richardson 6,071 2.5 October 2003 October 2018
Bridgepoint Education, Inc.(7) 5,786 2.4 April 2007 September 2018
Epson America, Inc. 5,538 2.3 October 1999 October 2019
Accredited Home Lenders, Inc. 5,164 2.1 December 2005 May 2016
Verenium Corporation 5,158 2.1 November 2000 Various (8)
Hewlett-Packard Company 4,348 1.8 October 1999 April 2012
Fair Isaac Corporation 4,006 1.6 August 2003 July 2010
Avnet, Inc. 3,768 1.6 March 2003 February 2013
Epicor Software Corporation 3,509 1.4 September 1999 August 2009
Total $ 102,932 42.3 %
|
(1) Based upon annualized contractual base rental revenue, which is calculated on a straight-line basis in accordance with GAAP, for leases for which rental revenue is being recognized by us as of September 30, 2008.
(2) Represents the date of the first relationship between the tenant and us or our predecessor.
(3) The Intuit leases, which contribute $16,000, $1.5 million and $13.5 million of annualized base rental revenues, expire in January 2009, August 2010 and August 2017, respectively.
(5) In July 2008, we executed a lease amendment with DIRECTV Group, Inc. for an additional 24,500 rentable square feet at 2240 E. Imperial Highway in El Segundo, CA. This lease will increase our annualized base rental revenue from DIRECTV Group, Inc. by approximately $0.5 million and is expected to commence in the fourth quarter of 2008.
(6) The Boeing Company leases, which contribute $0.7 million, $5.4 million and $0.5 million of annualized base rental revenues, expire in March 2009, July 2010 and October 2010, respectively.
(7) Bridgepoint Education, Inc. ("Bridgepoint") is projected to increase its current occupancy of 120,693 rentable square feet to 289,750 rentable square feet in phases through the third quarter of 2010. This expansion will increase our annualized base rental revenue from Bridgepoint to approximately $13.9 million in the third quarter of 2010. Bridgepoint is currently projected to become our third largest tenant during the fourth quarter of 2008 and our second largest tenant during the fourth quarter of 2009.
(8) The Verenium Corporation leases, which contribute $2.9 million and $2.3 million of annualized base rental revenues, expire in November 2015 and March 2017, respectively.
Stabilized Portfolio Information
Building and Occupancy Information
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our stabilized portfolio at September 30, 2008, which was comprised of the Office Properties and the Industrial Properties. Our stabilized portfolio of operating properties consists of all our properties, except for properties we recently developed or redeveloped that have not yet reached 95.0% occupancy and are within one year following cessation of major construction activity ("lease-up" properties), properties classified as held for sale and properties currently under construction.
Occupancy by Segment Type
Number of Square Feet Occupancy at:
Region Buildings Total 9/30/2008 6/30/2008 12/31/2007
Office Properties:
Los Angeles County 25 3,007,187 91.2 % 96.0 % 96.1 %
Orange County 5 277,340 72.6 72.0 99.1
San Diego County 53 4,711,980 89.0 93.8 91.4
Other 5 346,439 94.2 93.8 99.6
88 8,342,946 89.5 93.8 93.7
Industrial Properties:
Los Angeles County 1 192,053 100.0 100.0 100.0
Orange County 42 3,684,068 93.1 90.3 94.4
43 3,876,121 93.4 90.7 94.7
Total portfolio 131 12,219,067 90.7 % 92.8 % 94.0 %
|
As of the date this report was filed, Office Properties and Industrial Properties represented approximately 88.0% and 12.0%, respectively, of our annualized base rental revenue. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, average occupancy in our stabilized portfolio was 91.9% compared to 92.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, average occupancy in our stabilized portfolio was 93.1% compared to 93.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately 1,134,400 rentable square feet of vacant space in our stabilized portfolio compared to approximately 919,400 rentable square feet as of September 30, 2007.
The following table reconciles the changes in the rentable square feet in our stabilized portfolio of operating properties from September 30, 2007 to September 30, 2008. Rentable square footage in our portfolio of stabilized properties decreased by an aggregate of approximately 0.3 million rentable square feet, or 2.2%, to 12.2 million rentable square feet at September 30, 2008, as a result of the activity noted below.
Office Properties Industrial Properties Total
Quarter of Number of Rentable Number of Rentable Number of Rentable
Activity Buildings Square Feet Buildings Square Feet Buildings Square Feet
Total at September 30, 2007 89 8,619,531 43 3,869,969 132 12,489,500
Properties added from the
Development and Redevelopment
Portfolios Q3 2008 2 253,197 2 253,197
Dispositions(1) Q4 2007 (3 ) (532,430 ) (3 ) (532,430 )
Remeasurement 2,648 6,152 8,800
Total at September 30, 2008 88 8,342,946 43 3,876,121 131 12,219,067
|
(1) In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS 144") the operating results and gains (losses) on property sales of real estate assets sold are included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations.
Current Regional Information
Los Angeles County. Our Los Angeles stabilized office portfolio of 3.0 million rentable square feet was 91.2% occupied with approximately 264,800 vacant rentable square feet as of September 30, 2008, compared to 96.1% occupied with approximately 112,100 vacant rentable square feet as of December 31, 2007. The decrease in Los Angeles County stabilized office portfolio occupancy is primarily attributable to a lease with Intuit that was terminated in July 2008, which represents approximately 90,000 rentable square feet (see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in this report for additional information). As of the date this report was filed, leases representing an aggregate of approximately 16,900 and 322,300 rentable square feet are scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2008 and in 2009, respectively, in this region. The aggregate rentable square feet scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2008 and in 2009 represents approximately 11.8% of the total occupied rentable square feet in this region as of the date this report was filed and 4.0% of our annualized base rental revenues for our total stabilized portfolio.
Orange County. As of September 30, 2008, our Orange County stabilized industrial portfolio was 93.1% occupied with approximately 254,200 vacant rentable square feet, compared to 94.4% occupied with approximately 207,000 vacant rentable square feet as of December 31, 2007. Included in our Orange County industrial portfolio is one vacant building encompassing approximately 157,500 rentable square feet. We are in the process of re-entitling this property for residential use. Excluding this building, occupancy at our Orange County Industrial Properties would have been 97.3% as of September 30, 2008 and 98.6% as of December 31, 2007. If the re-entitlement is successful, we will evaluate the strategic options for the property, including the potential disposition of the asset. Our Orange County stabilized office portfolio of approximately 277,300 rentable square feet was 72.6% occupied with approximately 76,000 vacant rentable square feet as of September 30, 2008, compared to 99.1% occupied with approximately 2,600 vacant rentable square feet as of December 31, 2007. The decrease in occupancy was primarily attributable to a lease that expired during the second quarter of 2008, which represented approximately 54,300 rentable square feet.
As of the date this report was filed, leases representing an aggregate of approximately 56,000 and 802,300 rentable square feet were scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2008 and in 2009, respectively, in this region. The aggregate rentable square feet scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2008 and in 2009 represents approximately 24.5% of the total occupied rentable square feet in this region as of the date this report was filed and 3.5% of the annualized base rental revenues for our total stabilized portfolio.
. . .
|
|