DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

As of June 30, 2008, Alberto-Culver Company and its subsidiaries (the company or New Alberto-Culver) operated two businesses: Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) and Cederroth International (Cederroth). The CPG business develops, manufactures, distributes and markets branded beauty care products as well as branded food and household products in the United States and more than 100 other countries. Cederroth manufactures, markets and distributes beauty and health care products throughout Scandinavia and in other parts of Europe.

OVERVIEW

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Cederroth International

On May 18, 2008, the company entered into an agreement to sell its Cederroth business to CapMan, a Nordic based private equity firm. Pursuant to the transaction agreement, on July 31, 2008 Cederroth Intressenter AB, a company owned by two funds controlled by CapMan, purchased all of the issued and outstanding shares of Cederroth International AB in exchange for 159.5 million Euros, which were delivered to Alberto Culver AB, a wholly-owned Swedish subsidiary of the company. The Euros were immediately converted to $243.8 million based on the deal contingent Euro forward contract entered into by the company in connection with the transaction. The purchase price is subject to adjustment to the extent actual balances of cash, debt and working capital on the July 31, 2008 closing date differ from estimates assumed in the transaction agreement.

In accordance with the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board's (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," the results of operations and cash flows related to the Cederroth business are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. In addition, the assets and liabilities of Cederroth have been segregated from the assets and liabilities related to the company's continuing operations and presented separately on the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007.

As noted above, the company entered into a deal contingent forward contract to sell the Euros it expected to receive in exchange for U.S. dollars. At June 30, 2008, the company recognized an unrealized pre-tax loss of $5.0 million in discontinued operations to adjust the outstanding forward contract to fair value. In connection with the transaction, the company incurred transaction costs (primarily legal and other professional service fees) of $3.6 million during the first nine months of fiscal year 2008, most of which are not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. These costs were expensed in the periods incurred and are included in discontinued operations.

During the first nine months of fiscal year 2007, the Cederroth business recognized pre-tax charges of $1.5 million that were previously classified as "restructuring and other" in the consolidated statement of earnings. These charges include $706,000 of severance and other exit costs related to the company's reorganization following the Separation. In addition, Cederroth's discontinued operations results include an $815,000 non-cash charge related to the acceleration of vesting of stock options and restricted shares that occurred in connection with the Separation (as more fully described in the Sally Holdings, Inc. section below). This charge reflects the amount of future compensation expense as of November 16, 2006, the closing date of the Separation, that would have been recognized in subsequent periods as the stock options and restricted shares for Cederroth employees vested over the original vesting periods.

Sally Holdings, Inc.

Prior to November 16, 2006, the company also operated a beauty supply distribution business which included two segments: (1) Sally Beauty Supply, a domestic and international chain of cash-and-carry stores offering professional beauty supplies to both salon professionals and retail consumers, and (2) Beauty Systems Group, a full-service beauty supply distributor offering professional brands directly to salons through its own sales force and professional-only stores in exclusive geographical territories in North America and Europe. These two segments comprised Sally Holdings, Inc. (Sally Holdings), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company.

On June 19, 2006, the company announced a plan to split Sally Holdings from the consumer products business. Pursuant to an Investment Agreement, on November 16, 2006:

• The company separated into two publicly-traded companies: New Alberto-Culver, which owns and operates the consumer products business, and Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (New Sally), which owns and operates Sally Holdings' beauty supply distribution business;

• CDRS Acquisition LLC (Investor), a limited liability company organized by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P., invested $575 million in New Sally in exchange for an equity interest representing approximately 47.55% of New Sally common stock on a fully diluted basis, and Sally Holdings incurred approximately $1.85 billion of indebtedness; and

• The company's shareholders received, for each share of common stock then owned, (i) one share of common stock of New Alberto-Culver, (ii) one share of common stock of New Sally and (iii) a $25.00 per share special cash dividend.

To accomplish the results described above, the parties engaged in a number of transactions including:

• A holding company merger, after which the company was a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of New Sally and each share of the company's common stock converted into one share of New Sally common stock.

• New Sally, using a substantial portion of the proceeds of the investment by Investor and the debt incurrence, paid a $25.00 per share special cash dividend to New Sally shareholders (formerly the company's shareholders) other than Investor. New Sally then contributed the company to New Alberto-Culver and proceeded to spin off New Alberto-Culver by distributing one share of New Alberto-Culver common stock for each share of New Sally common stock.

Notwithstanding the legal form of the transactions, because of the substance of the transactions, New Alberto-Culver was considered the divesting entity and treated as the "accounting successor" to the company, and New Sally was considered the "accounting spinnee" for financial reporting purposes in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-11, "Accounting for Reverse Spinoffs."

The separation of the company into New Alberto-Culver and New Sally involving Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (CD&R) is hereafter referred to as the "Separation." For purposes of describing the events related to the Separation, as well as other events, transactions and financial results of Alberto-Culver Company and its subsidiaries related to periods prior to November 16, 2006, the term "the company" refers to New Alberto-Culver's accounting predecessor, or Old Alberto-Culver.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, effective with the closing of the Separation on November 16, 2006, the results of operations and cash flows related to Sally Holdings' beauty supply distribution business are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

In connection with the Separation, the company had to pay certain transaction costs, primarily legal and investment banking fees, which were expensed in the periods incurred and are included in discontinued operations. Approximately $18.7 million of transaction costs were expensed by the company in the first nine months of fiscal year 2007.

In accordance with the Investment Agreement, upon the closing of the Separation, New Sally paid (i) all of Investor's transaction expenses and a transaction fee in the amount of $30 million to CD&R, (ii) $20 million to the company covering certain of the combined transaction expenses of Sally Holdings and the company and (iii) certain other expenses of the company. The transaction expenses that New Sally paid on behalf of Investor and the transaction fee paid to CD&R, along with other costs incurred by New Sally directly related to its issuance of new equity and debt in connection with the Separation, were capitalized as equity and debt issuance costs on New Sally's balance sheet. The transaction expenses of the company, including Sally Holdings' portion, were expensed by the company as incurred through the date of completion of the Separation and are included in discontinued operations.

The company has treated the Separation as though it constituted a change in control for purposes of the company's stock option and restricted stock plans. As a result, in accordance with the terms of these plans, all outstanding stock options and restricted shares of the company became fully vested upon completion of the Separation on November 16, 2006. Included in Sally Holdings' discontinued operations results in the first nine months of fiscal year 2007 is a $5.3 million charge which reflects the amount of future compensation expense that would have been recognized in subsequent periods as the stock options and restricted shares for Sally Holdings employees vested over the original vesting periods.

In connection with the Separation, Michael H. Renzulli, the former Chairman of Sally Holdings, terminated his employment with the company and received certain contractual benefits totaling $4.0 million, which is included in discontinued operations in the first nine months of fiscal year 2007.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE

To supplement the company's financial results presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the company discloses "organic sales growth" which measures the growth in net sales excluding the effects of foreign exchange rates, acquisitions and divestitures. This measure is a "non-GAAP financial measure" as defined by Regulation G of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This non-GAAP financial measure is not intended to be, and should not be, considered separately from or as an alternative to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure of "net sales growth." This specific non-GAAP financial measure is presented in MD&A with the intent of providing greater transparency to supplemental financial information used by management and the company's board of directors in their financial and operational decision-making. This non-GAAP financial measure is among the primary indicators that management and the board of directors use as a basis for budgeting, making operating and strategic decisions and evaluating performance of the company and management as it provides meaningful supplemental information regarding the normal ongoing operations of the company and its core businesses. This amount is disclosed so that the reader has the same financial data that management uses with the belief that it will assist investors and other readers in making comparisons to the company's historical operating results and analyzing the underlying performance of the company's normal ongoing operations for the periods presented. Management believes that the presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure, when considered along with the company's GAAP financial measure and the reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP financial measure, provides the reader with a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting the company than could be obtained absent this disclosure. It is important for the reader to note that the non-GAAP financial measure used by the company may be calculated differently from, and therefore may not be comparable to, a similarly titled measure used by other companies. A reconciliation of this measure to its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is provided in the "Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure" section of MD&A and should be carefully evaluated by the reader.

RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER

Restructuring and other expenses during the three and nine months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007 consist of the following (in thousands):



                                                            Three Months         Nine Months
                                                           ended June 30        ended June 30
                                                           2008       2007     2008       2007
Severance and other exit costs                           $  2,003     1,164    5,283     15,127
Impairment and other property, plan and equipment
charges                                                     2,688       249    5,762        249
Gain on sale of assets                                     (2,034 )      -    (1,808 )   (5,894 )
Non-cash charges related to the acceleration of
vesting of stock options and restricted shares in
connection with the Separation                                 -         -        -      11,383
Contractual termination benefits for the former
President and Chief Executive Officer in connection
with the Separation                                            -         -        -       9,888
Non-cash charge for the recognition of foreign
currency translation loss (gain) in connection with
the liquidation of a foreign legal entity                      (2 )       9      225      1,279
Legal fees and other expenses incurred to assign the
company's trademarks following the closing of the
Separation                                                     71        -       123         -

                                                         $  2,726     1,422    9,585     32,032

Severance and Other Exit Costs

On November 27, 2006, the company committed to a plan to terminate employees as part of a reorganization following the Separation. In connection with this reorganization plan, on December 1, 2006 the company announced that it was going to close its manufacturing facility in Dallas, Texas. The company's worldwide workforce has been reduced by approximately 215 employees as a result of the reorganization plan, including 125 employees from the Dallas, Texas manufacturing facility.

Through June 30, 2008, the company has recorded cumulative charges related to this plan of $15.0 million for severance, $241,000 for contract termination costs and $1.3 million for other exit costs. The following table reflects the activity related to this restructuring plan during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 (in thousands):

                                    Liability at             New            Cash Payments &          Liability at
                                 September 30, 2007        Charges         Other Settlements         June 30, 2008
Severance                        $             2,487           353                    (2,285 )                 555
Contract termination costs                        -              4                        (4 )                  -
Other                                             93           406                      (328 )                 171

                                 $             2,580           763 *                  (2,617 )                 726

On October 25, 2007, the company committed to a plan primarily related to the closure of its manufacturing facility in Toronto, Canada. As part of the plan, the company's workforce has been reduced by approximately 125 employees.

The following table reflects the activity related to this restructuring plan during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 (in thousands):

                          Initial       Cash Payments &      Liability at
                          Charges      Other Settlements     June 30, 2008
              Severance   $  2,539                (1,702 )             837
              Other            404                  (404 )              -

                          $  2,943 *              (2,106 )             837

On May 29, 2008, the company committed to a plan to close its manufacturing facility, reduce its headcount and relocate to a smaller commercial office in Puerto Rico. As part of the plan, the company's workforce will be reduced by approximately 100 employees.

The following table reflects the activity related to this restructuring plan during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 (in thousands):

                          Initial       Cash Payments &      Liability at
                          Charges      Other Settlements     June 30, 2008
              Severance   $  1,527                    -              1,527
              Other             50                   (22 )              28

                          $  1,577 *                 (22 )           1,555

* The sum of these three amounts from the tables above represents the $5.3 million of total charges for severance and other exit costs recorded during the first nine months of fiscal year 2008.

Cash payments related to these plans are expected to be substantially completed by the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.

Impairment and Other Property, Plant and Equipment Charges

During the first nine months of fiscal year 2008, the company recorded total impairment and other fixed asset charges of $5.8 million. This amount includes impairments of $648,000 related to the building and certain manufacturing equipment in connection with the closure of the Dallas, Texas manufacturing facility, $1.3 million related to manufacturing equipment in connection with the closure of the Toronto, Canada manufacturing facility and $1.6 million related to the building and certain manufacturing equipment in connection with the closure of the Puerto Rico manufacturing facility.

In each case, the fair value of the assets was determined using prices for similar assets in the respective markets, as determined by management using data from external sources. All asset groups subject to impairment were included as identifiable assets of the Consumer Packaged Goods business segment in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. In addition to the impairments, the company recognized $2.2 million of other fixed asset charges related to the closure of the Dallas, Texas and Toronto, Canada manufacturing facilities during the first nine months of fiscal year 2008.

Gain on Sale of Assets - Including Related Party Transactions

The company closed on the sale of its manufacturing facility in Toronto, Canada on May 30, 2008. The company received net cash proceeds of $7.5 million and recognized a pre-tax gain of $2.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 as a result of the sale. The company closed on the sale of its manufacturing facility in Dallas, Texas on March 26, 2008. The company received net cash proceeds of $3.1 million and recognized a pre-tax loss of $226,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 as a result of the sale.

On December 21, 2006, the company entered into an agreement with 18000 LLC, a limited liability company controlled by Howard B. Bernick, NJI Sales, Inc., NetJets International, Inc. and NetJets Services, Inc. to assign 50% of the company's 1/8th interest in a fractional-ownership airplane to 18000 LLC in exchange for $1.2 million. Mr. Bernick, a former director and the former President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, was the husband of Carol Lavin Bernick, Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of the company. The company recognized a pre-tax gain of $386,000 as a result of the sale, which closed on December 22, 2006. This transaction was approved by the audit committee of the board of directors of the company, consisting solely of independent directors.

On January 10, 2007, the Leonard H. Lavin Trust u/a/d 12/18/87, a trust for the benefit of Leonard H. Lavin (the Lavin Trust), purchased all of the membership units of Eighteen, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company and subsidiary of the company, pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement dated January 10, 2007 among the Lavin Trust, Eighteen, LLC and the company. The trustees of the Lavin Trust are Leonard H. Lavin, a director of the company, and Ms. Bernick. The primary asset of Eighteen, LLC was a Gulfstream IV-SP airplane. The purchase price for the membership interests of Eighteen, LLC was $25.0 million and was paid on January 10, 2007. The company recognized a pre-tax gain of $5.1 million as a result of the sale. This transaction was approved by the audit committee of the board of directors of the company, consisting solely of independent directors.

On January 30, 2007, the company entered into an agreement with NJI Sales, Inc., NetJets International, Inc. and NetJets Services, Inc. to sell the remaining 50% of its 1/8th interest in a fractional-ownership airplane back to NetJets for $1.2 million. The company recognized a pre-tax gain of $389,000 as a result of the sale.

Acceleration of Vesting of Stock Options and Restricted Shares

As previously discussed, the company has treated the Separation as though it constituted a change in control for purposes of the company's stock option and restricted stock plans. As a result, in accordance with the terms of these plans, all outstanding stock options and restricted shares of the company became fully vested upon completion of the Separation on November 16, 2006. The $11.4 million charge recorded by the company in the first nine months of fiscal year 2007 is equal to the amount of future compensation expense that would have been recognized in subsequent periods as the stock options and restricted shares vested over the original vesting periods.

Contractual Termination Benefits

In connection with the Separation, Howard B. Bernick, the former President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, terminated his employment with the company and received certain contractual benefits primarily consisting of a lump sum cash payment of $9.7 million plus applicable employer payroll taxes.

Foreign Currency Translation Loss (Gain)

The company substantially completed the liquidation of a foreign legal entity in connection with its reorganization plan and is therefore recognizing in restructuring and other expenses the accumulated foreign currency translation loss related to the entity, which resulted in a $225,000 charge during the first nine months of fiscal year 2008.

Trademark Legal Fees and Other Expenses

Due to the series of transactions affecting the company's legal structure as part of the closing of the Separation, the company has initiated a process to assign many of its existing trademarks in various countries around the world. In connection with this effort, the company incurred legal fees and other expenses of $123,000 in the first nine months of fiscal year 2008 and expects to incur additional costs of up to $300,000 during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 and the first half of fiscal year 2009.

Expected Savings

As a result of the reorganization plan and other restructuring activities, the company expects to recognize cost savings of approximately $27 million on an annualized basis. A majority of the cost savings amounts will affect the advertising, marketing, selling and administrative expenses line item on the consolidated statement of earnings, with certain savings amounts related to the closures of the Dallas, Texas, Toronto, Canada and Puerto Rico manufacturing facilities expected to affect gross profit. These savings will partially offset certain corporate costs that were previously unallocated and certain other expenses that were previously allocated to the discontinued Cederroth and Sally Holdings businesses.

AUCTION RATE SECURITIES

Prior to the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, the company regularly invested in auction rate securities (ARS) which typically are bonds with long-term maturities that have interest rates which reset at intervals of up to 35 days through an auction process. These investments are considered available for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." All of the company's remaining investments in ARS at June 30, 2008 represent interests in pools of student loans and have AAA/Aaa credit ratings. In addition, all of these securities carry an indirect guarantee by the U.S. federal government of at least 97% of the par value through the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP). Based on these factors and the credit worthiness of the underlying assets, the company does not believe that it has significant principal risk with regard to these investments.

Historically, the periodic auctions for these ARS investments have provided a liquid market for these securities. As a result, the company carried its investments at par value, which approximated fair value, and classified them as short-term in the consolidated balance sheets. During the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2008, each of the company's remaining ARS investments has experienced multiple failed auctions, meaning that there have been insufficient bidders to match the supply of securities submitted for sale. The company continues to earn interest on these investments at the maximum contractual rate and continues to collect the interest in accordance with the stated terms of the securities. Given the company's inability to estimate when its ARS will settle, the investments have been classified as long-term consistent with the terms of the underlying securities. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, one security was called by the issuer and the company received the full par value of $7.5 million.

At June 30, 2008, the company has auction rate securities with a total par value of $69.8 million. The company has recorded these investments on its consolidated balance sheet at an estimated fair value of $66.7 million and recorded an unrealized loss of $3.1 million in other comprehensive income in the first nine months of fiscal year 2008, reflecting the decline in the estimated fair value. The fair value of these securities has been estimated by management using data from external sources. Because there is no active market for these securities, management utilized a discounted cash flow valuation model to estimate fair value, with the key assumptions in the model being the expected holding period for the ARS, the expected coupon rate over the holding period and the required rate of return by market participants (discount rate), adjusted to reflect the current illiquidity in the market. As of June 30, 2008, the company has concluded that no other-than-temporary impairment losses have occurred because its investments continue to be of high credit quality and the company has the intent and ability to hold these investments until the anticipated recovery in market value occurs. The company will continue to analyze its ARS in future periods for impairment and may be required to record a charge in its statement of earnings in future periods if the decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary.

The company anticipates that its existing cash and cash equivalent balances, along with cash flows from operations and available credit, will be sufficient to fund its operating and other requirements.

. . .