Statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as that term is defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, the forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those projected. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements made by the Company are not guarantees of future performance and those actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation:
well-established competitors who have substantially greater financial resources and longer operating histories, regulatory delays or denials, ability to compete as a start-up company in a highly competitive market, and access to sources of capital.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of the Company's plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. The cautionary statements made in this Form 10-Q should be read as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear herein. The Company's actual results could differ materially from those discussed here.

The financial information furnished herein has not been audited by an independent accountant; however, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (only consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2008, have been included.

Reorganization with BlastGard Technologies, Inc.

On January 31, 2004, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, we acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of BlastGard Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation, from BlastGard Technologies' shareholders, in exchange for an aggregate of 18,200,000 (adjusted to reflect subsequent stock split) shares of our common stock. BTI is a development stage company that was created to develop, design, manufacture, and market proprietary blast mitigation materials. BlastGard Technologies' patent-pending BlastWrap® technology is designed to effectively mitigate blasts and suppress fires resulting from explosions. As a result of the Reorganization Agreement, a change in control and change in management of the Company occurred and BTI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Reorganization Agreement also provided that the Company hold a shareholders meeting to (i) change the name of the corporation to BlastGard® International, Inc., and (ii) approve a reverse split of the outstanding common stock on a 5:1 basis. A Special Shareholder meeting was held on March 12, 2004, and both proposals were approved. The name change and the reverse split of the outstanding common stock became effective on March 31, 2004.

We intend to focus exclusively on the business plan of BlastGard Technologies. BlastGard Technologies was formed on September 26, 2003, and was a development stage company. BTI acquired its only significant asset, a patent application for BlastWrap®, in January 2004, from co-inventors John L. Waddell, Jr., our Chief Operating Officer, and President, and James F. Gordon, our Chief Executive Officer, who assigned the patent to BlastGard Technologies in consideration of the consummation of the Reorganization Agreement. For accounting purposes, we assigned no monetary value to the patent application that was assigned to BlastGard Technologies. Our current management team, which was the management team of BlastGard Technologies prior to the reorganization, had operated a corporation called BlastGard, Inc., which was dissolved in 2004. BlastGard, Inc. had a license from a third-party to certain technology which is different from the technology owned by BlastGard Technologies.

Pursuant to the Reorganization Agreement, BlastGard Technologies became a wholly-owned subsidiary of our company. However, for accounting purposes, the acquisition was treated as a recapitalization of BlastGard Technologies, with our company the legal surviving entity.

Results of Operations

Since emerging from our development stage operations in 2005, our BlastGard MTR blast mitigated trash receptacles have been sold to six government service advantage ("GSA") clients located in the United States. We received orders for MTRs from AmTrak, the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, GSA for Federal Buildings,
NYC

Transit, and for BlastWrap® from the Naval Weapons Station Earle, Sandia National Labs, and several domestic and international entities. However, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we recognized sales of $8,324 and a gross profit of $4,994.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, our overall operating and non operating expenses, including interest expense and gain on derivative liability, dropped significantly from the prior year due to a reduction in stock based compensation expenses of $0.00 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $351,555 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. During this time period, officers' salaries were also reduced by $254,241 and $254,977 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 over the comparable period of the prior year.

Our net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 was $387,717 as compared to $1,321,743 for the comparable period of the prior year. Our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $915,083 as compared to $1,970,008 for the comparable period of the prior year. The decreases in net loss are due to a decrease in operating and non-operating expenses.

BlastGard's products are currently being tested (or have recently been tested) and evaluated by many military and defense contractors and commercial companies in the United States and abroad as described under Business Prospects. As we experience anticipated growth and expansion of our operations, we will experience an increase in operating expenses and costs of doing business.

Business Prospects

On July 17, 2008 BlastGard announced receipt of a formal purchase agreement for 156 BlastGard MTR blast mitigated receptacles valued at approximately $700,000 for a major United States airport. BlastGard's blast mitigating receptacles will be installed throughout the facility and this very important transaction has opened the door to the Airport Security market for our Blast Mitigating Receptacles. Receptacles, which are a necessity for waste management, pose a serious threat to public safety considering how easily they can conceal an explosive device. The installation of these blast mitigating receptacles is another step toward USA airport's emphasis on safety, reliability, enhanced cleanliness and improved customer service.

Various Product Lines Identified For BlastWrap® - We have Several Completed and Finished Products

We are currently manufacturing our core product, BlastWrap®, for sale in various forms to non-affiliated third-parties. The primary application for BlastWrap® is as an intermediate good for numerous civilian and military applications and uses.

Our technology is being customized for specific industries and applications. We have examined the various markets where explosions occur, selected targeted applications and focused on development of products for those businesses and agencies at risk. While designing finished products engineered with BlastWrap®, we have taken into account that some products must be portable, while others will remain at a fixed location. Some products have been designed to contain identified explosive agents, while others are designed to mitigate unidentified explosive threats. With these standards in mind, we have developed or are developing the following product lines to address the needs of customers and targeted markets:

·

Mitigated Bomb Receptacles and MBR Gard Cart;

·

Blast Mitigated Unit Load Device ("BMULD") - LD3 Container;

·

Lining - Aircraft;

·

Insensitive Munitions (IM) Weapons Container;

·

Mitigated Trash Receptacle; and

·

BlastGard Barrier System ("BBS").

MBR 300 and MBR Gard Cart

The BlastGard Mitigated-Bomb Receptacle (MBR 300) is intended to provide airport security personnel with an effective tool, if and when an explosive is discovered. The MBR 300 will dramatically contain and protect against all lethal threats posed by the detonation of an IED; namely, primary fragments, secondary fragments, mechanical effects (shock/blast pressure) and thermal effects (contact and radiation burn) from the fireball, after burn and resultant post-blast fires. If a suspect package or bomb is discovered, the airports will use the MBR 300 as a safe means of securing that package until the bomb squad arrives, or remove the suspicious device from the area, allowing airport operations to continue.

The BlastGard® MBR Gard Cart (Mobile Suspect Package Removal Unit), which houses BlastGard's MBR 300, provides security personnel with an effective tool for safe removal of an explosive device after it is discovered. The MBR Gard Cart contains and protects against all lethal threats posed by the detonation of an improvised explosive device (IED) and also provides rapid removal of the threat using a Mobile Removal Unit Cart. When a suspect package or device is discovered, the airports now have a safe means of securing that package and removing it from public exposure until the bomb squad arrives. In this way, the MBR Gard Cart can help prevent long airport facility shut-down times presently experienced when a suspect package is discovered. The United States Transportation Security Administration has worked hard to secure U.S. airports against a range of threats that includes attacks against both aircraft and ground facilities. The largest and most visible investment made by the agency has been in enhancing the passenger screener force and in massively expanding the number of explosive detection systems (EDS) required to examine checked luggage for bombs. Effective security, therefore, includes not only deterrent and preventive measures but also efforts to mitigate casualties, damage, and disruption. Since deterrence and prevention are sometimes difficult to achieve given the nature of terrorism and the inherent vulnerabilities of public transportation, great emphasis is also placed upon the mitigation of casualties through design of facilities and upon effective, rapid response that ensures safety while minimizing disruption. We believe that the MBR 300 is an ideal incident / security management technology for airports when dealing with bomb threats and suspicious objects or packages, especially in passenger carryon baggage.

Twin-Aisle (containerized) Aircraft - Blast Mitigated Unit Load Devices (BMULDs)

LD3 Cargo Containers are used primarily on twin aisle/wide body aircraft such as the B747. These luggage or cargo containers are manufactured by a few well-established companies throughout the world. The market is extremely competitive with low margins. In accordance with an agreement with Nordisk Aviation Products, we have combined our BlastWrap® blast-mitigating technology with Nordisk's LD3 containers to create superior blast mitigating products for the air cargo and unit loading device (ULD) market called BlastGard BMULD. ULDs are pallets and containers used to load luggage, freight, and mail onto wide-body aircraft that facilitate the bundling of cargo into large units. The alliance has developed a new line of ULDs that include BlastWrap®. The introduction of this product line enables us to provide the airline industry an important new line of defense to increase airline safety of passengers and crewmembers. This revolutionary new container design incorporating BlastWrap® will prevent shock holing of the fuselage, effectively retaining the structural integrity of the aircraft; prevent post-blast fires and conflagration in the hold; and add little or only negligible weight to the ULD.

Lining - Single-Aisle (non-containerized) Aircraft

Working in conjunction with aircraft and shipping manufacturers, we are designing products and component assemblies to be used in the cargo holds of single-aisle aircraft. Due to the heightened security surrounding aircraft safety, we are diligently working to demonstrate the effectiveness of our product on this large sector which is estimated at about 70% of the commercial fleet.

Insensitive Munitions (IM) Weapons Containers

Weapons containers require specialty design. We have developed several of these containers for evaluation and testing by the United States, United Kingdom and other military clients. Although we do not have a development or supply contract with any military agencies at this time, we anticipate important prototype testing of these designs will ensue in the second half of 2008 with our strategic partner Lancer Systems and with the National Warheads and Energetics Consortium (NWEC) / Defense Ordnance Technology Consortium (DOTC). This product line will have numerous versions for military weapons including bombs, rockets, medium and large caliber ammunition and missiles.

Trash Receptacles

We have four models of mitigated trash receptacles, the BlastGard® MTR 81, MTR 91, MTR 96 and MTR 101. These containers have been designed and proof tested to drastically mitigate blast pressures and thermal output and to capture bomb fragments.

Vehicle Improvised Explosive Devices and Mine Protection

Military vehicles (such as MRAPs, HMMWVs, HEMMT, M915 and FMTV) are or can be "up-armored" for improvised explosive devices and land mine protection. BlastGard® and Colt Rapid Mat LLC have developed and are now offering a new product called BATS. These specialty Colt Rapid Mat fiberglass-cased BlastWrap® products are easy to retro-fit to armored vehicles to provide protection for occupants from blast thermal output and head, neck and spine injuries from blast pressures. Initial durability testing of BATS by the Nevada Automotive Test Center (NATC) for the Office of Naval Research has been concluded successfully. Further testing awaits selection and funding by NATC/ONR for blast testing. An important additional partner in these vehicle applications is Cellular Materials International, Inc. which has a periodic cellular material shown to be effective in managing the heavy G-loads typical of under-vehicle blast threats.

BlastGard Barrier System ("BBS") High-Capacity Wall System for Perimeter and Structure Protection

The BBS product is an innovative combination of three patented technologies, an HDPE cellular core, BlastWrap® and an aesthetically pleasing novel fascia system. BBS has extraordinary blast, ballistic, fragment, shaped charge jet and breaching resistance capabilities and it is beautiful, low cost, configurable and "stealthy". The cellular core material, patented by the U.S. Army, has been used extensively by the U.S. military and commercial clients worldwide for building roads, for shoring up unstable roads, for extensive soil stabilization projects and for revetments and barriers. After the core is placed and filled, BlastWrap® is attached to the "threat side(s)" of the BBS structure, and finally, the fascia system encloses the entire structure, thereby creating an effective "stealth" characteristic for the entire BBS structure that is, the extreme capabilities of this system are not at all visually apparent. Clients with concerns about heavy blast, breaching, ballistic, fragment and shaped charge jet threats to their facilities can now effectively address all of those threats with our economical solution. Optional electronic security capabilities can also be integrated into the system.

In summary, we have developed either finished products or working prototypes of BlastWrap® products for each of the product lines described above. All of these products have been successfully tested and evaluated in-house, by third-parties and by interested clients and strategic partners. Prototypes may require further modifications based on the test results and client and partner feed-back. However, we have the following products that are completed and finished products, available for sale that we are currently manufacturing and marketing:

·

The core product, BlastWrap®;

·

BlastGard® MTR (mitigated trash receptacle);

·

BlastGard MBR 300 (mitigated bomb receptacle) and MBR Gard Cart;

·

BMULD (Blast Mitigated Unit Load Device - LD3 Container); and

·

BlastGard Barrier System ("BBS") high-capacity wall system for perimeter and structure protection.

Liquidity and Capital Resources.

At June 30, 2008, we had cash of $416,906, working capital of $(383,132), an accumulated deficit of $11,927,636 and shareholder equity of $213,218.

For the six months ended June 30, 2008, net cash used in operating activities was $(588,385) primarily due to our net loss of $915,083, partially offset by a $235,856 discount on convertible notes payable. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we used cash in investing activities for payment of deferred costs of $(51,334). During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we used $(328,354) for principle payments on long-term debt. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, net cash used in operating activities was $1,143,232 primarily due to our net loss of $1,970,008 partially offset by a discount on convertible notes payable of $506,195. During the six months ended

June 30, 2007, we used cash in investing activities for payment of deferred costs of $(13,910) and received $2,040 from the sale of assets. During the six months ended June 30 2007, net cash provided by financing activities consisted of proceeds from the sale of stock of $3,968,810 less offering costs of $(491,648) and principal payments on convertible debt of $(68,143).

We anticipate that our future liquidity requirements will arise from the need to finance our accounts receivable and inventories, and from the need to fund our growth from operations, current debt obligations and capital expenditures. The primary sources of funding for such requirements are expected to be cash generated from operations and raising additional capital from the sale of equity and/or debt securities. In April/May 2007 we secured approximately $4,000,000 through an equity financing. However, we can provide no assurances that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and/or obtain additional financing on terms satisfactory to us, if at all, to remain a going concern. In this respect, see "Note 1 - Going Concern" in our financial statements for additional information as to the possibility that we may not be able to continue as a "going concern."

At June 30, 2008, we had cash of $416,906. As of July 31, 2008, we had cash of approximately $300,000 and we owed approximately $452,076 in principal and $14,485 in accrued interest to the holders of our December 2004 Debt. As described below, we recently paid down the December 2004 Debt by $150,000 in addition to several partial conversions and received an extension from the holders of the December 2004 Debt to make payment in full on or before August 29, 2008.

In regards to the June 2006 Debt, we filed a Form 8-K on July 2, 2008. On June 22, 2006, we borrowed the principal amount of $1,200,000 (the "June 2006 Debt") from two non-affiliated persons (the "Lenders") due June 22, 2008. Pursuant to an agreement dated as of August 7, 2007 (the "August 2007 Agreement"), Robert F. Rose Investments and two other non-affiliated parties (collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Purchasers") entered into an agreement with the Lenders to purchase the June 2006 Debt, which transaction is personally guaranteed by Mr. Rose. Upon the completion of said transaction, the Purchasers had agreed to automatically convert their June 2006 Debt into shares of our Common Stock at $.30 per share. To date, $795,000 of the $1,200,000 has been completed and converted into our Common Stock at $.30 per share and $50,000 in principal was paid back. Pursuant to an agreement dated as of September 21, 2007, the Purchasers agreed to assign the remaining $355,000 to be purchased pursuant to the August 2007 Agreement to five non-affiliated persons (collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Assignees") and the Assignees deposited $355,000 in escrow with Lenders' attorney, as Escrow Agent. Subsequently, the Assignees notified the Escrow Agent that it should not release the escrowed funds from escrow and demanded the return of their funds. Said $355,000 is currently the subject of a legal dispute and such funds are being held in escrow by the Lenders' attorneys. Although there is a dispute as to the rights and obligations of the parties pursuant to the aforementioned agreements and the possible conversion of the June 2006 Debt into shares of our Common Stock, we had continued to make the quarterly interest payments on the June 2006 Debt so as to avoid any claim of default. However, on June 22, 2008, the June 22, 2006 debt became due and payable and no payment of principal or accrued interest thereon was made by us. It is management's position, although no assurance can be given in this regard, that we do not owe the lenders the $355,000 and that we are obligated to deliver 1,183,333 shares of common stock to the assignees upon conversion thereof. Nevertheless, we have continued to include the principal of the June 2006 Debt (exclusive of interest after June 22, 2008) on our consolidated balance sheet in order to reflect the worse case scenario.

See "Note 1" and "Recent Developments."

We estimate that we will require at least an additional $1,500,000 in additional financing and cash flow from operations to support our operations and to meet our debt obligations as they become due and payable over the next 15 months of operations. We can provide no assurances that cash generated from operations will occur or additional financing will be obtained on terms satisfactory to us, if at all, or that additional debt conversions will occur.

To date, we have relied on management's ability to raise capital through equity private placement financings to fund our operations. We anticipate that our future liquidity requirements will arise from the need to finance our accounts receivable and inventories, and from the need to fund our growth from operations, current debt obligations and capital expenditures. The primary sources of funding for such requirements are expected to be cash generated from operations and raising additional capital from the sale of equity and/or debt securities.

Recent Developments

The Company entered into employment agreements with its corporate officers effective April 1, 2007. These agreements committed the Company to combined salaries of $950,000 and granted 1,450,000 options as signing bonuses. One officer also received a cash signing bonus in the amount of $160,000. The employment agreements also contain provisions for the grant of options to purchase 15,900,000 shares as performance bonuses based on certain sales volumes. On November 9, 2007, our executives agreed to amend their employment agreements to cancel 10,600,000 (equivalent to two-thirds) of the performance based option incentives to reduce the potential dilution to our shareholders. Effective December 31, 2007, Kevin J. Sharpe voluntarily terminated his employment contract due to visa issues. Also effective February 1, 2008, James F. Gordon, John L. Waddell, Jr. and Michael J. Gordon, each agreed to reduce their monthly salaries to $8,000 per month in exchange for the right to receive sales commissions. Pursuant to an agreement dated as of March 20, 2008, the holders of the December 2004 Debt received from us a payment towards principal of $150,000 and agreed to extend their balloon notes to August 29, 2008 and to eliminate the monthly payment of principal and interest. The revised debt terms will result in monthly savings of approximately $45,000.

Since April 2008, our monthly cash needs are budgeted to average approximately $80,000 per month, with the following approximate breakdown:

                       salaries and benefits:     $ 46,000
                       professional fees            12,000
                       office overhead               3,000
                       Travel                        9,000
                       research and development      5,000
                       Miscellaneous                 5,000
                       Total                      $ 80,000

The December 2004 Debt became due and payable on March 20, 2008. However, pursuant to a Waiver and Modification Agreement dated as of March 20, 2008, the Senior Lenders received $150,000 from BlastGard in exchange for an extension of the due date of the December 2004 Debt which is now due and payable on August 29, 2008. The Senior Lenders and BlastGard also agreed to adjust the conversion price from a fixed price of $.30 per share to provide the Senior Lenders with the following rights:

"The Holder(s) may elect at any time to convert through the Maturity Date of the Notes and thereafter until the Notes are paid in full, the unpaid principal of the Notes and the accrued interest thereon at a 10% discount (15% discount if the average trading volume per day over the ten preceding trading days prior to a conversion date is 60,000 shares per day or less) to the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock. The fair market value of the Company's Common Stock is defined as the average of the closing sales price of the Company's Common Stock on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board for the ten trading days preceding each respective conversion date of the Note(s). Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the Notes shall not at any time be convertible at a conversion price below $.10 per share (the "Floor Price") or above a ceiling price of $.25 per share (the "Ceiling Price"). During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the principal amount of $30,000 of the December 2004 Debt was converted at prices ranging from $0.10 per share to $0.114 per share.

In connection with the foregoing, the Senior Lenders agreed to waive the anti-dilution provisions of their Class A and Class F Warrants which would have entitled them to an adjustment in the exercise price of their Warrants and, in the case of the Class F Warrants, an adjustment in the number of shares purchasable there under.

The foregoing Modification Agreement between BlastGard and the Senior Lenders triggered the anti-dilution provisions of (i) the June 2006 Debt to the extent that it is ultimately determined by a court of law or settlement agreement that we owe the principal of the June 2006 Debt to the 2006 Lenders (as opposed to being

obligated to deliver our Common Stock upon conversion thereof to the Purchasers or Assignees at a conversion price of $.30 per share) and (ii) the Class A, Class C and Class F Warrants held (or to be acquired) by the 2006 Lenders, the Purchasers, the Assignees and/or certain other non-affiliated persons (collectively hereinafter referred to as "Our Securities Holders").

We have obtained Waiver and Modification Agreements with some but not all of our Securities Holders to waive the anti-dilution provisions of their Class A, . . .