|
Quotes & Info
|
| WES > SEC Filings for WES > Form 10-Q on 13-Jun-2008 | All Recent SEC Filings |
13-Jun-2008
Quarterly Report
OUR OPERATIONS
Our results are driven primarily by the volumes of natural gas we gather,
compress, treat or transport through our systems. For the quarter ended
March 31, 2008, approximately 68% of our revenues were derived from gathering,
compression and treating activities, approximately 13% of our revenues were
derived from transportation activities, approximately 14% of our revenues were
derived from condensate sales and 5% of our revenues were derived from natural
gas sales from settlement of imbalances and other revenues. For the quarter
ended March 31, 2008, approximately 72% and 14% of our total revenues were
attributable to transactions entered into with Anadarko and National Cooperative
Refinery Association, respectively.
In our gathering operations, we contract with producers to gather natural gas
from individual wells located near our gathering systems. We connect wells to
gathering lines through which natural gas may be compressed and delivered to a
processing plant, treating facility or downstream pipeline, and ultimately to
end-users. We also treat a significant portion of the natural gas that we gather
so that it will satisfy required specifications for pipeline transportation.
Effective January 1, 2008, we received a significant dedication from our largest
customer, Anadarko, in order to maintain or increase our existing throughput
levels and to offset the natural production declines of the wells currently
connected to our gathering systems. Specifically, Anadarko has dedicated to us
all of the natural gas production it owns or controls from (i) wells that are
currently connected to our gathering systems, and (ii) additional wells that are
drilled within one mile of connected wells or our gathering systems, as the
systems currently exist and as they are expanded to connect additional wells in
the future. As a result, this dedication will continue to expand as additional
wells are connected to our gathering systems. Volumes associated with this
dedication averaged approximately 671,000 MMBtu/d for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 and 771,000 MMBtu/d for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, based
on throughput from the wells ultimately subject to the dedication.
We generally do not take title to the natural gas that we gather, compress,
treat or transport. We currently provide all of our gathering and treating
services pursuant to fee-based contracts. Under these arrangements, we are paid
a fixed fee based on the volume and thermal content of the natural gas we
gather, compress, treat or transport. This type of contract provides us with a
relatively stable revenue stream that is not subject to direct commodity price
risk, except to the extent that we retain and sell condensate that is recovered
during the gathering of natural gas from the wellhead. Pursuant to the terms of
the new gathering contracts we entered into with Anadarko and described in more
detail under "Items Affecting the Comparability of our Financial Results" below,
we will receive higher gathering fees than we have historically received.
We have indirect exposure to commodity price risk in that persistent low
commodity prices may cause our current or potential customers to delay drilling
or shut in production, which would reduce the volumes of natural gas available
for gathering, compressing, treating and transporting by our systems. Please
read "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" below for a
discussion of our exposure to commodity price risk through our condensate
recovery and sales.
We provide a significant portion of our transportation services on our MIGC
system through firm contracts that obligate our customers to pay a monthly
reservation or demand charge, which is a fixed charge applied to firm contract
capacity and owed by a customer regardless of the actual pipeline capacity used
by that customer. When a customer uses the capacity it has reserved under these
contracts, we are entitled to collect an additional commodity usage charge based
on the actual volume of natural gas transported. These usage charges are
typically a small percentage of the total revenues received from our firm
capacity contracts. We also provide transportation services through
interruptible contracts, pursuant to which a fee is charged to our customers
based upon actual volumes transported through the pipeline.
As a result of the completion of the Offering on May 14, 2008, the results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows are expected to vary
significantly in 2008 and future periods when compared to the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 and prior periods. Please see "Items Affecting the Comparability
of our Financial Results," set forth below in this Item.
HOW WE EVALUATE OUR OPERATIONS
Our management relies on certain financial and operational metrics to analyze
our performance. These metrics are significant factors in assessing our
operating results and profitability and include (1) throughput volumes,
(2) operating expenses and (3) Adjusted EBITDA.
Throughput volumes
In order to maintain or increase throughput volumes on our gathering systems, we
must connect additional wells to our systems. Our success in connecting
additional wells is impacted by successful drilling of new wells which will be
dedicated to our systems, our ability to secure volumes from new wells drilled
on non-dedicated acreage and our ability to attract natural gas volumes
currently gathered or treated by our competitors.
To maintain and increase throughput volumes on our MIGC system, we must continue
to contract our capacity to shippers, including producers and marketers, for
transportation of their natural gas. We monitor producer and marketing
activities in the area served by our transportation system to identify new
opportunities.
Operating expenses
We analyze operating expenses to evaluate our performance. The primary
components of our operating expenses that we evaluate include operation and
maintenance expenses, cost of product expenses, general and administrative
expenses and direct operating expenses. Certain of our operating expenses are
classified based on whether the expenses are accrued for or paid to our
affiliates or third-party vendors. Neither affiliate expenses nor third-party
expenses bear a direct relationship to affiliate revenues or third-party
revenues. For example, our third-party expenses are not those expenses necessary
for generating our third-party revenues. Third-party expenses include all
amounts accrued for or paid to third parties for the operation of our systems,
whether in providing services to Anadarko or third parties, including utilities,
field labor, measurement and analysis and other third-party disbursements.
Operation and maintenance expenses include, among other things, direct labor,
insurance, repair and maintenance, contract services, utility costs and services
provided to us or on our behalf. For future periods, including a portion of the
period in which the Offering was completed, these expenses are governed by our
services and secondment agreement with Anadarko.
Cost of product expenses include (i) costs associated with the purchase of
natural gas pursuant to the gas imbalance provisions contained in our contracts,
(ii) costs associated with our obligations under certain contracts to redeliver
a volume of natural gas to shippers which is thermally equivalent to condensate
retained by us and sold to third parties and (iii) our fuel tracking mechanism,
which tracks the difference between actual fuel usage and loss and amounts
recovered for estimated fuel usage and loss under our contracts. These expenses
are subject to variability. However, for the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and
2007, cost of product expenses comprised 17.4% and 15.8% of total operating
expenses, respectively. We do not expect the variability in our cost of product
expenses to have a material impact on our overall results.
General and administrative expenses include reimbursements of costs incurred by
Anadarko on our behalf and allocations from Anadarko in the form of a management
service fee in lieu of direct reimbursements for various corporate services.
Subsequent to the Offering, Anadarko will not receive a management services fee
and we expect general and administrative expenses to be comprised primarily of
amounts reimbursed by us to Anadarko pursuant to our omnibus agreement with
Anadarko and expenses attributable to our status as a publicly traded
partnership, such as:
• expenses associated with annual and quarterly reporting;
• tax return and Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution expenses;
• Sarbanes-Oxley compliance expenses;
• expenses associated with listing on the New York Stock Exchange;
• independent auditor fees; legal fees; investor relations expenses; and registrar and transfer agent fees.
Pursuant to the omnibus agreement with Anadarko, we will reimburse Anadarko for allocated general and administrative expenses. The amount required to be reimbursed by us to Anadarko for certain allocated general and administrative expenses pursuant to the omnibus agreement will be capped at $6.0 million annually through December 31, 2009, subject to adjustment to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index and, with the concurrence of the special committee of our general partner's board of directors, to reflect expansions of our operations through the acquisition or construction of new assets or businesses. Thereafter, our general partner will
determine the general and administrative expenses to be reimbursed by us in
accordance with our partnership agreement. The cap contained in the omnibus
agreement does not apply to incremental general and administrative expenses we
expect to incur or to be allocated to us as a result of becoming a publicly
traded partnership. We currently expect those expenses to be approximately $2.5
million per year.
Adjusted EBITDA
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), plus interest expense, income
tax expense and depreciation, less interest income, income tax benefit and other
income (expense).
We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides information useful
to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations and
that Adjusted EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator of a company's
ability to incur and service debt, fund capital expenditures and make
distributions. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure that
management and external users of our combined financial statements, such as
industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies, may use to assess:
• our operating performance as compared to publicly traded partnerships in the
midstream energy industry, without regard to financing methods, capital
structure or historical cost basis;
• the ability of our assets to generate cash flow to make distributions; and
• the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the returns on investment of various investment opportunities.
The GAAP measures most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA are net income and
net cash provided by operating activities. Our non-GAAP financial measure of
Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to the GAAP measures
of net income or net cash provided by operating activities. Adjusted EBITDA has
important limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes some but not all
items that affect net income and net cash provided by operating activities. You
should not consider Adjusted EBITDA in isolation or as a substitute for analysis
of our results as reported under GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA may be defined
differently by other companies in our industry, our definition of Adjusted
EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies,
thereby diminishing its utility.
Management compensates for the limitations of Adjusted EBITDA as an analytical
tool by reviewing the comparable GAAP measures, understanding the differences
between Adjusted EBITDA and net income and net cash provided by operating
activities, and incorporating this knowledge into its decision-making processes.
We believe that investors benefit from having access to the same financial
measures that our management uses in evaluating our operating results.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA to the GAAP financial measures of net income and net cash provided by operating activities on an historical as adjusted basis:
Quarter Ended March 31,
2008 2007
(in thousands)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net Income
Net Income $ 9,219 $ 6,350
Add:
Interest expense - affiliates 2,126 2,139
Income tax expense 5,288 3,535
Depreciation 6,456 5,372
Less:
Other income 4 -
Adjusted EBITDA $ 23,085 $ 17,396
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 19,749 $ 11,012
Interest expense 2,126 2,139
Current income tax expense 1,990 85
Less other income 4 -
Changes in operating working capital:
Accounts receivable and natural gas imbalances (19 ) 98
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (758 ) 4,131
Other, including changes in non-current assets and
liabilities 1 (69 )
Adjusted EBITDA $ 23,085 $ 17,396
|
ITEMS AFFECTING THE COMPARABILITY OF OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS
Our historical results of operations for the periods presented may not be
comparable to future or historic results of operations for the reasons described
below:
• We anticipate incurring approximately $2.5 million of general and
administrative expenses annually attributable to operating as a publicly
traded partnership, such as expenses associated with annual and quarterly
reporting; tax return and Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution
expenses; Sarbanes-Oxley compliance expenses; expenses associated with
listing on the New York Stock Exchange; independent auditor fees; legal
fees; investor relations expenses; and registrar and transfer agent fees.
These incremental general and administrative expenses are not reflected in
our historical combined financial statements.
• We anticipate incurring up to $6.0 million in general and administrative expenses annually to be charged to us by Anadarko pursuant to the omnibus agreement. This amount is expected to be greater than the amount allocated to us by Anadarko for the management services fee reflected in our historical combined financial statements.
• Historically, the impact of all affiliated transactions has been net settled within our combined financial statements because these transactions related to Anadarko and were funded by Anadarko's working capital. Third-party transactions were funded by our working capital. In the future, all affiliate and third-party transactions will be funded by our working capital. This will impact the comparability of our cash flow statements, working capital analysis and liquidity discussion.
• Prior to the Offering, we incurred interest expense on intercompany notes payable to Anadarko. These intercompany balances were extinguished through non-cash transactions in connection with the Offering; therefore, interest expense attributable to these balances and reflected in our historical combined financial statements will not be incurred in future periods.
• For periods ending prior to January 1, 2008, our combined financial statements reflect the gathering fees we historically charged Anadarko under our affiliate cost-of-service-based arrangements. Under these arrangements, we recovered, on an annual basis, our operation and maintenance, general and administrative and depreciation expenses in addition to earning a return on our invested capital. Effective January 1, 2008, we entered into new 10-year gas gathering agreements with Anadarko. As discussed above, our fees for gathering and treating services rendered to Anadarko pursuant to the terms of the new gas gathering agreements increased. In part, this increase is attributable to our operation and maintenance expense increasing as a result of us bearing all of the cost of employee benefits specifically identified and related to operational personnel working on our assets, as compared to bearing only those employee benefit costs reasonably allocated by Anadarko to us for the periods ending prior to January 1, 2008. Since our new gas gathering agreements are designed to fully recover these costs, our revenues increased by an amount equal to the employee-benefit related increase in operation and maintenance expense. Although this change in methodology for computing affiliate gathering rates does not impact our net cash flows or net income, this methodology change impacts the components thereof as compared to periods ending prior to January 1, 2008. If we applied the methodology employed under our new gas gathering agreements with Anadarko for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we estimate our gathering revenues and operation and maintenance expense would have increased by $1.1 million and our cash flow from operations would have remained unchanged.
• The gas gathering agreements with Anadarko effective January 1, 2008 include new fees for gathering and treating. The new fees are based on recent capital improvements and changes in our cost-of-service analysis and are higher than those fees reflected in our historical financial results prior to January 1, 2008.
• Concurrent with the closing of the Offering, we loaned $260.0 million to Anadarko in exchange for a 30-year note bearing interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.50%. Interest income attributable to the note is not reflected in our historical combined financial statements, but will be included in our combined financial statements in the future.
• Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, as a co-borrower under Anadarko's credit facility, we are required to reimburse Anadarko for our allocable portion of commitment fees (0.11% of our committed and available borrowing capacity) that Anadarko incurs under its credit facility, or up to $110,000. Please read "Certain relationships and related party transactions - Agreements governing the transactions - Omnibus agreement" in the Partnership's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, filed with the SEC on April 25, 2008. In addition, Anadarko entered into a working capital facility with us, under which we expect to incur an annual commitment fee of 0.11% of the unused portion of our committed borrowing capacity of $30 million, or up to $33,000.
• Our historical combined financial statements include U.S. federal and state income tax expense incurred by us. Due to our status as a partnership, we will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax and certain state income taxes in the future. However, we will make payments to Anadarko pursuant to a tax sharing agreement for our share of state and local income and other taxes that are included in combined or consolidated tax returns filed by Anadarko.
• After the Offering date, we intend to make cash distributions to our unitholders and our general partner at an initial distribution rate of $0.30 per unit per full quarter ($1.20 per unit on an annualized basis). Based on the terms of our cash distribution policy, we expect that we will distribute to our unitholders and our general partner most of the cash generated by our operations. As a result, we expect that we will rely upon external financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings and debt and equity issuances, to fund our acquisition and expansion capital expenditures. Historically, we largely relied on internally generated cash flows and capital contributions from Anadarko to satisfy our capital expenditure requirements.
• In connection with the closing of the Offering, our general partner adopted two new compensation plans, the Western Gas Partners, LP 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") and the Western Gas Holdings, LLC Equity Incentive Plan ("Incentive Plan"). Phantom unit grants have been made to each of our independent directors under the LTIP, and incentive unit grants have been made to each of our executive officers pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), "Shared-Based Payment" ("SFAS 123R"), grants made under
equity-based compensation plans result in share-based compensation expense which is determined, in part, by reference to the fair value of equity compensation as of the date of grant. Share-based compensation expense is not reflected in our historical combined financial statements as there were no outstanding equity grants under either plan for the periods presented. Share-based compensation expense for grants made pursuant to the LTIP and Incentive Plan will be reflected in our future statements of operations. Share-based compensation expense attributable to grants made pursuant to the LTIP will impact our cash flow from operating activities only to the extent our board of directors, at its discretion, elects to make a cash payment to . . .
|
|